Huawei P30 Lite
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix 24 MP, f/2.0 Blende
Price comparison
Average of 47 scores (from 85 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P30 Lite
The best-selling smartphone as of Q3/2018 gets yet another reincarnation. Huawei dubs the P30 Lite a photography masterpiece featuring a "revolutionary" triple-camera. Find out whether or not this 48 MP camera is capable of redefining mid-range smartphone photography in our extensive Huawei P30 Lite review.
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P30 Lite is a good phone. It looks striking, has a decent screen and the camera is versatile too. With middling power though, and good, but not great battery life, all combined with a lofty price tag, it isn’t quite a no-brainer.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P30 Lite is a basically competent mid-tier offering with a somewhat-powerful triple-lens camera and above-average battery life. However, the design doesn’t do much to endear itself and the software side of the equation isn’t much better. If you’re looking to settle for a pretty cheap phone that can do the basic things you expect a phone to be able to do, it’ll be a good fit. If you’re looking for the best cheap phone, I’m a little more hesitant to recommend it. There are many superior options out there.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Cool Smartphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
OK, the bad points. The fingerprint-magnet screen, the LCD display, the lack of NFC. These are going to be my major concerns. However, when I say, “major”, for sub-£270 they’re really not that major. The wide-angle shots I took on this weer impressive, as were the normal shots. The phone design itself, the processor, the storage, the addition of two SIM slots (or one slot and a microSD card) ticked some big boxes for me and, I have to say, Huawei have done it again – a very well-made phone which features a lot of kit for the budget.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 88% display: 79% mobility: 80% workmanship: 92%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Sure maybe it’s missing Huawei's zoom lens or wireless charging, but am I really willing to pay over $500 more dollars for features like that when the P30 Lite can get me through each day without issue? If you’re looking to buy a new phone this summer consider the P30 Lite because while it may not be cutting edge, it doesn't have a ton of issues holding it back either.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei will still be able to provide updates to the phone if the Americans totally cut off access to Google, and the P30 Lite will continue to have access to all essential apps like Google Play, Facebook and others throughout its life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/10/2019
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P30 Lite is a good phone. It looks striking, has a decent screen and the camera is versatile too. With middling power though, and good, but not great battery life, all combined with a lofty price tag, it isn’t quite a no-brainer.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei has done a decent job of retaining the attractive design and excellent camera performance of the P30 flagships into a much more affordable phone. On that basis, the P30 Lite is a decent buy. However, when you compare to some similarly priced rivals there are better options to choose from. We're disappointed by the P30 Lite's lacklustre battery life and laggy performance, which should really be a thing of the past. The display isn't as good as rivals either. So we'd recommend checking out the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and Google Pixel 3a as more well-rounded devices. Or even go cheaper with the Motorola One Vision or Honor 20 Lite.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2019
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you want class and some high-end surface thrills at a sensible price, the Huawei P30 Lite is one of the best phones you can buy. I enjoyed using it a lot. It’s not too big, feels great and looks like a cutting-edge phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Huawei P30 Lite has some of the flagship P30 magic, but those little sparkles are not enough to light up the fire of excitement. It has a good screen, but it's not an OLED. There is a triple-camera on the back, but it's not even close to what the P30's and the Pro's can do. The lack of excitement doesn't make the P30 Lite a bad phone, on the contrary - it has a lot going on, including game-ready hardware. But it far from being competitive until its price goes down. Not that the Lite is expensive, but there are cheaper phones that are simply better.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P30 Lite does a great job of distilling the bits we loved about the P30 and making them available at a more manageable price. Now that flagship phones are regularly shattering the £1000 mark, cut-price versions like this are only going to get more popular. Still, it does feel a bit like this is a phone riding on the coattails of a more in-demand bigger brother - were it called something different there's every chance Huawei would have charged less for it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P30 Lite sheds a lot of what makes its higher-end siblings stand out but manages to deliver premium design and a versatile triple camera setup on a budget. Middling battery and chipset aside, Huawei might have another budget hit on their hands.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/01/2019
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Huawei’s P30 Lite slots neatly into the mid-range category with its Php 16,990 price point. While it’s not as fast as some of its rivals in the same category, the smartphone’s triple cameras are good enough for people looking to dabble in mobile photography. We like the inclusion of the 3.5mm jack, as well as the USB Type-C port and roomy 128GB storage, things that usually aren’t present in the offerings of other brands in the same price segment.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/20/2019
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the P30 Lite is pretty much just the Huawei Nova 4e under a different name, it’s still worthy of being tagged as the affordable device under the P30 line-up. The device has an excellent design and quite a decent performance. If you aren’t seriously into smartphone photography but still want something that offers quality photos, you might want to take a look at this device. The Huawei P30 Lite is priced at PHP 16,990.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/18/2019
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The P30 Lite sheds a lot of what makes its higher-end siblings stand out but manages to deliver premium design and a versatile triple camera setup on a budget. Middling battery and chipset aside, Huawei might have another budget hit on their hands.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2019
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We'll hold off on our final verdict till we complete our review, in which we will thoroughly assess the Huawei P30 Lite's camera performance, battery longevity, gaming capabilities, and other key parameters. Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 for our in-depth review, set to arrive soon.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/10/2019
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Want the feel of Huawei’s new P30 line without paying flagship prices? Then the new P30 Lite may just be for you. This new mid-range phone from Huawei has many of the same design cues as its more expensive brothers, though gets by without the power of Leica’s branding. Is this your new mid-range phone?
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/09/2019
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/03/2023
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/22/2020
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/15/2020
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 82% display: 85% mobility: 88%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/15/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Hartware DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 75% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 85%
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 72% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2019
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 40% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/13/2019
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2019
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 83% features: 76% display: 88% mobility: 87%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2019
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2019
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/23/2019
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2019
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Showmetech.com.br PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 85% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2019
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2019
Source: Optima IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/24/2019
Rating: performance: 75% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/23/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% features: 75% display: 78% mobility: 81% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2019
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% display: 70% mobility: 82% workmanship: 79%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2019
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/15/2019
Source: XGN NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Consumentenbond NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/22/2019
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/18/2019
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2019
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Sabah TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2020
Source: HWP.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 71% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/01/2019
Source: KinaTech HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/05/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/11/2019
Source: Cell Phones VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/26/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/04/2019
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/03/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/28/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/26/2019
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 67% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Unlimited Tech →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Comment
ARM Mali-G51 MP4:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 710:
基于ARM的八核SoC,包含四个用于执行性能任务的Cortex-A73内核(高达2.2 GHz)和四个Cortex-A53内核(高达1.7 GHz)以节省功耗。此外,SoC集成了LTE无线电(低600 MBps)和ARM Mali-G51MP4 GPU。 SoC以台积电(TSMC)12纳米制程生产。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.15":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.