Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy S20+智能手机评测：有8K视频能力的手持设备

天才旗舰？

三星Galaxy S20 Plus提供的功能比Galaxy S20多。屏幕更大，电池更大，还多了一个后置摄像头。推出价格从7999元起，您应该对Galaxy S20 +充满期待。因此，我们将详细测试Galaxy S20 +，以了解其功能。
Android ARM Smartphone Galaxy S
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Galaxy S20 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 524 PPI, 10点触控, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: USB-C上的音频, Card Reader: 1 TB的microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计，陀螺仪，接近传感器，指南针，气压计
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS: Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 8. LTE: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 161.9 x 73.7
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f / 1.8，相位对比AF（双像素），OIS，LED闪光灯（1号摄像头）；64 MPix f / ‐2.0，相位检测AF，OIS，视频@ 4320p / 24fps（2号摄像头）; 12 MP，f / 1.8，相位检测自动对焦（双像素），OIS，LED闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix , f/2.2, 相位检测自动对焦（双像素），视频@ 2160p / 30fps
Additional features
Speakers: 游戏启动器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 快速充电器，USB Type-C电缆，S-Pen，SIM工具, 24 Months Warranty, LTE速度：下载-LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 8CA 2 Gbps； 上传-Cat.20 3CA 316 Mbps。 SAR值：身体– 1.57 W / kg，头部– 0.376 W / kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
188 g, Power Supply: 59 g
Price
1000 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
87.7 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2020
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11		188 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.70"3200x1440
87.1 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU		226 g64 GB SSD6.50"2688x1242
89 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16		198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
86.9 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2019
OnePlus 7T Pro
SD 855+, Adreno 640		206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
84.7 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2025
Sony Xperia 1
SD 855, Adreno 640		178 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"3840x1644
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (923min - 995max) MBit/s +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (584min - 715max) MBit/s -26%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
863 (759min - 898max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (461min - 625max) MBit/s -32%
Sony Xperia 1
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
531 (414min - 620max) MBit/s -38%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (311min - 375max) MBit/s -59%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (912min - 1092max) MBit/s +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (468min - 602max) MBit/s -36%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
835 (808min - 847max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 1
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
617 (356min - 662max) MBit/s -26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (550min - 597max) MBit/s -31%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (347min - 505max) MBit/s -44%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S20+; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø835 (808-847)
Samsung Galaxy S20+; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø863 (759-898)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
9.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20+: 8.46 ∆E min: 3.48 - max: 13.24 ∆E
ColorChecker
20.8 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
18 ∆E
27 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20+: 24.59 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 31.82 ∆E
728
cd/m²		736
cd/m²		770
cd/m²
738
cd/m²		740
cd/m²		771
cd/m²
732
cd/m²		742
cd/m²		767
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 771 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 747.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 740 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.269
Samsung Galaxy S20+
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"		Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.5"		OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"		Sony Xperia 1
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5"
Screen
10%
-21%
-21%
17%
Brightness middle
740
790
7%
592
-20%
606
-18%
541
-27%
Brightness
747
790
6%
605
-19%
611
-18%
543
-27%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
96
2%
95
1%
99
5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.6
1.4
46%
2.5
4%
3.46
-33%
0.8
69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.57
3.4
26%
5.5
-20%
5.64
-23%
1.7
63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
1.9
-27%
2.6
-73%
2
-33%
1.2
20%
Gamma
2.269 97%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.258 97%
2.2 100%
CCT
6284 103%
6466 101%
6173 105%
6779 96%
6601 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 214 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 214 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 214 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | Basemark GPU 1.1 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
944 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1326 Points +40%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=5)
929 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=167, last 2 years)
1080 Points +14%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2899 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3476 Points +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=5)
2800 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=167, last 2 years)
3638 Points +25%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=168, last 2 years)
131.8 Points +160%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.1 Points +155%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.9 Points +30%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.4 Points +23%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
59.5 Points +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5)
53.8 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
50.6 Points

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S20+Huawei Mate 30 ProOnePlus 7T ProSony Xperia 1Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
7%
-38%
-57%
-7%
60%
Sequential Read 256KB
1603
1781
11%
1489
-7%
750
-53%
1520 ?(1406 - 1692, n=13)
-5%
2002 ?(269 - 4512, n=190, last 2 years)
25%
Sequential Write 256KB
694
401.8
-42%
405
-42%
206.9
-70%
546 ?(213 - 740, n=13)
-21%
1613 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=190, last 2 years)
132%
Random Read 4KB
199.6
226.4
13%
169
-15%
147.3
-26%
206 ?(170.1 - 253, n=13)
3%
283 ?(47.6 - 504, n=190, last 2 years)
42%
Random Write 4KB
229.8
259.2
13%
26
-89%
24.16
-89%
193.9 ?(29.9 - 271, n=13)
-16%
324 ?(9.4 - 964, n=190, last 2 years)
41%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
66.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.5 ?(Nano Memory Card)
24%
31.34 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-53%
67.3 ?(34.6 - 81.6, n=8)
1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
57.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.2 ?(Nano Memory Card)
20%
27.84 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-52%
55.7 ?(30.7 - 66.4, n=8)
-3%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S20+; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.17.0: Ø59.5 (54-61)
Samsung Galaxy S20+; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.17.0: Ø39.6 (23-42)
Samsung Galaxy S20+; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø60.1 (60-61)
Samsung Galaxy S20+; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø60 (48-61)
Samsung Galaxy S20+; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.1.2a: Ø58.6 (39-61)
Samsung Galaxy S20+; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.1.2a: Ø57.1 (12-61)
Max. Load
 44.6 °C43.9 °C40.4 °C 
 44.7 °C44.2 °C40.4 °C 
 44.8 °C42.9 °C39.8 °C 
Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 42.9 °C
38.1 °C42.2 °C42.3 °C
37.9 °C42.9 °C43.6 °C
37.6 °C42.3 °C42.9 °C
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 41.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.348.92537.543.2312931.24031.631.25033.235.46328.329.98023.322.510023.323.312524.230.416020.541.52001948.225017.652.231516.954.440016.256.850016.463.363018.36680016.166100014.770.9125014.274.3160014.776.1200013.976.2250014.376.4315014.975.3400014.875.3500015.371.4630014.967.380001570.41000015.572.31250016.469.3160001672.4SPL75.372.427.585.6N3326.1160.9median 16.1median 69.3median 14.2median 73.2Delta4.510.413.312.332.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.39.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S20+Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.7 / 2.3 Watt
Load midlight 5.8 / 11.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh		Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh		Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh		OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh		Sony Xperia 1
3330 mAh		Average Samsung Exynos 990
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-1%
22%
-40%
22%
13%
10%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.92
8%
0.87
13%
2.1
-110%
1
-0%
0.846 ?(0.65 - 1, n=5)
15%
0.872 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=163, last 2 years)
13%
Idle Average *
1.7
2.9
-71%
1.75
-3%
3
-76%
1.48
13%
1.534 ?(1.06 - 1.91, n=5)
10%
1.435 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=163, last 2 years)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
2.94
-28%
1.83
20%
3.5
-52%
1.56
32%
1.858 ?(1.49 - 2.3, n=5)
19%
1.583 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=163, last 2 years)
31%
Load Average *
5.8
3.65
37%
3.85
34%
5.3
9%
3.76
35%
5.14 ?(4.72 - 5.8, n=5)
11%
6.97 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years)
-20%
Load Maximum *
11.8
6.18
48%
6.64
44%
8.3
30%
8.48
28%
10.7 ?(9.99 - 11.8, n=5)
9%
10.4 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years)
12%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 01min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 18min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 38min
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh		Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh		Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh		OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh		Sony Xperia 1
3330 mAh
Battery Runtime
42%
6%
11%
-27%
Reader / Idle
2041
2618
28%
2174
7%
2015
-1%
1067
-48%
H.264
978
1346
38%
1098
12%
957
-2%
712
-27%
WiFi v1.3
794
909
14%
823
4%
912
15%
441
-44%
Load
218
408
87%
219
0%
283
30%
246
13%

Pros

+ 屏幕非常亮
+ 120 Hz用着舒服
+ 现代的UI
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ 8K视频录制...

Cons

- ...但是没有自动对焦
- 对1080p以上的60 FPS视频的限制
- 网络性能不佳
- 重负荷下的降频
- 预装软件多

Verdict - Camera weaknesses

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
The Samsung Galaxy S20+ smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

在三星以7999元推出它之后不久，Galaxy S20 +的价格已经大幅下跌。无疑，这对消费者来说是个好消息，因为他们可以通过花更少的钱来获得相同的智能手机。但是，欧洲客户将收到无法发挥其潜力的Galaxy S20 +。主要原因是三星为该设备配备了Exynos 990，它的内部芯片组在许多领域都没有达到Snapdragon 865的水平。简而言之，与Snapdragon 865相比，欧洲Galaxy S20 +的5G连接更差，在负载下的降频严重，并且CPU性能更差。总体而言，配备高通骁龙865的Galaxy S20 +版本是两款设备中最好的。

至少Exynos SoC的续航现在正在慢慢接近竞争水平。不过，Exynos 990在持续负载下比较耗电。即使是Galaxy S20 +，您都不应该期望三星拥有一流的充电技术，因为三星将其保留给了Galaxy S20 Ultra。总的来说，与S20 Ultra相比，Galaxy S20和Galaxy S20 Plus都感觉像是大幅阉割版。

这主要是由于三星提供的相机。如果没有真正的光学变焦，三星似乎会觉得8K视频功能优先于合适的远摄镜头。但是，该公司对8K视频录制施加了许多限制，例如无法缩放或使用自动对焦。同样，三星限制以1080p及以上的分辨率拍摄60帧FPS视频时可以使用哪些选项。

虽然Galaxy S20 +拍照表现还算可以，但相机上的省略仍然令人遗憾。One UI 2.1感觉很现代，并包含最新的安全补丁，而该设备具有明亮且响应迅速的AMOLED屏幕。

三星Galaxy S20 +使用了特殊技巧来隐藏相机的弱点。不过，其出色的屏幕仍然值得一看。

简而言之，如果您想要最好的相机智能手机，应该去看看别家的。三星将为您提供高质量的旗舰产品，该产品可凭借其Wi-Fi，良好的通话质量，出色的GPS精度，令人印象深刻的制造质量和超长的续航来为您提供惊喜。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy S20+ - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 74%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
92%
Games Performance
57 / 64 → 88%
Application Performance
75 / 86 → 87%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
78%
Average
81%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S20+智能手机评测：有8K视频能力的手持设备
Florian Schmitt, 2020-06- 6 (Update: 2024-11- 4)