三星 Galaxy View 平板电脑简短评测
Samsung Galaxy View
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
2048 MB
Display
18.40 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 120 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 25.06 GB free
Weight
2.65 kg, Power Supply: 303 g
Price
649 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| Samsung Galaxy View | Chuwi Hi12 | Wiko Lenny 3 | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | OnePlus 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Networking | -78% | -79% | 32% | 21% | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | 254 | 44.8 -82% | 303 19% | 286 13% | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | 200 | 43 -78% | 49.2 -75% | 290 45% | 256 28% |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 488 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 435.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.74 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 468 cd/m²
Contrast: 821:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.45
| Samsung Galaxy View IPS, 1920x1080, 18.4" | Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9" | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L IPS, 2560x1600, 10.1" | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 11% | 21% | 37% | 6% | 26% | |
| Brightness middle | 468 | 334 -29% | 358 -24% | 399 -15% | 429 -8% | 389.2 -17% |
| Brightness | 435 | 341 -22% | 357 -18% | 393 -10% | 434 0% | 392 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 91 14% | 86 8% | 92 15% | 82 3% | 92 15% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.22 61% | 0.35 39% | 0.27 53% | ||
| Contrast | 821 | 1814 121% | 1226 49% | 1441 76% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 2.84 43% | 1.78 64% | 2.96 41% | 4.61 8% | 3.61 28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.3 | 9.28 -27% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 2.91 50% | 1.38 76% | 3 48% | 6.64 -14% | 3.8 34% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.01 109% | 2.24 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.42 91% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 7676 85% | 6432 101% | 6366 102% | 7049 92% | 6929 94% | 5969 109% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 71.15 | 63 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.87 | 97 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
PCMark for Android | AnTuTu v6 | Geekbench 3 | BaseMark OS II | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | 3DMark
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy View | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Real Racing 3 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 35 fps | ||
| low | 58 fps | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.04 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle |  4.73 / 17.09 / 17.19 Watt |
| Load |
18.71 / 20.41 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy View 64.6 Wh | Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo 11 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 22 Wh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 39 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L 23 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 77% | 59% | 38% | 7% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 4.73 | 1.68 64% | 2.3 51% | 2.69 43% | 8.6 -82% | |
| Idle Average * | 17.09 | 2.2 87% | 4.5 74% | 10.95 36% | 11.26 34% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 17.19 | 2.33 86% | 5 71% | 11.14 35% | 11.3 34% | |
| Load Average * | 18.71 | 4.09 78% | 9.4 50% | 11.54 38% | 14.57 22% | |
| Load Maximum * | 20.41 | 5.92 71% | 10.4 49% | 12.8 37% | 14.9 27% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy View 64.6 Wh | Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo 11 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 22 Wh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 39 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L 23 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 37% | -3% | 27% | 16% | -27% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1026 | 1615 57% | 918 -11% | 1933 88% | 1261 23% | 791 -23% |
| H.264 | 534 | 773 45% | 651 22% | 630 18% | 644 21% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 521 | 546 5% | 393 -25% | 695 33% | 558 7% | 488 -6% |
| Load | 289 | 402 39% | 291 1% | 195 -33% | 323 12% | 138 -52% |
Pros
+ 大尺寸触控屏幕
+ 高速microSD卡槽
+ 支持USB-OTG和App2SD
+ 高速无线网
+ 明亮的屏幕可视角度范围大
+ 不错的电池续航
+ 集成支架...
Cons
- ...只能提供两个角度
- 机身采用硬质塑料
- 不支持Miracast或MHL
- 仅可用横屏模式
- 视频应用不太适用
- 仅210万像素摄像头
- 按键较为粗糙
- 不均匀的屏幕亮度分布
- 遥控器功能仅支持部分型号
三星的Galaxy View是一款与众不同的超大尺寸18.4寸触控平板电脑。它的触控屏幕也是它最引人注目的功能：它的便携性受到高重量、大尺寸和无法简单取下的支架的限制；同时它也受到这个特点的限制，只能在横屏模式使用、没有后置相机。尽管稳定性不错，但由于硬质塑料的材质和粗糙的按键，它的机身使用起来并不是特别舒适。
三星调整了Galaxy View软件的一些部分，它们对于已有的安卓用户界面并没有很大的帮助。它搭配独立的数字键盘区的触控键盘十分实用，而新的主屏幕和格子设计显得不是很精致。用户不能添加新服务也无法移除无用的链接。
它的优势包括高速无线模组，高速microSD卡槽，尽管屏幕很大也有不错的电池续航。这台设备因此主要对多媒体爱好者比较有趣，作为可以一定程度上移动的网络视频播放设备，由于控制界面较大也十分易于使用，也不是总需要连接充电器，能够吸引较小的一个用户群体。
由于较高的重量和较大的尺寸，三星Galaxy View主要为可以接受牺牲功能性和便携性换取大尺寸触控屏幕设计。
如果你可以接受较小的屏幕尺寸，可以考虑一下三星 Galaxy Tab S2 9.7。它更加强大，更轻也更精致，搭配了优秀的AMOLED屏幕，售价也更加实惠。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Samsung Galaxy View
- 07/20/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Kilian
Tablet - Weighted Average
Price comparison
