HTC U Ultra 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| LG G6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 470 cd/m²
Contrast: 2136:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
| HTC U Ultra SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | LG G6 IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 25% | 13% | 46% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 470 | 557 19% | 402 -14% | 554 18% | 646 37% |
| Brightness | 445 | 553 24% | 408 -8% | 552 24% | 611 37% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 97 10% | 85 -3% | 96 9% | 89 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.35 -59% | 0.23 -5% | ||
| Contrast | 2136 | 1591 -26% | 2809 32% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 1.4 75% | 4 27% | 1.59 71% | 4.5 18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.9 | 3.1 74% | 10.1 15% | 2.56 78% | 8.3 30% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.6 | 1.3 83% | 3.2 58% | 2.01 74% | 6 21% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.01 109% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 7454 87% | 6667 97% | 7037 92% | 6321 103% | 7996 81% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.1 | 82.12 | 67.74 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.83 | 99.98 | 99.05 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
HTC U Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.12 / 0.28 Watt |
| Idle |  1 / 2.41 / 2.46 Watt |
| Load |
6.8 / 8.9 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | 41% | 33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.77 23% | 0.53 47% | 0.63 37% |
| Idle Average * | 2.41 | 2.04 15% | 1.07 56% | 1.1 54% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.46 | 2.24 9% | 1.12 54% | 1.56 37% |
| Load Average * | 6.8 | 4.69 31% | 5.53 19% | 5.95 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.9 | 8.66 3% | 6.26 30% | 6.7 25% |
* ... smaller is better
| HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | LG G6 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 16% | -8% | 44% | 22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1568 | 1835 17% | 1333 -15% | 1663 6% | 1789 14% |
| H.264 | 605 | 813 34% | 505 -17% | 914 51% | 779 29% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 546 | 587 8% | 505 -8% | 732 34% | 692 27% |
| Load | 214 | 225 5% | 230 7% | 392 83% | 252 18% |
Pros
Cons
在设计方面，HTC U Ultra无疑是一台充满魅力的设备：闪闪发光的后盖无疑会吸引大家的目光。这台设备也能在其他许多地方得到分数：随机附送的高端耳机让人感到满足，超大的存储配置也是一个加分项，它的相机也能很好地完成工作。固件系统本身也十分吸引人，HTC为了让它的智能手机设备变得特别的的确确做足了功课
仅仅平均水平的电池续航时间，落后的Wi-Fi链接速度，欠缺准确度的GPS模块，以及一些欠缺的功能，其他厂商在现有的高端型号上提供的例如无线充电或是防水防尘能力，这些都将HTC U Ultra放在了不利的位置上。副屏幕的存在是一把双刃剑：一方面，它需要耗费额外的电能而且分辨率通常不尽人意。另一方面，在一小块副屏幕上显示音乐播放器的确是很好的选择。因此，用户将需要去决定它是否有用。
HTC U ultra是一个巨兽：一块5.7英寸的面板再加上副屏，使它拥有不小的屏幕显示区域。它还捆绑附赠了一个创新性的耳机和一个个人助手。HTC搞砸了它的关键性能：手机麦克风性能平平。这着实让人感到遗憾。
总的来说，多亏了不错的性能表现，工作时较低的温度，高质量的配件以及一些创新，HTC U Ultra无疑是一台值回票价的旗舰手机。但是它在面对苹果及三星的旗舰手机是依然没有什么竞争力。它就是在某些地方缺少一些必要的精雕细琢
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
HTC U Ultra
- 03/23/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
