三星 Galaxy J5 (2016) 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 289 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.03
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | LG K10 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Acer Liquid Z630S Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 35% | -51% | -13% | 10% | -1% | |
Brightness middle | 289 | 378 31% | 370 28% | 350 21% | 535 85% | 349 21% |
Brightness | 291 | 380 31% | 355 22% | 345 19% | 521 79% | 353 21% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 91 -5% | 92 -4% | 84 -12% | 85 -11% | 93 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.43 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 1.95 59% | 6.7 -43% | 4.7 -0% | 4.88 -4% | 5.22 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.3 | 3.09 58% | 17.8 -144% | 8.5 -16% | 8.66 -19% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 1.86 38% | 7.9 -163% | 5.6 -87% | 5.2 -73% | 3.96 -32% |
Gamma | 2.03 108% | 2.13 103% | 2.21 100% | 1.84 120% | 2.26 97% | 2.08 106% |
CCT | 6291 103% | 6376 102% | 9072 72% | 6795 96% | 7766 84% | 7308 89% |
Contrast | 1321 | 1296 | 1244 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 243.9 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 243.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 243.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 |
* ... smaller is better
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Honor 5X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
LG K10 |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 16 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 30 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Off / Standby | 0 / 0.12 Watt |
Idle | 0.61 / 1.41 / 1.51 Watt |
Load |
2.56 / 3.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Acer Liquid Z630S Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | LG K10 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 6% | -27% | 16% | -28% | -14% | |
Reader / Idle | 1599 | 1053 -34% | 2323 45% | 1123 -30% | 1292 -19% | |
H.264 | 658 | 602 -9% | 672 2% | 603 -8% | 657 0% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 643 | 681 6% | 643 0% | 626 -3% | 453 -30% | 495 -23% |
Load | 402 | 144 -64% | 483 20% | 231 -43% | 350 -13% |
Pros
Cons
如果你问,三星Galaxy J5的更新是否成功?那么答案很简单:是的。
它的金属机身带来了更好的质感,也相比前作过时的设计显得更加现代。它的前置相机也得到了升级,搭配LED闪光灯,同时工作内存和存储空间也得到了提升。它也搭配了更快的处理器和更大的屏幕。AMOLED屏幕面板和可更换电池等传统也得到了延续。另外,它的电池续航现在也长了很多。
三星的Galaxy J5 (2016)并不完美,但它是一台非常优秀的中低端产品。归功于长电池续航,AMOLED面板和最新操作系统,正在寻找实惠的新机型的用户可以考虑一下这台设备。
最后我们也有几点不满:它的无线网络传输速度相比较低,机身较为沉重,同时通话质量也很难让人满意。它的扬声器不算出色,同时相机拍摄效果较暗,也不够锐利。
可以它的接受这些不足的用户可能会对三星Galaxy J5 (2016)十分满意。它可能也值得拥有前代机型的用户升级选购。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
-
05/11/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer