Notebookcheck Logo

三星 Galaxy J7 (2016) 智能手机简短评测

新版本。 三星的中端智能手机,Galaxy J7,经历了一次整改。其结果是Galaxy J7(2016)拥有了更为时尚的外壳,相较于前代更强的性能和电池续航。我们的评测将会说明这个升级是否物有所值。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 (Galaxy Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T830 MP1
Memory
2048 MB 
, LPDDR3
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.63 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: MicroSD (up to 128 GB), NFC, Sensors: Accelerometer, proximity sensor, ANT+, Wi-Fi Direct, 智能开关, App2SD, Android Beam, USB-OTG
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM-Quadband (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS-Quadband (850, 900, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40), Downloads/Uploads with a maximum of 150/50 MBit/s, Micro-SIM, Head-SAR 0.349 W/kg, Body-SAR 1.390 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 151.7 x 76
Battery
12.71 Wh, 3300 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 23 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix F/1.9, autofocus, LED flash, pictures up to 4.128 x 3.096 pixels, video recording up to 1.920 x 1.080 pixels/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix F/1.9, pictures up to 2.576 x 1.932 pixels, video recording up to 1.920 x 1.080 pixels
Additional features
Speakers: One speaker on the back., Keyboard: Virtual, Keyboard Light: yes, Modular power supply, Micro-USB cable, headphones, warranty information, Google Apps, Microsoft Apps, Samsung Apps (S Planner, S Health, Galaxy Apps), UKW-Radio, Facebook, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
169 g, Power Supply: 30 g
Price
0 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case

Size Comparison

151.7 mm 76 mm 7.8 mm 169 g151.3 mm 76.3 mm 8.2 mm 158 g146.8 mm 72.6 mm 7.5 mm 147 g145.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.1 mm 159 g143.6 mm 66.8 mm 7.9 mm 137 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.1 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.9 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Whole route
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Whole route
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Turning point
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Turning point
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Bridge
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016): Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Whole route
Garmin Edge 500: Whole route
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3

In addition to our test shots, we also test the sharpness and colors under controlled lighting conditions. For this we take a picture of the ColorChecker passport and our test chart. We do not edit the pictures. Colors reproduced by the Galaxy J7 (2016) are a touch too strong and bright. The test chart is sharp in the middle, but the brightness and sharpness decrease towards the edges. However, this can also happen with professional cameras.

ColorChecker-Farben abfotografiert. In der unteren Hälfte jedes Patches ist jeweils die Originalfarbe abgebildet.
Photograph of ColorChecker colors. The original colour is in the lower half of each patch.
Detail of the test picture
Detail of the test picture
Test picture (click for original)
Test picture (click for original)

Display

302
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 305 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 288.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 287 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.05
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.5"
Honor 5X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2"
Screen
-7%
1%
-41%
-12%
Brightness middle
287
535
86%
505
76%
518
80%
289
1%
Brightness
289
521
80%
468
62%
475
64%
291
1%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
88
-3%
81
-11%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.43
0.74
0.61
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.9
4.88
-68%
4.1
-41%
6.8
-134%
4.7
-62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.1
8.66
14%
5.8
43%
11.4
-13%
7.3
28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
5.2
-148%
4.9
-133%
7
-233%
3
-43%
Gamma
2.05 107%
2.26 97%
2.5 88%
2.35 94%
2.03 108%
CCT
6228 104%
7766 84%
7116 91%
8151 80%
6291 103%
Contrast
1244
682
849

* ... smaller is better

Color space coverage (target color space: AdobeRGB)
Color space coverage (target color space: AdobeRGB)
Color space coverage (target color space: P3)
Color space coverage (target color space: P3)
Color space coverage (target color space: sRGB
Color space coverage (target color space: sRGB
Mixed colors (Display mode Simple, target color space: sRGB)
Mixed colors (Display mode Simple, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Display mode Simple, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Display mode Simple, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (Display mode Simple, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (Display mode Simple, target color space: sRGB)
Mixed colors (Display mode AMOLED cinema, target color space: sRGB)
Mixed colors (Display mode AMOLED cinema, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Display mode AMOLED cinema, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Display mode AMOLED cinema, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (Display mode AMOLED cinema, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (Display mode AMOLED cinema, target color space: sRGB)
Mixed colors (Display mode AMOLED photo, target color space: sRGB)
Mixed colors (Display mode AMOLED photo, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Display mode AMOLED photo, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Display mode AMOLED photo, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (Display mode AMOLED photo, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (Display mode AMOLED photo, target color space: sRGB)

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Performance

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
45234 Points
Honor 5X
37152 Points -18%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points +11%
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points -40%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
680 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3277 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
8505 Points
Honor 5X
7852 Points -8%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points +38%
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points -48%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
7746 Points
Honor 5X
7764 Points 0%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points +46%
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points -50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
12949 Points
Honor 5X
8174 Points -37%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points +6%
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
475 Points
Honor 5X
129 Points -73%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points +17%
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
394 Points
Honor 5X
103 Points -74%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points +20%
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1687 Points
Honor 5X
1089 Points -35%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points -19%
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
299 Points
Huawei P9 Lite
369 Points +23%
Sony Xperia XA
422 Points +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
242 Points
Huawei P9 Lite
305 Points +26%
Sony Xperia XA
306 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1681 Points
Huawei P9 Lite
1370 Points -19%
Sony Xperia XA
1236 Points -26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
19 fps
Honor 5X
14 fps -26%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps -49%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
12 fps
Honor 5X
14 fps +17%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps +58%
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
9.4 fps
Honor 5X
5.9 fps -37%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps -11%
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps +60%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps -60%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
4.9 fps
Honor 5X
5.4 fps +10%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps +59%
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps -63%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
7.2 fps
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps -32%
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3.2 fps
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps +41%
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps -100%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3691 Points
Honor 5X
3794 Points +3%
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points +45%
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points +12%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
973 Points
Honor 5X
297 Points -69%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points +23%
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points -40%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
2127 Points
Honor 5X
1378 Points -35%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points +15%
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points -50%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1319 Points
Honor 5X
787 Points -40%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points -51%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
512 Points
Honor 5X
763 Points +49%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points +60%
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points -39%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
624 Points
Honor 5X
9 Points -99%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points +23%
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points -12%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

The results of the browser tests put the smartphones in the same order as the synthetic benchmarks: At the top, the Huawei P9 Lite and the Sony Xperia XA, this time, however, closely followed by the Galaxy J7 (2016). The Honor 5X and the Galaxy J5 (2016) finish last.

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3905 Points
Honor 5X
3595 Points -8%
Huawei P9 Lite
4756 Points +22%
Sony Xperia XA
4046 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
9671 ms *
Honor 5X
12510 ms * -29%
Huawei P9 Lite
9397 ms * +3%
Sony Xperia XA
9610 ms * +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms * -35%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
66 Points
Honor 5X
65 Points -2%
Huawei P9 Lite
67 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XA
72 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points -29%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
24.12 Points
Honor 5X
21.92 Points -9%
Huawei P9 Lite
29.03 Points +20%
Sony Xperia XA
27.5 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points -30%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016Honor 5XHuawei P9 LiteSony Xperia XASamsung Galaxy J5 2016
AndroBench 3-5
5%
16%
11%
5%
Sequential Read 256KB
189.4
144
-24%
283.5
50%
240.4
27%
147
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB
46.24
78
69%
46.24
0%
68.6
48%
72
56%
Random Read 4KB
22.33
17
-24%
38.22
71%
22.05
-1%
21
-6%
Random Write 4KB
10.11
10
-1%
15.35
52%
10.6
5%
11.6
15%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.5
60.8
-19%
72.9
-3%
79.8
6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.2
25.1
-57%
50.7
-13%
46.61
-20%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps

Emissions

Max. Load
 29.1 °C29.3 °C28.9 °C 
 30.1 °C29.6 °C29.2 °C 
 29.7 °C29.9 °C29.2 °C 
Maximum: 30.1 °C
Average: 29.4 °C
29.1 °C28.5 °C28.6 °C
29 °C29.2 °C28.9 °C
29.9 °C30.5 °C31 °C
Maximum: 31 °C
Average: 29.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6472525.431.43125.332.44032.9315033.643.76331.634.78028.430.21002730.412520.824.71602231.520021.336.825020.84831521.250.440019.456.650019.560.463017.766.480017.973100017.873.5125017.374.7160017.473.9200016.774.1250017.275315018.276.8400017.976.8500017.679630017.780800017.875.61000017.966.11250018.163.41600018.255.8SPL3087.5N1.369.7median 17.9median 69.7Delta1.41237.727.732.437.722.330.631.322.326.529.131.726.52931.4262932.337.239.432.32927.736.22924.627.628.624.623.223.425.423.228.321.821.328.330.823.223.330.834.52422.534.537.222.922.437.242.126.921.342.147.428.218.447.456.236.117.556.262.641.517.562.670.848.617.270.875.853.716.875.872.450.217.372.470.548.117.470.568.146.716.668.167.245.117.367.268.547.217.668.570.949.417.670.974.953.217.774.976.554.417.476.576.354.717.776.365.242.617.965.251.330.718.151.346.826.118.146.884.162.229.884.156.714.71.356.7median 65.2median 42.6median 17.7median 65.212.912.11.712.940.731.832.440.732.731.831.332.730.834.231.730.831.830.42631.836.633.139.436.633.330.936.233.332.42528.632.429.624.325.429.631.523.921.331.536.324.323.336.344.329.822.544.352.236.622.452.257.341.721.357.362.747.118.462.764.950.117.564.96752.517.56769.153.917.269.17254.216.8727454.217.37475.755.317.475.775.756.916.675.776.157.817.376.17757.917.67779.159.517.679.180.161.117.780.178.359.417.478.377.358.417.777.378.859.717.978.872.953.518.172.956.83718.156.888.469.529.888.473.724.21.373.7median 72.9median 53.9median 17.7median 72.910.110.41.710.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy J7 2016Samsung Galaxy J5 2016Huawei P9 Lite
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Frequency comparison diagram (checkboxes selectable/deselectable!)

Energy Management

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.71 / 1.83 Watt
Load midlight 2.37 / 3.31 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3300 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Power Consumption
-57%
-35%
-22%
8%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.87
-30%
0.73
-9%
0.72
-7%
0.61
9%
Idle Average *
1.71
2.08
-22%
2.09
-22%
1.5
12%
1.41
18%
Idle Maximum *
1.83
2.22
-21%
2.11
-15%
1.57
14%
1.51
17%
Load Average *
2.37
5.26
-122%
4.15
-75%
3.48
-47%
2.56
-8%
Load Maximum *
3.31
6.34
-92%
5.05
-53%
6.04
-82%
3.1
6%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 50min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 20min
Load (maximum brightness)
11h 21min
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3300 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-54%
-46%
-66%
-36%
Reader / Idle
2030
1053
-48%
1404
-31%
775
-62%
1599
-21%
H.264
1220
602
-51%
568
-53%
460
-62%
658
-46%
WiFi v1.3
1025
643
-37%
604
-41%
353
-66%
643
-37%
Load
681
144
-79%
272
-60%
170
-75%
402
-41%

Pros

+ 机身坚固
+ 安卓6.0.1
+ 高对比度AMOLED显示屏
+ 系统运行高速
+ 顺畅游戏
+ 几乎不发烫
+ 可拆卸电池
+ 超长续航

Cons

- 无线模组速度缓慢
- 无亮度传感器
- 无指纹传感器
- 平庸的语音质量
- 仅是中等水平的后置摄像头
- 屏幕闪烁

verdict

In review: Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016). Review unit provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016). Review unit provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

三星用一种微妙却有效的方式改造了它的5.5寸中端智能手机Galaxy J7(2016)。作为2016版的亮点之一的金属外壳与前代机型相比,为它提供了更好的质感和更强的坚固性。从八核骁龙615处理器到三星Exynos 7870的转换,和从1.5到2GB的内存升级,让它性能得到了突破。另一个加分项:新版本配备了更为先进的安卓6.0.1 Marshmallow操作系统,而不是安卓5.1。

这个升级物有所值:如果你正在寻找一台物美价廉的中端智能手机,那么Galaxy J7(2016)会是正确的选择。

前代产品的优点,比方说,Super AMOLED显示屏,1500万像素后置摄像头,500万像素的前置摄像头和可拆卸电池都被保留了下来。而后者在Galaxy J7(2016)上具备了更大的容量,给予了这台智能手机更优异的续航能力。

可惜Galaxy J7(2016)也有几个弱点。在这里必须提到的是:缓慢的Wi-Fi速度,亮度传感器的缺失,平庸的通话音质,以及一般般的主相机。在这个价格位上,指纹传感器应该作为标配 。更敏感的用户可能会感受到在设置屏幕亮度偶有发生的闪烁。基本上它和之前的Galaxy J5(2016)所存在的问题十分相似。所以,如果你想节约50欧元(约52美元),而且可以接受稍小的显示屏(5.2,而不是5.5英寸)以及较慢的处理器,那么Galaxy J5(2016)也同样值得考虑。

 注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 - 12/06/2016 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
72 / 75 → 95%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
39 / 60 → 65%
Weight
91%
Battery
100%
Display
84%
Games Performance
17 / 63 → 26%
Application Performance
40 / 70 → 58%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
67%
Average
73%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星 Galaxy J7 (2016) 智能手机简短评测
Manuel Masiero, 2016-12-18 (Update: 2024-08-15)