Huawei P10 Series
Processor: Kirin 658, Kirin 659, Kirin 960Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G71 MP8, ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Display: 5.10 inch, 5.20 inch, 5.50 inch
Weight: 0.144kg, 0.146kg, 0.165kg, 0.169kg
Price: 349, 599, 749 euro
Average of 353 scores (from 735 reviews)
Huawei P10
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei P10Processor: Kirin 960
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Display: 5.10 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.144kg
Price: 599 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
请下一位! 十大于九——华为在P10的设计中很好地实现了这个理念。更快的处理器,更大存储空间,更大电池容量,还有更优秀的相机。它的设计更加圆润,指纹识别器也移到了机身正面。尽管没有重要革新,但华为P10没有暴露出明显的弱点。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For fans of the P9, the P10 is an excellent phone. Huawei has tweaked the design and added nearly all the right upgrades to make it feel like a step up. The phone has an excellent screen, offers top performance and ticks all the right boxes design-wise.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For fans of the P9, the P10 is an excellent phone. Huawei has tweaked the design and added nearly all the right upgrades to make it feel like a step up. The phone has an excellent screen, offers top performance and ticks all the right boxes design-wise.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In its own right the Huawei P10 is a solid piece of kit across the board, both in terms of looks and specs. But once you start looking at other handsets – the iPhone 7 Plus, the Google Pixel, the LG G6, the OnePlus 3T, the Galaxy S8 – things start to fall apart quickly. And a good camera alone cannot change this.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In its own right the Huawei P10 is a solid piece of kit across the board, both in terms of looks and specs. But once you start looking at other handsets – the iPhone 7 Plus, the Google Pixel, the LG G6, the OnePlus 3T, the Galaxy S8 – things start to fall apart quickly. And a good camera alone cannot change this.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While it’s a great device with a clean look, comfortable handling, and practical features, it’s not leading in benchmarks performance and it’s further hampered with middling battery life. The Kirin 960 processor is just a hair below the Snapdragon 820’s results. The Snapdragon 820 itself is already superseded by the better Snapdragon 821 and the current-generation Snapdragon 835. Fortunately for Huawei, the average phone buyer isn’t typically concerned with processor differences.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/15/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While it’s a great device with a clean look, comfortable handling, and practical features, it’s not leading in benchmarks performance and it’s further hampered with middling battery life. The Kirin 960 processor is just a hair below the Snapdragon 820’s results. The Snapdragon 820 itself is already superseded by the better Snapdragon 821 and the current-generation Snapdragon 835. Fortunately for Huawei, the average phone buyer isn’t typically concerned with processor differences.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/15/2017
Source: Techspot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you like the Huawei P10’s feature set and what it brings to the table, I’d recommend you save some cash and grab last year’s model at a far lower cost. If you have the cash to spend and you’re looking for the best smartphone, unfortunately you’ll find that elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techspot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you like the Huawei P10’s feature set and what it brings to the table, I’d recommend you save some cash and grab last year’s model at a far lower cost. If you have the cash to spend and you’re looking for the best smartphone, unfortunately you’ll find that elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you currently own a P9 then the P10’s incrementally improved specs may not be quite enough to justify upgrading to the newer model, especially with its £549 price tag. But if you are coming from an older or lower range model, then you’ll be more than happy with the Huawei P10. The P10 is an evolutionary improvement on the P9, nothing more, nothing less, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. If it featured a higher resolution display and f/1.8 Summilux camera lens like the P10 Plus does, I’d be saying it was a handset capable of competing with the LG G6, Pixel, and Galaxy S8. However, this is the regular P10, with slightly lower specs, and as such, it doesn’t quite match up to the big hitters of 2017.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/03/2017
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you currently own a P9 then the P10’s incrementally improved specs may not be quite enough to justify upgrading to the newer model, especially with its £549 price tag. But if you are coming from an older or lower range model, then you’ll be more than happy with the Huawei P10. The P10 is an evolutionary improvement on the P9, nothing more, nothing less, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. If it featured a higher resolution display and f/1.8 Summilux camera lens like the P10 Plus does, I’d be saying it was a handset capable of competing with the LG G6, Pixel, and Galaxy S8. However, this is the regular P10, with slightly lower specs, and as such, it doesn’t quite match up to the big hitters of 2017.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/03/2017
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei made a huge step ahead with the P9 last year and the company kept performing well after its success. P10 made its fans happy once again with a unibody construction which now carries an octa-core Kirin 960 CPU which increases performance without draining the battery. The latter performed decently in our tests and it comes with several useful power saving modes.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/24/2017
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei made a huge step ahead with the P9 last year and the company kept performing well after its success. P10 made its fans happy once again with a unibody construction which now carries an octa-core Kirin 960 CPU which increases performance without draining the battery. The latter performed decently in our tests and it comes with several useful power saving modes.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/24/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While it’s a great device with a clean look, comfortable handling, and practical features, it’s not leading in benchmarks performance and it’s further hampered with middling battery life. The Kirin 960 processor is just a hair below the Snapdragon 820’s results. The Snapdragon 820 itself is already superseded by the better Snapdragon 821 and the current-generation Snapdragon 835. Fortunately for Huawei, the average phone buyer isn’t typically concerned with processor differences.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 phone is well designed, effective in use and offers an impressive Leica co-branded camera that hints at what the future might hold for great cameras in tiny packages.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While it’s a great device with a clean look, comfortable handling, and practical features, it’s not leading in benchmarks performance and it’s further hampered with middling battery life. The Kirin 960 processor is just a hair below the Snapdragon 820’s results. The Snapdragon 820 itself is already superseded by the better Snapdragon 821 and the current-generation Snapdragon 835. Fortunately for Huawei, the average phone buyer isn’t typically concerned with processor differences.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 phone is well designed, effective in use and offers an impressive Leica co-branded camera that hints at what the future might hold for great cameras in tiny packages.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei has definitely improved on the P9’s design and features, but the significantly higher price tag isn’t so appealing.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/01/2017
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei has definitely improved on the P9’s design and features, but the significantly higher price tag isn’t so appealing.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/01/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 looks to be a great phone you'll love if you're upgrading from a two year old handset, but not much has changed here to keep true Huawei fans thrilled by the flagship line.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 looks to be a great phone you'll love if you're upgrading from a two year old handset, but not much has changed here to keep true Huawei fans thrilled by the flagship line.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the Huawei P10 is no doubt a worthy upgrade from the P9, there are still numerous areas which require some form of polishing. The camera for instance, does not live up to the price of the phone when factoring in its performance under low light. The average battery life of the phone leaves much room for improvement as well. Overall, the Huawei P10 can be deemed as a more refined version of its predecessor, but some letdowns in certain aspects of the phone leaves a lot to be desired. It can be difficult to justify the RM2,499 price tag, but compared to most premium flagships, the P10 is definitely worth every penny spent.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the Huawei P10 is no doubt a worthy upgrade from the P9, there are still numerous areas which require some form of polishing. The camera for instance, does not live up to the price of the phone when factoring in its performance under low light. The average battery life of the phone leaves much room for improvement as well. Overall, the Huawei P10 can be deemed as a more refined version of its predecessor, but some letdowns in certain aspects of the phone leaves a lot to be desired. It can be difficult to justify the RM2,499 price tag, but compared to most premium flagships, the P10 is definitely worth every penny spent.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you can't run to the more-expensive P10 Plus this is a superb, powerful mid-range phone thanks to the brilliant Leica camera and beefy processors.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you can't run to the more-expensive P10 Plus this is a superb, powerful mid-range phone thanks to the brilliant Leica camera and beefy processors.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: What Hi-Fi EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
And that’s a lot of what’s wrong with the P10. Previous P-range handsets from Huawei have always challenged the high-end competition, but at a much cheaper price. At £570, the P10 is now priced alongside them.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: What Hi-Fi EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
And that’s a lot of what’s wrong with the P10. Previous P-range handsets from Huawei have always challenged the high-end competition, but at a much cheaper price. At £570, the P10 is now priced alongside them.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 and P10 Plus are fast. At least they are when using LPDDR4 RAM and UFS 2.0 NAND like both of our review units. It would have been nice to receive a unit with a different memory type (assuming Huawei is actually shipping units with slower hardware) to explore the performance impact, but that’s outside our control.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 and P10 Plus are fast. At least they are when using LPDDR4 RAM and UFS 2.0 NAND like both of our review units. It would have been nice to receive a unit with a different memory type (assuming Huawei is actually shipping units with slower hardware) to explore the performance impact, but that’s outside our control.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the brief time we spent with the P10 and P10 Plus, we didn't really find that much which completely blew us away, but on the other hand we didn't find much to dislike either. It's exactly what you'd expect from a flagship Android phone in 2017 – nothing more, and nothing less – which means the answer to the question of "should you buy this?" largely comes down to whether you've used Huawei phones before and liked them. If you have, then you're going to like the P10.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 05/08/2017
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the brief time we spent with the P10 and P10 Plus, we didn't really find that much which completely blew us away, but on the other hand we didn't find much to dislike either. It's exactly what you'd expect from a flagship Android phone in 2017 – nothing more, and nothing less – which means the answer to the question of "should you buy this?" largely comes down to whether you've used Huawei phones before and liked them. If you have, then you're going to like the P10.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 05/08/2017
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But of course, they aren’t really cameras with phone functionality. They are really Android phones with excellent cameras. They are powered by octacore Kirin 960 processors (up to 4 by 2.4GHz and 4 by 1.8GHz), run Android 7.0 Nougat with Huawei’s EMUI 5.1 skin and have 8 megapixel f/1.9 selfie cameras. And they have a fast charge capability.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But of course, they aren’t really cameras with phone functionality. They are really Android phones with excellent cameras. They are powered by octacore Kirin 960 processors (up to 4 by 2.4GHz and 4 by 1.8GHz), run Android 7.0 Nougat with Huawei’s EMUI 5.1 skin and have 8 megapixel f/1.9 selfie cameras. And they have a fast charge capability.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Source: V3.co.uk EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The latest flagship Android device from Huawei is the Huawei P10, a more refined version of its predecessor that sees the return of the Leica-branded dual-camera setup on the rear of the handset, and the shift of the fingerprint sensor from the rear to the front.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2017
Source: V3.co.uk EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The latest flagship Android device from Huawei is the Huawei P10, a more refined version of its predecessor that sees the return of the Leica-branded dual-camera setup on the rear of the handset, and the shift of the fingerprint sensor from the rear to the front.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2017
Source: Androidbeat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In addition to the other caveats above, there are two other dark clouds over the P10, and they’re of Huawei’s own making. You see, they also announced the P10 Plus and this brings in a 5.5” QHD display for only 8mm extra length to the phone. And the Plus model has extra storage and RAM options, a main camera with much larger f/1.8 aperture, and a 3750mAh battery. Now, the Plus is slightly harder to find for sale, and is usually well over £100 (or local equivalent) more expensive, but it’s undoubtedly the better option if it’s available where you are in the world and if you can find the cash.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2017
Source: Androidbeat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In addition to the other caveats above, there are two other dark clouds over the P10, and they’re of Huawei’s own making. You see, they also announced the P10 Plus and this brings in a 5.5” QHD display for only 8mm extra length to the phone. And the Plus model has extra storage and RAM options, a main camera with much larger f/1.8 aperture, and a 3750mAh battery. Now, the Plus is slightly harder to find for sale, and is usually well over £100 (or local equivalent) more expensive, but it’s undoubtedly the better option if it’s available where you are in the world and if you can find the cash.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2017
Source: DP Review EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 combines a beautifully made metal body and powerful processing with a very capable camera. Thanks to Huawei's new Kirin 960 chipset the P10 always feels smooth and responsive in general operation, and the Leica-branded dual-camera offers very good still image quality across the ISO range, especially in lower light conditions.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: DP Review EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 combines a beautifully made metal body and powerful processing with a very capable camera. Thanks to Huawei's new Kirin 960 chipset the P10 always feels smooth and responsive in general operation, and the Leica-branded dual-camera offers very good still image quality across the ISO range, especially in lower light conditions.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite some criticisms, the P10's lovely design and brilliant camera make it a very compelling choice -- as long as you can stomach the cost.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite some criticisms, the P10's lovely design and brilliant camera make it a very compelling choice -- as long as you can stomach the cost.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: New Atlas EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is unlikely to come to the US directly, but it's on sale without a contract in Europe for €649 and the UK for £570 (roughly US$690-710), so slightly below the top-tier prices but not by all that much. It's also worth noting that the P10 Plus is another option for buyers, with a 5.5-inch, QHD display, and the option of more RAM and storage.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Source: New Atlas EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is unlikely to come to the US directly, but it's on sale without a contract in Europe for €649 and the UK for £570 (roughly US$690-710), so slightly below the top-tier prices but not by all that much. It's also worth noting that the P10 Plus is another option for buyers, with a 5.5-inch, QHD display, and the option of more RAM and storage.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Source: Soycincau EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Would I buy a P10? My answer is almost certainly a no. This time, the larger Plus version definitely is the more appealing phone to me because it represents a bigger leap forward. However, its RM3,099 price tag is also one that’s a little hard to swallow so I’ll let you know my final decision on that phone when I’m done with that review.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 looks to be a great phone you'll love if you're upgrading from a two year old handset, but not much has changed here to keep true Huawei fans thrilled by the flagship line.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Soycincau EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Would I buy a P10? My answer is almost certainly a no. This time, the larger Plus version definitely is the more appealing phone to me because it represents a bigger leap forward. However, its RM3,099 price tag is also one that’s a little hard to swallow so I’ll let you know my final decision on that phone when I’m done with that review.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 looks to be a great phone you'll love if you're upgrading from a two year old handset, but not much has changed here to keep true Huawei fans thrilled by the flagship line.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, the Huawei P10 is a beast of a phone when it comes to speed and camera performance. It has all the features and stability of a flagship device. Perhaps the camera could be a little difficult to use for an average consumer, but it does take great photos when you really understand the concept of photography. The price tag is pretty reasonable at RM 2499 especially if you are considering the P10 for its various photography features. Normal users can still take advantage of these features, but pro photographers will really enjoy the P10.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, the Huawei P10 is a beast of a phone when it comes to speed and camera performance. It has all the features and stability of a flagship device. Perhaps the camera could be a little difficult to use for an average consumer, but it does take great photos when you really understand the concept of photography. The price tag is pretty reasonable at RM 2499 especially if you are considering the P10 for its various photography features. Normal users can still take advantage of these features, but pro photographers will really enjoy the P10.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 feels like a coming of age device for Huawei. The experience is sleeker, the software more mature, the finish more refined than it has been before. Add great battery life, decent dual cameras and microSD expansion (or dual SIM) and there's a plenty to like. There's all the power and usability you're likely to ever need from a phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 feels like a coming of age device for Huawei. The experience is sleeker, the software more mature, the finish more refined than it has been before. Add great battery life, decent dual cameras and microSD expansion (or dual SIM) and there's a plenty to like. There's all the power and usability you're likely to ever need from a phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is great for those looking for a very capable and powerful smartphone in a smaller package. There is definitely a focus on the camera experience too. The P10 looks great and US customers can buy the P10 through online retailers such as Amazon as a GSM unlocked device for about $800.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So, the big question is, should you upgrade to the P10? If you’re coming from the P9, not really – the image quality of the P10 is good, but it’s not enough to necessitate the upgrade from Huawei’s already solid dual-camera flagship from last year. If you are looking for an upgrade, you’d be better served by the Mate 9, which basically has the same guts and camera as the P10, encased in body that holds a bigger display and battery.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In its own right the Huawei P10 is a solid piece of kit across the board, both in terms of looks and specs. But once you start looking at other handsets – the iPhone 7 Plus, the Google Pixel, the LG G6, the OnePlus 3T, the Galaxy S8 – things start to fall apart quickly. And a good camera alone cannot change this.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is great for those looking for a very capable and powerful smartphone in a smaller package. There is definitely a focus on the camera experience too. The P10 looks great and US customers can buy the P10 through online retailers such as Amazon as a GSM unlocked device for about $800.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So, the big question is, should you upgrade to the P10? If you’re coming from the P9, not really – the image quality of the P10 is good, but it’s not enough to necessitate the upgrade from Huawei’s already solid dual-camera flagship from last year. If you are looking for an upgrade, you’d be better served by the Mate 9, which basically has the same guts and camera as the P10, encased in body that holds a bigger display and battery.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In its own right the Huawei P10 is a solid piece of kit across the board, both in terms of looks and specs. But once you start looking at other handsets – the iPhone 7 Plus, the Google Pixel, the LG G6, the OnePlus 3T, the Galaxy S8 – things start to fall apart quickly. And a good camera alone cannot change this.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei P10 has great features such as dual camera lens, 64GB ROM and 4GB RAM. The device is packed with full top-notch features and we have tested the device and it has not given us any negative point. Fingerprint Sensor also work very fast and quick moreover its camera results are brilliant.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phone Scoop EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is one of those phones that snatches defeat from the jaws of victory. In baseball, the P10 would be a home run that winds up being a double because some dumb fan caught the ball and threw it to third base. The P10 is so close to being a killer phone, and yet it falls disappointingly short. I have no complaints about the basic hardware. Aside from the too-familiar design, Huawei pieced together a nice set of high-quality materials in a compact form that's a pleasure to use day in and day out. Call quality is very good, data speeds are fine, the screen is nice (though prone to grime), and battery life is outstanding. The camera app is incredibly powerful and produces mostly excellent results.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei P10 has great features such as dual camera lens, 64GB ROM and 4GB RAM. The device is packed with full top-notch features and we have tested the device and it has not given us any negative point. Fingerprint Sensor also work very fast and quick moreover its camera results are brilliant.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phone Scoop EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is one of those phones that snatches defeat from the jaws of victory. In baseball, the P10 would be a home run that winds up being a double because some dumb fan caught the ball and threw it to third base. The P10 is so close to being a killer phone, and yet it falls disappointingly short. I have no complaints about the basic hardware. Aside from the too-familiar design, Huawei pieced together a nice set of high-quality materials in a compact form that's a pleasure to use day in and day out. Call quality is very good, data speeds are fine, the screen is nice (though prone to grime), and battery life is outstanding. The camera app is incredibly powerful and produces mostly excellent results.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: The Verge EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei is a titan outside the US — the third-biggest smartphone vendor in the world, according to data from IDC. It has the resources to keep on trying to crack the West, and it’s sinking money into research and marketing in an attempt to overthrow Apple and Samsung. It ought to have the ability to design a phone that customers the world over would genuinely want. On the evidence of the P10, though, the US isn’t missing out on all that much.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 69%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is an impressive beast – it’s gorgeous, powerful and the dual cameras are a huge improvement over the 2016 flagship, the P9. Portrait mode works better than expected, photos are crisp, vibrant and detailed and even the selfie camera has had a meaningful upgrade. Huawei’s EMUI, one of the most controversial Android overlays, is much better to use than with previous smartphones, and offers machine learning algorithms that should speed up your phone the more you use it. Even the price is competitive at £569.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Verge EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei is a titan outside the US — the third-biggest smartphone vendor in the world, according to data from IDC. It has the resources to keep on trying to crack the West, and it’s sinking money into research and marketing in an attempt to overthrow Apple and Samsung. It ought to have the ability to design a phone that customers the world over would genuinely want. On the evidence of the P10, though, the US isn’t missing out on all that much.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 69%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is an impressive beast – it’s gorgeous, powerful and the dual cameras are a huge improvement over the 2016 flagship, the P9. Portrait mode works better than expected, photos are crisp, vibrant and detailed and even the selfie camera has had a meaningful upgrade. Huawei’s EMUI, one of the most controversial Android overlays, is much better to use than with previous smartphones, and offers machine learning algorithms that should speed up your phone the more you use it. Even the price is competitive at £569.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
One thing very much in the favour of Huawei's P series of phones is they are usually that bit cheaper than Apple and Samsung's efforts. And Google's too, if the Pixel is any guide. And while that's still true here, the price of its flagship devices keeps creeping up - the P10 is £569 SIM free.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
One thing very much in the favour of Huawei's P series of phones is they are usually that bit cheaper than Apple and Samsung's efforts. And Google's too, if the Pixel is any guide. And while that's still true here, the price of its flagship devices keeps creeping up - the P10 is £569 SIM free.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is an impressive beast – it’s gorgeous, powerful and the dual cameras are a huge improvement over the 2016 flagship, the P9. Portrait mode works better than expected, photos are crisp, vibrant and detailed and even the selfie camera has had a meaningful upgrade. Huawei’s EMUI, one of the most controversial Android overlays, is much better to use than with previous smartphones, and offers machine learning algorithms that should speed up your phone the more you use it. Even the price is competitive at £499.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is an impressive beast – it’s gorgeous, powerful and the dual cameras are a huge improvement over the 2016 flagship, the P9. Portrait mode works better than expected, photos are crisp, vibrant and detailed and even the selfie camera has had a meaningful upgrade. Huawei’s EMUI, one of the most controversial Android overlays, is much better to use than with previous smartphones, and offers machine learning algorithms that should speed up your phone the more you use it. Even the price is competitive at £499.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Reg Hardware EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 story is one of steady improvement, rather than revolutionary change. But the odd thing is that the real action here is going on with the P10’s bigger sibling, the 5.5inch display P10 Plus. For only £50 more SIM-free, the P10 Plus boasts a Leica Summilax f/1.8 aperture main sensor, offering far better low light performance, 4x4 MIMO antennas for 600mbit/s download speeds on LTE, and an infra-red blaster. The display is true QHD (1440 x 2560 at around 540 ppi) And, as you’d expect, you the Plus packs a bigger battery.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Reg Hardware EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 story is one of steady improvement, rather than revolutionary change. But the odd thing is that the real action here is going on with the P10’s bigger sibling, the 5.5inch display P10 Plus. For only £50 more SIM-free, the P10 Plus boasts a Leica Summilax f/1.8 aperture main sensor, offering far better low light performance, 4x4 MIMO antennas for 600mbit/s download speeds on LTE, and an infra-red blaster. The display is true QHD (1440 x 2560 at around 540 ppi) And, as you’d expect, you the Plus packs a bigger battery.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei set the claim that the P10 was their best smartphone yet, and that’s something that virtually every manufacturer says about its new phone. However, the Huawei P10 might almost be the best smartphone yet. It sets the new line in the sand in benchmarks, and in the hand, it feels perfectly usable. The software is quick, responsive, and enjoyable. The camera launches very quickly, takes great photos, and offers some excellent creative effects which really jazz up your photos with adjustable colouring, depth of field, and more.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95%
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei set the claim that the P10 was their best smartphone yet, and that’s something that virtually every manufacturer says about its new phone. However, the Huawei P10 might almost be the best smartphone yet. It sets the new line in the sand in benchmarks, and in the hand, it feels perfectly usable. The software is quick, responsive, and enjoyable. The camera launches very quickly, takes great photos, and offers some excellent creative effects which really jazz up your photos with adjustable colouring, depth of field, and more.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95%
Source: Forbes EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
When I reviewed the Huawei P9 about a year ago, one of the things that caught my attention was how proud Huawei was of its Chinese roots, flaunting that the device was "Made in China" when all other Chinese brands (and American brands, like Ivanka Trump's clothing line or Apple) tries to hide that fact. The most shameless of these may be Shenzhen-based ZTE, which puts "Designed in USA" on the box of its Axon 7 smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/19/2017
Source: Forbes EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
When I reviewed the Huawei P9 about a year ago, one of the things that caught my attention was how proud Huawei was of its Chinese roots, flaunting that the device was "Made in China" when all other Chinese brands (and American brands, like Ivanka Trump's clothing line or Apple) tries to hide that fact. The most shameless of these may be Shenzhen-based ZTE, which puts "Designed in USA" on the box of its Axon 7 smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/19/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 feels like a coming of age device for Huawei. The experience is sleeker, the software more mature, the finish more refined than it has been before. Add great battery life, decent dual cameras and microSD expansion (or dual SIM) and there's a plenty to like. There's all the power and usability you're likely to ever need from a phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If it has been awhile since you've bought a new flagship smartphone, opting for the Huawei P10 is well advised. If however, you purchased a P9 or perhaps a Galaxy S7 or LG G5, making the jump to this iteration of the device feels less warranted. While Huawei has made a number of subtle changes and enhancements to the P10, there is not a big enough jump from this iteration and the previous one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is definitely a commendable flagship smartphone. While its battery life could definitely be improved, its other attributes are that of a capable high-end device. It has a solid camera, premium (albeit familiar) design and performance expected of a flagship smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 feels like a coming of age device for Huawei. The experience is sleeker, the software more mature, the finish more refined than it has been before. Add great battery life, decent dual cameras and microSD expansion (or dual SIM) and there's a plenty to like. There's all the power and usability you're likely to ever need from a phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If it has been awhile since you've bought a new flagship smartphone, opting for the Huawei P10 is well advised. If however, you purchased a P9 or perhaps a Galaxy S7 or LG G5, making the jump to this iteration of the device feels less warranted. While Huawei has made a number of subtle changes and enhancements to the P10, there is not a big enough jump from this iteration and the previous one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 is definitely a commendable flagship smartphone. While its battery life could definitely be improved, its other attributes are that of a capable high-end device. It has a solid camera, premium (albeit familiar) design and performance expected of a flagship smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 and P10 Plus are not perfect, but they are about as close as it is possible to get right now. They offer almost all the benefits of the larger Mate 9 flagship but in smaller, more manageable form factors. To put this is in perspective, most smartphones in the 5.1-inch range don’t have half the features of the regular P10, and the P10 Plus can comfortably hold its own against any of the 5.5-inch flagships around right now, even if some might argue it’s a little overpriced.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 and P10 Plus are not perfect, but they are about as close as it is possible to get right now. They offer almost all the benefits of the larger Mate 9 flagship but in smaller, more manageable form factors. To put this is in perspective, most smartphones in the 5.1-inch range don’t have half the features of the regular P10, and the P10 Plus can comfortably hold its own against any of the 5.5-inch flagships around right now, even if some might argue it’s a little overpriced.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Personally, the whole oleophobic kerfuffle with the Huawei P10 has considerably dampened my enthusiasm for these phones. This is a core hardware feature which has been the norm in just about every flagship smartphone for the past decade. The P10 forces me to choose between two bad options: leave the screen protector on and deal with a display that feels like crappy plastic, or take it off and live in a frustrating hellscape of screen smudges.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Personally, the whole oleophobic kerfuffle with the Huawei P10 has considerably dampened my enthusiasm for these phones. This is a core hardware feature which has been the norm in just about every flagship smartphone for the past decade. The P10 forces me to choose between two bad options: leave the screen protector on and deal with a display that feels like crappy plastic, or take it off and live in a frustrating hellscape of screen smudges.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All things considered, the Huawei P10 is not a groundbreaking improvement over the P9. However, it does introduce a host of meaningful improvements and incremental tweaks over the already-decent P9 in order to offer a better overall experience to the user. Somehow, this “more of the same” formula works just fine for Huawei.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All things considered, the Huawei P10 is not a groundbreaking improvement over the P9. However, it does introduce a host of meaningful improvements and incremental tweaks over the already-decent P9 in order to offer a better overall experience to the user. Somehow, this “more of the same” formula works just fine for Huawei.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 has all the essential features of a great flagship smartphone — beautiful design, impressive performance, really good camera and improved battery life. We also applaud taking the risk in introducing a variety of unusual colors such as dazzling blue and greenry. Huawei has done a great job in making the P10 a very desirable device.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 has all the essential features of a great flagship smartphone — beautiful design, impressive performance, really good camera and improved battery life. We also applaud taking the risk in introducing a variety of unusual colors such as dazzling blue and greenry. Huawei has done a great job in making the P10 a very desirable device.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei P10 is upgrading the P9 big time - there is a new and striking design, a huge hardware leap with the Kirin 960 chip, and the new Leica Dual Camera 2.0. If we had to plan a sequel for the P9 one year ago, we couldn't have imagined it better than the P10.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Source: Pocketnow EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In a way, this phone isn’t really getting a fair shake, as the most immediate comparison people make is against the bigger brother Mate which only just made it to the United States about a month ago. Remembering that this is an update to the P9, nearly every aspect of this phone is noticeably better than last year’s fashion flagship. Screaming performance, better battery life, significantly faster charging, and an evolved camera system. It’s admirable that Huawei packaged all of these improvements while also playing with some new design elements and focusing on fresh color options.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei P10 is upgrading the P9 big time - there is a new and striking design, a huge hardware leap with the Kirin 960 chip, and the new Leica Dual Camera 2.0. If we had to plan a sequel for the P9 one year ago, we couldn't have imagined it better than the P10.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Source: Pocketnow EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In a way, this phone isn’t really getting a fair shake, as the most immediate comparison people make is against the bigger brother Mate which only just made it to the United States about a month ago. Remembering that this is an update to the P9, nearly every aspect of this phone is noticeably better than last year’s fashion flagship. Screaming performance, better battery life, significantly faster charging, and an evolved camera system. It’s admirable that Huawei packaged all of these improvements while also playing with some new design elements and focusing on fresh color options.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I’m also not convinced about its price. The Huawei P10 Plus is only €50 more than the regular P10 and comes with a better camera, a larger higher-resolution screen, and 128GB of storage. Although I can't comment definitively until I get to test the P10 Plus, this combination of factors adds up to make it appear the better option for those who can afford it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For Smartphone video enthusiasts, the Huawei P10 offers 1080p@60fps, as well as higher-resolution 2160p@30fps moving image capture, and achieves a good Video sub-score of 84 points. Videos generally have pleasant exposures with good dynamic range and accurate white balance in all conditions. The excellent detail and texture seen in stills persists in movie files, too, with well-defined edges and plenty of fine detail present. Autofocus performance for video is very good, too, with fast reaction and smooth convergence during scene changes and in panning videos.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I’m also not convinced about its price. The Huawei P10 Plus is only €50 more than the regular P10 and comes with a better camera, a larger higher-resolution screen, and 128GB of storage. Although I can't comment definitively until I get to test the P10 Plus, this combination of factors adds up to make it appear the better option for those who can afford it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For Smartphone video enthusiasts, the Huawei P10 offers 1080p@60fps, as well as higher-resolution 2160p@30fps moving image capture, and achieves a good Video sub-score of 84 points. Videos generally have pleasant exposures with good dynamic range and accurate white balance in all conditions. The excellent detail and texture seen in stills persists in movie files, too, with well-defined edges and plenty of fine detail present. Autofocus performance for video is very good, too, with fast reaction and smooth convergence during scene changes and in panning videos.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Speaking of cost, the P10 looks like retailing at £599 when it arrives on March 31. That’ll put it just a smidgen below the absolute top-tier phones - which is apt, because that’s also where it sits in terms of overall quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Speaking of cost, the P10 looks like retailing at £599 when it arrives on March 31. That’ll put it just a smidgen below the absolute top-tier phones - which is apt, because that’s also where it sits in terms of overall quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei P10 Review: After a week of using the Huawei P10 flagship phone as my full-time smartphone, I'm more than impressed with Huawei's enticing blend of attractive design, solid specs and fully-functional software. Here's our full Huawei P10 review.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei P10 Review: After a week of using the Huawei P10 flagship phone as my full-time smartphone, I'm more than impressed with Huawei's enticing blend of attractive design, solid specs and fully-functional software. Here's our full Huawei P10 review.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: T Break EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 could easily be described as a Mate 9 mini with a refreshed design. The Mate 9 was a fantastic phone and bringing it down to a size that’s usable with one-handed will surely attract the crowd that shies away from phablets. I do wish that the P10 was equipped with the new camera that Huawei has put on the P10 Plus.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% performance: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: T Break EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 could easily be described as a Mate 9 mini with a refreshed design. The Mate 9 was a fantastic phone and bringing it down to a size that’s usable with one-handed will surely attract the crowd that shies away from phablets. I do wish that the P10 was equipped with the new camera that Huawei has put on the P10 Plus.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% performance: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: V3.co.uk EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 looks and feel very similar to the P9, and even closer to Apple's flagship than previous attempts. But all-in-all it seems responsive thanks to a number of spec updates. The screen is pretty neat and there's everything there's you'd expect from the Chinese manufacturer, just nothing really that innovative.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/03/2017
Source: V3.co.uk EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 looks and feel very similar to the P9, and even closer to Apple's flagship than previous attempts. But all-in-all it seems responsive thanks to a number of spec updates. The screen is pretty neat and there's everything there's you'd expect from the Chinese manufacturer, just nothing really that innovative.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/03/2017
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Both the P10 and P10 Plus are more iterative products this time around, and that’s okay. Huawei has found a winning formula to their phones, and it makes sense for the company to milk it (and their partnership with Leica) for all its worth. Still it’d be interesting to see how both phones will fare in the local market considering that they’re priced higher than the previous models, with the top tier P10 Plus priced at past 40K. At those levels you’re already talking about iPhone-level pricing, something that simply doesn’t fly in the Philippines. We’ll have to see when the phones officially launch in April.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Both the P10 and P10 Plus are more iterative products this time around, and that’s okay. Huawei has found a winning formula to their phones, and it makes sense for the company to milk it (and their partnership with Leica) for all its worth. Still it’d be interesting to see how both phones will fare in the local market considering that they’re priced higher than the previous models, with the top tier P10 Plus priced at past 40K. At those levels you’re already talking about iPhone-level pricing, something that simply doesn’t fly in the Philippines. We’ll have to see when the phones officially launch in April.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10, at least based on initial impressions, feels like a solid if a little uninspiring update to the P9 blueprint. Yes there are some design changes – I personally always prefer a front fingerprint sensor rather than rear – but there’s not been as great an evolution between models as seen in rivals such as the LG G6 or heavily rumoured changes to the Samsung Galaxy S8.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I really like the Huawei P10. I like the Dazzling Blue version with its Diamond-Cut back, I like the sleek look and feel of the black version and I like the fact that it's at least trying something a bit different with the green model. Not that I'd buy that one myself.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We managed to get some alone time with the recently announced Huawei P10, in this case, the graphite black and did a brief first looks hands-on and unboxing as shown in the images. We even did a comparison with the previous Huawei P9 which you can see in the video below but you can also check our Huawei P9 vs P10 comparison tool as well:
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nonetheless, the coming month will be a very interesting – and crucial – time for Huawei. If the Chinese company plays its cards right and price its new flagships well, the P10 and P10 Plus may be another success story; they certainly have the potential.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the brief time we spent with the P10 and P10 Plus, we didn't really find that much which completely blew us away, but on the other hand we didn't find much to dislike either. It's exactly what you'd expect from a flagship Android phone in 2017 – nothing more, and nothing less – which means the answer to the question of "should you buy this?" largely comes down to whether you've used Huawei phones before and liked them. If you have, then you're going to like the P10.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10, at least based on initial impressions, feels like a solid if a little uninspiring update to the P9 blueprint. Yes there are some design changes – I personally always prefer a front fingerprint sensor rather than rear – but there’s not been as great an evolution between models as seen in rivals such as the LG G6 or heavily rumoured changes to the Samsung Galaxy S8.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I really like the Huawei P10. I like the Dazzling Blue version with its Diamond-Cut back, I like the sleek look and feel of the black version and I like the fact that it's at least trying something a bit different with the green model. Not that I'd buy that one myself.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We managed to get some alone time with the recently announced Huawei P10, in this case, the graphite black and did a brief first looks hands-on and unboxing as shown in the images. We even did a comparison with the previous Huawei P9 which you can see in the video below but you can also check our Huawei P9 vs P10 comparison tool as well:
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Lowyat.net EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Nonetheless, the coming month will be a very interesting – and crucial – time for Huawei. If the Chinese company plays its cards right and price its new flagships well, the P10 and P10 Plus may be another success story; they certainly have the potential.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the brief time we spent with the P10 and P10 Plus, we didn't really find that much which completely blew us away, but on the other hand we didn't find much to dislike either. It's exactly what you'd expect from a flagship Android phone in 2017 – nothing more, and nothing less – which means the answer to the question of "should you buy this?" largely comes down to whether you've used Huawei phones before and liked them. If you have, then you're going to like the P10.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10's biggest success might be the one thing we've barely discussed: its size. At 5.1-inches, it's nearer to palm-size than many of the current giant phones on the market and that, irrelevant of greenery/dazzling blue colours, we suspect will be the feature to lure punters in.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: The Independent EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei hasn't announced UK pricing yet, but the P10 will cost €649 and the P10 Plus will cost €699 when they go on sale in March.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10's biggest success might be the one thing we've barely discussed: its size. At 5.1-inches, it's nearer to palm-size than many of the current giant phones on the market and that, irrelevant of greenery/dazzling blue colours, we suspect will be the feature to lure punters in.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: The Independent EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei hasn't announced UK pricing yet, but the P10 will cost €649 and the P10 Plus will cost €699 when they go on sale in March.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Connect - 9/17
Single Review, , Short, Date: 09/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90%
Source: Connect - 9/17
Single Review, , Short, Date: 09/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90%
Source: Smart Web DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% features: 91% display: 94%
Source: Smart Web DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% features: 91% display: 94%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 100%
Source: Cyberbloc DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Cyberbloc DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2017
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 84% performance: 100% features: 80% display: 100% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 84% performance: 100% features: 80% display: 100% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2017
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2017
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/27/2017
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/27/2017
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2017
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2017
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% features: 91% ergonomy: 84%
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% features: 91% ergonomy: 84%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 83%
Source: Bulaland DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 83%
Source: Bulaland DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: RP-Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/04/2017
Source: RP-Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/04/2017
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: RP-Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2017
Source: RP-Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2017
Source: Technik Surfer DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70%
Source: PocketPC DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Technik Surfer DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70%
Source: PocketPC DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Frankfurter Allgemeine DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/22/2017
Source: Frankfurter Allgemeine DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/22/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 88% display: 87% mobility: 88%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: PC Welt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 88% display: 87% mobility: 88%
Source: IT-Markt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Source: IT-Markt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2017
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2017
Source: Notebookinfo DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% performance: 95% display: 95% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 90% emissions: 98%
Source: Notebookinfo DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% performance: 95% display: 95% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 90% emissions: 98%
Source: Computerbild - 6/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Computerbild - 6/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 90% display: 91% mobility: 90%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% features: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 90% display: 91% mobility: 90%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% features: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/10/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/10/2017
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 91% display: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 91% display: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2017
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 98% features: 96% display: 92% mobility: 87%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 98% features: 96% display: 92% mobility: 87%
Source: Sin Celular ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/09/2017
Source: Sin Celular ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/09/2017
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/08/2017
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/08/2017
Source: Geeknetic ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Geeknetic ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/30/2017
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/30/2017
Source: Noticias 3D ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/16/2017
Source: Noticias 3D ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/16/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Source: Andro Asia ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 85%
Source: Andro Asia ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 85%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 90% features: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 90% features: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 88% display: 85% mobility: 88% workmanship: 93%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 88% display: 85% mobility: 88% workmanship: 93%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/25/2017
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/25/2017
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 100% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 100% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/04/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/04/2017
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2017
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2017
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2017
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2017
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2017
Source: Notebook Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Source: Notebook Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/18/2017
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/18/2017
Source: Geek 4 You IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Geek 4 You IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 70% features: 85% display: 85% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 75% features: 85% display: 87% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 70% features: 85% display: 85% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 75% features: 85% display: 87% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 69% display: 76% mobility: 69% workmanship: 82%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 69% display: 76% mobility: 69% workmanship: 82%
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Techstation.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Techstation.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Techzine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 85% display: 65% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Techzine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 85% display: 65% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/16/2017
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/16/2017
Source: Les Mobiles FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Les Mobiles FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/26/2017
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/26/2017
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/12/2017
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/12/2017
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Galaktyczny PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 95% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Galaktyczny PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 95% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 100%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 100%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/29/2017
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/29/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2017
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: HWSW HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: HWSW HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Smartfoun.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: Smartfoun.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: Smartfoun.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: Smartfoun.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: CNews.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Source: CNews.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/31/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/31/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/12/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/12/2017
Source: PC Store BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2017
Source: PC Store BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2017
Source: Mobility.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Source: Mobility.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Tweak.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tweak.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Portal SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Portal SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Source: Puhelinvertailu →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Puhelinvertailu →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Huawei P10 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei P10 PlusProcessor: Kirin 960
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixels
Weight: 0.165kg
Price: 749 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
性能提升?华为P10 Plus是华为P10高端智能手机中的更大,更好的机型,在我们的评级中达到“非常好”。5.5英寸的P10 Plus能做得更好吗?我们把答案放在评测中。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
P10 Plus has many similarities with the classic P10, while their most significant difference lies in the dimensions. The display is now 5.5″ which will appeal to the users looking for bigger working space. What’s more, the resolution is also increased, so if you insist on the really high image detail, P10 Plus will provide it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/02/2017
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
P10 Plus has many similarities with the classic P10, while their most significant difference lies in the dimensions. The display is now 5.5″ which will appeal to the users looking for bigger working space. What’s more, the resolution is also increased, so if you insist on the really high image detail, P10 Plus will provide it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/02/2017
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 Plus is definitely a worthy upgrade over the old P9 Plus, it’s upgraded Leica dual camera system is the only reason that you will want to invest on if you are serious about smartphone photography, it also outperforms certain flagship smartphone cameras with great dynamic range and detail. Otherwise, smartphone performance is similar to the Honor 8 Pro, which costs RM1,000 less than the P10 Plus, or you could also consider the Mate 9 if you are particular about battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/08/2017
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 Plus is definitely a worthy upgrade over the old P9 Plus, it’s upgraded Leica dual camera system is the only reason that you will want to invest on if you are serious about smartphone photography, it also outperforms certain flagship smartphone cameras with great dynamic range and detail. Otherwise, smartphone performance is similar to the Honor 8 Pro, which costs RM1,000 less than the P10 Plus, or you could also consider the Mate 9 if you are particular about battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/08/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While it’s a great device with a clean look, comfortable handling, and practical features, it’s not leading in benchmarks performance and it’s further hampered with middling battery life. The Kirin 960 processor is just a hair below the Snapdragon 820’s results. The Snapdragon 820 itself is already superseded by the better Snapdragon 821 and the current-generation Snapdragon 835. Fortunately for Huawei, the average phone buyer isn’t typically concerned with processor differences.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/15/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While it’s a great device with a clean look, comfortable handling, and practical features, it’s not leading in benchmarks performance and it’s further hampered with middling battery life. The Kirin 960 processor is just a hair below the Snapdragon 820’s results. The Snapdragon 820 itself is already superseded by the better Snapdragon 821 and the current-generation Snapdragon 835. Fortunately for Huawei, the average phone buyer isn’t typically concerned with processor differences.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/15/2017
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you're a budget-minded Android user looking for a premium phone with a great camera, this handset is for you. If battery and a powerhouse chipset are your main concern, I’d look elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you're a budget-minded Android user looking for a premium phone with a great camera, this handset is for you. If battery and a powerhouse chipset are your main concern, I’d look elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 Plus is a totally decent phone: it's got brisk performance, a camera that's more flexible than most, and a big, high-res screen. But at the same time, it's also a phone that's really difficult to feel very passionately for.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 Plus is a totally decent phone: it's got brisk performance, a camera that's more flexible than most, and a big, high-res screen. But at the same time, it's also a phone that's really difficult to feel very passionately for.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei software is much improved, so much so that I am very tempted to make the P10 Plus my daily driver and may just do so if I can get root access (stay tuned for my how to root your P10 and P10 Plus piece coming soon). You can change the theme to whatever you want or you can make your own fairly easily using the plethora of EMUI theme factory apps on the Play Store. Huawei have ruined parts of the stock Nougat (the sharing and open with intents for starters) but most of their enhancements really are enhancements.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95%
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei software is much improved, so much so that I am very tempted to make the P10 Plus my daily driver and may just do so if I can get root access (stay tuned for my how to root your P10 and P10 Plus piece coming soon). You can change the theme to whatever you want or you can make your own fairly easily using the plethora of EMUI theme factory apps on the Play Store. Huawei have ruined parts of the stock Nougat (the sharing and open with intents for starters) but most of their enhancements really are enhancements.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While it’s a great device with a clean look, comfortable handling, and practical features, it’s not leading in benchmarks performance and it’s further hampered with middling battery life. The Kirin 960 processor is just a hair below the Snapdragon 820’s results. The Snapdragon 820 itself is already superseded by the better Snapdragon 821 and the current-generation Snapdragon 835. Fortunately for Huawei, the average phone buyer isn’t typically concerned with processor differences.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: What Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P9 was a huge success for the Chinese manufacturer, being the first smartphone from the company to reach over 10 million sales worldwide. The partnership with famed glass maker Leica proved to be a worthwhile investment, even if those sample images generated a bit of controversy. Creating a successor was always going to be a difficult move for Huawei, as the handset needs to excel in some very crucial areas. Will it be able to take the camera even further and continue to impress, or is this just an incremental upgrade? Let’s find out…
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 60% performance: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While it’s a great device with a clean look, comfortable handling, and practical features, it’s not leading in benchmarks performance and it’s further hampered with middling battery life. The Kirin 960 processor is just a hair below the Snapdragon 820’s results. The Snapdragon 820 itself is already superseded by the better Snapdragon 821 and the current-generation Snapdragon 835. Fortunately for Huawei, the average phone buyer isn’t typically concerned with processor differences.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: What Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P9 was a huge success for the Chinese manufacturer, being the first smartphone from the company to reach over 10 million sales worldwide. The partnership with famed glass maker Leica proved to be a worthwhile investment, even if those sample images generated a bit of controversy. Creating a successor was always going to be a difficult move for Huawei, as the handset needs to excel in some very crucial areas. Will it be able to take the camera even further and continue to impress, or is this just an incremental upgrade? Let’s find out…
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 60% performance: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Getting your hands on a P10 Plus will cost you roughly R13 999 if you opt for the 6 GB RAM, 128 GB onboard storage model. While crossing the R10k threshold is always going to be a tough ask for consumers, if the camera performance of a flagship device is important to you, then the option on the P10 Plus is certainly worth it.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/18/2017
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Getting your hands on a P10 Plus will cost you roughly R13 999 if you opt for the 6 GB RAM, 128 GB onboard storage model. While crossing the R10k threshold is always going to be a tough ask for consumers, if the camera performance of a flagship device is important to you, then the option on the P10 Plus is certainly worth it.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/18/2017
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei's phones have arguably been the most innovative in recent years. The P10 Plus is an impressive flagship with an outstanding camera and no real weak point (except for annoying low-light camera performance).
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 95%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei's phones have arguably been the most innovative in recent years. The P10 Plus is an impressive flagship with an outstanding camera and no real weak point (except for annoying low-light camera performance).
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 95%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The recent Huawei P-type smartphones place huge emphasis on their photography features, thanks to their collaboration with Leica. Ever since the Huawei P9, Leica and Huawei have begun working even more closely for better mobile photography. More work has gone behind the P10 Plus's cameras, such as implementing new lenses, and an overhaul to its algorithms.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/13/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The recent Huawei P-type smartphones place huge emphasis on their photography features, thanks to their collaboration with Leica. Ever since the Huawei P9, Leica and Huawei have begun working even more closely for better mobile photography. More work has gone behind the P10 Plus's cameras, such as implementing new lenses, and an overhaul to its algorithms.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/13/2017
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 and P10 Plus are fast. At least they are when using LPDDR4 RAM and UFS 2.0 NAND like both of our review units. It would have been nice to receive a unit with a different memory type (assuming Huawei is actually shipping units with slower hardware) to explore the performance impact, but that’s outside our control.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 and P10 Plus are fast. At least they are when using LPDDR4 RAM and UFS 2.0 NAND like both of our review units. It would have been nice to receive a unit with a different memory type (assuming Huawei is actually shipping units with slower hardware) to explore the performance impact, but that’s outside our control.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the brief time we spent with the P10 and P10 Plus, we didn't really find that much which completely blew us away, but on the other hand we didn't find much to dislike either. It's exactly what you'd expect from a flagship Android phone in 2017 – nothing more, and nothing less – which means the answer to the question of "should you buy this?" largely comes down to whether you've used Huawei phones before and liked them. If you have, then you're going to like the P10.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 05/08/2017
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the brief time we spent with the P10 and P10 Plus, we didn't really find that much which completely blew us away, but on the other hand we didn't find much to dislike either. It's exactly what you'd expect from a flagship Android phone in 2017 – nothing more, and nothing less – which means the answer to the question of "should you buy this?" largely comes down to whether you've used Huawei phones before and liked them. If you have, then you're going to like the P10.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 05/08/2017
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But of course, they aren’t really cameras with phone functionality. They are really Android phones with excellent cameras. They are powered by octacore Kirin 960 processors (up to 4 by 2.4GHz and 4 by 1.8GHz), run Android 7.0 Nougat with Huawei’s EMUI 5.1 skin and have 8 megapixel f/1.9 selfie cameras. And they have a fast charge capability.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But of course, they aren’t really cameras with phone functionality. They are really Android phones with excellent cameras. They are powered by octacore Kirin 960 processors (up to 4 by 2.4GHz and 4 by 1.8GHz), run Android 7.0 Nougat with Huawei’s EMUI 5.1 skin and have 8 megapixel f/1.9 selfie cameras. And they have a fast charge capability.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Source: Reg Hardware EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 Plus is a top-specced contender with a top-specced price. The main rivals in the Android world are all more expensive, and in their own way, flawed too. Samsung's S8 is a strong phone, and boasts the waterproofing and wireless charging missing here, but the placement of its fingerprint sensor right next to the main camera - apparently a last minute design decision because the under-glass fingerprint sensor wasn't sufficiently reliable - is already causing much annoyance. Google's ludicrously priced Google Pixel has a fine camera but a much inferior display and bafflingly, no expandable storage. By comparison the Huawei is a solid design, a Volvo maybe, but at an Audi price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2017
Source: Reg Hardware EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 Plus is a top-specced contender with a top-specced price. The main rivals in the Android world are all more expensive, and in their own way, flawed too. Samsung's S8 is a strong phone, and boasts the waterproofing and wireless charging missing here, but the placement of its fingerprint sensor right next to the main camera - apparently a last minute design decision because the under-glass fingerprint sensor wasn't sufficiently reliable - is already causing much annoyance. Google's ludicrously priced Google Pixel has a fine camera but a much inferior display and bafflingly, no expandable storage. By comparison the Huawei is a solid design, a Volvo maybe, but at an Audi price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2017
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We review the Huawei P10 Plus, a super-sized version of Huawei’s P10 flagship phone boasting more premium specs. Here’s what we think of the P10 Plus after using it as our full-time mobile for over a week.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We review the Huawei P10 Plus, a super-sized version of Huawei’s P10 flagship phone boasting more premium specs. Here’s what we think of the P10 Plus after using it as our full-time mobile for over a week.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei P10 Plus is by far the best device by Huawei but it is little bit expensive. The device has some massive features like 128GB ROM, 6GB RAM, dual back camera lens and many others. Design section has resemblance with IPhone 7 Plus and it can compete with its other competitors such as IPhone 7 Plus, Samsung C9 Pro and many others. We have tested the device and it has given us brilliant results.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 60% performance: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei P10 Plus is by far the best device by Huawei but it is little bit expensive. The device has some massive features like 128GB ROM, 6GB RAM, dual back camera lens and many others. Design section has resemblance with IPhone 7 Plus and it can compete with its other competitors such as IPhone 7 Plus, Samsung C9 Pro and many others. We have tested the device and it has given us brilliant results.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 60% performance: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: T Break EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei has priced the P10 at AED 1899 for a 64GB version while the P10 Plus comes at AED 2599 for a 128GB version with 6GB RAM. With the P10 Plus you're also getting an iR sensor and a bit of water resistance. Deciding between them purely comes down to a personal preference.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 85% performance: 85% workmanship: 70%
Source: T Break EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei has priced the P10 at AED 1899 for a 64GB version while the P10 Plus comes at AED 2599 for a 128GB version with 6GB RAM. With the P10 Plus you're also getting an iR sensor and a bit of water resistance. Deciding between them purely comes down to a personal preference.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 85% performance: 85% workmanship: 70%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Having used the P10 Plus for a week, we know for sure that we won't be stepping back into the smaller P10 (despite having the more exciting looking blue colour in that device). Why? Because the Plus is the better device. And while it's not quite as budget as was suggested at Huawei's unveiling press conference, it's still worth its asking price considering everything that's on board.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The high price of the Huawei P10 Plus means that it should have had the book thrown at it in terms of specifications and features. With that in mind, there are some issues that are difficult to forgive: the screen is a fingerprint magnet; the single speaker could deliver better-quality audio and more volume; and arguably it should be water resistant and support wireless charging. I would have preferred the fingerprint sensor on the back of the phone, although its positioning on the front does allow for gesture controls.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Having used the P10 Plus for a week, we know for sure that we won't be stepping back into the smaller P10 (despite having the more exciting looking blue colour in that device). Why? Because the Plus is the better device. And while it's not quite as budget as was suggested at Huawei's unveiling press conference, it's still worth its asking price considering everything that's on board.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The high price of the Huawei P10 Plus means that it should have had the book thrown at it in terms of specifications and features. With that in mind, there are some issues that are difficult to forgive: the screen is a fingerprint magnet; the single speaker could deliver better-quality audio and more volume; and arguably it should be water resistant and support wireless charging. I would have preferred the fingerprint sensor on the back of the phone, although its positioning on the front does allow for gesture controls.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's no right or wrong way to end a story, but it would be unfair to the P10 and the P10 Plus to not give them what they well deserve. Huawei simply did a good job. The P-series has come a long way, thanks in no small part to strategic partnerships in design and imaging. Huawei's own Kirin 960 chipset (HiSilicon's a Huawei subsidiary) is another major part of the equation.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite a few flaws, we’re big fans of the power-packed and fun P10 Plus. It offers much more than the standard P10 and is a serious competitor to the iPhone 7 Plus.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's no right or wrong way to end a story, but it would be unfair to the P10 and the P10 Plus to not give them what they well deserve. Huawei simply did a good job. The P-series has come a long way, thanks in no small part to strategic partnerships in design and imaging. Huawei's own Kirin 960 chipset (HiSilicon's a Huawei subsidiary) is another major part of the equation.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite a few flaws, we’re big fans of the power-packed and fun P10 Plus. It offers much more than the standard P10 and is a serious competitor to the iPhone 7 Plus.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 Plus is another solid smartphone from Huawei offering attractive design, high-end hardware and much improved software. However, it's missing a few features compared to rivals such as waterproofing and wireless charging. The phone is also pretty expensive so you're probably better-off getting the regular P10 or even cheaper options like the OnePlus 3T or Honor 8 Pro.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 Plus is another solid smartphone from Huawei offering attractive design, high-end hardware and much improved software. However, it's missing a few features compared to rivals such as waterproofing and wireless charging. The phone is also pretty expensive so you're probably better-off getting the regular P10 or even cheaper options like the OnePlus 3T or Honor 8 Pro.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mirror EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei has produced another stunner of a phone. The camera is undoubtedly the highlight but it also has all the other necessities for a modern smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mirror EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei has produced another stunner of a phone. The camera is undoubtedly the highlight but it also has all the other necessities for a modern smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 Plus is Huawei’s best phone to date. It isn't perfect, but it ticks most of the boxes for an impressive 2017 flagship. It’s fast, looks attractive and has an excellent-sized display. The Leica-engineered camera is ace too, and the wider aperture makes a huge difference when comparing it to the regular Huawei P10.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We thought the regular P10 was a great Android phone, with few flaws beyond screen resolution and battery life - which were both average, rather than flagship-worthy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P10 Plus is Huawei’s best phone to date. It isn't perfect, but it ticks most of the boxes for an impressive 2017 flagship. It’s fast, looks attractive and has an excellent-sized display. The Leica-engineered camera is ace too, and the wider aperture makes a huge difference when comparing it to the regular Huawei P10.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We thought the regular P10 was a great Android phone, with few flaws beyond screen resolution and battery life - which were both average, rather than flagship-worthy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Mirror EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei has produced another stunner of a phone. The camera is undoubtedly the highlight but it also has all the other necessities for a modern smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mirror EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei has produced another stunner of a phone. The camera is undoubtedly the highlight but it also has all the other necessities for a modern smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 and P10 Plus are not perfect, but they are about as close as it is possible to get right now. They offer almost all the benefits of the larger Mate 9 flagship but in smaller, more manageable form factors. To put this is in perspective, most smartphones in the 5.1-inch range don’t have half the features of the regular P10, and the P10 Plus can comfortably hold its own against any of the 5.5-inch flagships around right now, even if some might argue it’s a little overpriced.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 and P10 Plus are not perfect, but they are about as close as it is possible to get right now. They offer almost all the benefits of the larger Mate 9 flagship but in smaller, more manageable form factors. To put this is in perspective, most smartphones in the 5.1-inch range don’t have half the features of the regular P10, and the P10 Plus can comfortably hold its own against any of the 5.5-inch flagships around right now, even if some might argue it’s a little overpriced.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Personally, the whole oleophobic kerfuffle with the Huawei P10 has considerably dampened my enthusiasm for these phones. This is a core hardware feature which has been the norm in just about every flagship smartphone for the past decade. The P10 forces me to choose between two bad options: leave the screen protector on and deal with a display that feels like crappy plastic, or take it off and live in a frustrating hellscape of screen smudges.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Personally, the whole oleophobic kerfuffle with the Huawei P10 has considerably dampened my enthusiasm for these phones. This is a core hardware feature which has been the norm in just about every flagship smartphone for the past decade. The P10 forces me to choose between two bad options: leave the screen protector on and deal with a display that feels like crappy plastic, or take it off and live in a frustrating hellscape of screen smudges.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Avec ce P10 Plus, Huawei livre enfin son smartphone le plus haut de gamme qui ne se contente pas d’être une version plus grande du P10, mais vient l’améliorer sur un point clé : l’appareil photo. La marque chinoise veut, via son partenariat avec Leica, s’imposer sur le marché des photophones. Après avoir changé la manière dont on prend des photos sur smartphones avec le Huawei P9, la marque améliore encore sa formule.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Avec ce P10 Plus, Huawei livre enfin son smartphone le plus haut de gamme qui ne se contente pas d’être une version plus grande du P10, mais vient l’améliorer sur un point clé : l’appareil photo. La marque chinoise veut, via son partenariat avec Leica, s’imposer sur le marché des photophones. Après avoir changé la manière dont on prend des photos sur smartphones avec le Huawei P9, la marque améliore encore sa formule.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Considering the P10 Plus is slated to cost only €50 more than the regular P10 – €649 vs €699 – it seems the larger handset is the one to go for. Benefits include a wider aperture camera, higher-resolution screen, decent 3,750mAh battery, all the while maintaining a thin and sleek design. What's not to like?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Considering the P10 Plus is slated to cost only €50 more than the regular P10 – €649 vs €699 – it seems the larger handset is the one to go for. Benefits include a wider aperture camera, higher-resolution screen, decent 3,750mAh battery, all the while maintaining a thin and sleek design. What's not to like?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On first look, there are a lot of reasons to like the P10 Plus. It's a nice evolution from the P9 Plus which we liked, and with the improved cameras and much better software experience with EMUI 5.1 and Android Nougat, we're very much looking forward to testing it further.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the brief time we spent with the P10 and P10 Plus, we didn't really find that much which completely blew us away, but on the other hand we didn't find much to dislike either. It's exactly what you'd expect from a flagship Android phone in 2017 – nothing more, and nothing less – which means the answer to the question of "should you buy this?" largely comes down to whether you've used Huawei phones before and liked them. If you have, then you're going to like the P10.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
On first look, there are a lot of reasons to like the P10 Plus. It's a nice evolution from the P9 Plus which we liked, and with the improved cameras and much better software experience with EMUI 5.1 and Android Nougat, we're very much looking forward to testing it further.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the brief time we spent with the P10 and P10 Plus, we didn't really find that much which completely blew us away, but on the other hand we didn't find much to dislike either. It's exactly what you'd expect from a flagship Android phone in 2017 – nothing more, and nothing less – which means the answer to the question of "should you buy this?" largely comes down to whether you've used Huawei phones before and liked them. If you have, then you're going to like the P10.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/18/2017
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/18/2017
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% features: 96% ergonomy: 86%
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% features: 96% ergonomy: 86%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 98% features: 96% display: 88% mobility: 87%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 98% features: 96% display: 88% mobility: 87%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Heute DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/08/2017
Source: Heute DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/08/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2017
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 90% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 90% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 90% display: 88% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 90% display: 88% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/12/2017
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/12/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2017
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/06/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/06/2017
Source: Key for web IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 80% features: 100% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Key for web IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 80% features: 100% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Wiz Blog IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/24/2017
Source: Wiz Blog IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/24/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/07/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/07/2017
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2017
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/09/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/09/2017
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 90% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 90% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/25/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/25/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 70% features: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 70% features: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/27/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/27/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 68% display: 79% mobility: 75% workmanship: 82%
Source: Techstation.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 72% features: 95% display: 92% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 84%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 68% display: 79% mobility: 75% workmanship: 82%
Source: Techstation.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 72% features: 95% display: 92% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 84%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 60% display: 100% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 60% display: 100% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 65% features: 85% display: 85% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 65% features: 85% display: 85% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2017
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2017
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Diskidee.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Diskidee.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 95% display: 95% mobility: 70% workmanship: 100%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 95% display: 95% mobility: 70% workmanship: 100%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 79%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 79%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 93%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 93%
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2017
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 100% display: 96% mobility: 68%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 100% display: 96% mobility: 68%
Source: i2Hard RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/06/2017
Source: i2Hard RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/06/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 100% display: 96% mobility: 74%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 100% display: 96% mobility: 74%
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Source: CNews.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/29/2017
Source: CNews.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/29/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Reviewzat →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/10/2017
Source: Reviewzat →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/10/2017
Huawei P10 Lite
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei P10 LiteProcessor: Kirin 658
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Display: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.146kg
Price: 349 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
明智选择。 华为P10 Lite中端智能手机售价只有搭配徕卡镜头的华为P10的一半,不过除此之外可以提供接近高端的硬件配置。我们的测试将会分析它和P10机型的区别,以及如何在两台设备之间作出选择。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei’s P lineup has a yet another mid-range representative in the face of P10 Lite. This time, however, in addition to the capabilities, the company has paid attention to the elegant appearance achieved with the help of the glass back and pleasantly curved edges. This, of course, hasn’t prevented the fingerprint sensor from being available again. The display is 5.2″ with Full HD resolution, which is not a change compared to P9 Lite, but in the menu we find a special Eye comfort mode limiting blue light. Additionally, the battery offers reasonable durability, although in some of our tests the results were lower than those of P9 Lite. On the other hand, its charging is fast and for 10 minutes in the plug, you can get around 2 hours of video playback.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei’s P lineup has a yet another mid-range representative in the face of P10 Lite. This time, however, in addition to the capabilities, the company has paid attention to the elegant appearance achieved with the help of the glass back and pleasantly curved edges. This, of course, hasn’t prevented the fingerprint sensor from being available again. The display is 5.2″ with Full HD resolution, which is not a change compared to P9 Lite, but in the menu we find a special Eye comfort mode limiting blue light. Additionally, the battery offers reasonable durability, although in some of our tests the results were lower than those of P9 Lite. On the other hand, its charging is fast and for 10 minutes in the plug, you can get around 2 hours of video playback.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Neither of those changes make it a bad phone. If you’re after something with style, that comes in at half the price of a flagship phone, it’s still a great choice - just be aware that a little extra cash buys you a lot more phone, and the cheaper competition is basically on par when it comes to screen and CPU.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Neither of those changes make it a bad phone. If you’re after something with style, that comes in at half the price of a flagship phone, it’s still a great choice - just be aware that a little extra cash buys you a lot more phone, and the cheaper competition is basically on par when it comes to screen and CPU.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 Lite handset is powered by a non-removable Li-Polymer battery. This has a capacity of 3000 mAh. Running my usual continuous movie playing test, I was able to get 7 hours 5 minutes of viewing time before the handset closed itself down. I was rather disappointed with the battery performance especially when compared with the handset’s other facilities.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 Lite handset is powered by a non-removable Li-Polymer battery. This has a capacity of 3000 mAh. Running my usual continuous movie playing test, I was able to get 7 hours 5 minutes of viewing time before the handset closed itself down. I was rather disappointed with the battery performance especially when compared with the handset’s other facilities.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, I think the P10 lite is another great smartphone for phoneography, especially with the given Portrait and Selfie Superstar mode. With the Sapphire Blue design, the demographic for this device is probably for the young and trendy millennials who really likes taking photos, especially Huawei's blurred background portrait selfie shots.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, I think the P10 lite is another great smartphone for phoneography, especially with the given Portrait and Selfie Superstar mode. With the Sapphire Blue design, the demographic for this device is probably for the young and trendy millennials who really likes taking photos, especially Huawei's blurred background portrait selfie shots.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 Lite may be quite a few features short of the flagship P10, but that's actually fine. We expected lower specs and we got them but the internals are not bottom-of-the-barrel either.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/01/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 Lite may be quite a few features short of the flagship P10, but that's actually fine. We expected lower specs and we got them but the internals are not bottom-of-the-barrel either.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/01/2017
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Future talk aside, let's get back to the real question – Should you buy the P10 Lite? If you like and can handle EMUI and you do prefer Huawei's design over its rivals, by all means yes. This is one complete phone that offers great value for your money, so we can't help but give it the thumbs up.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Future talk aside, let's get back to the real question – Should you buy the P10 Lite? If you like and can handle EMUI and you do prefer Huawei's design over its rivals, by all means yes. This is one complete phone that offers great value for your money, so we can't help but give it the thumbs up.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei P10 lite is perfect device with light weight. It has 32GB ROM and 4GB RAM moreover it has 3000 mAh battery. All the features are excellent and it is totally providing us full entertainment in affordable price range. P10 lite can give the tough time to its competitors like Samsung, QMobile and many others. We have tested the P10 lite and it has given us best results in every field.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phone World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei P10 lite is perfect device with light weight. It has 32GB ROM and 4GB RAM moreover it has 3000 mAh battery. All the features are excellent and it is totally providing us full entertainment in affordable price range. P10 lite can give the tough time to its competitors like Samsung, QMobile and many others. We have tested the P10 lite and it has given us best results in every field.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 lite certainly ticks a lot of the right boxes for a mid-range device. It’s thin, has a good sized battery, and offers reasonable performance, all on a budget. Also the ability to enable an app drawer should help EMUI find greater acceptance. The software offers some good extra features and having 4 GB of RAM is nice. While it doesn’t have a dual camera setup, the included camera is certainly usable especially in good lighting.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P10 lite certainly ticks a lot of the right boxes for a mid-range device. It’s thin, has a good sized battery, and offers reasonable performance, all on a budget. Also the ability to enable an app drawer should help EMUI find greater acceptance. The software offers some good extra features and having 4 GB of RAM is nice. While it doesn’t have a dual camera setup, the included camera is certainly usable especially in good lighting.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cyberbloc DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Cyberbloc DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/23/2017
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/23/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 84% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 100% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 84% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 100% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Technik Surfer DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Technik Surfer DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 92% features: 87% display: 86% mobility: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 92% features: 87% display: 86% mobility: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 82% display: 86% mobility: 85%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 82% display: 86% mobility: 85%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/09/2017
Rating: price: 70% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/09/2017
Rating: price: 70% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Aberto ate de Madrugada PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/16/2017
Source: Aberto ate de Madrugada PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/16/2017
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 75% features: 85% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 75% features: 85% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 72% features: 79% display: 85% mobility: 84% ergonomy: 83%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 72% features: 79% display: 85% mobility: 84% ergonomy: 83%
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: All About Phones NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/30/2017
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/30/2017
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Helpix RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 88% mobility: 62%
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 88% mobility: 62%
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/16/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/16/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/15/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/15/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Portal SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Portal SK→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/26/2017
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/26/2017
Source: Playtech.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Playtech.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/05/2017
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/05/2017
Huawei P10 Selfie
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei P10 SelfieProcessor: Kirin 659
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.169kg
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Arturogoga ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/24/2017
Comment
Huawei:
ARM Mali-G71 MP8:
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
82.42%: No rating comment found (one expected)!
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.