Notebookcheck Logo

驰为Hi10 Air (Atom x5-Z8350, 4 GB RAM, 64 GB eMMC) 二合一平板评测

简单的复制？

中国厂商生产的设备往往比其更成熟的竞争对手便宜，并且在质量上也有所长进。 Chuwi Hi10 Air当然便宜，与Hi10 Pro基本相同，不过Hi10 Pro已有近三年的历史了。 尽管如此，200欧元（约合1500元）的价格实在是很便宜，无论如何都值得一看，即使它的一些部件现在已经有些过时了。 请继续阅读以了解Hi10 Air在我们的测试中的表现以及它与竞争对手的竞争情况。
Chinese Tech Tablet Convertible / 2-in-1
Chuwi Hi10 Air (Hi10 Series)
Processor
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 4 x 1.4 - 1.9 GHz, Cherry Trail
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Core: 500 MHz
Memory
4 GB 
, 单通道DDR3 SDRAM
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, 10点触控, native pen support, BOE TV101WUM, a-Si TFT LCD, LCM, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Cherry Trail
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 32 GB free
Soundcard
Intel SST Audio Device
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米组合耳机和麦克风插孔, Card Reader: TF卡, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 环境光传感器，加速度计，距离传感器
Networking
Realtek RTL8723BS (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 261.8 x 167.3
Battery
6500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix main camera
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix front-facing camera
Additional features
Speakers: 扬声器, Keyboard: 键盘：磁性底座键盘, Keyboard Light: no, 键盘底座和笔, fanless
Weight
1.103 kg, Power Supply: 81 g
Price
200 Euro
Links
Chuwi homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
265 mm 183 mm 23.5 mm 1.2 kg261.8 mm 167.3 mm 8.8 mm 1.1 kg261.8 mm 167.3 mm 8.5 mm 562 g249 mm 186 mm 18 mm 1.1 kg245 mm 175 mm 8.3 mm 523 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP x2 210 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
483 (364min - 559max) MBit/s +1227%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
476 MBit/s +1208%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
802.11 b/g/n
41.6 MBit/s +14%
Chuwi Hi10 Air
Realtek RTL8723BS
36.4 (12min - 53max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
581 MBit/s +1924%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
448 (399min - 476max) MBit/s +1461%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
802.11 b/g/n
40.6 MBit/s +41%
Chuwi Hi10 Air
Realtek RTL8723BS
28.7 (4min - 39max) MBit/s
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Chuwi Hi10 Air; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø28.7 (4-39)
Chuwi Hi10 Air; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø36.4 (12-53)
303
cd/m²		341
cd/m²		319
cd/m²
291
cd/m²		374
cd/m²		326
cd/m²
308
cd/m²		339
cd/m²		355
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE TV101WUM tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 374 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 328.4 cd/m² Minimum: 48 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 78 %
Center on Battery: 315 cd/m²
Contrast: 1247:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.44 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Chuwi Hi10 Air
BOE TV101WUM, , 1920x1200, 10.1"		Chuwi Hi10 Pro
LCD, , 1920x1200, 10.1"		HP x2 210 G2
AU Optronics AUO18D4, , 1280x800, 10.1"		Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
AU Optronics B101UAN01.7, , 1920x1200, 10.1"		Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Sharp SHP14A6, , 1800x1200, 10"
Display
-37%
-20%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
68.5
42.17
-38%
54.1
-21%
66.5
-3%
sRGB Coverage
98.9
62.9
-36%
81.2
-18%
97.5
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.2
43.6
-38%
55.9
-20%
67.5
-4%
Response Times
-64%
-28%
-7%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 ?(21, 19)
83 ?(39, 44)
-108%
46 ?(22, 24)
-15%
39 ?(21, 18)
2%
44 ?(22, 22)
-10%
Response Time Black / White *
25 ?(14, 11)
30 ?(11, 19)
-20%
35 ?(18, 17)
-40%
29 ?(17, 12)
-16%
25.6 ?(11.6, 14)
-2%
PWM Frequency
1020 ?(99)
Screen
-13%
-26%
-10%
29%
Brightness middle
374
379
1%
292
-22%
389
4%
456
22%
Brightness
328
356
9%
275
-16%
376
15%
426
30%
Brightness Distribution
78
87
12%
82
5%
91
17%
88
13%
Black Level *
0.3
0.42
-40%
0.17
43%
0.43
-43%
0.31
-3%
Contrast
1247
902
-28%
1718
38%
905
-27%
1471
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4
4.8
-20%
6.76
-69%
5.23
-31%
1.3
67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.68
11.2
-16%
24.45
-153%
9.39
3%
3
69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.44
6.7
-23%
6.01
-10%
5.45
-0%
1.4
74%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.49 88%
2.24 98%
CCT
7689 85%
6988 93%
6749 96%
7728 84%
6687 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
64
40
-37%
51
-20%
62.3
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
63
-36%
81
-18%
96.8
-2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.99
1.1
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-39% / -23%
-30% / -28%
-12% / -12%
7% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (68.6 - 287, n=60, last 2 years)
234 Points +680%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
77 Points +157%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
65 Points +117%
Chuwi Hi10 Air
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
30 Points
Average Intel Atom x5-Z8350
  (25 - 31, n=9)
28.3 Points -6%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
28 Points -7%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (110.1 - 2889, n=63, last 2 years)
1690 Points +1642%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
237 Points +144%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
164 Points +69%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
97 Points 0%
Chuwi Hi10 Air
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
97 Points
Average Intel Atom x5-Z8350
  (88 - 101, n=10)
96.1 Points -1%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
85 Points -12%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
97 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
7.92 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
30 Points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Convertible
  (4435 - 5830, n=4, last 2 years)
5025 Points +307%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2201 Points +78%
HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1546 Points +25%
Average Intel Atom x5-Z8350, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
  (1088 - 1520, n=7)
1310 Points +6%
Chuwi Hi10 Air
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1235 Points
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash
741 Points -40%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1235 points
Help
Chuwi Hi10 Air
64 GB eMMC Flash		HP x2 210 G2
64 GB eMMC Flash		Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
128 GB eMMC Flash		Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash		Average 64 GB eMMC Flash
 		Average of class Convertible
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
25%
86%
95%
21%
2113%
Write 4K
15.11
18.11
20%
39.04
158%
26.91
78%
16 ?(1.95 - 42.9, n=18)
6%
134.3 ?(45.5 - 349, n=44, last 2 years)
789%
Read 4K
12.37
15.77
27%
6.114
-51%
19.72
59%
11 ?(4.94 - 23.7, n=18)
-11%
60.9 ?(27.7 - 84.2, n=44, last 2 years)
392%
Write Seq
74.7
62.5
-16%
220
195%
126.2
69%
109 ?(27.9 - 225, n=18)
46%
2512 ?(402 - 3614, n=33, last 2 years)
3263%
Read Seq
147
121.8
-17%
213.5
45%
268
82%
207 ?(74.7 - 271, n=18)
41%
2791 ?(1504 - 4763, n=33, last 2 years)
1799%
Write 4K Q32T1
15.19
31.72
109%
46.89
209%
62.9
314%
22.4 ?(2.17 - 62.9, n=18)
47%
360 ?(171.6 - 745, n=44, last 2 years)
2270%
Read 4K Q32T1
33.82
48.64
44%
40.26
19%
39.82
18%
31.5 ?(9.66 - 76.3, n=18)
-7%
455 ?(79.6 - 866, n=44, last 2 years)
1245%
Write Seq Q32T1
77.3
95.6
24%
145.2
88%
131.3
70%
104.6 ?(18.4 - 214, n=18)
35%
3282 ?(412 - 5405, n=44, last 2 years)
4146%
Read Seq Q32T1
153.2
166.5
9%
194.4
27%
259.3
69%
166.5 ?(68.9 - 259, n=18)
9%
4748 ?(2507 - 7131, n=44, last 2 years)
2999%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
64 GB eMMC Flash
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 153.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 77.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 33.82 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 15.19 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 147 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 74.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 12.37 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 15.11 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Convertible
  (471 - 40768, n=59, last 2 years)
8473 Points +2948%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1257 Points +352%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
757 Points +172%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8350
349 Points +26%
Average Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
  (278 - 494, n=22)
320 Points +15%
Chuwi Hi10 Air
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350
278 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
319 points
Help
Chuwi Hi10 Air
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash		Chuwi Hi10 Pro
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash		HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash		Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash		Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Heat
-2%
2%
4%
6%
Maximum Upper Side *
42.4
43.5
-3%
40.8
4%
41.7
2%
44
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
37.7
36
5%
38.9
-3%
39.7
-5%
43
-14%
Idle Upper Side *
33.8
35.5
-5%
32.4
4%
31.7
6%
26
23%
Idle Bottom *
30.4
32.2
-6%
29.8
2%
26.5
13%
24.4
20%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 42.4 °C36 °C36.8 °C 
 39.9 °C33.2 °C36.1 °C 
 34.2 °C31.6 °C36.2 °C 
Maximum: 42.4 °C
Average: 36.3 °C
30.4 °C33.6 °C37.7 °C
30.3 °C32.8 °C34.2 °C
30.1 °C31.3 °C33.5 °C
Maximum: 37.7 °C
Average: 32.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.6 °C | Room Temperature 24.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.93331.92531.134.431.13130.334.130.3403130.8315033.134.733.16328.12928.18027.227.827.210025.926.625.912525.327.325.316024.227.324.220022.925.922.92502223.92231521.12321.140020.425.820.450020.237.720.263019.752.619.780018.859.918.8100018.666.418.6125018.362.318.3160018.25818.2200017.853.617.8250017.959.717.9315018.159.518.1400018.258.818.2500018.367.218.3630018.566.418.5800018.553.818.51000018.652.318.61250018.654.318.61600018.647.618.6SPL30.873.830.8N1.326.71.3median 18.6median 53.6median 18.6Delta1.714.31.743.437.243.436.83636.835.631.235.63528.5353632.23635.328.735.336.428.636.437.327.537.337.825.137.839.225.539.24123.64143.12343.151.722.151.753.92153.954.620.254.657.62057.656.818.756.85917.95963186362.717.362.766.117.366.167.617.367.66717.26764.61764.662.41762.459.117.159.159.617.159.657.617.357.650.317.350.346.317.546.375.430.275.432.21.232.2median 57.6median 17.9median 57.681.98hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseChuwi Hi10 AirHP x2 210 G2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Chuwi Hi10 Air audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.6% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (20% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (39.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP x2 210 G2 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Chuwi Hi10 Air
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash		Chuwi Hi10 Pro
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash		HP x2 210 G2
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash		Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash		Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
-132%
-146%
-195%
-230%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
1.4
-17%
2.9
-142%
3.1
-158%
2.88
-140%
Idle Average *
1.3
4.82
-271%
4.8
-269%
5.6
-331%
4.8
-269%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
5.43
-202%
5.2
-189%
6.2
-244%
7.5
-317%
Load Average *
6.2
11.61
-87%
10.4
-68%
13.5
-118%
16.9
-173%
Load Maximum *
6.8
12.48
-84%
10.9
-60%
15.3
-125%
23.8
-250%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 4.5 / 2.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.3 / 1.8 Watt
Load midlight 6.2 / 6.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Chuwi Hi10 Air
Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail),  Wh		Chuwi Hi10 Pro
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 0 Wh		HP x2 210 G2
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 32.5 Wh		Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 39 Wh		Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh		Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
395
364
-8%
551
39%
684
73%
448
13%
588 ?(305 - 981, n=60, last 2 years)
49%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
6h 35min

Pros

+ 铝合金机身
+ 做工出色
+ 不错的键盘，铰链很结实
+ 不错的IPS屏幕
+ 价格低廉

Cons

- 有问题的触摸板
- Wi-Fi速度慢
- SD卡读卡器速度慢
- 闪存速度慢
- 续航差
驰为Hi10 Air 二合一平板评测. Test device courtesy of Chuwi.
驰为Hi10 Air 二合一平板评测. Test device courtesy of Chuwi.

Chuwi Hi10 Air是一款极具吸引力的设备。它有很多很便宜并且有些过时的部件，但它仍然是物有所值的。Hi10 Air拥有做工出色的铝制外壳和令人印象深刻的显示屏，同时它的键盘也很不错。

Windows 10基本上可以流畅运行，但这是事情开始分崩离析的地方。你不能像Hi10 Pro那样同时拥有Android系统，这很令人不爽，因为Hi10 Air上的多任务处理几乎都会造成死机。

此外，触控板过于敏感，平板电脑的续航时间非常差。此外，一些Hi10 Air的部件已显疲态。该设备具有性能差的可怕的microSD，Wi-Fi以及Atom的处理器。 eMMC闪存存储比我们的比较设备中使用的闪存速度慢得多。

尽管配备过时的硬件，Chuwi Hi10 Air总体上是一个令人惊讶的产品。物有所值，只有一些实际的缺点。

或者，如果您对Hi10 Air感兴趣，甚至可以看看Hi10 Pro。它发布于2016年，但它与其较新的Air衍生型号共享大部分相同的部件，优缺点也和Hi10 Air大致相同。虽然它依赖于过时的Android 5.1作为其第二个操作系统，所以我们可以看到为什么Chuwi没有将其包含在Hi10 Air中。

Chuwi Hi10 Air - 04/25/2019 v6 (old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
75%
Pointing Device
76%
Connectivity
44 / 80 → 56%
Weight
74 / 35-78 → 90%
Battery
89%
Display
84%
Games Performance
29 / 68 → 43%
Application Performance
35 / 87 → 40%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
58 / 91 → 63%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Average
68%
79%
Convertible - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Chuwi Hi10 Air (Hi10 Series)
Review
•
Chuwi Hi10 Max 可折叠电脑评测--配备英特尔 ...
|
Review
•
驰为 Hi10 Pro 平板电脑简短评测

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 驰为Hi10 Air (Atom x5-Z8350, 4 GB RAM, 64 GB eMMC) 二合一平板评测
Christian Hintze, 2019-07- 1 (Update: 2019-07- 1)