Notebookcheck Logo

三星 Galaxy J5 (2016) 智能手机简短评测

金属弹头。 曾经是塑料,现在是金属:新一代的Galaxy J5给我们更好的质感。不过,它的内在几乎毫无改变。这是否可以算作一次成功的更新呢?
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Galaxy J5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 4 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 306
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5.20 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, 电容式, AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 12.3 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 128GB, NFC, Sensors: 运动传感器,加速传感器,位置传感器, USB OTG
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1800/2100), LTE (1,3,5,7,8,20); 最高速度: 150 MBit/s (下载), 50 MBit/s (上传); 0.45 W/kg (头部), 1.17 W/kg (身体), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 145.8 x 72.3
Battery
11.94 Wh, 3100 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.9, 自动对焦, LED闪光灯, 视频拍摄 @1080p/30FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/1.9, LED闪光灯
Additional features
Speakers: 后置扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器,USB数据线,耳机, S-Planner, Microsoft Office, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
159 g, Power Supply: 48 g
Price
279 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

156.3 mm 77.5 mm 8.9 mm 156.3 g151.3 mm 76.3 mm 8.2 mm 158 g146.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.8 mm 140 g145.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.1 mm 159 g144.8 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 155 g142.1 mm 71.8 mm 7.9 mm 147 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Crossing
GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Crossing
GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Riverside
GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Riverside
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Riverside
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Riverside

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
293
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 299 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 291.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.01 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 289 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.03
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG K10
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Acer Liquid Z630S
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
35%
-51%
-13%
10%
-1%
Brightness middle
289
378
31%
370
28%
350
21%
535
85%
349
21%
Brightness
291
380
31%
355
22%
345
19%
521
79%
353
21%
Brightness Distribution
96
91
-5%
92
-4%
84
-12%
85
-11%
93
-3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.27
0.43
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.7
1.95
59%
6.7
-43%
4.7
-0%
4.88
-4%
5.22
-11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.3
3.09
58%
17.8
-144%
8.5
-16%
8.66
-19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3
1.86
38%
7.9
-163%
5.6
-87%
5.2
-73%
3.96
-32%
Gamma
2.03 108%
2.13 103%
2.21 100%
1.84 120%
2.26 97%
2.08 106%
CCT
6291 103%
6376 102%
9072 72%
6795 96%
7766 84%
7308 89%
Contrast
1321
1296
1244

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 243.9 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 243.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 243.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points
LG K10
27383 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points +53%
Acer Liquid Z630S
35585 Points +31%
Honor 5X
37152 Points +36%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
473 Points
LG K10
476 Points +1%
Honor 5X
698 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy J5
464 Points -2%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1425 Points
LG K10
1448 Points +2%
Honor 5X
3047 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1403 Points -2%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points
LG K10
4339 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points +80%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6868 Points +56%
Honor 5X
7852 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy J5
4345 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points
LG K10
3774 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points +97%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6250 Points +63%
Honor 5X
7764 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3782 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points
LG K10
9106 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points +5%
Acer Liquid Z630S
10508 Points +16%
Honor 5X
8174 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy J5
9079 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points
LG K10
52 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points +534%
Acer Liquid Z630S
278 Points +425%
Honor 5X
129 Points +143%
Samsung Galaxy J5
53 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points
LG K10
41 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points +555%
Acer Liquid Z630S
229 Points +445%
Honor 5X
103 Points +145%
Samsung Galaxy J5
42 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points
LG K10
730 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points +109%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1113 Points +57%
Honor 5X
1089 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy J5
734 Points +4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps
LG K10
9.7 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps +44%
Acer Liquid Z630S
21 fps +116%
Honor 5X
14 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps
LG K10
5.2 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps +169%
Acer Liquid Z630S
12 fps +131%
Honor 5X
14 fps +169%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps
LG K10
4.1 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S
9 fps +137%
Honor 5X
5.9 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3.8 fps 0%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps
LG K10
1.8 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps +111%
Acer Liquid Z630S
4.2 fps +133%
Honor 5X
5.4 fps +200%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1.8 fps 0%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points
LG K10
3999 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
3814 Points -8%
Honor 5X
3794 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3966 Points -4%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points
LG K10
536 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points +38%
Acer Liquid Z630S
691 Points +18%
Honor 5X
297 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy J5
534 Points -9%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points
LG K10
1050 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points +103%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1614 Points +52%
Honor 5X
1378 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1058 Points 0%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points
LG K10
453 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points -14%
Acer Liquid Z630S
540 Points -16%
Honor 5X
787 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy J5
399 Points -38%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points
LG K10
310 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points +56%
Acer Liquid Z630S
416 Points +33%
Honor 5X
763 Points +145%
Samsung Galaxy J5
314 Points +1%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points
LG K10
562 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points +34%
Acer Liquid Z630S
627 Points +14%
Honor 5X
9 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy J5
615 Points +12%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Z630S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points
LG K10
2838 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3611 Points +32%
Acer Liquid Z630S
2855 Points +5%
Honor 5X
3595 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3038 Points +11%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms *
LG K10
16638 ms * -28%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11887 ms * +9%
Acer Liquid Z630S
12876 ms * +1%
Honor 5X
12510 ms * +4%
Samsung Galaxy J5
14074 ms * -8%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points
LG K10
47 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
64 Points +36%
Honor 5X
65 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy J5
52 Points +11%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points
LG K10
17.48 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22 Points +31%
Acer Liquid Z630S
19.03 Points +13%
Honor 5X
21.92 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5
18.42 Points +10%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
147 MB/s
LG K10
131 MB/s -11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
209.4 MB/s +42%
Acer Liquid Z630S
249 MB/s +69%
Honor 5X
144 MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy J5
145.5 MB/s -1%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
72 MB/s
LG K10
78 MB/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
60.4 MB/s -16%
Acer Liquid Z630S
67.7 MB/s -6%
Honor 5X
78 MB/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy J5
39.4 MB/s -45%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
21 MB/s
LG K10
9.2 MB/s -56%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22.9 MB/s +9%
Acer Liquid Z630S
28.43 MB/s +35%
Honor 5X
17 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy J5
19.25 MB/s -8%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
11.6 MB/s
LG K10
7.5 MB/s -35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11.2 MB/s -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
5.82 MB/s -50%
Honor 5X
10 MB/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy J5
7.2 MB/s -38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
79.8 MB/s
LG K10
75.5 MB/s -5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
46.61 MB/s
LG K10
45 MB/s -3%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high16 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
Max. Load
 34.3 °C34 °C33.7 °C 
 36.4 °C36.1 °C34.4 °C 
 36.9 °C37 °C34.7 °C 
Maximum: 37 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
34.9 °C34.6 °C34.6 °C
35.5 °C36.7 °C37.9 °C
36 °C38.2 °C38.5 °C
Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 36.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.12 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.41 / 1.51 Watt
Load midlight 2.56 / 3.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 39min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 42min
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Acer Liquid Z630S
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG K10
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
6%
-27%
16%
-28%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1599
1053
-34%
2323
45%
1123
-30%
1292
-19%
H.264
658
602
-9%
672
2%
603
-8%
657
0%
WiFi v1.3
643
681
6%
643
0%
626
-3%
453
-30%
495
-23%
Load
402
144
-64%
483
20%
231
-43%
350
-13%

Pros

+ 高对比度AMOLED屏幕
+ 金属边框
+ 最新操作系统
+ 不错的信号接收
+ 前置LED闪光灯
+ 相对快速的闪存
+ 低功耗
+ 非常优秀的电池续航

Cons

- 相对沉重
- 无线网络速度较慢
- 通话品质较差
- 相机拍摄效果暗淡,有时比较模糊
- 一般的音响效果
- 无环境光传感器
- 高频率闪烁
In review: Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
In review: Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

如果你问,三星Galaxy J5的更新是否成功?那么答案很简单:是的。

它的金属机身带来了更好的质感,也相比前作过时的设计显得更加现代。它的前置相机也得到了升级,搭配LED闪光灯,同时工作内存和存储空间也得到了提升。它也搭配了更快的处理器和更大的屏幕。AMOLED屏幕面板和可更换电池等传统也得到了延续。另外,它的电池续航现在也长了很多。

三星的Galaxy J5 (2016)并不完美,但它是一台非常优秀的中低端产品。归功于长电池续航,AMOLED面板和最新操作系统,正在寻找实惠的新机型的用户可以考虑一下这台设备。

最后我们也有几点不满:它的无线网络传输速度相比较低,机身较为沉重,同时通话质量也很难让人满意。它的扬声器不算出色,同时相机拍摄效果较暗,也不够锐利。

可以它的接受这些不足的用户可能会对三星Galaxy J5 (2016)十分满意。它可能也值得拥有前代机型的用户升级选购。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 - 05/11/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
38 / 60 → 64%
Weight
92%
Battery
93%
Display
85%
Games Performance
5 / 63 → 8%
Application Performance
33 / 70 → 47%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
48 / 91 → 52%
Camera
67%
Average
69%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星 Galaxy J5 (2016) 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2016-05-19 (Update: 2024-11- 4)