Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 21 scores (from 31 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
内置扬声器。华为为MediaPad M3 Lite,配备了四个扬声器,以产生生动而强大的声场。也就是说,乍一看,该设备是一个典型的中档平板电脑,还有几个开口。
Source: PC Perspective EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For the price, the Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 10 is a tablet worth considering with a few caveats. In combination with EMUI 5.1, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 CPU and 3GB of flash memory make for a tablet that’s responsive, even after extended periods of use. It’s front-facing camera has a higher megapixel count than many others in the sub-$300 range, which makes this a good device for Skyping with family over a long distance. The speakers and beautiful IPS LCD screen also make consuming content easy to enjoy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2018
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For $250, the Huawei MediaPad Lite 10 is a sleek tablet with a big, crisp screen and booming speakers at a reasonable price. Unfortunately, it's just not reasonable enough to compete with the Amazon Fire HD 10, which is available for $100 less and offers the same performance. It's also uncomfortably close in price to the $329 Apple iPad, which offers a faster processor, a sharper screen, and access to Apple's App Store, which still has an advantage over Android when it comes to quality tablet apps. So unless you absolutely need access to Google Play, you're better off paying a lot less for the Fire HD 10 or a bit more for the iPad.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Computer Shopper EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Although the 10-inch Huawei M3 Lite cuts a stylish frame, it's not just about looks. The tablet packs impressive battery life and a crisp display, although it's no benchmark speed demon.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I've always been a fan of using tablets for consumption tasks. Historically, I've used an iPad for this, but iPads are getting really expensive, given that Apple keeps adding 'pro' features. Indeed, it seems that the era of consumption tablets is behind us, so I found the MediaPad M3 Lite to be refreshing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/16/2017
Source: e-media - 10/17
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 97% price: 93% performance: 100% features: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2017
Source: Tablet Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/23/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/08/2017
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/22/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/24/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 75% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 73% features: 78% display: 75% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 60% mobility: 90%
Source: Les Androides FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/17/2017
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% display: 86% mobility: 100%
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/29/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Ljud och Bild SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 505:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
435: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
10.10":
这是在平板电脑和小型变形本中常见的屏幕尺寸。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.