HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle 智能手机简短评测

Name: HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle
Brand: HTC

突入中端。 HTC经常尝试在时尚的外观，高品质的声音和出色的相机上得分。因此，HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle 双卡手机在在中端市场上是一款有趣的产品。720P屏幕和相对较慢的SoC能够阻挡这个趋势吗？

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Manuel Masiero (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 12/25/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of HTC Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle (Desire Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 4 x 1.6 GHz @ 1.6 GHz, ARMv7

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 305

Memory

3 GB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, 电容式触摸屏, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 19.97 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD卡最大2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计，距离传感器，罗盘

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B40); Bandwidth (download/upload): 150Mbps/50Mbps (LTE); SAR rates: 0.38 W/kg (head), 0.62 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 156.9 x 76.9

Battery

10.3 Wh, 2700 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 24 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 672 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, AF, LED闪光灯, 录像 @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.8, 录像 @1080p

Additional features

Speakers: 2 扬声器, HTC BoomSound, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 充电器, USB线, 耳机, 手环, Zoe Video, News Republic, Themes, Boost+, 24 Months Warranty, 24 bit hi-res 音频, USB-OTG, FM 收音机, fanless

Weight

155 g, Power Supply: 49 g

Price

299 Euro

Links

HTC homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	298 MBit/s +187%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash	104 MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31.2 MBit/s -70%
iperf3 receive AX12
ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	337 MBit/s +234%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash	101 MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32.9 MBit/s -67%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


365 cd/m²	376 cd/m²	350 cd/m²
360 cd/m²	380 cd/m²	374 cd/m²
363 cd/m²	378 cd/m²	373 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 380 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 368.8 cd/m² Minimum: 15.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 380 cd/m²
Contrast: 1462:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29

	HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	LG Stylus 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.7"	Lenovo Moto G4 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		4%	-5%	7%	3%
Brightness middle	380	328 -14%	370 -3%	609 60%	658 73%
Brightness	369	334 -9%	374 1%	589 60%	633 72%
Brightness Distribution	92	88 -4%	92 0%	87 -5%	93 1%
Black Level *	0.26		0.25 4%	0.63 -142%	0.66 -154%
Contrast	1462		1480 1%	967 -34%	997 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.6	4.6 30%	6.1 8%	3.8 42%	4.9 26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.4	14.7 -41%	16.5 -59%	8.3 20%	9.1 12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.4	2.8 62%	7 5%	3.1 58%	5.8 22%
Gamma	2.29 ^96%	2.29 ^96%	2.25 ^98%	2.06 ^107%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	8665 ^75%	6612 ^98%	8350 ^78%	6725 ^97%	7840 ^83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 44 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	24799 Points
ZTE Axon 7	122524 Points +394%
LG Stylus 2	28232 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	45232 Points +82%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	62484 Points +152%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	441 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1280 Points +190%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	820 Points +86%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	1100 Points
ZTE Axon 7	3867 Points +252%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4042 Points +267%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	4675 Points
ZTE Axon 7	23319 Points +399%
LG Stylus 2	4307 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	9717 Points +108%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13955 Points +199%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	24310 Points
LG Stylus 2	3744 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	9773 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13466 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 7	20408 Points
LG Stylus 2	9085 Points
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	9527 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	15984 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	58 Points
ZTE Axon 7	2698 Points +4552%
LG Stylus 2	53 Points -9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	667 Points +1050%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	842 Points +1352%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	46 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4619 Points +9941%
LG Stylus 2	42 Points -9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	605 Points +1215%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	719 Points +1463%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	813 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1099 Points +35%
LG Stylus 2	728 Points -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	1042 Points +28%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2112 Points +160%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	10 fps
ZTE Axon 7	53 fps +430%
LG Stylus 2	4.9 fps -51%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	18 fps +80%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	21 fps +110%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	5.7 fps
ZTE Axon 7	88 fps +1444%
LG Stylus 2	5.1 fps -11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	17 fps +198%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	23 fps +304%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	4.2 fps
ZTE Axon 7	28 fps +567%
LG Stylus 2	1.8 fps -57%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	7 fps +67%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.7 fps +131%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	2 fps
ZTE Axon 7	39 fps +1850%
LG Stylus 2	3.9 fps +95%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	6.6 fps +230%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.9 fps +395%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	2383 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4970 Points +109%
LG Stylus 2	4030 Points +69%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	Points -100%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6785 Points +185%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	517 Points
ZTE Axon 7	2165 Points +319%
LG Stylus 2	609 Points +18%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	283 Points -45%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1215 Points +135%
System (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	858 Points
ZTE Axon 7	3307 Points +285%
LG Stylus 2	914 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	1359 Points +58%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2923 Points +241%
Memory (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	421 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1489 Points +254%
LG Stylus 2	462 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	604 Points +43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1042 Points +148%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	346 Points
ZTE Axon 7	4631 Points +1238%
LG Stylus 2	324 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	805 Points +133%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1019 Points +195%
Web (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	573 Points
ZTE Axon 7	963 Points +68%
LG Stylus 2	1008 Points +76%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	10 Points -98%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	702 Points +23%

Legend

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 32 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

LG Stylus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	12145 ms *
ZTE Axon 7	3097 ms * +74%
LG Stylus 2	12713 ms * -5%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	11102 ms * +9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	8041 ms * +34%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	2141 Points
ZTE Axon 7	8062 Points +277%
LG Stylus 2	2742 Points +28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	3656 Points +71%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4905 Points +129%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	51 Points
ZTE Axon 7	111 Points +118%
LG Stylus 2	51 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	61 Points +20%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	84 Points +65%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	18.22 Points
ZTE Axon 7	44.75 Points +146%
LG Stylus 2	17.8 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	22.8 Points +25%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	31.12 Points +71%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	149.4 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	406.5 MB/s +172%
LG Stylus 2	130.3 MB/s -13%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	271.4 MB/s +82%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	282 MB/s +89%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	60.6 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	150.9 MB/s +149%
LG Stylus 2	75.9 MB/s +25%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	43.48 MB/s -28%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	188 MB/s +210%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	17.03 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	121.1 MB/s +611%
LG Stylus 2	9.8 MB/s -42%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	36.32 MB/s +113%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	74 MB/s +335%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	7.94 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	16.22 MB/s +104%
LG Stylus 2	7.3 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	35.79 MB/s +351%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	7.4 MB/s -7%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	47.7 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	78.4 MB/s +64%
LG Stylus 2	74.9 MB/s +57%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	74.4 MB/s +56%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	79.2 MB/s +66%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle	29.2 MB/s
ZTE Axon 7	51.3 MB/s +76%
LG Stylus 2	49.73 MB/s +70%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus	46.92 MB/s +61%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	50.1 MB/s +72%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	18 fps

... in comparison

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	29 fps

... in comparison

Max. Load

Idle


35.4 °C	33.6 °C	33.4 °C
37.4 °C	34.1 °C	34.9 °C
35.8 °C	34 °C	33.3 °C

Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 34.7 °C


31.8 °C	33.3 °C	34 °C
32 °C	33.1 °C	36 °C
31.3 °C	34 °C	35.2 °C

Maximum: 36 °C
Average: 33.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 35.8 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		24h 45min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 54min

	HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle 2700 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh	LG Stylus 2 3000 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 3000 mAh	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		2%	5%	6%	34%
Reader / Idle	1485	1735 17%	1225 -18%	1226 -17%	1502 1%
H.264	622	704 13%	697 12%	775 25%	905 45%
WiFi v1.3	574	411 -28%	663 16%	735 28%	797 39%
Load	234	245 5%	258 10%	201 -14%	352 50%

Pros

+ 哑光，相对时尚的外壳

+ 出色的内存配置

+ 双卡

+ 出色的GPS表现

+ 可靠的输入设备

+ 屏幕的优秀对比度

+ 运行温度低

+ hi-res音频

+ 极好的扬声器

Cons

- 弯曲手机时有开裂的声音

- 劣质的麦克风

- 低通话质量

- 不可能升级到Android 7

- 低于平均水平的相机

- 低分辨率屏幕

- 过时低性能处理器

- 低存储访问速率

In review: HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle. Test model courtesy of HTC Germany.

HTC实际上在Desire 10 Lifestyle上做出了一些“激进”的决定，这使得这台手机可能不会合适所用的用户，但的确以较低的价位提供了出色的音频体验。

但首先：在中档价位上，HTC不得不做出一些妥协以加入例如24bit采样率音频等高端功能。屏幕分辨率和亮度都不是很高。电池续航能力仅仅在平均水平而性能表现明显相较该价位平均水平偏低，相机亦无法使人满意。再者由于过时的技术，不能期望它能够更新到最新的版本的Android系统。看重通话质量的用户也应该考虑其他产品。

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle可以被看作一台有着智能手机功能的Hi-Res音乐播放器。不幸的是，性能，摄像，通话质量和软件等方面明显低于平均水平。

那么，它有什么优点呢？HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle提供了相当不错的内存配置，相对来说出色的外壳，GPS模块也不错。输入设备是可靠的。然后当然是声音：扬声器十分出色，通过耳机输出的声音听起来比其他智能手机更动听。

但这些是否足够？对那些不想买或者买不起HTC 10的人来说这只能是个坏消息。他们会得到一台除了有令人兴奋的音频表现之外其余性能都低于平均水平的智能手机。一台真正的Hi-Res播放器，比如来自索尼的产品，价格大概和这台手机相同。这也证明了除了音频功能外这台手机在其余部件上的成本没有多少。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle - 2016-12-09 12/09/2016 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis

79%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

37 / 60 → 62%

Weight

92%

Battery

92%

Display

83%

Games Performance

5 / 63 → 8%

Application Performance

25 / 70 → 36%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

71 / 91 → 78%

Camera

61%

Average

69%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer, 2016-12-25 (Update: 2016-12-25)