Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A7(2018款)智能手机评测

好事成“三”。

在我们的测试中,2018款三星Galaxy A7最亮眼的地方并不是它的三个摄像头,而是另外一个可以一举击败所有中端机型的硬件配置。
Android Touchscreen Smartphone
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Galaxy Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7885 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.00 inch 18.5:9, 2220 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, 多点电容触控屏, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 读卡器(最大512 GB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 亮度传感器,加速传感器, 距离传感器, 指南针, Miracast, VoLTE, WiFi-Calling, LED, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM band: GSM 850 MHz, GSM 900 MHz, DCS 1800 MHz, PCS 1900 MHz; UMTS band: B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B5 (850), B8 (900); LTE band: B1 (2100), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B20 (800), 4G TDD LTE B38 (2600), B40 (2300), B41 (2500), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.5 x 159.8 x 76.8
Battery
3300 mAh, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 19 h
Operating System
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 24 MPix 2400万像素 f/1.7,800万120度超广角镜头 f/2.4,500万 f/2.2,1080p 30帧录像
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 单扬声器, Keyboard: 屏幕键盘, 模块化充电器, USB线, 三星Experience UI, 24 Months Warranty, SAR值(head): 0.335 W/kg, SAR值(body): 1.425 W/kg, fanless
Weight
168 g, Power Supply: 61 g
Price
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 vs Honor 8X
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018

Size Comparison

160.4 mm 76.6 mm 7.8 mm 175 g158.4 mm 75.64 mm 9.55 mm 186 g159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g158.6 mm 75.4 mm 7.3 mm 168 g155.5 mm 75.2 mm 8.8 mm 182 g150.7 mm 72.3 mm 8.3 mm 163 g149.2 mm 70.6 mm 8.4 mm 172 g142 mm 70 mm 9.7 mm 171 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (598min - 665max) MBit/s +102%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
333 MBit/s +4%
BQ Aquaris X2
Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
322 (275min) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (164min - 362max) MBit/s
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s -4%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
269 MBit/s -16%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 (136min - 231max) MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (630min - 704max) MBit/s +142%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s +11%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (265min - 284max) MBit/s
BQ Aquaris X2
Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
275 MBit/s -1%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s -11%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
246 MBit/s -12%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
207 (162min - 243max) MBit/s -26%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 ; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø278 (265-284)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 ; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø320 (164-362)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Standard angle
Standard angle
Ultra-wide angle
Ultra-wide angle
Standard angle
Standard angle
Ultra-wide angle
Ultra-wide angle
Automatic mode
Automatic mode
Live Focus mode
Live Focus mode
Photo taken at night
Photo taken at night
Photo taken by day
Photo taken by day
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Galaxy A7 2018
Galaxy A7 2018
583
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
571
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 583 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 565.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.79 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 570 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6"
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6"
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Xiaomi Mi 6X
LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Xiaomi Poco F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"
Honor 8X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5"
BQ Aquaris X2
IPS LCD, 2160x1080, 5.7"
Sony Xperia XA2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8"
Screen
-84%
-101%
-173%
-91%
-191%
-124%
-170%
-48%
Brightness middle
570
541
-5%
458
-20%
459
-19%
489
-14%
484
-15%
631
11%
513
-10%
566
-1%
Brightness
565
538
-5%
463
-18%
441
-22%
486
-14%
469
-17%
622
10%
506
-10%
564
0%
Brightness Distribution
93
96
3%
92
-1%
91
-2%
93
0%
93
0%
96
3%
93
0%
94
1%
Black Level *
0.22
0.47
0.34
0.55
0.61
0.42
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.5
5.8
-287%
4
-167%
5.8
-287%
3.8
-153%
7.3
-387%
5.5
-267%
5
-233%
2.7
-80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.6
7.4
-106%
10.7
-197%
7.1
-97%
11.1
-208%
8.5
-136%
11.4
-217%
5.4
-50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
2.7
-125%
4.7
-292%
7.3
-508%
4.4
-267%
7.4
-517%
5.6
-367%
7.8
-550%
3.1
-158%
Gamma
2.07 106%
2.07 106%
2.19 100%
2.28 96%
2.22 99%
2.16 102%
2.38 92%
2.2 100%
2.15 102%
CCT
6504 100%
6570 99%
7425 88%
7984 81%
7213 90%
8534 76%
7531 86%
7964 82%
6335 103%
Contrast
2082
977
1438
880
1034
1221
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1525 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1526 Points 0%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1620 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F1
2468 Points +62%
Honor 8X
1614 Points +6%
BQ Aquaris X2
1323 Points -13%
Sony Xperia XA2
865 Points -43%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1525 - 1526, n=2)
1526 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5486 Points +260%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4429 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4431 Points 0%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5843 Points +32%
Xiaomi Poco F1
9182 Points +107%
Honor 8X
5557 Points +25%
BQ Aquaris X2
4974 Points +12%
Sony Xperia XA2
4170 Points -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (4429 - 4431, n=2)
4430 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
15064 Points +240%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4026 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3680 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5486 Points +36%
Xiaomi Poco F1
14369 Points +257%
Honor 8X
4083 Points +1%
BQ Aquaris X2
4309 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (3680 - 4026, n=2)
3853 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)
11998 Points +198%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5625 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5916 Points +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
6723 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco F1
9664 Points +72%
Honor 8X
8939 Points +59%
BQ Aquaris X2
6437 Points +14%
Sony Xperia XA2
5844 Points +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (5625 - 5916, n=2)
5771 Points +3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5387 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5214 Points -3%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5995 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco F1
8101 Points +50%
Honor 8X
7141 Points +33%
BQ Aquaris X2
5706 Points +6%
Sony Xperia XA2
5006 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (5214 - 5387, n=2)
5301 Points -2%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15167 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
14779 Points -3%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points +75%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
26731 Points +76%
Xiaomi Poco F1
63159 Points +316%
Honor 8X
20468 Points +35%
BQ Aquaris X2
19743 Points +30%
Sony Xperia XA2
16974 Points +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (14779 - 15167, n=2)
14973 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15567 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15262 Points -2%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points +88%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
28984 Points +86%
Xiaomi Poco F1
82125 Points +428%
Honor 8X
21533 Points +38%
BQ Aquaris X2
20806 Points +34%
Sony Xperia XA2
18534 Points +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (15262 - 15567, n=2)
15415 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
13914 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
13306 Points -4%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points +44%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21016 Points +51%
Xiaomi Poco F1
34928 Points +151%
Honor 8X
17450 Points +25%
BQ Aquaris X2
16747 Points +20%
Sony Xperia XA2
13112 Points -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (13306 - 13914, n=2)
13610 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
960 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1001 Points +4%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points +112%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2023 Points +111%
Xiaomi Poco F1
5687 Points +492%
Honor 8X
1445 Points +51%
BQ Aquaris X2
1478 Points +54%
Sony Xperia XA2
1334 Points +39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (960 - 1001, n=2)
981 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +338%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
845 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
879 Points +4%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points +124%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1891 Points +124%
Xiaomi Poco F1
8261 Points +878%
Honor 8X
1280 Points +51%
BQ Aquaris X2
1337 Points +58%
Sony Xperia XA2
1251 Points +48%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (845 - 879, n=2)
862 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +461%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1829 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1946 Points +6%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points +49%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2680 Points +47%
Xiaomi Poco F1
2720 Points +49%
Honor 8X
2645 Points +45%
BQ Aquaris X2
2338 Points +28%
Sony Xperia XA2
1737 Points -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1829 - 1946, n=2)
1888 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1071 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1097 Points +2%
Nokia 7 Plus
2114 Points +97%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2121 Points +98%
Xiaomi Poco F1
5230 Points +388%
Honor 8X
1485 Points +39%
BQ Aquaris X2
1540 Points +44%
Sony Xperia XA2
1370 Points +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1071 - 1097, n=2)
1084 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +937%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
954 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
971 Points +2%
Nokia 7 Plus
1980 Points +108%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1981 Points +108%
Xiaomi Poco F1
6898 Points +623%
Honor 8X
1316 Points +38%
BQ Aquaris X2
1402 Points +47%
Sony Xperia XA2
1305 Points +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (954 - 971, n=2)
963 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +1966%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1871 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2003 Points +7%
Nokia 7 Plus
2768 Points +48%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2815 Points +50%
Xiaomi Poco F1
2832 Points +51%
Honor 8X
2697 Points +44%
BQ Aquaris X2
2359 Points +26%
Sony Xperia XA2
1657 Points -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1871 - 2003, n=2)
1937 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +167%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
741 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
729 Points -2%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points +80%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1335 Points +80%
Xiaomi Poco F1
3972 Points +436%
Honor 8X
945 Points +28%
BQ Aquaris X2
955 Points +29%
Sony Xperia XA2
811 Points +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (729 - 741, n=2)
735 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points +316%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
634 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
618 Points -3%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points +83%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1164 Points +84%
Xiaomi Poco F1
4746 Points +649%
Honor 8X
798 Points +26%
BQ Aquaris X2
816 Points +29%
Sony Xperia XA2
709 Points +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (618 - 634, n=2)
626 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points +415%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1821 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1950 Points +7%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points +51%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2757 Points +51%
Xiaomi Poco F1
2528 Points +39%
Honor 8X
2663 Points +46%
BQ Aquaris X2
2353 Points +29%
Sony Xperia XA2
1631 Points -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1821 - 1950, n=2)
1886 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
737 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
687 Points -7%
Nokia 7 Plus
1441 Points +96%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1417 Points +92%
Xiaomi Poco F1
3669 Points +398%
Honor 8X
950 Points +29%
BQ Aquaris X2
1016 Points +38%
Sony Xperia XA2
896 Points +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (687 - 737, n=2)
712 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points +954%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
629 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
577 Points -8%
Nokia 7 Plus
1239 Points +97%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1244 Points +98%
Xiaomi Poco F1
4468 Points +610%
Honor 8X
801 Points +27%
BQ Aquaris X2
872 Points +39%
Sony Xperia XA2
790 Points +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (577 - 629, n=2)
603 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +1734%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1845 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2051 Points +11%
Nokia 7 Plus
2789 Points +51%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2764 Points +50%
Xiaomi Poco F1
2257 Points +22%
Honor 8X
2702 Points +46%
BQ Aquaris X2
2396 Points +30%
Sony Xperia XA2
1696 Points -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1845 - 2051, n=2)
1948 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points +150%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
31 fps
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6X
48 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
60 fps
Honor 8X
36 fps
BQ Aquaris X2
34 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
31 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 ()
31 fps
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
86.1 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
34 fps
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6X
50 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
150 fps
Honor 8X
39 fps
BQ Aquaris X2
36 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
30 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 ()
34 fps
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
283 fps
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15 fps
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
58 fps
Honor 8X
19 fps
BQ Aquaris X2
15 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
15 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 ()
15 fps
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
75.5 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
16 fps
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6X
23 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
71 fps
Honor 8X
21 fps
BQ Aquaris X2
16 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
14 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 ()
16 fps
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)
167.1 fps
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.6 fps
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6X
14 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
54 fps
Honor 8X
13 fps
BQ Aquaris X2
9.8 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
10 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 ()
9.6 fps
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)
65.6 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.9 fps
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6X
15 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
35 fps
Honor 8X
14 fps
BQ Aquaris X2
10 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
9.7 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 ()
9.9 fps
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)
118.5 fps
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5.8 fps
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6X
8.6 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
33 fps
Honor 8X
6.4 fps
BQ Aquaris X2
6 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
6 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 ()
5.8 fps
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)
47.9 fps
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6 fps
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps
Xiaomi Mi 6X
9 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
35 fps
Honor 8X
7.6 fps
BQ Aquaris X2
6.3 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
5.5 fps
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 ()
6 fps
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
71.2 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
8.2 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
31 fps
Honor 8X
5.2 fps
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=202, last 2 years)
50.5 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
8.6 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
32 fps
Honor 8X
4.6 fps
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
80.3 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
5.2 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
22 fps
Honor 8X
4.1 fps
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.6 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
3.2 fps
Xiaomi Poco F1
14 fps
Honor 8X
2.6 fps
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
32.3 fps
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
122826 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
116746 Points -5%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points +15%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
140714 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco F1
263165 Points +114%
Honor 8X
140188 Points +14%
BQ Aquaris X2
116748 Points -5%
Sony Xperia XA2
89228 Points -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (116746 - 122826, n=2)
119786 Points -2%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
87728 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
83284 Points -5%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points +34%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
110680 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco F1
227026 Points +159%
Honor 8X
112870 Points +29%
BQ Aquaris X2
96430 Points +10%
Sony Xperia XA2
71552 Points -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (83284 - 87728, n=2)
85506 Points -3%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2009 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1993 Points -1%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points +18%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2343 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F1
3838 Points +91%
Honor 8X
2410 Points +20%
BQ Aquaris X2
1972 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA2
1563 Points -22%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1993 - 2009, n=2)
2001 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6326 Points +215%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4506 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4358 Points -3%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
4797 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F1
6506 Points +44%
Honor 8X
5529 Points +23%
BQ Aquaris X2
4434 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA2
3256 Points -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (4358 - 4506, n=2)
4432 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10181 Points +126%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2445 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2275 Points -7%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2470 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F1
3239 Points +32%
Honor 8X
4360 Points +78%
BQ Aquaris X2
2016 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XA2
1328 Points -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (2275 - 2445, n=2)
2360 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6785 Points +178%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1356 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1331 Points -2%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points +69%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2295 Points +69%
Xiaomi Poco F1
7945 Points +486%
Honor 8X
1456 Points +7%
BQ Aquaris X2
1597 Points +18%
Sony Xperia XA2
1500 Points +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1331 - 1356, n=2)
1344 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
17165 Points +1166%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1090 Points
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1195 Points +10%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1108 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F1
1296 Points +19%
Honor 8X
1207 Points +11%
BQ Aquaris X2
1059 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XA2
921 Points -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1090 - 1195, n=2)
1143 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1566 Points +44%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)
76 Points +58%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.9 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
52.1 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
49.07 Points +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (48 - 49.1, n=2)
48.5 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.99 Points
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
47.01 Points -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
44.24 Points -8%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
27.37 Points -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37278 Points +307%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points +58%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
9995 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
9350 Points +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (9165 - 9350, n=2)
9258 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
9095 Points -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
9004 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
4771 Points -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
10236 ms * -148%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
4769 ms * -16%
BQ Aquaris X2
4733 ms * -15%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
4275 ms * -4%
Honor 8X
4248 ms * -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (4123 - 4275, n=2)
4199 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4123 ms *
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937 ms * +5%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)
2714 ms * +34%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1563 ms * +62%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +161%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
63 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
61 Points +7%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
58 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 ()
57 Points 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
54 Points -5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)
223 Points +33%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
173 Points +3%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
164 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (156 - 168, n=2)
162 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
156 Points -7%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
147 Points -12%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
106 Points -37%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Galaxy A8 2018Nokia 7 PlusXiaomi Mi 6XXiaomi Poco F1Honor 8XBQ Aquaris X2Sony Xperia XA2Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
15%
5%
39%
51%
3%
-6%
22%
979%
Sequential Read 256KB
295.8
299.9
1%
283.1
-4%
272
-8%
705
138%
283.9
-4%
270.5
-9%
271.5
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB
104.9
104.2
-1%
211.6
102%
203.7
94%
155.6
48%
170
62%
188.7
80%
127.4
21%
176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203)
68%
Random Read 4KB
84
82.6
-2%
54.7
-35%
73
-13%
101
20%
49.54
-41%
43.9
-48%
43.07
-49%
Random Write 4KB
15.45
14.69
-5%
19.62
27%
6.89
-55%
17.81
15%
59.9
288%
14.4
-7%
13.82
-11%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
82.2
5%
85.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
82.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
86 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
62.3
-3%
65.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
68.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
62.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
64.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
051015202530Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 ; Balanced: Ø29.3 (22-31)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 ; HD: Ø28.7 (19-31)
051015202530Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 : Ø29.4 (21-31)
Max. Load
 34.7 °C34.7 °C29.4 °C 
 33.9 °C34.8 °C29.4 °C 
 33.4 °C33.2 °C29.5 °C 
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 32.6 °C
28.3 °C30.5 °C34.5 °C
26.9 °C29.5 °C35.8 °C
27.6 °C29.7 °C33.2 °C
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 30.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  25.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.733.8252528.73126.828.44026.328.75029.838.26327.424.7802123.210019.525.812518.825.716019.240.420017.641.325016.947.431515.855.54001556.75001562.863014.766.980014.868100014.666.5125014.369.2160013.471.8200014.472.5250014.473.2315014.876.640001577.7500014.875.3630014.774.380001575.31000014.972.81250015.264.51600015.755.1SPL26.885.5N0.961.4median 15median 66.9Delta0.610.835.240.932.939.937.234.931.740.339.639.128.334.127.332.326.928.726.731.5243920.946.220.948.319.555.718.562.917.565.817.569.615.769.215.87016.675.215.873.715.474.215.573.51671.615.873.11671.616.367.116.367.716.271.816.475.516.459.928.684.11.158.5median 16.4median 69.22.28.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Xiaomi Mi 6X
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 6X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.22 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.71 / 1.36 / 1.47 Watt
Load midlight 5.13 / 7.89 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6X
3010 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F1
4000 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
21%
-9%
-7%
-15%
-24%
-14%
19%
10%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
0.71
0.67
6%
0.65
8%
0.65
8%
0.65
8%
0.92
-30%
0.65
8%
0.39
45%
Idle Average *
1.36
1.02
25%
1.76
-29%
1.94
-43%
1.97
-45%
2.3
-69%
2.24
-65%
1.61
-18%
Idle Maximum *
1.47
1.1
25%
1.78
-21%
1.97
-34%
2.01
-37%
2.32
-58%
2.26
-54%
1.62
-10%
1.285 ?(1.1 - 1.47, n=2)
13%
Load Average *
5.13
3.86
25%
4.47
13%
4.65
9%
4.29
16%
4.37
15%
3.87
25%
3.12
39%
Load Maximum *
7.89
5.97
24%
9.13
-16%
5.93
25%
9.05
-15%
6.13
22%
6.8
14%
4.92
38%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
24h 27min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 33min
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6X
3010 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F1
4000 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
4%
-8%
-26%
17%
41%
2%
30%
Reader / Idle
1467
1546
5%
1703
16%
1046
-29%
2088
42%
2503
71%
H.264
836
908
9%
706
-16%
608
-27%
936
12%
766
-8%
WiFi v1.3
605
646
7%
672
11%
495
-18%
808
34%
852
41%
617
2%
886
46%
Load
273
260
-5%
158
-42%
192
-30%
220
-19%
298
9%

Pros

+ 优秀的OLED面板
+ 长续航
+ 扎实的做工
+ 精准的GPS
+ 三个插槽
+ 三摄

Cons

- 塑料中框
- SoC性能落后
- 老旧的USB接口
- 指纹识别器速度缓慢

总结-中端手机中的屏幕素质标杆:

三星Galaxy A7(2018款)智能手机评测. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.com
三星Galaxy A7(2018款)智能手机评测. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.com

2018款三星Galaxy A7出色的Super AMOLED面板在我们的测试中有着出色的表现,这块屏幕亮度很高,具有极其精确的色彩还原以及稳定的可视角度。最重要的是,由于OLED屏幕的典型黑色值,它具有良好的对比度。总而言之,这是一个在这个价格范围内没有对手的屏幕。

三星自家的中端处理器给我们留下了并不那么深刻的印象。在我们的测试中,在日常工作负载下,Exynos 7885暴露出了一些缺点。三星SoC的系统性能完全跟不上高通。而配备新型海思麒麟710荣耀 8X也可提供更加稳定的日常性能。

2018款Galaxy A7的噱头是它的三摄,它提供了极大的可玩性和不错的照片质量。超广角和实时聚焦功能为用户提供了有趣的选择,虽然后者有时会令人失望。

与荣耀8X一样,我们仍然想知道为什么三星仍然决定为其2018年的型号配备microUSB接口。这没有任何意义,特别是考虑到2017年的Galaxy A5就已经配备了USB Type-C接口。

“如果买家们正在寻找合适的中档价位设备,注重屏幕素质的人将无法绕过2018款三星Galaxy A7。”

在这个中档细分市场中有很多有趣的替代品可供选择。例如强大的Pocophone F1以及更便宜的性价比冠军小米A2。如果2018款三星Galaxy A7的价格略低一点,其出色的显示屏和广角相机使得它成为一个值得的选择。

 

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 - 11/19/2018 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
44 / 60 → 74%
Weight
91%
Battery
94%
Display
91%
Games Performance
42 / 63 → 66%
Application Performance
58 / 70 → 83%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
67 / 91 → 74%
Camera
70%
Average
76%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A7(2018款)智能手机评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-12-11 (Update: 2018-12-11)