Huawei Mate 20 Lite
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix Dual: 24MP (f/2.0) + 2MP
Price comparison
Average of 44 scores (from 81 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei Mate 20 Lite
The arrival of the Mate 20 Lite heralds the next generation of Huawei’s elite-performance smartphones. Huawei has equipped the device with the brand-new HiSilicon Kirin 710 SoC, which integrates an ARM Mali-G51 MP4 among other components; we are expecting good things of both chips. Find out in this review whether the Huawei Mate 20 Lite can meet expectations and if the device has any shortcomings.
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In conclusion, the Mate 20 Lite offers a premium design that disguises its mid-range nature, outstanding battery life, and good photography chops. It packs a punch for its price of £379, and as a mid-range phone that I really enjoyed using (apart from the odd crashing app), I would generally have no hesitation in recommending the Mate 20 Lite.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/05/2018
Source: Kitguru EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All-in-all, the Mate 20 Lite is a decent mid-range phone retailing for £379. Its design has been brought down from 2018 flagships which makes it look like a top-end phone, and generally there isn’t much wrong with it at this price. It doesn’t seem to offer anything new or radical at this price point, though, and I would expect most people will be just as happy with the Honor 10 or ZenFone 5 – the latter which I think does have the slightly superior camera setup.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The tech has promise, I’m hoping it will be better realized when we see the real Mate 20. This isn’t a bad phone, it’s just not a compelling option for the money, given what else is out there right now. The mid-range has become incredibly competitive, and you need to do a lot more to stand out.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 58%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
One look at the Mate 20 Lite's neat and tidy exterior design would suggest it's a great phone. But it's let down by context: the Honor Play is £100 cheaper and that phone is far more powerful and stable. Plus the whole idea of the Mate series is for powerful, top-end devices, thus the Lite is a contradiction to that very premise.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei Mate 20 Lite is a large handset, and that's both a blessing and a curse. The 6.3-inch screen lends itself well to media-rich tasks, but the phone can be tricky to pocket. It has good battery life and a solid chassis, although the glass back does attract fingerprints.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei Mate 20 Lite is a handsome phablet with an attractive and all-encompassing display and some impressive dual-camera tricks. However, its performance is only alright, and there are some tantalizing alternatives for similar or even less money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Having the flagship's name is good and all, but Huawei's priced the Mate 20 lite without accounting for the 'lite' bit too much, and we're not liking the numbers. It's a good overall package, with excellent battery life, decent display and good image quality from its two (real) cameras. But other phones offer those too, some even outperform the Mate in key areas, and often at a lower price. Carrier subsidies could sway things in any direction, but at full retail (north of €400)р we find the Mate 20 tough to recommend.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A solid, long-lasting mid-range Android – but the competition from sister-brand Honor phones is strong.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mate 20 Lite is a difficult phone to place. It looks attractive enough, if not exactly striking, and offers decent mid-range performance while falling short of the flagship processors found in similarly priced Honor phones.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A design step up isn't enough when both rivals and rangemates offer better specs for less. A misstep for the Mate sub-brand.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei Mate 20 Lite brings some lovely looks and a great feel in the hand, along with a competent spec list, to the party. However, it's not the most powerful phone from the brand, and looks to make up that deficit mostly through design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/05/2018
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei Mate 20 Lite looks as though it’s crammed full of features and equipped to dish out respectable performance, despite not rocking the newly-unveiled Kirin 980 flagship chipset destined for its more powerful siblings. Pricing places it in a tricky position, though, as it finds itself lodged between more affordable offerings with beefier specs (like the aforementioned Honor Play) and more powerful handsets like the OnePlus 6, which isn’t a huge leap cost-wise.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mate 20 Lite is a difficult phone to place. It looks attractive enough, if not exactly striking, and promises mid-range performance while falling short of the flagship processors found in similarly priced Honor phones.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei Mate 20 Lite will first be available on September 5, but Europeans will have to wait a couple of more weeks. The pricing for the UK is £380, which should translate to €420 on the mainland.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mate 20 Lite is a conundrum: it's well designed and well built, but only succeeds in getting us excited for the future Mate 20 proper. The Lite is a solid phone, sure, but it's also superfluous...
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei Mate 20 Lite will go on sale in the UK for 380 pounds (~$500), starting in October. That’s not exactly cheap, in comparison to devices like the Pocophone F1 or the Honor Play, but Huawei clearly hopes that its brand cachet and AI features will help the Mate 20 Lite stand out in the market.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Lite will cost £379 when it hits shelves, which isn't a bad price for the spec sheet. It is, however, not much less than the OnePlus 6 ($644 at Amazon.com), which at £469 comes with more RAM and a splash-resistant design. I'm looking forward to seeing how these two phones compare in the full review.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 95% features: 94% display: 97% mobility: 95%
Source: Tech.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 82% display: 82% mobility: 84% workmanship: 100%
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 85% features: 98% display: 93% mobility: 99%
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/10/2018
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Connect - 10/18
Single Review, , Medium, Date: 10/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 81% mobility: 94% ergonomy: 78%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2018
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/13/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 75% display: 88% mobility: 80%
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: Spiegel Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: Heute DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% performance: 75% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 85% features: 98% display: 93% mobility: 99%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2018
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/01/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2018
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/12/2018
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/22/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/02/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/19/2018
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/17/2018
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/28/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/25/2018
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 65% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 82%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 70% features: 84% display: 79% mobility: 9% ergonomy: 79%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 70% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: XGN NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/04/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/03/2018
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Bright.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/03/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Portables4Gamers FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 75% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 95%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/27/2018
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/14/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/06/2018
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/24/2018
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Input DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 63% price: 62% performance: 60% workmanship: 62%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/23/2018
Comment
ARM Mali-G51 MP4:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 710:
基于ARM的八核SoC,包含四个用于执行性能任务的Cortex-A73内核(高达2.2 GHz)和四个Cortex-A53内核(高达1.7 GHz)以节省功耗。此外,SoC集成了LTE无线电(低600 MBps)和ARM Mali-G51MP4 GPU。 SoC以台积电(TSMC)12纳米制程生产。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.30":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.