三星Galaxy S10+智能手机评测

盖世 -

三星Galaxy S的这10年。S10 +只是韩国制造商在其Galaxy UNPACKED活动中宣布的五款智能手机之一，但它也是目前最大的Galaxy S10型号。S10 +有一个几乎没有边框的大型AMOLED屏幕，以及一个打孔前置摄像头。新的旗舰产品有着性能更强的SoC，更多更好的相机，并配备高达1 TB的内部存储空间。请继续阅读，以了解三星是否已经做得足够好来创造一款值得庆祝Galaxy S系列10周年纪念的智能手机。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zoltan), Published 04/13/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Galaxy S Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Samsung Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Galaxy S Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 9820 8 x 1.9 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4x

Display

6.40 inch 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, 电容屏, 10点触控, Curved Dynamic AMOLED, OLED, glossy: yes

Storage

512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 462.5 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米组合耳机和麦克风插孔, Card Reader: 最多512 GB microSD卡; 支持FAT，FAT32和exFAT文件系统, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计，气压计，陀螺仪传感器，地磁传感器，霍尔传感器，心率传感器，接近传感器, MST, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, Samsung DeX

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, LTE Cat. 20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 157.6 x 74.1

Battery

15.79 Wh, 4100 mAh Lithium-Ion, QuickCharge 2.0, AFC, PD 3.0, Qi 无线充电

Operating System

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix 主摄像头：12 MPix，双像素自动对焦，77°，f / 1.5和f /2.4,1.4μm，OIS。 12 MPix远摄，2倍放大倍率，PDAF，45°，f / 2.4，OIS。 16 MPix超广角，固定焦距，123°，f / 2.2），超高清视频
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix 双像素自动对焦，80°，f / 1.9。 8 MPix，RGB深度，固定焦距，90°，f / 2.2

Additional features

Speakers: 双扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 充电器，USB线，2个OTG适配器，AKG耳机，快速入门指南，安全说明, One UI, Galaxy App Store, 24 Months Warranty, IP68认证，SAR值：Body - 1.582 W / kg，Head - 0.516 W / kg, fanless

Weight

198 g, Power Supply: 57 g

Price

8699 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus LG V40 ThinQ Google Pixel 3 XL OnePlus 6T Huawei Mate 20 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Apple iPhone Xs Max DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	696 (647^min - 714^max) MBit/s +52%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	663 (289^min - 805^max) MBit/s +45%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 (6^min - 792^max) MBit/s +42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 MBit/s +42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	602 MBit/s +32%
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	554 (492^min - 579^max) MBit/s +21%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	474 (241^min - 497^max) MBit/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	457 (398^min - 508^max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 3 XL Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	456 (429^min - 468^max) MBit/s 0%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1001 (209^min - 1106^max) MBit/s +58%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	615 (532^min - 642^max) MBit/s -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	491 (100^min - 534^max) MBit/s -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	677 MBit/s +7%
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	677 (655^min - 698^max) MBit/s +7%
Google Pixel 3 XL Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	635 (315^min - 645^max) MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (561^min - 684^max) MBit/s
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	629 (621^min - 638^max) MBit/s -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	624 MBit/s -1%

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø632 (561-684)

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø457 (398-508)

GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Overview

GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Roundabout

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

click to load images

A photo of our test chart taken with the ultra-wide-angle lens

A photo of our test chart taken with the telephoto lens


715 cd/m²	719 cd/m²	729 cd/m²
726 cd/m²	710 cd/m²	725 cd/m²
732 cd/m²	708 cd/m²	726 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Curved Dynamic AMOLED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 732 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 721.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.58 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 710 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1

	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2"	Huawei Mate 20 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3"	Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"	Google Pixel 3 XL AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3"	LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4"	OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Screen		4%	13%	15%	-6%	5%	-3%
Brightness middle	710	565 -20%	576 -19%	656 -8%	410 -42%	567 -20%	437 -38%
Brightness	721	571 -21%	582 -19%	659 -9%	413 -43%	559 -22%	442 -39%
Brightness Distribution	97	96 -1%	90 -7%	88 -9%	97 0%	89 -8%	95 -2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.7	2.3 38%	1.3 65%	1.7 54%	3.16 15%	3.3 11%	2.21 40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.3	4.8 53%	3.5 66%	2.8 73%	5.5 47%	6.1 41%	4.27 59%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	1.9 -27%	1.6 -7%	1.7 -13%	1.7 -13%	1.1 27%	2.1 -40%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.16 ^102%	2.18 ^101%	1.998 ^110%	2.219 ^99%	2.46 ^89%	2.307 ^95%
CCT	6611 ^98%	6332 ^103%	6561 ^99%	6487 ^100%	6653 ^98%	6495 ^100%	6353 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

235.8 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4505 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3776 Points -16%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2397 Points -47%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3378 Points -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4774 Points +6%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2384 Points -47%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2325 Points -48%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2457 Points -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4499 - 4529, n=4)	4510 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=83, last 2 years)	5507 Points +22%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10259 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	8963 Points -13%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8687 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	10024 Points -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11244 Points +10%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8995 Points -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8292 Points -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8522 Points -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10162 - 10553, n=4)	10366 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=83, last 2 years)	15246 Points +49%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10177 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6202 Points -39%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13519 Points +33%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	8938 Points -12%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13341 Points +31%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	10876 Points +7%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14417 Points +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10128 - 10192, n=4)	10167 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 24524, n=59, last 2 years)	12211 Points +20%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9793 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5822 Points -41%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10361 Points +6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	12535 Points +28%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10590 Points +8%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	11180 Points +14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9858 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (9557 - 10008, n=4)	9777 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7812 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5319 Points -32%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8141 Points +4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9225 Points +18%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8487 Points +9%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	9029 Points +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8178 Points +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7595 - 7966, n=4)	7769 Points -1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55740 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	39745 Points -29%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58651 Points +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	57047 Points +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	77599 Points +39%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	64534 Points +16%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	34855 Points -37%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	64152 Points +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (54087 - 56465, n=4)	55454 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	70318 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	46610 Points -34%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	79818 Points +14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	67730 Points -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	159735 Points +127%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	84998 Points +21%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	53794 Points -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	81502 Points +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (66990 - 72022, n=4)	70156 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32302 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	26226 Points -19%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30418 Points -6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	36755 Points +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	27717 Points -14%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35022 Points +8%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	15614 Points -52%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	36762 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (31297 - 32308, n=4)	32016 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4465 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3895 Points -13%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4947 Points +11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4996 Points +12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	5205 Points +17%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6336 Points +42%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6180 Points +38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5492 Points +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4015 - 5186, n=3)	4555 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5303 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4637 Points -13%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6439 Points +21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5305 Points 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	7055 Points +33%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8272 Points +56%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7780 Points +47%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8219 Points +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4507 - 6058, n=3)	5289 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2875 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2496 Points -13%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2731 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4150 Points +44%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2713 Points -6%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3483 Points +21%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3594 Points +25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2541 Points -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2875 - 3448, n=3)	3076 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4052 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4018 Points -1%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4842 Points +19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5456 Points +35%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	6667 Points +65%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6310 Points +56%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	6228 Points +54%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5438 Points +34%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4052 - 4766, n=3)	4380 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +174%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4449 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4797 Points +8%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6024 Points +35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5854 Points +32%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	10374 Points +133%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8397 Points +89%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	8380 Points +88%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7609 Points +71%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4449 - 5307, n=3)	4881 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +343%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3087 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2561 Points -17%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2871 Points -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4407 Points +43%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2961 Points -4%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3374 Points +9%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3280 Points +6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2721 Points -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (3077 - 3513, n=3)	3226 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4452 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3256 Points -27%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3802 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4201 Points -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3544 Points -20%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4734 Points +6%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4662 Points +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4734 Points +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4383 - 4579, n=4)	4473 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=72, last 2 years)	3088 Points -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5186 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3582 Points -31%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4275 Points -18%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4206 Points -19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3726 Points -28%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5241 Points +1%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5089 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5190 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (5152 - 5206, n=4)	5180 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=72, last 2 years)	3272 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2977 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2469 Points -17%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2740 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4183 Points +41%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3027 Points +2%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3537 Points +19%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3605 Points +21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3620 Points +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2854 - 3296, n=4)	3033 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=72, last 2 years)	3285 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4529 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3420 Points -24%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3741 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4275 Points -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4121 Points -9%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5189 Points +15%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5133 Points +13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4555 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4529 - 4821, n=4)	4630 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 22303, n=161, last 2 years)	7911 Points +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5371 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3792 Points -29%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4133 Points -23%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4250 Points -21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4828 Points -10%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5877 Points +9%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	5789 Points +8%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5651 Points +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (5358 - 5418, n=4)	5379 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33560, n=161, last 2 years)	11758 Points +119%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2925 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2546 Points -13%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2809 Points -4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4364 Points +49%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2723 Points -7%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3681 Points +26%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3676 Points +26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2713 Points -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2925 - 3480, n=4)	3123 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10259, n=161, last 2 years)	4659 Points +59%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	58 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	60 fps +3%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	61 fps +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +3%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +3%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	60 fps +3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (58 - 60, n=4)	59.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	86.8 fps +50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	96 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	147 fps +53%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	105 fps +9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	120 fps +25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	226 fps +135%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	152 fps +58%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	140 fps +46%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	150 fps +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (96 - 143, n=4)	119.3 fps +24%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=172, last 2 years)	286 fps +198%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	45 fps -15%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps -38%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	42 fps -21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps +11%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps +11%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	37 fps -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58 fps +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 59, n=4)	54.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	76.3 fps +44%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	74 fps +10%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps -12%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	73 fps +9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	107 fps +60%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	56 fps -16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	71 fps +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (67 - 85, n=4)	80.5 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=172, last 2 years)	169.3 fps +153%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	37 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	24 fps -35%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	21 fps -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	26 fps -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	58.9 fps +59%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	53 fps +43%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	25 fps -32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	56 fps +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (30 - 53, n=4)	39.3 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years)	66.4 fps +79%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	47 fps -30%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	41 fps -39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	29 fps -57%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	69.3 fps +3%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	45 fps -33%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58 fps -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 67, n=4)	60 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years)	120 fps +79%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	14 fps -39%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13 fps -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	16 fps -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	31 fps +35%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps +35%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	18 fps -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps +61%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (23 - 40, n=4)	27.3 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=173, last 2 years)	48.5 fps +111%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	43 fps
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	28 fps -35%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	26 fps -40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	31 fps -28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	40 fps -7%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps -19%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	33 fps -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (35 - 43, n=4)	41 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=172, last 2 years)	72.1 fps +68%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	26 fps
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	16 fps -38%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	18 fps -31%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	47 fps +81%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34 fps +31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	40 fps +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 26, n=4)	23.3 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)	51.4 fps +98%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	46 fps
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30 fps -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	33 fps -28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	36.8 fps -20%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	38 fps -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (41 - 46, n=4)	44.3 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)	81.6 fps +77%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps -25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	19 fps +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	32.1 fps +101%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps +38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	25 fps +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 28, n=4)	19 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)	38.3 fps +139%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps -29%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	13 fps -24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	16.3 fps -4%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 17, n=4)	16.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)	32.9 fps +94%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.5 (9.69^min - 72.94^max) fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	25.57 (7.38^min - 46.96^max) fps -34%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32.86 fps -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (38.4 - 38.6, n=3)	38.5 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.18 (8.36^min - 46.5^max) fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	16.92 (6.06^min - 28.78^max) fps -38%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	29.68 fps +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (27.2 - 36.2, n=3)	30.2 fps +11%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32.26 (8.31^min - 85.07^max) fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	29.12 (9.74^min - 74.17^max) fps -10%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35.34 fps +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (32.3 - 33, n=3)	32.6 fps +1%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	333277 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	250577 Points -25%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	270884 Points -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	300617 Points -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	302955 Points -9%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	294488 Points -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	285269 Points -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	246366 Points -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (327454 - 333277, n=4)	329572 Points -1%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	273655 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	222290 Points -19%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	229374 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	250848 Points -8%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	228939 Points -16%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	215632 Points -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	226124 Points -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (269219 - 283270, n=4)	275038 Points +1%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4967 Score
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5025 Score +1%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4716 Score -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 ()	4967 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +17%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4520 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3302 Points -27%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3565 Points -21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4687 Points +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4895 Points +8%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4458 Points -1%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	3291 Points -27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4288 Points -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4226 - 4548, n=4)	4404 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)	6363 Points +41%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8344 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6413 Points -23%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6717 Points -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	8604 Points +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11675 Points +40%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8156 Points -2%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	4417 Points -47%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8418 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7476 - 8344, n=4)	7861 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)	10203 Points +22%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4306 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2625 Points -39%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2910 Points -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6283 Points +46%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1815 Points -58%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4344 Points +1%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	2825 Points -34%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3704 Points -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4306 - 4570, n=4)	4463 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)	6843 Points +59%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8401 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6370 Points -24%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6726 Points -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6273 Points -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	15659 Points +86%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7969 Points -5%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	7989 Points -5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7743 Points -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7361 - 8981, n=4)	8307 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	17343 Points +106%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1383 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	1109 Points -20%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1228 Points -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1424 Points +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1731 Points +25%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1398 Points +1%
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096	1176 Points -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1400 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1012 - 1439, n=4)	1305 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)	1569 Points +13%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1928 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	1481 Points -23%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1571 Points -19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2407 Points +25%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1201 Points -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1927 - 1937, n=3)	1931 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points +20%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	273 Points +197%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	109.2 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	91.8 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (84 - 91.8, n=3)	88.9 Points -3%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	86.1 Points -6%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	82.6 Points -10%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	75.8 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	71.2 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	69.6 Points -24%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	43114 Points +107%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)	37643 Points +81%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	23285 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20849 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=4)	20121 Points -3%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	16824 Points -19%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	16228 Points -22%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	15906 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	14760 Points -29%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	13360 Points -36%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	3179 ms * -71%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	2785 ms * -50%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	2361 ms * -27%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	2282 ms * -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	2060 ms * -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1823 - 2240, n=4)	1961 ms * -6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	1952 ms * -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1857 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * +16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	603 ms * +68%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	155 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +29%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	124 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	115 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (115 - 115, n=2)	115 Points 0%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	100 Points -13%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	94 Points -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	75 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	64 Points -44%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	347 Points +11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	334 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	314 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (292 - 325, n=3)	310 Points -1%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	287 Points -9%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	267 Points -15%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	260 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	211 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	164 Points -48%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)	139.5 runs/min +149%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 71)	58.6 runs/min +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	56 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (54 - 57, n=3)	55.7 runs/min -1%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	46.4 runs/min -17%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	LG V40 ThinQ	Huawei Mate 20 Pro	OnePlus 6T	Google Pixel 3 XL	Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	Average 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-0%	-2%	105%	-7%	111%	-24%	61%	494%
Sequential Read 256KB	811	819 1%	690 -15%	853 5%	735 -9%	633 -22%	749 -8%	682 ?(510 - 811, n=3) -16%	1863 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years) 130%
Sequential Write 256KB	249.1	204.9 -18%	203.9 -18%	196.4 -21%	204.4 -18%	228.6 -8%	171 -31%	281 ?(243 - 351, n=3) 13%	1446 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=194, last 2 years) 480%
Random Read 4KB	135.2	129.7 -4%	130.1 -4%	157.4 16%	138.5 2%	120.8 -11%	136 1%	136.4 ?(132.3 - 141.6, n=3) 1%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=194, last 2 years) 106%
Random Write 4KB	22.7	22.74 0%	23.36 3%	157.8 595%	22 -3%	132.7 485%	21.75 -4%	106 ?(22.7 - 152, n=3) 367%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=194, last 2 years) 1261%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	73 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 16%	83.2 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) 14%			34.18 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -53%	73 ?() 0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	67.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%	63.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	72.4 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) 19%			30.23 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -50%	60.7 ?() 0%

PUBG Mobile

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus; 0.11.0: Ø39.1 (14-42)

Asphalt 9

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus; 1.4.1a: Ø29.1 (26-30)

Battle Bay

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus; 4.3.22176: Ø59.6 (57-60)

Max. Load

Idle


35.8 °C	36.9 °C	36.3 °C
36.3 °C	38 °C	38.1 °C
37.2 °C	39.3 °C	37.1 °C

Maximum: 39.3 °C
Average: 37.2 °C


35.1 °C	34.8 °C	34.8 °C
34.7 °C	35.6 °C	35.2 °C
33.4 °C	35.4 °C	35.4 °C

Maximum: 35.6 °C
Average: 34.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 33 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone Xs Max audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 57.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 57.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 57.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.26 Watt
Idle	0.73 / 1.53 / 2.07 Watt
Load	6.03 / 9.18 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Google Pixel 3 XL 3430 mAh	OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9820	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		32%	12%	-4%	8%	6%	14%	7%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	0.73	0.68 7%	0.87 -19%	0.95 -30%	1 -37%	0.7 4%	0.7 4%	0.65 ?(0.6 - 0.73, n=4) 11%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) -21%
Idle Average *	1.53	0.95 38%	1.39 9%	2.17 -42%	1.4 8%	1.4 8%	1.1 28%	1.455 ?(1.2 - 1.82, n=4) 5%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) 5%
Idle Maximum *	2.07	1.09 47%	1.41 32%	2.25 -9%	1.7 18%	2 3%	2.1 -1%	1.675 ?(1.3 - 2.07, n=4) 19%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) 22%
Load Average *	6.03	4.58 24%	3.96 34%	4.47 26%	4.6 24%	4.8 20%	4.2 30%	5.88 ?(5.2 - 6.17, n=4) 2%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -9%
Load Maximum *	9.18	5.16 44%	8.6 6%	6.15 33%	6.7 27%	9.5 -3%	8.3 10%	9.44 ?(8.55 - 10.2, n=4) -3%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -8%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		26h 00min
WiFi Websurfing (Samsung Browser 9.0)		8h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 07min

	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh	Google Pixel 3 XL 3430 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	6%	29%	11%	35%	23%	-5%
Reader / Idle	1560	1343 -14%	1140 -27%	1747 12%	1305 -16%	1936 24%	1725 11%	1347 -14%
H.264	921	674 -27%	659 -28%	854 -7%	801 -13%	903 -2%	724 -21%	520 -44%
WiFi v1.3	483	521 8%	510 6%	767 59%	742 54%	865 79%	691 43%	547 13%
Load	187	237 27%	320 71%	282 51%	223 19%	261 40%	299 60%	235 26%

Pros

+ 很棒的设计

+ 优质的用料

+ 高性能SoC

+ 充足的RAM和存储空间

+ 可扩展存储

+ 双SIM卡

+ 相机表现优秀

+ 很不错的的OLED面板

+ 防水防尘

+ USB 3.1 TypeC，支持DP，HDMI和OTG

+ 扬声器效果出色

+ 好用的指纹传感器

+ 无线充电

Cons

- 一般般的续航

- 没有eSIM

- 面部识别不够安全

- SoC在高负载下会降频

- PWM调光

- 不支持aptX HD

三星Galaxy S10+智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany.

三星Galaxy S10 +肯定是其前辈合格的的继承者，是一款真正的旗舰智能手机。然而，最新的Galaxy S系列产品并不像其前身那样物有所值，部分原因是竞争对手们早就迎头赶上。最好的例子是S10 +的屏幕和相机。显示效果很好，但它不像我们的比较设备那样明亮或颜色准确。此外，虽然相机也可以拍摄精彩的照片和精彩的视频，但在低光照摄影方面还有更好的选择。从本质上讲，三星在过去两年中已经对其相机技术过于自信了。

Exynos 9820 SoC是一个强大的产品，但在今年晚些时候上市后，它可能会落后于Snapdragon 855。 LTE调制解调器也很快，但我们希望看到对更多频段的支持。此外，虽然Galaxy S10设备是支持Wi-Fi 6的最快的智能手机，但我们评测机中的调制解调器功耗太大，这个问题需要解决。

三星Galaxy S10 +拥有许多当前的技术趋势，并成功地将它们集成在一起，但它不足以成为2019年的年度智能手机。

我们仍然认为缺乏aptX HD支持是值得怀疑的。虽然LDAC是一种码率更高的编解码器，但在撰写本文时只有少数耳机支持它，所以三星继续放弃aptX HD实在无法理解。不过三星仍在为其旗舰智能手机配备耳机插孔，这样的OEM已经不多了。

超声波指纹传感器在测试过程中运行流畅，甚至用湿手或油腻的手也能解锁，这是令人印象深刻的。最后，新的Galaxy S10系列提供了极大的存储空间，可以使用高达512 GB的microSD卡进行扩展。不过你必须准备好投入大量资金来做到这一点。

总的来说，Galaxy S10 +几乎没有给已经过度饱和的市场带来任何新鲜感。我们怀疑三星已经为Galaxy Fold保留了任何真正的创新功能。虽然这对于一台旗舰级手机来说不那么要紧，我们还是建议在考虑是否要购买S10+时，应该谨慎行事。

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 463597 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S10+智能手机评测

Daniel Schmidt, 2019-04-13 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

Asphalt 9

Battle Bay

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus audio analysis

Apple iPhone Xs Max audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison