三星Galaxy S20+智能手机评测：有8K视频能力的手持设备

Name: Samsung Galaxy S20+
Brand: Samsung

天才旗舰？

三星Galaxy S20 Plus提供的功能比Galaxy S20多。屏幕更大，电池更大，还多了一个后置摄像头。推出价格从7999元起，您应该对Galaxy S20 +充满期待。因此，我们将详细测试Galaxy S20 +，以了解其功能。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 06/06/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Galaxy S

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Galaxy S20 Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G77 MP11

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.70 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 524 PPI, 10点触控, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 108 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: USB-C上的音频, Card Reader: 1 TB的microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计，陀螺仪，接近传感器，指南针，气压计

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS: Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 8. LTE: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 161.9 x 73.7

Battery

4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix f / 1.8，相位对比AF（双像素），OIS，LED闪光灯（1号摄像头）；64 MPix f / ‐2.0，相位检测AF，OIS，视频@ 4320p / 24fps（2号摄像头）; 12 MP，f / 1.8，相位检测自动对焦（双像素），OIS，LED闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix , f/2.2, 相位检测自动对焦（双像素），视频@ 2160p / 30fps

Additional features

Speakers: 游戏启动器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 快速充电器，USB Type-C电缆，S-Pen，SIM工具, 24 Months Warranty, LTE速度：下载-LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 8CA 2 Gbps；上传-Cat.20 3CA 316 Mbps。 SAR值：身体– 1.57 W / kg，头部– 0.376 W / kg, fanless, waterproof

Weight

188 g, Power Supply: 59 g

Price

1000 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Device comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
87.7 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2020	Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11	188 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.70"	3200x1440
87.1 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2019	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	226 g	64 GB SSD	6.50"	2688x1242
89 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2019	Huawei Mate 30 Pro Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16	198 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.53"	2400x1176
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2019	OnePlus 7T Pro SD 855+, Adreno 640	206 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	3120x1440
84.7 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2019	Sony Xperia 1 SD 855, Adreno 640	178 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	3840x1644

Size Comparison

Sony Xperia 1 OnePlus 7T Pro Samsung Galaxy S20+ Huawei Mate 30 Pro Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	966 (923^min - 995^max) MBit/s +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	637 (584^min - 715^max) MBit/s -26%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	863 (759^min - 898^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	589 (461^min - 625^max) MBit/s -32%
Sony Xperia 1 Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	531 (414^min - 620^max) MBit/s -38%
OnePlus 7T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	352 (311^min - 375^max) MBit/s -59%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1010 (912^min - 1092^max) MBit/s +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	533 (468^min - 602^max) MBit/s -36%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	835 (808^min - 847^max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 1 Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	617 (356^min - 662^max) MBit/s -26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	580 (550^min - 597^max) MBit/s -31%
OnePlus 7T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	471 (347^min - 505^max) MBit/s -44%

Samsung Galaxy S20+; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø835 (808-847)

Samsung Galaxy S20+; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø863 (759-898)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S20+

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S20+

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S20+

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20+: 8.46 ∆E min: 3.48 - max: 13.24 ∆E


728 cd/m²	736 cd/m²	770 cd/m²
738 cd/m²	740 cd/m²	771 cd/m²
732 cd/m²	742 cd/m²	767 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 771 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 747.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 740 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.269

	Samsung Galaxy S20+ AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"	Huawei Mate 30 Pro OLED, 2400x1176, 6.5"	OnePlus 7T Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Sony Xperia 1 OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5"
Screen		10%	-21%	-21%	17%
Brightness middle	740	790 7%	592 -20%	606 -18%	541 -27%
Brightness	747	790 6%	605 -19%	611 -18%	543 -27%
Brightness Distribution	94	97 3%	96 2%	95 1%	99 5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.6	1.4 46%	2.5 4%	3.46 -33%	0.8 69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.57	3.4 26%	5.5 -20%	5.64 -23%	1.7 63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	1.9 -27%	2.6 -73%	2 -33%	1.2 20%
Gamma	2.269 ^97%	2.23 ^99%	2.16 ^102%	2.258 ^97%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6284 ^103%	6466 ^101%	6173 ^105%	6779 ^96%	6601 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

214 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 214 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 214 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	944 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1326 Points +40%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	781 Points -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (903 - 944, n=5)	929 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)	989 Points +5%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	2899 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3476 Points +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3062 Points +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2731 - 2899, n=5)	2800 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)	3298 Points +14%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	14760 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	13947 Points -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	12645 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10747 Points -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (13627 - 14760, n=5)	14391 Points -2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10583 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10322 Points -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10442 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8760 Points -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (10008 - 11784, n=5)	10612 Points 0%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	41415 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	96826 Points +134%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	64626 Points +56%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	72173 Points +74%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	65656 Points +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (41415 - 68943, n=4)	61100 Points +48%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	48476 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	206190 Points +325%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	75073 Points +55%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	118129 Points +144%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	105718 Points +118%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (48476 - 87223, n=4)	74951 Points +55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	27431 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33898 Points +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	43459 Points +58%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	30561 Points +11%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	28223 Points +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (27431 - 42135, n=4)	37265 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5696 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	7893 Points +39%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6815 Points +20%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8165 Points +43%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7197 Points +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (5646 - 8097, n=5)	6920 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6392 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	11302 Points +77%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7671 Points +20%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10637 Points +66%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9447 Points +48%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6388 - 11488, n=5)	9004 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4124 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3839 Points -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4900 Points +19%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4503 Points +9%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3656 Points -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3846 - 4124, n=5)	3990 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7576 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7098 Points -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8605 Points +14%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5552 Points -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (7385 - 8485, n=5)	7798 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9471 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7970 Points -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11448 Points +21%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9158 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (9470 - 11868, n=5)	10329 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +109%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4455 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5133 Points +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4604 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2345 Points -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3935 - 4455, n=5)	4240 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6896 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5471 Points -21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6048 Points -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6266 Points -9%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4556 Points -34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6544 - 6896, n=5)	6733 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8469 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6088 Points -28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6478 Points -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7044 Points -17%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5663 Points -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (8005 - 8469, n=5)	8260 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4180 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4038 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4909 Points +17%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4519 Points +8%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2705 Points -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3963 - 4267, n=5)	4091 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7459 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6382 Points -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6916 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3969 Points -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6638 - 7459, n=5)	7083 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9190 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6657 Points -28%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8006 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5674 Points -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (870 - 9190, n=5)	7112 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4495 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5576 Points +24%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4683 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1934 Points -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (4063 - 4495, n=5)	4284 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6355 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5570 Points -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5509 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3832 Points -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (5042 - 6355, n=5)	5599 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=73, last 2 years)	2841 Points -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8783 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6369 Points -27%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6527 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5007 Points -43%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (6136 - 8783, n=5)	7254 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=73, last 2 years)	3085 Points -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3230 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3870 Points +20%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3564 Points +10%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2104 Points -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3104 - 3230, n=5)	3154 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=73, last 2 years)	2706 Points -16%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (60 - 119, n=5)	81.8 fps +36%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	199 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	287 fps +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	152 fps -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	185 fps -7%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (145 - 200, n=5)	186.8 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +40%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	57 fps -5%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (59 - 90, n=5)	65.8 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +25%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	126 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	157 fps +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	106 fps -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	111 fps -12%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (96 - 126, n=5)	108.8 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +30%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	59 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	73 fps +24%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	40 fps -32%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (58 - 61, n=5)	59 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +11%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	85 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	100 fps +18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	56 fps -34%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	79 fps -7%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	55 fps -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (65 - 85, n=5)	77.4 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +37%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	45 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	48 fps +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	34 fps -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	24 fps -47%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	33 fps -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (34 - 45, n=5)	42 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +6%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	51 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	63 fps +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	41 fps -20%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	48 fps -6%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (38 - 51, n=5)	47.6 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +38%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	52 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	58 fps +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	40 fps -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	26 fps -50%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	34 fps -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (49 - 52, n=5)	50.8 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps -5%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	58 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	75 fps +29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	49 fps -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps -19%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (43 - 58, n=5)	53.4 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +37%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	33 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	46 fps +39%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	26 fps -21%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps -48%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	17 fps -48%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (22 - 34, n=5)	29.8 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +12%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	22 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	29 fps +32%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	19 fps -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	19 fps -14%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (20 - 23, n=5)	21.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +44%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	296746 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	510245 Points +72%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	483224 Points +63%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	486654 Points +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (296746 - 527820, n=5)	469996 Points +58%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	71.4 fps
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	33.9 (9.36^min - 74.72^max) fps -53%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	44.62 fps -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (71.4 - 71.6, n=2)	71.5 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	63 fps
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	31.12 (11.09^min - 63.1^max) fps -51%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	28.5 fps -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (42.3 - 63, n=2)	52.7 fps -16%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	85.6 fps
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	29.22 (4.07^min - 95.16^max) fps -66%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	45.28 fps -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)	84.9 fps -1%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4607 Score
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4997 Score +8%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4986 Score +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (4607 - 4957, n=3)	4783 Score +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +26%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4779 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5607 Points +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5389 Points +13%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4992 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4112 Points -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (4764 - 4915, n=5)	4815 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +31%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9281 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	14189 Points +53%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	9309 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	9294 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8870 Points -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (8843 - 9478, n=5)	9209 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +9%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3775 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2350 Points -38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6130 Points +62%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5091 Points +35%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2661 Points -30%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (3775 - 4497, n=5)	4037 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +78%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10803 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	16996 Points +57%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10112 Points -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10618 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9318 Points -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (10646 - 10803, n=5)	10744 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +55%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	1378 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1745 Points +27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1462 Points +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	1236 Points -10%
Sony Xperia 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1300 Points -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (1270 - 1439, n=5)	1351 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +13%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	129.1 Points +155%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	119.3 Points +136%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	65.9 Points +30%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	62.4 Points +23%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)	59.5 Points +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5)	53.8 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	50.6 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	301.9 Points +238%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	115.5 Points +29%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	115.4 Points +29%
Sony Xperia 1	110.8 Points +24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 96.2, n=5)	92.8 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	89.3 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	153 runs/min +144%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	133.6 runs/min +113%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	74.1 runs/min +18%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)	66.4 runs/min +6%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)	64.2 runs/min +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80)	62.8 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 64.4, n=4)	60.4 runs/min -4%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	181 Points +110%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points +71%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	119 Points +38%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)	106 Points +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 102, n=5)	94.4 Points +10%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	93 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	86 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	49388 Points +173%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +103%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	23999 Points +33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	23568 Points +30%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)	23318 Points +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 20022, n=5)	19019 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	18094 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	2488 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2294 - 2511, n=5)	2387 ms * +4%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)	2134 ms * +14%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)	2040 ms * +18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	1963 ms * +21%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +36%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)	571 ms * +77%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S20+	Huawei Mate 30 Pro	OnePlus 7T Pro	Sony Xperia 1	Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		7%	-38%	-57%	-7%	48%
Sequential Read 256KB	1603	1781 11%	1489 -7%	750 -53%	1520 ?(1406 - 1692, n=13) -5%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 14%
Sequential Write 256KB	694	401.8 -42%	405 -42%	206.9 -70%	546 ?(213 - 740, n=13) -21%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 105%
Random Read 4KB	199.6	226.4 13%	169 -15%	147.3 -26%	206 ?(170.1 - 253, n=13) 3%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 39%
Random Write 4KB	229.8	259.2 13%	26 -89%	24.16 -89%	193.9 ?(29.9 - 271, n=13) -16%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 35%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	66.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	82.5 ?(Nano Memory Card) 24%		31.34 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -53%	67.3 ?(34.6 - 81.6, n=8) 1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	57.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	69.2 ?(Nano Memory Card) 20%		27.84 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -52%	55.7 ?(30.7 - 66.4, n=8) -3%

Samsung Galaxy S20+; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.17.0: Ø59.5 (54-61)

Samsung Galaxy S20+; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.17.0: Ø39.6 (23-42)

Samsung Galaxy S20+; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø60.1 (60-61)

Samsung Galaxy S20+; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø60 (48-61)

Samsung Galaxy S20+; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.1.2a: Ø58.6 (39-61)

Samsung Galaxy S20+; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.1.2a: Ø57.1 (12-61)

Max. Load

Idle


44.6 °C	43.9 °C	40.4 °C
44.7 °C	44.2 °C	40.4 °C
44.8 °C	42.9 °C	39.8 °C

Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 42.9 °C


38.1 °C	42.2 °C	42.3 °C
37.9 °C	42.9 °C	43.6 °C
37.6 °C	42.3 °C	42.9 °C

Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 41.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S20+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	1 / 1.7 / 2.3 Watt
Load	5.8 / 11.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh	OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh	Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 990	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-1%	22%	-40%	22%	13%	13%
Idle Minimum *	1	0.92 8%	0.87 13%	2.1 -110%	1 -0%	0.846 ?(0.65 - 1, n=5) 15%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 10%
Idle Average *	1.7	2.9 -71%	1.75 -3%	3 -76%	1.48 13%	1.534 ?(1.06 - 1.91, n=5) 10%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Maximum *	2.3	2.94 -28%	1.83 20%	3.5 -52%	1.56 32%	1.858 ?(1.49 - 2.3, n=5) 19%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 30%
Load Average *	5.8	3.65 37%	3.85 34%	5.3 9%	3.76 35%	5.14 ?(4.72 - 5.8, n=5) 11%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -11%
Load Maximum *	11.8	6.18 48%	6.64 44%	8.3 30%	8.48 28%	10.7 ?(9.99 - 11.8, n=5) 9%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) 19%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		34h 01min
WiFi Websurfing		13h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 18min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 38min

	Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh	OnePlus 7T Pro 4085 mAh	Sony Xperia 1 3330 mAh
Battery Runtime		42%	6%	11%	-27%
Reader / Idle	2041	2618 28%	2174 7%	2015 -1%	1067 -48%
H.264	978	1346 38%	1098 12%	957 -2%	712 -27%
WiFi v1.3	794	909 14%	823 4%	912 15%	441 -44%
Load	218	408 87%	219 0%	283 30%	246 13%

Pros

+ 屏幕非常亮

+ 120 Hz用着舒服

+ 现代的UI

+ 快速Wi-Fi

+ 8K视频录制...

Cons

- ...但是没有自动对焦

- 对1080p以上的60 FPS视频的限制

- 网络性能不佳

- 重负荷下的降频

- 预装软件多

Verdict - Camera weaknesses

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

在三星以7999元推出它之后不久，Galaxy S20 +的价格已经大幅下跌。无疑，这对消费者来说是个好消息，因为他们可以通过花更少的钱来获得相同的智能手机。但是，欧洲客户将收到无法发挥其潜力的Galaxy S20 +。主要原因是三星为该设备配备了Exynos 990，它的内部芯片组在许多领域都没有达到Snapdragon 865的水平。简而言之，与Snapdragon 865相比，欧洲Galaxy S20 +的5G连接更差，在负载下的降频严重，并且CPU性能更差。总体而言，配备高通骁龙865的Galaxy S20 +版本是两款设备中最好的。

至少Exynos SoC的续航现在正在慢慢接近竞争水平。不过，Exynos 990在持续负载下比较耗电。即使是Galaxy S20 +，您都不应该期望三星拥有一流的充电技术，因为三星将其保留给了Galaxy S20 Ultra。总的来说，与S20 Ultra相比，Galaxy S20和Galaxy S20 Plus都感觉像是大幅阉割版。

这主要是由于三星提供的相机。如果没有真正的光学变焦，三星似乎会觉得8K视频功能优先于合适的远摄镜头。但是，该公司对8K视频录制施加了许多限制，例如无法缩放或使用自动对焦。同样，三星限制以1080p及以上的分辨率拍摄60帧FPS视频时可以使用哪些选项。

虽然Galaxy S20 +拍照表现还算可以，但相机上的省略仍然令人遗憾。One UI 2.1感觉很现代，并包含最新的安全补丁，而该设备具有明亮且响应迅速的AMOLED屏幕。

三星Galaxy S20 +使用了特殊技巧来隐藏相机的弱点。不过，其出色的屏幕仍然值得一看。

简而言之，如果您想要最好的相机智能手机，应该去看看别家的。三星将为您提供高质量的旗舰产品，该产品可凭借其Wi-Fi，良好的通话质量，出色的GPS精度，令人印象深刻的制造质量和超长的续航来为您提供惊喜。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy S20+ - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

52 / 70 → 74%

Weight

90%

Battery

90%

Display

92%

Games Performance

57 / 64 → 88%

Application Performance

75 / 86 → 87%

Temperature

85%

Noise

100%

Audio

80 / 90 → 89%

Camera

78%

Average

81%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11107 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 451873 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S20+智能手机评测：有8K视频能力的手持设备

Florian Schmitt, 2020-06- 6 (Update: 2020-06- 7)

Device comparison

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy S20+ audio analysis

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

Pros

Cons

Verdict - Camera weaknesses

More articles related to this device

Price comparison