Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy Tab Active Pro (LTE, SM-T545)平板电脑评测：拥有超长续航的户外专家

根本玩不坏。

10.1英寸的三星Galaxy Tab Active Pro在很大程度上可以防尘和防水，甚至可以更换电池，从而确保了非常长的续航。 最重要的是，这台坚固的平板电脑具有令人惊讶的广泛功能，包括三星S笔，NFC，指纹读取器和出色的13-MP相机。
Android Tablet Touchscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Galaxy Tab Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 8 x 2 GHz, Kryo 360 Gold / Silver
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Memory
4 GB 
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, 电容式触摸屏, native pen support, TFT, WUXGA，16毫米。 颜色，S笔支持, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米音频插孔, Card Reader: microSDXC（最大512GB，FAT，FAT32，exFAT, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计 ，气压计，指纹读取器，位置传感器，Compas，霍尔传感器，接近传感器, ANT +，WiFi Direct，三星智能开关，三星DeX，DRM Widevine Level 1，Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM（850，900，1.800，1.900 MHz），UMTS （频段1、2、4、5、8），LTE（频段1、2、3、4、5、7、8、12、17、20、28、38、40、41、66），单卡 ，机身SAR 1.057 W / Kg, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.9 x 243.5 x 170.2
Battery
28.88 Wh, 7600 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, Samsung EB-BT545ABY
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 1 / 3.4“，f / 2.0,8倍数码变焦，照片最高可达4128x3096（4：3），视频最高可达3,840 x 2,160 / 30 FPS（UHD）
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 视频高达1,920 x 1,080 / 30 FPS（全高清）
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 模块化15瓦AC适配器（USB-A，9V / 1.56A或5V / 2A），USB电缆（Type A至Type C），Samsung S Pen，电池，保护盖，快速 指南，保修信息, OneUI 1.5, 24 Months Warranty, IP68, DRM Widevine L1, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
653 g, Power Supply: 35 g
Price
679 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
83.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
SD 670, Adreno 616		653 g9.9 mm10.10"1920x1200
85.4 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2020
Apple iPad 7 2019
A10 Fusion, A10 Fusion GPU		483 g7.5 mm10.20"2160x1620
79.4 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2020
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
SD 439, Adreno 505		580 g23 mm10.10"1920x1200
81.3 %
v6 (old)
11 / 2017
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1		512 g13 mm8.00"1280x800
83.1 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3		467 g7 mm10.40"2000x1200

Size Comparison

❌
242 mm 166 mm 23 mm 580 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 7.5 mm 483 g243.5 mm 170.2 mm 9.9 mm 653 g244.5 mm 154.3 mm 7 mm 467 g238 mm 133 mm 13 mm 512 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 (319min - 335max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
260 MBit/s -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
231 (114min - 380max) MBit/s -30%
Apple iPad 7 2019
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
229 (160min - 286max) MBit/s -30%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
223 (143min - 310max) MBit/s -32%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
613 (300min - 633max) MBit/s +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
348 (334min - 353max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
315 MBit/s -9%
Apple iPad 7 2019
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
225 (43min - 264max) MBit/s -35%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (100min - 233max) MBit/s -53%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (334-353)
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (319-335)
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro: overview
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro: overview
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro: lake
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro: lake
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro: turning point
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Notebookcheck-Maskottchen (Szene 1)Schloss (Szene 2)Schloss-Ansicht bei 5-fachem Zoom (Szene 3)Lowlight-Umgebung (Szene 4)
ColorChecker
4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545: 5.42 ∆E min: 1.85 - max: 9.04 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
63.8 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
75.3 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
42 ∆E
91.1 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545: 46.72 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 91.08 ∆E
553
cd/m²		585
cd/m²		535
cd/m²
546
cd/m²		601
cd/m²		554
cd/m²
525
cd/m²		552
cd/m²		537
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 601 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 554.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 601 cd/m²
Contrast: 897:1 (Black: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
94.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1"		Apple iPad 7 2019
IPS, 2160x1620, 10.2"		Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"		Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
TFT LCD, 1280x800, 8"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
TFT, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Screen
25%
-5%
-9%
-25%
Brightness middle
601
499
-17%
392
-35%
509
-15%
503
-16%
Brightness
554
470
-15%
359
-35%
477
-14%
477
-14%
Brightness Distribution
87
87
0%
88
1%
91
5%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.67
0.49
27%
0.36
46%
0.48
28%
0.29
57%
Contrast
897
1018
13%
1089
21%
1060
18%
1734
93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.2
0.97
56%
2.7
-23%
3.45
-57%
4.4
-100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
1.98
64%
5.4
2%
5.17
6%
10.4
-89%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.2
0.9
72%
3.8
-19%
4.5
-41%
7.5
-134%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.135 103%
2.24 98%
2.11 104%
2.19 100%
CCT
7129 91%
6571 99%
7276 89%
7171 91%
7700 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 61350 Hz ≤ 36 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 61350 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 36 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 61350 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8516 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.2 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 7 2019
777 Points +133%
Average of class Tablet (103 - 2224, n=73, last 2 years)
765 Points +130%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
345 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (333 - 350, n=3)
344 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
333 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (303 - 10522, n=73, last 2 years)
2846 Points +99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
1429 Points
Apple iPad 7 2019
1426 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1331 - 1429, n=3)
1368 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1207 Points -16%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (452 - 10879, n=18, last 2 years)
2929 Points +299%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1477 Points +101%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
735 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (639 - 735, n=2)
687 Points -7%
Vulkan Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (89 - 9161, n=18, last 2 years)
2708 Points +335%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
1081 Points +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (623 - 640, n=3)
633 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
623 Points

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Qualcomm Adreno 616, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad 7 2019 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Samsung Exynos 9611, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
 
Average of class Tablet
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=70, last 2 years)
124.1 Points +280%
Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13)
76.2 Points +133%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=4)
33 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96)
32.69 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
27.46 Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
16.3 Points -50%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705FSamsung Galaxy Tab Active 2Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 LiteAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
3%
-33%
182%
6%
443%
Sequential Read 256KB
294.5
295.6
0%
218.1
-26%
483.7
64%
274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=206)
-7%
1193 ?(126.9 - 3912, n=75, last 2 years)
305%
Sequential Write 256KB
207.5
238.9
15%
54
-74%
219.3
6%
177.3 ?(40 - 274, n=206)
-15%
834 ?(78.2 - 3387, n=75, last 2 years)
302%
Random Read 4KB
71.2
64.8
-9%
25.96
-64%
119.8
68%
59.9 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=206)
-16%
200 ?(18.4 - 474, n=75, last 2 years)
181%
Random Write 4KB
18.75
16.76
-11%
10.98
-41%
195.8
944%
32.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=206)
74%
203 ?(8.23 - 668, n=75, last 2 years)
983%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
78.6
4%
78.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144)
2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
64.3
6%
65.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144)
-4%
Asphalt 9: Legends & PUBG Mobile
051015202530Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545; PUBG Mobile; 0.18.0: Ø29.7 (11-32)
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.2.2a: Ø28.8 (22-31)
Max. Load
 30.3 °C29.1 °C27.5 °C 
 30.6 °C27.2 °C25.9 °C 
 27.8 °C26.9 °C25.6 °C 
Maximum: 30.6 °C
Average: 27.9 °C
27.8 °C27.2 °C28.2 °C
25.2 °C26.2 °C28 °C
24.1 °C25.7 °C26.9 °C
Maximum: 28.2 °C
Average: 26.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.536.12529.430.73122.827.64025.323.95030.234.66323.324.38021.926.81001932.912519.638.71601949.920016.149.425018.953.631516.658.640014.359.95001559.263015.261.680014.364.6100014.365.9125014.264.2160014.863.1200014.864.7250014.470.3315014.376.3400014.674.9500014.763.7630014.958.2800014.960.51000014.659.91250014.852.51600015.448.1SPL26.881.5N0.945.4median 14.8median 59.9Delta0.75.736.944.735.838.933.536.134.936.636.137.23131.922.526.223.93421.543.419.650.21852.31752.8165614.658.91562.117.965.116.464.316.27013.4701572.814.569.514.167.113.862.314.164.814.36613.975.214.573.814.26714.25514.460.263.127.181.617.30.951median 15median 62.3median 66.33.5815.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545Apple iPad 7 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad 7 2019 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.34 / 4.43 / 4.52 Watt
Load midlight 5.91 / 7.91 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
7600 mAh		Apple iPad 7 2019
 mAh		Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
7000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
7040 mAh
Power Consumption
-69%
3%
31%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
1.34
2.2
-64%
1.28
4%
0.89
34%
1.21
10%
Idle Average *
4.43
6.7
-51%
4.5
-2%
3.13
29%
4.24
4%
Idle Maximum *
4.52
8.2
-81%
4.59
-2%
3.36
26%
4.34
4%
Load Average *
5.91
11.3
-91%
5.71
3%
3.93
34%
6.99
-18%
Load Maximum *
7.91
12.5
-58%
6.99
12%
5.45
31%
8.79
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
44h 53min
WiFi Websurfing
16h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 28min
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
7600 mAh		Apple iPad 7 2019
 mAh		Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
7000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite
7040 mAh
Battery Runtime
-40%
-24%
-30%
-21%
Reader / Idle
2693
1486
-45%
2083
-23%
1357
-50%
2120
-21%
H.264
1230
802
-35%
919
-25%
493
-60%
950
-23%
WiFi v1.3
990
707
-29%
795
-20%
895
-10%
792
-20%
Load
388
196
-49%
288
-26%
396
2%
309
-20%

Pros

+ 非常稳定的机身
+ IP68认证
+ 附带S笔
+ 三星DeX
+ NFC，WiFi 5，蓝牙5.0
+ 精确的GPS
+ 白天的录像很好
+ 续航时间很长
+ 可更换电池

Cons

- 高重量
- 目前仅配备Android 9
- 声音比较薄弱
- 高价

总结——价格高昂但好用的特殊用途板：

Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

三星Galaxy Active Pro厚重而坚固的外壳可能不是设计最精美的平板电脑-但这绝不是这款坚固耐用的Android的目的。该设备可在其他平板电脑挤兑的市场里蓬勃发展-在具有挑战性的使用条件下。

如果您正在寻找户外使用的平板电脑，您会发现Galaxy Tab Active Pro是可靠且持久的伴侣。可更换电池在增加了另一个相当独特的功能。三星还包括了S-Pen，考虑到LTE版本的690美元的高价，这已经足够公平了。 Wi-Fi-Version并不便宜多少，要价600美元。

三星Galaxy Tab Active Pro是强大的伙伴，具有许多出色的功能。不幸的是，它也相当昂贵。

该平板电脑当前运行Android 上，但有望在2020年9月收到对Android 10的更新。三星还承诺，自产品于10月发布以来，将对Wi-Fi和LTE版本的软件进行四年的更新。

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 - 06/12/2020 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
72 / 80 → 90%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
66 / 70 → 95%
Weight
81 / 40-88 → 85%
Battery
91%
Display
86%
Games Performance
19 / 78 → 24%
Application Performance
58 / 92 → 63%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 91 → 88%
Camera
61 / 85 → 72%
Average
76%
84%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Tab Active Pro (LTE, SM-T545)平板电脑评测：拥有超长续航的户外专家
Manuel Masiero, 2020-08-15 (Update: 2020-08-15)