三星 Galaxy View 平板电脑简短评测

Name: Samsung Galaxy View
Brand: Samsung

白色巨人。 得力于18.4寸的屏幕，三星Galaxy View在众多平板中独树一帜。不过这也影响了它的重量和尺寸。这样一台平板能够适合实际使用吗？

Andreas Kilian, ✓ Stefanie Voigt, Published 08/04/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Samsung Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy View

Processor

Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memory

2048 MB

Display

18.40 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 120 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 25.06 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米立体声接口, Card Reader: microSD 最大支持 128 GB, Brightness Sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 11.9 x 451.8 x 275.8

Battery

64.6 Wh, 5700 mAh

Operating System

Android 5.1 Lollipop

Camera

Webcam: 全高清 (定焦 f/2.2, 1080p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器, Microsoft Apps, Galaxy Apps, Smart Manager, SideSync, S Console, Family Square, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

2.65 kg, Power Supply: 303 g

Price

649 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Samsung Galaxy View Apple iPad Pro 12.9 Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo DIN A4 ❌

	Samsung Galaxy View	Chuwi Hi12	Wiko Lenny 3	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	OnePlus 3
Networking		-78%	-79%	32%	21%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m	254		44.8 -82%	303 19%	286 13%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m	200	43 -78%	49.2 -75%	290 45%	256 28%


414 cd/m²	414 cd/m²	390 cd/m²
488 cd/m²	468 cd/m²	427 cd/m²
458 cd/m²	451 cd/m²	406 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 488 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 435.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.74 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 468 cd/m²
Contrast: 821:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.45

	Samsung Galaxy View IPS, 1920x1080, 18.4"	Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 9.7"	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"	Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L IPS, 2560x1600, 10.1"	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3"
Screen		11%	21%	37%	6%	26%
Brightness middle	468	334 -29%	358 -24%	399 -15%	429 -8%	389.2 -17%
Brightness	435	341 -22%	357 -18%	393 -10%	434 0%	392 -10%
Brightness Distribution	80	91 14%	86 8%	92 15%	82 3%	92 15%
Black Level *	0.57			0.22 61%	0.35 39%	0.27 53%
Contrast	821			1814 121%	1226 49%	1441 76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5	2.84 43%	1.78 64%	2.96 41%	4.61 8%	3.61 28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.3				9.28 -27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.8	2.91 50%	1.38 76%	3 48%	6.64 -14%	3.8 34%
Gamma	2.45 ^90%	2.01 ^109%	2.24 ^98%	2.21 ^100%	2.42 ^91%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	7676 ^85%	6432 ^101%	6366 ^102%	7049 ^92%	6929 ^94%	5969 ^109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)				71.15		63
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)				97.87		97

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	4131 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	4134 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	5565 Points +35%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	5152 Points +25%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	42156 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	184346 Points +337%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	70385 Points +67%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	3754 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3330 Points -11%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	732 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	721 Points -2%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	601 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	733 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	648 Points +8%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	1091 Points +82%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	872 Points +45%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	486 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	488 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	1385 Points +185%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	8422 Points +1633%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	1886 Points +288%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	1877 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	2095 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	2867 Points +53%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	6230 Points +232%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	1643 Points -12%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	803 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	808 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	1103 Points +37%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	3282 Points +309%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	1325 Points +65%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	14 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	14 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	29 fps +107%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	59.3 fps +324%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	20 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	13 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	14 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	38 fps +192%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	163.2 fps +1155%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	34 fps +162%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	4.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	4.8 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	17 fps +262%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	80.1 fps +1604%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	18 fps +283%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	4.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	4.8 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	12 fps +145%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	33.3 fps +580%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	8.5 fps +73%

GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	3.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3.1 fps 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	83 fps +2577%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	11 fps +255%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	3.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3.4 fps 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	54.3 fps +1497%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	5.8 fps +71%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	8072 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	8030 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	19867 Points +146%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	33812 Points +319%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	20081 Points +149%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	7457 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	7536 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	20482 Points +175%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	51124 Points +586%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	21327 Points +186%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	11358 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	10424 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	17981 Points +58%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	15473 Points +36%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	16673 Points +47%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy View Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 Apple A9X, Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)

Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30, Intel HD Graphics 515, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	11146 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	11603 ms * -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	6483 ms * +42%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	1499 ms * +87%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	4472 ms * +60%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3	1556 ms * +86%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	4022 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3627 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	6885 Points +71%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	19852 Points +394%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	8197 Points +104%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	69 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	68 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	79 Points +14%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	215 Points +212%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	111 Points +61%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	24.4 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	23.1 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	41.12 Points +69%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	142 Points +482%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	41 Points +68%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5 | BaseMark OS II

AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	21.35 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	22.57 MB/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	25.56 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	23.7 MB/s +11%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	10.66 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	11.07 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	9.82 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	10.57 MB/s -1%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	49.97 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	57.9 MB/s +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	49.37 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	51 MB/s +2%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	218.8 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	215.9 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	248.2 MB/s +13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	153.7 MB/s -30%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	51 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	15.93 MB/s -69%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	77.9 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	56.4 MB/s -28%

BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View	760 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	569 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	590 Points -22%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	2027 Points +167%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L	1141 Points +50%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	29 fps
	very low	30 fps

Real Racing 3
	Settings	Value
	high	35 fps
	low	58 fps

Max. Load

Idle


35.1 °C	35.1 °C	36.2 °C
29.2 °C	32.9 °C	36.5 °C
31.4 °C	33.4 °C	35.5 °C

Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 33.9 °C


33.9 °C	35.1 °C	35.8 °C
41.2 °C	33.9 °C	29.3 °C
40.3 °C	34.7 °C	31.4 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 35.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 37.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	4.73 / 17.09 / 17.19 Watt
Load	18.71 / 20.41 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy View 64.6 Wh	Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo 11 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 22 Wh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 39 Wh	Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L 23 Wh
Power Consumption		77%	59%	38%	7%
Idle Minimum *	4.73	1.68 64%	2.3 51%	2.69 43%	8.6 -82%
Idle Average *	17.09	2.2 87%	4.5 74%	10.95 36%	11.26 34%
Idle Maximum *	17.19	2.33 86%	5 71%	11.14 35%	11.3 34%
Load Average *	18.71	4.09 78%	9.4 50%	11.54 38%	14.57 22%
Load Maximum *	20.41	5.92 71%	10.4 49%	12.8 37%	14.9 27%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		17h 06min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 51)		8h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 54min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 49min

	Samsung Galaxy View 64.6 Wh	Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo 11 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE 22 Wh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 39 Wh	Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L 23 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh
Battery Runtime		37%	-3%	27%	16%	-27%
Reader / Idle	1026	1615 57%	918 -11%	1933 88%	1261 23%	791 -23%
H.264	534	773 45%	651 22%	630 18%	644 21%
WiFi v1.3	521	546 5%	393 -25%	695 33%	558 7%	488 -6%
Load	289	402 39%	291 1%	195 -33%	323 12%	138 -52%

Pros

+ 大尺寸触控屏幕

+ 高速microSD卡槽

+ 支持USB-OTG和App2SD

+ 高速无线网

+ 明亮的屏幕可视角度范围大

+ 不错的电池续航

+ 集成支架...

Cons

- ...只能提供两个角度

- 机身采用硬质塑料

- 不支持Miracast或MHL

- 仅可用横屏模式

- 视频应用不太适用

- 仅210万像素摄像头

- 按键较为粗糙

- 不均匀的屏幕亮度分布

- 遥控器功能仅支持部分型号

In review: Samsung Galaxy View (SM-T670). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.

三星的Galaxy View是一款与众不同的超大尺寸18.4寸触控平板电脑。它的触控屏幕也是它最引人注目的功能：它的便携性受到高重量、大尺寸和无法简单取下的支架的限制；同时它也受到这个特点的限制，只能在横屏模式使用、没有后置相机。尽管稳定性不错，但由于硬质塑料的材质和粗糙的按键，它的机身使用起来并不是特别舒适。

三星调整了Galaxy View软件的一些部分，它们对于已有的安卓用户界面并没有很大的帮助。它搭配独立的数字键盘区的触控键盘十分实用，而新的主屏幕和格子设计显得不是很精致。用户不能添加新服务也无法移除无用的链接。

它的优势包括高速无线模组，高速microSD卡槽，尽管屏幕很大也有不错的电池续航。这台设备因此主要对多媒体爱好者比较有趣，作为可以一定程度上移动的网络视频播放设备，由于控制界面较大也十分易于使用，也不是总需要连接充电器，能够吸引较小的一个用户群体。

由于较高的重量和较大的尺寸，三星Galaxy View主要为可以接受牺牲功能性和便携性换取大尺寸触控屏幕设计。

如果你可以接受较小的屏幕尺寸，可以考虑一下三星 Galaxy Tab S2 9.7。它更加强大，更轻也更精致，搭配了优秀的AMOLED屏幕，售价也更加实惠。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Samsung Galaxy View - 2016-07-20 07/20/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis

72%

Keyboard

82 / 80 → 100%

Pointing Device

79%

Connectivity

31 / 65 → 47%

Weight

59 / 40-88 → 40%

Battery

91%

Display

81%

Games Performance

15 / 68 → 23%

Application Performance

40 / 76 → 53%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

69 / 91 → 76%

Camera

55 / 85 → 65%

Average

66%

71%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星 Galaxy View 平板电脑简短评测

Andreas Kilian, 2016-08- 4 (Update: 2016-08-11)