Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarHTC U Play 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| HTC U Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| HTC U Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 424 cd/m²
Contrast: 1696:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
| HTC U Play Super LCD, 1920x1080, 5.2" | OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia X LCD, 1920x1080, 5" | Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -24% | -14% | -54% | -10% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle | 424 | 421 -1% | 658 55% | 404 -5% | 485 14% | 451 6% |
| Brightness | 432 | 430 0% | 633 47% | 392 -9% | 481 11% | 443 3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 84 -7% | 93 3% | 91 1% | 90 0% | 93 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.66 -164% | 0.68 -172% | 0.5 -100% | 0.4 -60% | |
| Contrast | 1696 | 997 -41% | 594 -65% | 970 -43% | 1128 -33% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 7.1 -25% | 4.9 14% | 7.1 -25% | 4.2 26% | 5.4 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.8 | 15.3 -42% | 9.1 16% | 13.2 -22% | 7.9 27% | 9.9 8% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 6.8 -66% | 5.8 -41% | 9.7 -137% | 4.8 -17% | 6.7 -63% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.23 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.23 99% | 2.36 93% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 7359 88% | 7866 83% | 7840 83% | 9502 68% | 7568 86% | 8262 79% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Honor 8 | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 48 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
HTC U Play audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.11 / 0.24 Watt |
| Idle |  0.92 / 1.84 / 2 Watt |
| Load |
4.3 / 6.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HTC U Play 2500 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia X 2620 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -17% | 4% | 1% | 24% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.92 | 0.61 34% | 0.83 10% | 0.56 39% | 0.49 47% | 0.78 15% |
| Idle Average * | 1.84 | 1.77 4% | 2.11 -15% | 1.69 8% | 1.63 11% | 1.89 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2 | 1.81 9% | 2.12 -6% | 1.75 12% | 1.76 12% | 2.02 -1% |
| Load Average * | 4.3 | 6.67 -55% | 3.41 21% | 6.01 -40% | 2.98 31% | 5.28 -23% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.2 | 10.98 -77% | 5.46 12% | 7.03 -13% | 4.99 20% | 5.44 12% |
* ... smaller is better
| HTC U Play 2500 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia X 2620 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 24% | 54% | -4% | 59% | 9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1302 | 1423 9% | 1502 15% | 1240 -5% | 2048 57% | 1487 14% |
| H.264 | 514 | 810 58% | 905 76% | 518 1% | 732 42% | 526 2% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 473 | 494 4% | 797 68% | 434 -8% | 820 73% | 499 5% |
| Load | 223 | 282 26% | 352 58% | 213 -4% | 366 64% | 255 14% |
Pros
Cons
HTC U Play的外观雅致，支持个人助理，搭配两个高分辨率相机，附赠众多配件。那么，为什么我们仍然无法衷心向用户推荐这台设备呢？一方面，这款HTC机型无法于众多功能更全面的同价位设备竞争。尽管它的相机分辨率均较高，但是在锐度和UltraPixel模式中的锯齿边缘等方面都不尽如人意。个人助理当然是个受欢迎的额外功能，但是在谷歌Play Store中也能找到很多类似的应用。自适应耳机效果出色也十分创新，不过因此失去3.5毫米耳机接口仍然对于很多用户是个不小的问题。
很遗憾，它的扬声器效果弱于来自HTC的其他设备；它的麦克风品质也只能算是一般。HTC U Play无法得到我们的推荐也是由于它在性能上低于同价位机型。另外一个问题是，它的电池续航也低于平均水平。
HTC带来了一台设计时尚，相对不错的中端设备，为它搭配了优秀的前置相机、软件功能、优秀的屏幕和许多配件。遗憾的是，在如音效、性能和电池续航等其他方面，它都低于我们预期的水平。
最终，HTC U Play只是一款不错的中端智能手机，它的竞争对手提供了更高的价值。正在寻找一台支持个人助理、搭配高分辨率前置相机的高科技设备的用户可以得到一台十分时尚的智能手机。但是，他们需要同时接受平庸的电池续航时间和较低的性能。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
HTC U Play
- 03/28/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer