Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar保时捷设计评测| Honor Magic V2 RSR - 时尚运动型折叠车
凭借保时捷设计| Honor Magic V2 RSR，Honor 成为继华为之后第二家与传统德国公司合作销售智能手机的中国公司。在此之前，该公司还与黑莓公司有过合作。
虽然技术基础保持不变，但Honor 增强了某些功能，尤其是丰富了包装内容。当然，这款奢华的可折叠设备还带有保时捷设计公司（Porsche Design）的独特标志，该公司重新设计了背板和摄像头设置。这种重新设计在整体价格上也有所体现。
请注意，这是一篇简短的评论，因为 Magic V2 的的广泛测试涵盖了与本篇相同的大部分技术要素。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Honor Magic V2 RSR SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 234 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.92" | 2344x2156 | |
| 89.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 253 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.60" | 2176x1812 | |
| 87.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 259 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.03" | 2160x1916 | |
| 84.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Google Pixel Fold Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7 | 283 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 7.60" | 2208x1840 |
外壳和连接 - Magic V2 RSR 采用更多钛金属和玻璃纤维材料
Porsche Design| Honor Magic V2 RSR 与标准 V2 在外观上的区别主要在于其设计。玛瑙灰略带金属质感的玻璃纤维后背取代了传统 V2 的玻璃或人造革后背。其设计灵感来自保时捷 911 的倾斜车顶线条，流畅而时尚。
摄像头元件经过重新设计，采用 3D 玻璃设计，与整体美感相得益彰。边框采用钛合金打造，并对摄像头细节进行了铣削处理，提升了该设备的高档感。值得注意的是，在扭转测试中，吱吱声微乎其微，显示了制造质量的提高。
在技术规格方面，Magic V2 RSR 与同类产品相比基本保持不变，只是将内置内存增加了一倍，达到 1,024 GB 或 1 TB。不过，供货范围却扩大了许多（见视频）。
值得注意的扩展在于包装中包含的全面配件，包括一个人造皮革保护套、一个保时捷设计风格的 SIM 卡针、带存储盒的Honor Magic Pen、两条 USB 线缆（黑色 Type-A 转 Type-C）和两个模块化电源适配器（黑色）。电源适配器配备了一个 C 型插头和一个 Commonwealth 插头（G 型），可满足经常出差人士的充电需求，功率为 66 瓦。
通信、软件和操作
Porsche Design| Honor Magic V2 RSR 频率覆盖范围广，支持当前的 5G Sub6，可提供广泛的移动连接。 虽然该设备支持最新的 Wi-Fi 标准，但缺少 6 GHz 频段。此外，规格中也没有 UWB 芯片。
Magic V2 RSR 拥有两个触摸屏，输入处理灵敏、精确。保时捷版内置的主动式手写笔增强了用户互动，为两个显示屏提供了多功能性。集成在电源按钮中的指纹扫描仪具有可靠的识别率。还可通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，但安全性较低。
该设备在谷歌Android 13 和 MagicOS 7.2 上运行，受益于Honor 承诺提供的四次重大更新和五年的安全补丁。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
| Google Pixel Fold | |
| Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Google Pixel Fold | |
| Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
| Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
| Google Pixel Fold | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Google Pixel Fold | |
| Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
摄像头 - 保时捷手机共有五个镜头
尽管后置摄像头设置的外观略有不同，但保时捷设计| Honor Magic V2 RSR 与Magic V2 的摄像头配置完全相同。前置摄像头位于外部显示屏和可折叠显示屏上，可拍摄令人印象深刻的自拍照。
主摄像头表现出色，在使用外盖显示屏时还能方便地拍摄自拍照。虽然主摄像头通常能拍摄出高质量的图像，但白色区域容易曝光过度，在拍摄兔子图案时尤为明显。
后置摄像头的视频录制功能扩展到 30 或 60 FPS 的超高清。全高清录制允许使用 21:9 宽高比。此外，专业模式还可以创建 10 位 LOG 视频。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-fach ZoomLow-Light
显示屏 - 带有高 PWM 调光功能的明亮 OLED 显示屏
Honor Magic V2 RSR 上的两块显示屏都采用了 LTPO 技术，允许 1 到 120 Hz 的可变刷新率。通过观察，我们没有发现面板之间有任何明显的差异，在质量方面与 V2 保持一致。
Honor 显示，外部显示屏的峰值亮度值为 2,500 cd/m²，内部显示屏为 1,600 cd/m²。在我们的测试中，可折叠面板在均匀分布（APL18）的情况下达到了 926 cd/m² 的峰值亮度，在 HDR 播放时达到了 1,589 cd/m²。盖板显示屏分别达到 1,053 和 1,399 cd/m²。手动调节亮度时，可达到 576 cd/m²（正面：600 cd/m²）。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 961 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Honor Magic V2 RSR OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9" | Honor Magic V2 RSR OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.6" | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8" | Google Pixel Fold OLED, 2208x1840, 7.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -15% | -164% | -80% | -148% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.18 ? | 2.21 ? -87% | 6.16 ? -422% | 3.32 ? -181% | 5.59 ? -374% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 2.09 ? | 1.19 ? 43% | 1.55 ? 26% | 1.55 ? 26% | 1.59 ? 24% |
| PWM Frequency | 2272 | 2272 0% | 120 -95% | 367 -84% | 120.2 -95% |
| Screen | -58% | -98% | 2% | -43% | |
| Brightness middle | 961 | 1093 14% | 1104 15% | 1307 36% | 993 3% |
| Brightness | 950 | 1087 14% | 1107 17% | 1308 38% | 997 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 96 -1% | 97 0% | 96 -1% | 94 -3% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 1.4 -75% | 3.1 -288% | 1 -25% | 1.4 -75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.5 | 4.1 -173% | 4.2 -180% | 1.7 -13% | 3.2 -113% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.7 -125% | 3 -150% | 1.5 -25% | 2.1 -75% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.01 109% | 2.24 98% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6396 102% | 6412 101% | 6594 99% | 6313 103% | 6796 96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-43% | -131% /
-120% | -39% /
-25% | -96% /
-78% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.106 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.9795 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.51 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6075 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2272 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 2272 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 2272 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命
保时捷设计| Honor Magic V2 RSR 配备了Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 和 16 GB 内存。尽管没有采用高通公司最新一代的顶级 SoC，但它为所有任务、应用和游戏提供了充足的动力。与 Gameloft 合作开发的《Asphalt 9: Legends》（见Magic V2 ）也出现在 RSR 上，这使其成为一款合适的产品。
Magic V2 RSR 的表面温度保持在可接受的范围内，明显的发热主要集中在内置 SoC 的区域。在 3DMark 压力测试中，Magic V2 RSR 的表现并不突出，随着时间的推移，性能明显下降。不过，由于其性能储备充足，只有在极少数情况下（如要求苛刻的游戏场景）才会出现明显的性能下降。
电池续航时间令人印象深刻，超过了 12 小时，但 RSR 有可能以更低的功耗实现更长的续航时间。
| Honor Magic V2 RSR | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | Google Pixel Fold | Average 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -15% | -7% | -56% | 0% | -46% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 3359.31 | 4384.43 31% | 3572.73 6% | 1606.37 -52% | 3543 ? 5% | 1839 ? -45% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 3399.45 | 2449.23 -28% | 2897.27 -15% | 1169.32 -66% | 3353 ? -1% | 1425 ? -58% |
| Random Read 4KB | 416.98 | 459.94 10% | 389.81 -7% | 219.11 -47% | 397 ? -5% | 277 ? -34% |
| Random Write 4KB | 568.29 | 161.39 -72% | 506.41 -11% | 238.72 -58% | 572 ? 1% | 309 ? -46% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
发言人
Honor Magic V2 RSR audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 | |
| Honor Magic V2 RSR | |
| Google Pixel Fold | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Magic V2 RSR 是保时捷车迷的时尚选择
虽然保时捷设计| Honor Magic V2 RSR 没有带来任何新的技术进步，但它的外观时尚，充满跑车风格。在测试过程中，它丰富的配件清单和精湛的工艺赢得了我们的青睐。与 Magic V2一样，Magic V2 RSR 也是一款非常出色、非常轻薄的可折叠手机，保时捷版本的重量比它重 3 克。
小巧的硅碳电池功能强大，摄像头设置令人印象深刻，显示屏明亮、护眼，并支持所有现代 HDR 标准。
保时捷设计| Honor Magic V2 RSR 体现了纯粹的奢华，其高端的定价更突出了这一点。
不出所料，Porsche Design 折叠机的价格更高，与其说这是一个理性的决定，不如说是一种奢侈的放纵。包括Honor Magic Pen 在内的丰富包装未能完全弥补其高昂的价格。
尽管保时捷设计| Honor Magic V2 RSR 存在 Wi-Fi 限制、没有无线充电和 IP 认证等缺点，但它仍然是一款出色的可折叠设备，其特点是奢侈豪华。
顺便提一下，在保时捷的世界里，RSR 是 RennSport 赛车的缩写，指的是未经上路许可的纯竞技车型。特别是保时捷 911 RSR，被认为是耐力赛车的理想代表。
价格和供应情况
Magic V2 RSR 可直接从Porsche Design 订购或Honor购买，价格约为 3,000 美元。
Honor Magic V2 RSR
- 02/21/2024 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
