华为Huawei MatePad Pro (5G) 10.8平板电脑评测：iPad Pro的安卓替代品？
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2020 | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16 | 460 g | 7.2 mm | 10.80" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU | 471 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2019 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 420 g | 5.7 mm | 10.50" | 2560x1600 | |
| 83.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 467 g | 7 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 606 cd/m²
Contrast: 1894:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 IPS, 2388x1668, 11" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite TFT, 2000x1200, 10.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 22% | 3% | -29% | |
| Brightness middle | 606 | 617 2% | 446 -26% | 503 -17% |
| Brightness | 579 | 585 1% | 445 -23% | 477 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 84 -6% | 86 -3% | 91 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.36 -13% | 0.29 9% | |
| Contrast | 1894 | 1714 -10% | 1734 -8% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 0.94 68% | 2.7 7% | 4.4 -52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 1.87 69% | 5.4 10% | 10.4 -73% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 1.4 67% | 2.1 51% | 7.5 -74% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.156 102% | 2.05 107% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 7272 89% | 6733 97% | 6468 100% | 7700 84% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 23810 Hz | ≤ 38 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 23810 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 38 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 23810 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (409039 - 483224, n=2) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (55.1 - 65.9, n=2) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (101.2 - 115.5, n=2) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (97 - 119, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (63.9 - 74.1, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (19885 - 23568, n=2) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (1963 - 2345, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -13% | -34% | -6% | -4% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1789 | 1416 -21% | 483.7 -73% | 1547 ? -14% | 1045 ? -42% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 399 | 522 31% | 219.3 -45% | 575 ? 44% | 686 ? 72% |
| Random Read 4KB | 224.6 | 191.6 -15% | 119.8 -47% | 210 ? -7% | 189.4 ? -16% |
| Random Write 4KB | 262.4 | 170.2 -35% | 195.8 -25% | 188.5 ? -28% | 189.9 ? -28% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.4 ? | 70.5 ? -14% | 78.3 ? -5% | 70.6 ? -14% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 71.7 ? | 54.5 ? -24% | 65.3 ? -9% | 59.8 ? -17% |
PUBG Compare
Real Racing 3
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.02 / 0.39 Watt |
| Idle |  1.98 / 5.66 / 5.69 Watt |
| Load |
6.96 / 6.98 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -36% | 11% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.98 | 1.3 34% | 1.96 1% | 1.21 39% |
| Idle Average * | 5.66 | 3.5 38% | 2.8 51% | 4.24 25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.69 | 5.6 2% | 2.82 50% | 4.34 24% |
| Load Average * | 6.96 | 12.5 -80% | 5.31 24% | 6.99 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.98 | 19.2 -175% | 11.91 -71% | 8.79 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -1% | -7% | 10% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1877 | 2001 7% | 1276 -32% | 2120 13% |
| H.264 | 909 | 936 3% | 872 -4% | 950 5% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 891 | 902 1% | 556 -38% | 792 -11% |
| Load | 233 | 197 -15% | 340 46% | 309 33% |
Pros
Cons
总结——MatePad Pro是台出色的小众平板电脑：
考虑到缺少Google移动服务以及缺乏Widevine L1认证，关于最新华为平板电脑的客观判决几乎是不可能的——个人喜好和个人使用行为是核心。多媒体爱好者需要意识到，受DRM保护内容的播放非常差。
缺少Google服务使使用Google应用程序非常困难，并导致许多第三方应用程序出现问题。可以安装来自外部源的应用程序，但这给没有经验的用户带来了安全风险，即使是有经验的用户有时也无法理解来自外部源的APK文件与系统进行交互的方式。
尽管如此，MatePad Pro还是提供了一个不错的扬声器系统，较长的运行时间以及不错的性能。另外，华为平板电脑具有很好的结构和功能，在平板电脑市场上很少见，例如无线充电和反向无线充电。
但是MatePad Pro的硬件并没有受到批评。在给定价格范围的情况下，平板电脑应配备安全的生物识别解锁选项和足够强大的40瓦电源。此外，与iPad Pro相比，更高级平板电脑具有高刷新率的OLED显示屏或IPS显示屏。 决定采用液晶显示器技术及接受其弱点（清晰度，视角）以及打孔（会产生阴影），将不会使看重屏幕的人感到满意。
MatePad Pro是一款漂亮的平板电脑，但总体而言，对于大多数人而言，它并不是真正值得推荐的。
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
- 07/06/2020 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
