Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD笔记本电脑评测。下一代4K OLED
技嘉Aero系列专注于多媒体以及内容创作;因此,它试图满足图形设计师和媒体设计师的高要求。在Aero系列中也有一些游戏空间,因为自从Nvidia给予制造商影响RTX 30XX显卡性能(TDP)的自由后,强大的GPU,如我们评测单元中发现的RTX 3070
,也找到了一个位置。由于外部变化不大,我们将在评测的相应部分参考对技嘉Aero 15 OLED XC的评价。
我们选择下面列出的竞争设备进行比较,在每个部分下都可以添加额外的笔记本电脑。
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
85 % v7 (old) | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
85 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 27.2 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2021 | Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 除了微小的修改外,与前代产品完全相同
由于机箱与前代产品相比没有太大变化,我们在此参考Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC。只有显示屏盖子表面的图案发生了变化。另外值得一提的是,当开孔高度在10厘米左右或以下时,盖子会自动关闭。此外,显示屏盖子的上边框是凹进去的,这使得抬起盖子更容易。
尺寸和重量也没有变化。如果将测试设备与竞争对手相比,Aero 15 OLED XD以最低的重量和两厘米的高度脱颖而出。
连接性 - 相同的端口,升级到Thunderbolt 4
Aero 15 OLED XD配备了一个创作者可能需要的所有端口。其中包括一个完整的SD读卡器和一个以太网端口。事实上,技嘉已经成功地将一个完整的以太网端口整合到薄薄的机箱中,这是非常了不起的然而,不幸的是,除了增加了Thunderbolt 4端口外,与前代产品相比没有任何变化。我们希望端口能更好地放在右边,因为当电源适配器、Thunderbolt 4端口和两个USB Type-A端口都在使用时,用鼠标工作就很困难。不幸的是,技嘉牺牲了整个后部,以支持冷却系统,至少电源通常在这里。
SD卡阅读器
Aero 15 OLED XD有一个成熟的SD读卡器,在使用我们的128GB UHS-II AV PRO V60 microSD参考存储卡时能提供良好的效果。前代产品在相同的读取速度下,使用东芝Exceria Pro的性能要高出10%左右。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Aorus 15P XC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Alienware m15 R4 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware m15 R4 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Aorus 15P XC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) |
沟通
Gigabyte继续使用英特尔AX200 WLAN模块,它支持蓝牙5.1和Wi-Fi 6等(速率仍比前代产品略高)。相比之下,华硕TUF Gaming A15在数据传输测试中比我们的审查样本高出19%,在数据接收测试中甚至高出整整40%。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=127) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1684, n=128) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC |
网络摄像头
网络摄像头位置的选择在我们方面引起了一些疑问。虽然这里有一个手动开关来隐藏网络摄像头,但与机箱相比,它的质量较差。此外,它还提供了一个不利于从下面观看的角度。任何依赖网络摄像头的人都希望这里有一个更好的摄像头。最重要的是,有足够的空间来安装更大的传感器,从而提高分辨率。在我们看来,为了至少提供一个正常位置的网络摄像头,可以放弃顶部区域的狭窄显示屏边框。
维护
为了能够打开机箱,需要卸下12颗Torx TR6螺丝。与前代产品一样,其中两个被密封条覆盖。根据经验判断,技嘉可能想增加打开设备的难度,或者在保修情况下表明设备是否被打开过。这也使得更换SSD、内存和WLAN模块变得困难。其他组件的更换也不容易,而且不费吹灰之力。至少技嘉充分利用了Aero 15的空间,允许用户因此而安装第二块M.2固态硬盘。
担保
德国技嘉为用户提供两年的保修期。如果你想延长保修期,你必须在网上注册该设备。
输入设备 - 键盘再次缺乏对特殊字符的照明
键盘
Aero 15 OLED XD有一个全尺寸的键盘,按键大小正常。用户将体验到相当粘稠的打字体验,以及相当差和不精确的压力点。键盘的音量一般,敏感的用户可能会觉得太吵。我们注意到在轻按空格键时有 "吱吱 "的噪音。此外,它感觉非常摇晃,在输入较长的文字段落时经常导致打错。当涉及到单独的RGB照明时,技嘉可能已经从其前辈那里学到了东西,因为键盘的特殊字符再次没有被照亮。因此,在夜间或光线不足的情况下,很难甚至不可能识别特殊字符,我们发现这一点很令人讨厌。此外,该键盘非常容易受到指纹的影响。
触摸板
与前代产品一样,触摸板结构紧凑,但具有良好的滑行性能。集成的指纹传感器进一步阻碍了已经很小的触摸板的使用。集成的鼠标按钮有一个清晰的压力点和体面的反馈。触摸板也很容易受到指纹的影响。
显示屏--神奇的4K OLED面板,60赫兹
所使用的4K AMOLED面板的分辨率为3840x2160像素,并具有Pantone X-Rite认证,这使得该设备对设计师和专业图像编辑特别有吸引力。由此产生的色彩准确性与OLED面板相结合,提供了一个非常好的画面。Gigabyte在这里几乎得到了所有的东西,因为高分辨率在显示屏上提供了更多的空间。这在编辑视频时也很明显,例如在Adobe Premiere中使用较长的时间线。
不幸的是,没有120赫兹选项。内置面板只有60赫兹的刷新率,这使用户在玩快节奏游戏时处于不利地位。
如同OLED面板的惯例,亮度是通过PWM调节的。由于这里的频率很低,为240赫兹,用户在较长的工作流程中会出现眼睛疲劳、头痛和恶心的情况。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 440 cd/m²
Contrast: 11000:1 (Black: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.57
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.206
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Samsung SDC4143, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T Sharp SHP1532, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR LQ156M1JW25, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 SDC4143, OLED + IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -23% | -0% | 0% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 67.7 -32% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 94.3 -6% | 100 0% | 100 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.5 | 68.2 -31% | 98.5 -1% | 99.7 0% | |
Response Times | -69% | -277% | 8% | -27% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.8 ? | 12 ? -329% | 8.2 ? -193% | 2.4 ? 14% | 2.4 ? 14% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 8 ? -300% | 9.2 ? -360% | 1.8 ? 10% | 2.4 ? -20% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 1250 ? 421% | 240 ? 0% | 59.5 ? -75% | |
Screen | -72% | -103% | -3% | -20% | |
Brightness middle | 440 | 297 -32% | 308 -30% | 442 0% | 345 -22% |
Brightness | 446 | 268 -40% | 288 -35% | 452 1% | 332 -26% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 84 -9% | 86 -7% | 95 3% | 87 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.04 | 0.22 -450% | 0.23 -475% | 0.05 -25% | |
Contrast | 11000 | 1350 -88% | 1339 -88% | 8840 -20% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.53 | 1.36 46% | 3.28 -30% | 2.69 -6% | 3.3 -30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.82 | 3.82 51% | 8.51 -9% | 8.27 -6% | 7.2 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.57 | 0.83 68% | 2.59 -1% | 2.6 -1% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.88 -57% | 5 -317% | 0.9 25% | 2 -67% |
Gamma | 2.206 100% | 2.48 89% | 2.057 107% | 2.172 101% | 2.01 109% |
CCT | 6371 102% | 6768 96% | 7393 88% | 6434 101% | 6566 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 68 | 99 | 89.2 | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 90 | 100 | 100 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -71% /
-72% | -134% /
-110% | 2% /
-0% | -16% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
光滑的4K显示屏非常锐利,所有其他数值,如黑度和对比度,也由于OLED技术而提供了出色的成绩。通过我们的测量,我们还可以确认,这款笔记本电脑非常适用于数字图像和视频编辑。覆盖率分别为100%和99.5%,sRGB和AdobeRGB色彩空间(几乎)被完全覆盖。
当涉及到显示亮度时,你在这里得到了很好的率。亮度分布为92%,根据我们的独立测量,最大亮度约为446 cd/m²。
Aero 15 OLED XD可以在户外使用,但你应该找一个阴凉的地方,因为该显示器提供了高亮度,但它也是反光的。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ≤ 83 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 83 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于采用了OLED面板,Aero 15的可视角度在各个方向上都很好。
性能 - 面向未来的性能包
我们的测试设备配备了一个英特尔酷睿i7-11800H ,一个笔记本版本的GeForce RTX 3070,TDP为105瓦,以及一个NVMe SSD。此外,还有32GB的DDR4-3200内存,以双通道模式运行。通过这套方案,技嘉为客户提供了足够的性能,适用于所有常见的多媒体应用,以及视频和图像编辑所需的所有性能要求高的程序。
处理器
这里使用的处理器是英特尔酷睿i7-11800H :英特尔目前的Tiger Lake 组合中的一个八核CPU,适用于游戏笔记本以及工作站。八个处理器核心可以在2,300 MHz至4,600 MHz的时钟速率下运行,并处理多达16个线程。
技嘉特意选择了Tiger Lake ,而不是AMD,是考虑到创作者。由于英特尔的快速同步技术,视频编辑的速度更快。提供的性能非常高,但它不能完全跟上AMD 5900HX。
仔细观察里面的硬件发现,该芯片组已经配备了被动冷却装置。除此之外,技嘉在这里使用了Windforce Infinity Next Gen冷却系统,它配备了四根热管,其中两根分担GPU和CPU的废热。这两个锋利的风扇有71个叶片。
我们的CPU基准测试文章,显示了其他笔记本电脑的性能是否能在比较中跟上。
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (520 - 586, n=47) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (2498 - 5408, n=50) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (201 - 231, n=46) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1342 - 2173, n=50) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Alienware m15 R4 |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (217 - 454, n=46) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1429 - 1625, n=40) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (4655 - 9851, n=40) | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (7.38 - 17.4, n=46) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (38.6 - 59.9, n=45) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (0.548 - 0.615, n=46) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
在PCMark 10基准测试中,它模拟了计算机上的日常工作,然后根据不同的类别来衡量设备的强大程度,我们的测试设备显示了出色的成绩。所有的竞争设备在总分上都被超越了。有趣的是,这里使用的11800H与32GB的DDR4-3200内存和快速的NVMe SSD相结合,甚至让华硕ROG Strix G15 G513QR与 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (6126 - 7311, n=11) | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9248 - 10832, n=11) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8571 - 9669, n=11) | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7627 - 10851, n=11) | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 |
PCMark 10 Score | 7062 points | |
Help |
DPC延迟
与对笔记本电脑预期的目的相反,Latency-Mon在AI模式下显示出有问题的高DPC延迟,表明该笔记本电脑不适合实时编辑视频和音频文件。经过仔细检查,我们发现这可能是由于控制中心的设置造成的。在创造者、游戏和AI模式下,根据该工具,数值太高。显然,唯一的解决办法是打开涡轮模式,虽然这很吵。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR |
* ... smaller is better
储存
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -35% | -42% | -56% | ||
Write 4K | 231.4 | 182.5 -21% | 126 -46% | 102.8 -56% | |
Read 4K | 89.5 | 73.2 -18% | 44.94 -50% | 51.9 -42% | |
Write Seq | 4208 | 3005 -29% | 2763 -34% | 1625 -61% | |
Read Seq | 4512 | 2358 -48% | 1671 -63% | 1720 -62% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 648 | 389.5 -40% | 451.6 -30% | 313.4 -52% | |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 691 | 463.8 -33% | 552 -20% | 329.4 -52% | |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 5111 | 3166 -38% | 3060 -40% | 1604 -69% | |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 7002 | 3590 -49% | 3192 -54% | 3321 -53% | |
AS SSD | -20% | -28% | -37% | -41% | |
Seq Read | 5357 | 3133 -42% | 2881 -46% | 2331 -56% | 1938 -64% |
Seq Write | 3978 | 2969 -25% | 1570 -61% | 2312 -42% | 1248 -69% |
4K Read | 50.6 | 55.2 9% | 52.4 4% | 39.13 -23% | 47.35 -6% |
4K Write | 156.2 | 129.7 -17% | 124 -21% | 98.1 -37% | 93.7 -40% |
4K-64 Read | 2465 | 1891 -23% | 1334 -46% | 1663 -33% | 1060 -57% |
4K-64 Write | 3360 | 1795 -47% | 2189 -35% | 2138 -36% | 1932 -42% |
Access Time Read * | 0.08 | 0.052 35% | 0.055 31% | 0.099 -24% | 0.061 24% |
Access Time Write * | 0.027 | 0.028 -4% | 0.03 -11% | 0.038 -41% | 0.04 -48% |
Score Read | 3052 | 2259 -26% | 1675 -45% | 1935 -37% | 1301 -57% |
Score Write | 3914 | 2221 -43% | 2470 -37% | 2468 -37% | 2151 -45% |
Score Total | 8449 | 5630 -33% | 4943 -41% | 5388 -36% | 4092 -52% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1277 | 2903 | 2841 | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 575 | 686 | 613 | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1272 | 1594 | 1391 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -28% /
-26% | -28% /
-28% | -40% /
-39% | -49% /
-48% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
我们对测试设备的配置使用了NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070的笔记本版本,其TDP为105瓦。如果你让技嘉的控制中心的微软Azure AI自动管理性能配置文件,就不能实现最大的性能,3DMark的分数甚至比前代产品略低。我们的建议是,对于需要最高性能的标题,手动切换到涡轮模式。在某些情况下,不同性能配置文件的风扇控制没有被优化。在手动切换到游戏模式时,风扇的反应有时不够快,这可能导致不必要的性能下降。
一般来说,我们在电池供电的情况下无法实现全部性能。此外,针对创作者的Nvidia Studio驱动程序完成了它的工作,与游戏驱动程序相比,只有很小的差别。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12535 - 38275, n=54) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7178 - 29128, n=52) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (2644 - 11019, n=53) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 47262 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 25754 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19887 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8565 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
由于RTX 3070的105瓦TDP和伟大的4K显示器,技嘉Aero 15 OLED XD也适用于4K标题。如果你稍微调整一下细节,你将在几乎所有的游戏中实现流畅的帧率。与竞争对手相比,制造商提供的性能有些不稳定,但很高。在一些标题中,我们的测试设备甚至击败了具有更高TDP的设备,如华硕Strix G15 G513QR。不幸的是,Aero 15 OLED XD并没有接近Alienware m15 R4的性能。如果你把它与老款,技嘉Aero 15 OLED XC ,其性能与后继者相同。然而,这里没有120赫兹的面板,而只有一个60赫兹的面板。这或多或少自动取消了笔记本电脑的竞争性游戏资格,因为你必须连接一个外部显示器以防止缺点。
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (122.1 - 207, n=34) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (34.9 - 109, n=52) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (57.9 - 82, n=9) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (50 - 70.5, n=11) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
Far Cry 5 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (35 - 232, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (93 - 137, n=26) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (89 - 140, n=36) | |
Alienware m15 R4 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR |
在我们对TheWitcher 3的测试中,帧率保持不变,只是略有下降。我们没有发现任何重大的帧数下降,与竞争对手相比,我们的测试设备提供了非常好的性能。
The Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 184 | 175 | 159 | 94 | 78.4 | 83.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 339 | 241 | 173 | 91.6 | 64.3 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 158 | 142.2 | 135.8 | 126.7 | 107.1 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 172 | 118 | 88.9 | 66.5 | 39.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 122 | 104 | 84 | 57.8 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 138 | 117 | 111 | 103 | 94 | 51 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 427 | 211 | 173 | 152 | 114 | 68.1 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 119 | 186 | 159 | 132 | 99.8 | 57.7 |
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) | 104 | 89 | 87 | 69 | 56 | 37 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) | 116 | 81 | 67 | 58 | 39 | 17 |
排放 - 热和可变的风扇行为
噪声排放
我们的测试设备在空闲使用和低负载下保持相对安静。不幸的是,风扇的速度在这里也是波动的。只有在会议模式下,Aero 15 OLED XD的风扇才会保持在一个恒定的、只能略微感觉到的水平。我们发现测试中的噪音模式有点高频率,使其在工作时成为一种干扰。在这种情况下,我们建议手动调整风扇曲线并停用技嘉控制中心的AI。虽然风扇在负载下的表现各不相同,但噪音水平仍在可容忍的范围内,只有在特殊情况下才会真正变大。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30 / 32 / 35 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44 / 60 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
温度
Gigabyte在这里专注于以高温为代价的基本安静的操作。由于强大的NVMe固态硬盘是用热垫冷却的,它通过机箱底部传导废热,除了反应缓慢的风扇造成的温度上升外,后者会变得更热。笔记本电脑不仅在极端情况下会变得非常热,而且在闲置使用或浏览网页时也是如此。在这个过程中,键盘表面也会发热,这一点一针见血,使整个情况看起来更加糟糕。
在压力测试中,Aero 15 OLED XD的CPU开始时略高于4,000 MHz,然后稳定在2,900 MHz。一个有趣的方面是温度,它在很短的时间内上升到92℃(约198°F),然后稳定在80℃(约176°F)至90℃(约194°F)。显卡在1,445 MHz和1,155 MHz的时钟频率下保持相对凉爽,最高温度仅达到71 °C(约160 °F)。我们在日常使用中没有发现任何问题,因为这样的极端情况应该很少发生。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
发言人
说到扬声器,技嘉设法在Aero 15 OLED XD中提供了平衡的中音,但几乎没有的低音几乎没有改善。此外,现在的声音听起来并不像在前代产品中那么消沉。我们在这一点上也有共识。Aero 15 OLED XD为VoIP应用或YouTube视频提供了足够的质量,但想要更多的用户将不得不求助于集成音频插孔或蓝牙。
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--现在有了更高的功率消耗
能源消耗
尽管它具有相同的CPU和GPU TDP以及相当的亮度,但与前代产品相比,功耗有所增加。这样一来,最低值为23至34瓦,取决于配置文件和亮度,它甚至超过了华硕ZenBook Pro Duo
。虽然后者的亮度较低,但它有两个显示屏,其中一个是OLED面板,另一个是IPS技术的面板。我们测得负载下的最大消耗为190瓦,与前代产品相比,这是一个进步。技嘉在这里很谨慎,附带的230瓦的电源适配器有足够的容量。
Off / Standby | 0.6 / 1.4 Watt |
Idle | 23 / 26 / 34 Watt |
Load |
99 / 190 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, OLED + IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R4 i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 25% | 14% | 16% | 23% | -39% | 9% | 10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 10.2 56% | 4 83% | 11 52% | 9 61% | 35 -52% | 15.6 ? 32% | 13.6 ? 41% |
Idle Average * | 26 | 12.8 51% | 9 65% | 14 46% | 14 46% | 39 -50% | 20.1 ? 23% | 19 ? 27% |
Idle Maximum * | 34 | 15 56% | 36 -6% | 34 -0% | 15 56% | 48 -41% | 29.4 ? 14% | 26.8 ? 21% |
Load Average * | 99 | 130 -31% | 130 -31% | 95 4% | 107.2 -8% | 135 -36% | 110.8 ? -12% | 106.3 ? -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 163 | 137 16% | 174 -7% | 152 7% | 156 4% | 194 -19% | ||
Load Maximum * | 190 | 184 3% | 227 -19% | 216 -14% | 235 -24% | 252 -33% | 214 ? -13% | 249 ? -31% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during The Witcher 3
电池寿命
与前代产品一样,Aero 15 OLED XD配备了99Wh的电池,提供了允许的最大电池容量,仍然能够登上飞机。如果你比较我们的标准化Wi-Fi测试的速率(网络浏览脚本,150cd/m²亮度),技嘉用它的Tiger Lake 处理器管理了一个体面的8:28小时,这不是你根据耗电率所期望的。这是一个不寻常的高比率,这可能是由于积极的能源管理。然而,在这个测试中,将亮度增加到最大水平,运行时间减少了一半以上。
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 92 Wh | Alienware m15 R4 i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -21% | 35% | -13% | -13% | -68% | -33% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 508 | 399 -21% | 685 35% | 441 -13% | 441 -13% | 164 -68% | 375 ? -26% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 131 | 78.3 ? -40% | |||||
H.264 | 427 | 809 | 492 | 409 ? | |||
Load | 202 | 145 | 100 | 76 | 52 | 85.6 ? | |
Reader / Idle | 1043 | 220 | 565 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决书
制造商希望在最狭小的空间里装入尽可能多的性能,而且它在牺牲高热量的情况下成功地做到了这一点。我们还对技嘉将大量的端口装入仅有两厘米厚的机箱留下了积极的印象。然而,它们在右侧的位置有点不合适。在我们看来,电源可以很容易地移到后面,这样就不会妨碍使用鼠标工作。该公司无疑为内容创作者开发了一个设备,为用户长期提供良好的性能和现代端口。
Tiger Lake ,结合快速的NVMe固态硬盘,通过PCI Express Gen 4连接,削减了一个非常精细的数字。一个成熟的HDMI 2.1端口,Thunderbolt 4,以及可以添加另一个固态硬盘的选项,完善了该套件。全面的SD读卡器和以太网端口也提供了高传输率。NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070提供105瓦的TDP,只要你稍微调整一下细节,甚至可以将4K标题流畅地呈现在屏幕上。与前代产品相比,在我们的标准化Wi-Fi测试中,在测试设备不得不再次插电之前,电池寿命现在多了近2小时。
技嘉Aero 15 OLED XD的第一印象是光彩夺目。简洁、高质量的设计与梦幻般的、非常明亮的OLED显示屏相结合,包括潘通X-Rite认证,以及坚固的铝制底盘,真的很突出。
在我们的测试中,我们发现键盘的粘性是一个负面因素;当长时间打字时,它可能很快导致挫败感。此外,在我们的测试样本中,已经摇摇欲坠的空格键在被轻轻按压时发出吱吱声。在夜间使用键盘可能会变成一场猫捉老鼠的游戏,因为键盘上的特殊字符并没有被照亮。除了表面有点小,我们在触摸板上找不到任何其他弱点。此外,内置的按键具有可感知的、坚实的反馈。不幸的是,需要网络摄像头的用户在这里会感到失望。网络摄像头的位置在显示屏下面,没有给人留下好印象。
迟缓的风扇也是一个缺点,因为它们有时不能及时提供必要的气流,导致高温峰值迅速发展,从而导致CPU节流。
与60赫兹的4K OLED显示屏相比,游戏玩家可能会希望有一个120赫兹的显示屏,因为高帧率正慢慢成为4K领域的标准。由于性能和奇妙的显示屏,我们可以向设计师或专业图像编辑推荐该设备。尽管如此,游戏玩家也没有被排除在外。拥有105瓦的RTX 3070始终提供非常好的性能。
价格和可用性
你可以在亚马逊上找到Aero 15 OLED XD。上找到Aero 15 OLED XD,价格约为1,899美元,尽管它的内存为16GB而不是32GB。同样的版本目前也可在newegg也有同样的价格。
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
- 07/23/2021 v7 (old)
Patrick Schüdzig