三星 Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) 平板电脑简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 542 cd/m²
Contrast: 797:1 (Black: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.42
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | LG G Pad II 10.1 AH-IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 TFT, 1024x768, 9.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -10% | -18% | -4% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 542 | 392 -28% | 343 -37% | 355 -35% | 394 -27% |
| Brightness | 520 | 385 -26% | 328 -37% | 367 -29% | 392 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 88 -3% | 89 -2% | 80 -12% |
| Black Level * | 0.68 | 0.59 13% | 0.38 44% | 0.53 22% | 0.51 25% |
| Contrast | 797 | 664 -17% | 903 13% | 670 -16% | 773 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4.5 -7% | 6.86 -63% | 3.2 24% | 3.59 15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.7 | 7.8 -16% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 4.8 -0% | 6.95 -45% | 4.36 9% | 4.25 11% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.47 89% | 2.32 95% | 2.2 100% | 2.56 86% |
| CCT | 7434 87% | 7426 88% | 7249 90% | 7240 90% | 7148 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 105 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 58 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 47 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.02 / 0.12 Watt |
| Idle |  1.18 / 4.65 / 4.74 Watt |
| Load |
5.75 / 6.97 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 6600 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 mAh | LG G Pad II 10.1 7400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -45% | -43% | -13% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2634 | 1230 -53% | 1564 -41% | 1676 -36% | 2950 12% |
| H.264 | 893 | 593 -34% | 532 -40% | 1020 14% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 826 | 416 -50% | 485 -41% | 782 -5% | 862 4% |
| Load | 428 | 248 -42% | 221 -48% | 325 -24% | 297 -31% |
Pros
Cons
三星Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016)相比前代机型三星 Galaxy Tab A 9.7更加强劲。它的屏幕现在提供了1920x1200像素（16:10）而不再是1024x768像素（4:3）的分辨率，不过在尺寸上只是略大（10.1寸相比9.7寸）。520 cd/m²的平均亮度也相比Galaxy Tab A 9.7大有提高（392 cd/m²）。它的其它优势还有八核Exynos 7870 Octa处理器，为安卓6.0保证了流畅的使用体验。甚至是一些对显卡要求较高的游戏也可以流畅运行。归功于更大容量的电池，它的续航时间也相比Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016)有所提，一次充电可以使用很长时间。
相比前作更强劲的处理器，更明亮的屏幕，全高清分辨率以及更优秀的电池续航都是三星Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016)所得到的改进。
这台Galaxy平板的LTE版本由于价位实惠而特别吸引人。正在寻找搭配安卓6、LTE模组和全高清屏幕的设备的用户目前除了这台Galaxy平板外并没有其它的选择。未搭配LTE模组的机型售价低50欧元（约374人民币）。
不过，较低的售价也意味着它需要在一些方面节约成本。16 GB闪存只有10.5 GB空余空间可供用户使用，对于多媒体用途来说这显得十分紧张。它的相机模组也有些让人失望，拍摄质量只能算是一般般。它位于底部的扬声器位置还算可以，不过当用户横屏使用的时候声音就将只会从平板一边发出了。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
- 08/15/2016 v5.1 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
