Notebookcheck Logo

三星 Galaxy S5 Neo 智能手机简短评测

新修订。来自三星的Galaxy S5 Neo是前代旗舰Galaxy S5的新版本。它可以成为最新的Galaxy S6的实惠型替代品吗?
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo (Galaxy S Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, 电容式,10点触控, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.1 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机插口, Card Reader: microSD (最大支持128 GB), Sensors: 位置传感器,加速传感器,光线传感器,陀螺仪,近距传感器,磁感仪, Wi-Fi Direct, ANT+, NFC, USB-OTG, GPS, GLOANSS, 体辐射值: 0.583 W/kg 头辐射值: 0.457 W/kg, FM 收音机
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (800, 850, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz)
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 142 x 72.5
Battery
11 Wh Lithium-Ion, 2800 mAh, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 15 h
Operating System
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Webcam: 500万像素,主相机:1600万像素(自动对焦,LED闪光灯)全高清视频拍摄@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器 (7.75 瓦), USB数据线, 耳机, 快速开始说明, Galaxy Apps, S Health, S Planner, S Voice, Smart Manager, Microsoft OneNote, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
145 g, Power Supply: 53 g
Price
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

151.8 mm 74.9 mm 9.85 mm 178 g148 mm 75 mm 10.9 mm 169 g144.9 mm 71.8 mm 6.4 mm 147 g143.4 mm 70.5 mm 6.8 mm 138 g142 mm 72.5 mm 8.1 mm 145 g142 mm 72.5 mm 8.1 mm 145 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Galaxy S5 Neo: Complete
Galaxy S5 Neo: Complete
Galaxy S5 Neo: Crossing
Galaxy S5 Neo: Crossing
Galaxy S5 Neo: Turning point
Galaxy S5 Neo: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Complete
Garmin Edge 500: Complete
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Turning Point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning Point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
361
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 361 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 341 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 334 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.91 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.01
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
-28%
4%
-15%
-1%
-4%
Brightness middle
334
358
7%
335
0%
453
36%
451
35%
641
92%
Brightness
341
364
7%
345
1%
439
29%
446
31%
620
82%
Brightness Distribution
91
82
-10%
89
-2%
91
0%
90
-1%
93
2%
Black Level *
0.28
0.3
0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.84
5.28
-86%
2.51
12%
4.7
-65%
3.84
-35%
5.37
-89%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.91
4.65
-60%
2.59
11%
5.03
-73%
3.97
-36%
6.01
-107%
Gamma
2.01 109%
2.48 89%
2.43 91%
2.27 97%
2.46 89%
2.44 90%
CCT
6432 101%
7690 85%
6424 101%
7439 87%
7283 89%
7806 83%
Contrast
1618
1503
1603
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
72.04
58.07
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90.14

* ... smaller is better

AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
37854 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6
60804 Points +61%
Huawei P8
45927 Points +21%
OnePlus 2
58535 Points +55%
Motorola Moto X Play
29699 Points -22%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3330 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5
2885 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S6
5073 Points +52%
Huawei P8
2955 Points -11%
OnePlus 2
4154 Points +25%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
721 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5
941 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S6
1146 Points +59%
Huawei P8
698 Points -3%
OnePlus 2
1066 Points +48%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8
3458 Points
OnePlus 2
4804 Points
Motorola Moto X Play
2558 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8
864 Points
OnePlus 2
1140 Points
Motorola Moto X Play
717 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
1350 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
1777 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
1660 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
1267 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
2686 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 2
2151 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
1503 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6
1320 Points -12%
OnePlus 2
1517 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
169 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6
1152 Points +582%
OnePlus 2
846 Points +401%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
211 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6
1186 Points +462%
OnePlus 2
938 Points +345%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
1453 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6
1553 Points +7%
OnePlus 2
1414 Points -3%
Motorola Moto X Play
974 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
272 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6
1492 Points +449%
OnePlus 2
1854 Points +582%
Motorola Moto X Play
178 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
332 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6
1505 Points +353%
OnePlus 2
1734 Points +422%
Motorola Moto X Play
218 Points -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
10424 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5
15198 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S6
18649 Points +79%
Huawei P8
10494 Points +1%
OnePlus 2
10985 Points +5%
Motorola Moto X Play
6839 Points -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
7536 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5
19530 Points +159%
Samsung Galaxy S6
23193 Points +208%
Huawei P8
8743 Points +16%
OnePlus 2
31858 Points +323%
Motorola Moto X Play
7796 Points +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
8030 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5
18367 Points +129%
Samsung Galaxy S6
22002 Points +174%
Huawei P8
9080 Points +13%
OnePlus 2
22400 Points +179%
Motorola Moto X Play
7561 Points -6%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
10270 Points
Huawei P8
9404 Points -8%
Motorola Moto X Play
6841 Points -33%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4449 Points
Huawei P8
6064 Points +36%
Motorola Moto X Play
5082 Points +14%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
5090 Points
Huawei P8
6584 Points +29%
Motorola Moto X Play
5390 Points +6%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
10466 Points
Huawei P8
9337 Points -11%
Motorola Moto X Play
6799 Points -35%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
8304 Points
Huawei P8
10515 Points +27%
Motorola Moto X Play
10194 Points +23%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
8704 Points
Huawei P8
10228 Points +18%
Motorola Moto X Play
9176 Points +5%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5
11.7 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy S6
16 fps +233%
Huawei P8
5.8 fps +21%
OnePlus 2
23 fps +379%
Motorola Moto X Play
6.2 fps +29%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5
11.8 fps +146%
Samsung Galaxy S6
22 fps +358%
Huawei P8
5.5 fps +15%
OnePlus 2
23 fps +379%
Motorola Moto X Play
5.8 fps +21%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3.4 fps
OnePlus 2
19 fps +459%
Motorola Moto X Play
4.4 fps +29%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3.1 fps
OnePlus 2
19 fps +513%
Motorola Moto X Play
4.2 fps +35%
PCMark for Android
Computer Vision score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play
1756 Points
Storage score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play
3900 Points
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play
3293 Points
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4134 Points
Huawei P8
4479 Points +8%
OnePlus 2
4282 Points +4%
Motorola Moto X Play
3589 Points -13%
Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3500 points
Samsung Galaxy S5
4432 points +27%
Huawei P8
4340 points +24%
OnePlus 2
4325 points +24%
Motorola Moto X Play
2523 points -28%
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
6719 points
Samsung Galaxy S5
9054 points +35%
Huawei P8
5433 points -19%
OnePlus 2
10472 points +56%
Motorola Moto X Play
3820 points -43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
733 Points
Huawei P8
694 Points -5%
OnePlus 2
923 Points +26%
Motorola Moto X Play
710 Points -3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
488 Points
Huawei P8
882 Points +81%
OnePlus 2
2631 Points +439%
Motorola Moto X Play
785 Points +61%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
569 Points
Huawei P8
1216 Points +114%
OnePlus 2
1297 Points +128%
Motorola Moto X Play
595 Points +5%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
2095 Points
Huawei P8
1860 Points -11%
OnePlus 2
2536 Points +21%
Motorola Moto X Play
1177 Points -44%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
808 Points
Huawei P8
1085 Points +34%
OnePlus 2
1681 Points +108%
Motorola Moto X Play
701 Points -13%
Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
247.7 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy S5
678 MFLOPS +174%
Huawei P8
272.5 MFLOPS +10%
OnePlus 2
819 MFLOPS +231%
Motorola Moto X Play
275 MFLOPS +11%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
95.6 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy S5
355 MFLOPS +271%
Huawei P8
122 MFLOPS +28%
OnePlus 2
630 MFLOPS +559%
Motorola Moto X Play
134 MFLOPS +40%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S6 Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei P8 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
735 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
408.7 ms * +44%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
546 ms * +26%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1164 ms * -58%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
740 ms * -1%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1235 ms * -68%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3627 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3875 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8518 Points +135%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4084 Points +13%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6955 Points +92%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3764 Points +4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11603 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6302 ms * +46%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11808 ms * -2%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6585 ms * +43%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11694 ms * -1%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3765 Points
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4419 Points +17%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7650 Points +103%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3917 Points +4%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
68 Points
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
70 Points +3%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
80 Points +18%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56 Points -18%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
23.1 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
49.19 Points +113%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.29 Points +92%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
24.51 Points +6%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11.07 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1 MB/s -91%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
19.9 MB/s +80%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10.04 MB/s -9%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13.94 MB/s +26%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16 MB/s +45%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.57 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 MB/s -62%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
80 MB/s +254%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.46 MB/s 0%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21.87 MB/s -3%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16 MB/s -29%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
57.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
19.05 MB/s -67%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
138.9 MB/s +140%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.58 MB/s -32%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
125.5 MB/s +117%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
75 MB/s +30%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
215.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
83.5 MB/s -61%
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
319 MB/s +48%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
139.9 MB/s -35%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
234.2 MB/s +8%
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
139 MB/s -36%
Max. Load
 33 °C33 °C31.4 °C 
 33.5 °C32.7 °C31.3 °C 
 32.4 °C31.2 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 33.5 °C
Average: 32.1 °C
31.3 °C34 °C32.5 °C
30.8 °C31 °C30.5 °C
29.7 °C30.2 °C30.1 °C
Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 31.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.9 °C | Room Temperature 22.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.08 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.68 / 2.2 / 2.33 Watt
Load midlight 4.09 / 5.92 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
46%
32%
6%
14%
11%
Idle Minimum *
1.68
0.3
82%
0.4
76%
0.7
58%
0.6
64%
0.9
46%
Idle Average *
2.2
0.5
77%
0.6
73%
2
9%
1.7
23%
1.6
27%
Idle Maximum *
2.33
1.1
53%
1.2
48%
2.1
10%
1.8
23%
1.8
23%
Load Average *
4.09
3.1
24%
5
-22%
4.9
-20%
5.7
-39%
4.9
-20%
Load Maximum *
5.92
6.2
-5%
6.8
-15%
7.4
-25%
6
-1%
7.2
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 55min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 38)
9h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 42min
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Play
Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-20%
-21%
-36%
-29%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1615
1695
5%
1300
-20%
826
-49%
1393
-14%
1145
-29%
H.264
773
556
-28%
581
-25%
580
-25%
742
-4%
WiFi v1.3
546
475
-13%
434
-21%
356
-35%
674
23%
Load
402
253
-37%
278
-31%
215
-47%
229
-43%
174
-57%
WiFi
613
575

Pros

+ 坚固的机身
+ 防尘防水
+ 出色的屏幕
+ 优秀的相机
+ 可更换电池
+ microSD卡槽
+ 优秀的电池续航时间
+ 低发热量

Cons

- 性能相比前代产品更弱
- 处理器在持续负载下降频
- 视频拍摄选项较少
- 取消了指纹识别器
In review: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

三星Galaxy S5 Neo可以说是一种高水平的“废物利用”。上一代的旗舰机型在一些方面得到了改进,不过处理器的性能有所降低,一些功能也被去掉了。

Galaxy S5 Neo的优势依然是坚固的机身,出色的屏幕,完备的软件系统和超长的电池续航。这款智能手机依然防水,不过不再需要烦人的保护盖了。三星也改进了它的相机——最终效果相当不错。只是它的视频拍摄选项十分有限。和最新旗舰S6系列不同的事,你可以更换电池以及通过microSD卡槽拓展存储空间。

三星Galaxy S5 Neo是一款具备优秀核心功能的精致智能手机。如果你会满意它的塑料机身,也不需要最快的性能的话,那么S5 Neo会是很好的选择。

我们没有发现它有任何的严重问题。让人遗憾的是它的3D性能相比前代产品明显落后,而且一些功能也被省去了。我们希望它至少能搭配指纹识别器。不过330欧元(约2339人民币)对于一款这样全面的设备来说依然是十分不错的售价。老款的Galaxy S5在一些店家售价约350到380欧元(约2481人民币到2693人民币),不过如果不是需要额外的功能或玩大型游戏的话,Galaxy S5 Neo还是更胜一筹。

 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里 

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo - 12/04/2015 v4 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
46 / 60 → 77%
Weight
93%
Battery
95%
Display
87%
Games Performance
57 / 63 → 90%
Application Performance
38 / 70 → 54%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
79%
Average
77%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星 Galaxy S5 Neo 智能手机简短评测
Andreas Osthoff, 2015-12-20 (Update: 2015-12-30)