Gretel A9 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Gretel A9 | |
Blackview R6 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Gretel A9 | |
Blackview R6 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 380 cd/m²
Contrast: 974:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 8.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.8
Gretel A9 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Blackview R6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Archos 50 Platinum 4G IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo C2 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | ZTE Blade A510 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -4% | -6% | 16% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 380 | 352 -7% | 344 -9% | 458 21% | 528 39% |
Brightness | 370 | 320 -14% | 349 -6% | 449 21% | 524 42% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 81 -10% | 89 -1% | 92 2% | 94 4% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.3 23% | 0.65 -67% | 0.35 10% | 0.62 -59% |
Contrast | 974 | 1173 20% | 529 -46% | 1309 34% | 852 -13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8 | 8.7 -9% | 5.8 27% | 6.5 19% | 5.2 35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.6 | 15.1 -11% | 10.7 21% | 11.7 14% | 8.7 36% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.5 | 10.5 -24% | 5.7 33% | 7.7 9% | 5.7 33% |
Gamma | 2.8 79% | 2.04 108% | 2.1 105% | 2.15 102% | 1.99 111% |
CCT | 8337 78% | 8529 76% | 7792 83% | 8518 76% | 6631 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Blackview R6 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Blackview R6 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Blackview R6 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Blackview R6 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
ZTE Blade A510 |
BaseMark OS II | |
Overall (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
System (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Memory (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Graphics (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Web (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 |
* ... smaller is better
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Gretel A9 | |
Archos 50 Platinum 4G | |
Blackview R6 | |
Lenovo C2 | |
ZTE Blade A510 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Gretel A9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo C2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.01 / 0.22 Watt |
Idle | 0.77 / 1.99 / 2.2 Watt |
Load |
4.99 / 5.14 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Gretel A9 2300 mAh | Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh | Blackview R6 3000 mAh | Lenovo C2 2750 mAh | ZTE Blade A510 2200 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 18% | -12% | 24% | 12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.77 | 0.59 23% | 0.78 -1% | 0.71 8% | 0.61 21% |
Idle Average * | 1.99 | 1.68 16% | 1.63 18% | 1.62 19% | 1.75 12% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.2 | 1.79 19% | 1.84 16% | 1.64 25% | 1.83 17% |
Load Average * | 4.99 | 4.22 15% | 7.47 -50% | 3.24 35% | 4.49 10% |
Load Maximum * | 5.14 | 4.26 17% | 7.47 -45% | 3.36 35% | 5.14 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Gretel A9 2300 mAh | Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh | Blackview R6 3000 mAh | Lenovo C2 2750 mAh | ZTE Blade A510 2200 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -16% | 25% | 55% | -9% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 458 | 384 -16% | 604 32% | 662 45% | 416 -9% |
Load | 174 | 203 17% | 287 65% |
Pros
Cons
Gretel在Notebookcheck上的第一次登场带来了十分有趣的结论。A9是一台不错的入门级智能手机,它提供了同类机型所缺少的一些功能,如内置指纹感应器和大容量闪存。同时虽然不是最优秀的,但它不错的屏幕依然可以通过MiraVision功能得到自定义和改进。它的运算性能中规中矩,但图形性能并不出色:A9不是为游戏所设计的。它的扬声器音量较小,不过并不算最差的,电池续航也说得过去。普通日常使用它应该可以坚持一两天的时间。
不过仍然还有一个没有得到回答的问题:这样一台不足80美元的手机的缺点又在哪里呢?它最大的问题是出在相机上。差值运算成像已经应该是过去的技术了,而它的前置200万像素相机完全无法拍摄正常效果的照片。除了光线很好的情况之外它的相机都几乎无法使用,而视频拍摄也只支持720p分辨率。尽管它的机身品质缺陷在这个价位上司空见惯,但这样的相机可能对于大部分用户来说都无法接受。
入门级的Gretel A9在不足80美元的价位上提供了丰富的功能——指纹感应器,大容量闪存,相对优秀的性能。但低品质的相机可能会让很多用户望而却步。
作为一台仅仅80美元的智能手机,Gretel A9依然十分不错,比同类设备带来了更多的功能,也值得消费者考虑。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Gretel A9
-
06/12/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer