HTC 10 智能手机简短评测
HTC 10 (10 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 4 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Core: 624 MHz
Memory
4 GB
, LPDDR4
Display
5.20 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 565 PPI, 电容式，10点触控, Super LCD 5, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 23.08 GB free
Weight
161 g, Power Supply: 90 g
Price
699 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 445 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 433.7 cd/m² Minimum: 8.25 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 445 cd/m²
Contrast: 1236:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.31
| HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2" | HTC One M9 Super LCD 3, 1920x1080, 5" | Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3" | Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Motorola Moto X Force AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -30% | 0% | 33% | -21% | -5% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 445 | 474 7% | 583 31% | 554 24% | 784 76% | 582 31% | 337 -24% |
| Brightness | 434 | 458 6% | 560 29% | 552 27% | 774 78% | 563 30% | 336 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 85 -9% | 91 -2% | 96 3% | 91 -2% | 91 -2% | 91 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.4 -11% | 0.46 -28% | 0.43 -19% | 0.38 -6% | ||
| Contrast | 1236 | 1185 -4% | 1267 3% | 1823 47% | 1532 24% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 6.32 -126% | 3.55 -27% | 1.59 43% | 6.5 -132% | 4.4 -57% | 3.99 -43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 2.56 56% | 11.7 -102% | 7.4 -28% | 7.07 -22% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 6.36 -72% | 3.88 -5% | 2.01 46% | 8 -116% | 4.8 -30% | 1.66 55% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.43 91% | 2.2 100% | 2.01 109% | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 7164 91% | 8218 79% | 7280 89% | 6321 103% | 8699 75% | 6175 105% | 6584 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.81 | 59.05 | 82.12 | 68.08 | 77.78 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.8 | 99.98 | 97.46 | 99.44 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
AnTuTu v6 | PCMark for Android | Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | BaseMark OS II | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC 10 | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Huawei Mate 8 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Force | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 48 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.03 / 0.27 Watt |
| Idle |  0.68 / 1.49 / 1.91 Watt |
| Load |
7.4 / 9.71 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| HTC 10 3000 mAh | HTC One M9 mAh | LG G5 2800 mAh | Huawei P9 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Google Nexus 6P 3450 mAh | Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 3430 mAh | Motorola Moto X Force 3760 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -18% | 16% | 12% | 61% | 6% | -11% | 26% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1273 | 805 -37% | 1833 44% | 1514 19% | 1663 31% | 1447 14% | 1277 0% | 1610 26% |
| H.264 | 648 | 421 -35% | 600 -7% | 568 -12% | 914 41% | 533 -18% | 411 -37% | 710 10% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 413 | 348 -16% | 387 -6% | 569 38% | 732 77% | 375 -9% | 372 -10% | 426 3% |
| Load | 203 | 236 16% | 267 32% | 206 1% | 392 93% | 280 38% | 210 3% | 330 63% |
| WiFi | 573 |
Pros
+ 简洁的设计
+ 高速处理器
+ 不错的扬声器
+ 丰富的配置
+ 可扩展存储空间
+ 高速micro-SD卡槽
+ USB-C 3.1第一代接口
+ 优秀的屏幕
+ 优秀的相机
+ 出色的耳机
Cons
- 不支持红外传输
- 不支持收音机
- 处理器在负载下降频
- 在手机网络开启时，待机功耗较高
HTC给我们带来了一款出色的高科技旗舰智能手机，这可能让很多人出乎意料。它搭配了绚丽的屏幕，优秀的相机，易用的界面和出色的音响效果。
HTC 10没有什么严重的缺点。让人遗憾的是它没有提供红外传输和广播功能。另外，Snapdragon处理器的降频问题依然存在，但并不严重。它的续航时间略显不足，但也可以满足用户一天使用的需要。
HTC 10：强势回归。
因此，我们并没有什么可以挑剔的。它的设计则要根据用户个人喜好来评判，它的机身工艺非常优秀。HTC的这台智能手机能否取得成功就要看用户的选择了。但无论如何它都是一款优秀的设备。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
HTC 10
- 05/09/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
