三星Galaxy S10智能手机评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 701 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | Apple iPhone XS OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4" | Sony Xperia XZ3 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 10% | 12% | -5% | 4% | -62% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 701 | 529 -25% | 639 -9% | 437 -38% | 567 -19% | 543 -23% | 569 -19% |
Brightness | 705 | 527 -25% | 637 -10% | 442 -37% | 559 -21% | 542 -23% | 578 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 96 -2% | 94 -4% | 95 -3% | 89 -9% | 92 -6% | 95 -3% |
Black Level * | |||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 1.4 62% | 1 73% | 2.21 40% | 3.3 11% | 6.6 -78% | 1.3 65% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.3 | 4 61% | 2.2 79% | 4.27 59% | 6.1 41% | 11 -7% | 2.1 80% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.6 -14% | 2.2 -57% | 2.1 -50% | 1.1 21% | 4.7 -236% | 1.6 -14% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.16 102% | 1.9 116% | 2.307 95% | 2.46 89% | 1.835 120% | 2.31 95% |
CCT | 6553 99% | 6358 102% | 6364 102% | 6353 102% | 6495 100% | 6817 95% | 6401 102% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise | |
↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (38.4 - 38.6, n=3) | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (27.2 - 36.2, n=3) | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (32.3 - 33, n=3) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XS | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1927 - 1937, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (84 - 91.8, n=3) | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=4) | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1823 - 2240, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (115 - 115, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (292 - 325, n=3) | |
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70) | |
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy S10 | Samsung Galaxy S9 | Huawei P20 Pro | Nokia 8 Sirocco | LG V40 ThinQ | Sony Xperia XZ3 | OnePlus 6T | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 0% | 141% | -2% | -2% | -23% | -4% | 81% | 506% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 832 | 815 -2% | 832 0% | 738 -11% | 690 -17% | 681 -18% | 735 -12% | 760 ? -9% | 1839 ? 121% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 193.2 | 206.9 7% | 196.7 2% | 211.6 10% | 203.9 6% | 196.1 2% | 204.4 6% | 297 ? 54% | 1425 ? 638% |
Random Read 4KB | 137.4 | 131 -5% | 144.3 5% | 140.7 2% | 130.1 -5% | 135.7 -1% | 138.5 1% | 152.9 ? 11% | 277 ? 102% |
Random Write 4KB | 24.44 | 23.07 -6% | 160.5 557% | 22.4 -8% | 23.36 -4% | 22.22 -9% | 22 -10% | 131.6 ? 438% | 309 ? 1164% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 77.9 ? | 79.2 ? 2% | 84.9 ? 9% | 34.2 ? -56% | 76 ? -2% | ||||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.8 ? | 67.2 ? 4% | 63.1 ? -3% | 30.4 ? -53% | 59.6 ? -8% |
PUBG Mobile
Arena of Valor
Dead Trigger 2
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone XS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.01 / 0.07 Watt |
Idle | 0.61 / 1.27 / 1.3 Watt |
Load |
6.17 / 8.55 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 9820 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 24% | -0% | 10% | 5% | -5% | 2% | -11% | -21% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.61 | 0.65 -7% | 0.95 -56% | 0.84 -38% | 0.67 -10% | 0.87 -43% | 0.8 -31% | 0.65 ? -7% | 0.894 ? -47% |
Idle Average * | 1.27 | 0.81 36% | 1.34 -6% | 1.54 -21% | 1.26 1% | 1.39 -9% | 1.2 6% | 1.455 ? -15% | 1.456 ? -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.3 | 0.92 29% | 1.48 -14% | 1.57 -21% | 1.29 1% | 1.41 -8% | 1.5 -15% | 1.675 ? -29% | 1.616 ? -24% |
Load Average * | 6.17 | 4.76 23% | 4 35% | 2.47 60% | 3.71 40% | 3.96 36% | 4.8 22% | 5.88 ? 5% | 6.45 ? -5% |
Load Maximum * | 8.55 | 5.16 40% | 5.13 40% | 2.49 71% | 9.3 -9% | 8.6 -1% | 6.2 27% | 9.44 ? -10% | 9.8 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Nokia 8 Sirocco 3260 mAh | LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ3 3300 mAh | OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -7% | 52% | 40% | 19% | -8% | 55% | |
Reader / Idle | 1259 | 1182 -6% | 1727 37% | 1603 27% | 1140 -9% | 1270 1% | 1936 54% |
H.264 | 842 | 609 -28% | 784 -7% | 725 -14% | 659 -22% | 420 -50% | 903 7% |
WiFi v1.3 | 427 | 474 11% | 744 74% | 693 62% | 510 19% | 419 -2% | 865 103% |
Load | 170 | 164 -4% | 345 103% | 317 86% | 320 88% | 202 19% | 261 54% |
Pros
Cons
三星Galaxy S10是迄今为止我们评测过的两款S10机型中最好的。与Galaxy S10 +相比,S10在人体工程学方面更加优越,但其续航时间仍然令人失望。如果您需要一台可以续航一整天的智能手机,我们不会建议您选择S10。
尽管如此,S10较差的续航不足以阻止它成为一款出色的智能手机。三星为该设备配备了许多其竞争对手所没有的功能,而其屏幕和做工堪称典范。它的双向无线充电可能是一种噱头,但其耳机插孔和可扩展存储使S10与其同时代的产品区别明显。此外,它的双蓝牙5.0非常有用,其大量存储选项也很有用。超声波指纹传感器也很棒,并且比目前市场上的其他屏下指纹要好得多。
Exynos 9820也可以媲美其他旗舰SoC,而S10和S10 +是首批支持新Wi-Fi 6标准的智能手机之一。不幸的是,S10支持相对较少的LTE频段,我们也很难理解三星对aptX HD的坚持。
三星Galaxy S10是一款出色的旗舰智能手机,几乎没有什么弱点。尽管如此,它几乎没有任何新意,它一般的续航表现会让一些人失望。
S10也有很棒的相机,新的超广角传感器将成为许多人的心头好。然而,这三代Galaxy S系列在相机技术上没有任何巨大的飞跃,而三星的竞争对手现在已经赶上甚至超过了它。简而言之,Galaxy S10是可以买到的最好的智能手机之一,但它并没有像它的前辈那样从竞争中脱颖而出。
Samsung Galaxy S10
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt