Huawei P10 Lite
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 37 scores (from 62 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P10 Lite
明智选择。 华为P10 Lite中端智能手机售价只有搭配徕卡镜头的华为P10的一半,不过除此之外可以提供接近高端的硬件配置。我们的测试将会分析它和P10机型的区别,以及如何在两台设备之间作出选择。
Source: Laptop Media

Huawei’s P lineup has a yet another mid-range representative in the face of P10 Lite. This time, however, in addition to the capabilities, the company has paid attention to the elegant appearance achieved with the help of the glass back and pleasantly curved edges. This, of course, hasn’t prevented the fingerprint sensor from being available again. The display is 5.2″ with Full HD resolution, which is not a change compared to P9 Lite, but in the menu we find a special Eye comfort mode limiting blue light. Additionally, the battery offers reasonable durability, although in some of our tests the results were lower than those of P9 Lite. On the other hand, its charging is fast and for 10 minutes in the plug, you can get around 2 hours of video playback.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Stuff TV

Neither of those changes make it a bad phone. If you’re after something with style, that comes in at half the price of a flagship phone, it’s still a great choice - just be aware that a little extra cash buys you a lot more phone, and the cheaper competition is basically on par when it comes to screen and CPU.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak

The Huawei P10 Lite handset is powered by a non-removable Li-Polymer battery. This has a capacity of 3000 mAh. Running my usual continuous movie playing test, I was able to get 7 hours 5 minutes of viewing time before the handset closed itself down. I was rather disappointed with the battery performance especially when compared with the handset’s other facilities.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Nave

Overall, I think the P10 lite is another great smartphone for phoneography, especially with the given Portrait and Selfie Superstar mode. With the Sapphire Blue design, the demographic for this device is probably for the young and trendy millennials who really likes taking photos, especially Huawei's blurred background portrait selfie shots.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: GSM Arena

The Huawei P10 Lite may be quite a few features short of the flagship P10, but that's actually fine. We expected lower specs and we got them but the internals are not bottom-of-the-barrel either.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/01/2017
Source: Phone Arena

Future talk aside, let's get back to the real question – Should you buy the P10 Lite? If you like and can handle EMUI and you do prefer Huawei's design over its rivals, by all means yes. This is one complete phone that offers great value for your money, so we can't help but give it the thumbs up.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone World

Huawei P10 lite is perfect device with light weight. It has 32GB ROM and 4GB RAM moreover it has 3000 mAh battery. All the features are excellent and it is totally providing us full entertainment in affordable price range. P10 lite can give the tough time to its competitors like Samsung, QMobile and many others. We have tested the P10 lite and it has given us best results in every field.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Authority

The Huawei P10 lite certainly ticks a lot of the right boxes for a mid-range device. It’s thin, has a good sized battery, and offers reasonable performance, all on a budget. Also the ability to enable an app drawer should help EMUI find greater acceptance. The software offers some good extra features and having 4 GB of RAM is nice. While it doesn’t have a dual camera setup, the included camera is certainly usable especially in good lighting.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cyberbloc

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/23/2017
Source: Android Mag

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 84% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 100% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Technik Surfer

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 92% features: 87% display: 86% mobility: 80%
Source: WinFuture

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Allround-PC.com

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: n-tv

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 82% display: 86% mobility: 85%
Source: Tech Stage

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Android Pit

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: WinFuture

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/09/2017
Rating: price: 70% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Aberto ate de Madrugada

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/16/2017
Source: PC Guia

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Pplware

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Geek

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 75% features: 85% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75%
Source: Smartphone Italia

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 72% features: 79% display: 85% mobility: 84% ergonomy: 83%
Source: Esperienza Mobile

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hitek

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/30/2017
Source: Antyweb

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Helpix

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Product Test

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 88% mobility: 62%
Source: Yamobi

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2017
Source: Zing

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/16/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/15/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: Tek.no

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil DK

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Portal

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Arena IT

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/26/2017
Source: Playtech.ro

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerblog.ro

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/05/2017
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 658: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.