Huawei P40 Lite
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP, f/2.0 Blende
Price comparison
Average of 25 scores (from 51 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P40 Lite
The Huawei P40 Lite is the most affordable smartphone in the new P40 lineup. With its 6.4-inch display, the octa-core Kirin 810 SoC, 128 GB of storage, and a 48-MP four-camera system, it competes in the fiercely contested mid-range segment. Only one thing is lacking: There is no Google Play and no other Google Services. Our test shows how well the P40 Lite fares despite this lack.
In one area, the dominance is great! We let the current Huawei P40 series compete in a camera comparison. How big are the differences between the two top dogs, the Huawei P40 and P40 Pro? Can the cheapest Huawei P40 Lite surprise positively as it did last year? Our review of the Huawei P40 smartphones will reveal this.
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN
The Huawei P40 Lite puts in a very decent overall performance, providing over two full days of autonomy with average use — several hours more than the Oppo Find X3 Lite, but admittedly far behind the Samsung. Where the P40 Lite really impresses, however, is for how it soundly beats the Samsung Galaxy M51 for charging, and how it comes in just a few points below the M51 for efficiency. In short, the P40 Lite provides the best charging experience in its price range, along with very good efficiency, and even with a small battery, it’s not bad in terms of autonomy either.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yes, the Huawei P40 Lite is not a perfect device and requires more app tinkering than any other mainstream droid phone. But it has the price and the specs to make your time worthwhile. In the end, the fate of Huawei is up to you, and your decision to support it or not.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2020
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 95% workmanship: 70%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 97% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/07/2020
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/16/2020
Source: Heute DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2020
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 85% display: 85% mobility: 95% workmanship: 88%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2020
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2020
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2020
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/28/2020
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 100%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Source: Pplware PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/11/2020
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/16/2020
Source: Optima IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/10/2020
Rating: price: 80% display: 770% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2020
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 60% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 82%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2020
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/14/2020
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2020
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/12/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 79% mobility: 93% workmanship: 75%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 84% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2020
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2020
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2020
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 85% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/20/2020
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/23/2020
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2020
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 90% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Sabah TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2020
Source: Yamobi RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/17/2020
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/21/2020
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2020
Source: Geeks.hu HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2020
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 71%
Source: Mobility.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/14/2020
Source: Input DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2020
Rating: Total score: 62% price: 95% performance: 62% workmanship: 62%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2020
Source: Playtech.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/23/2020
Comment
ARM Mali-G52 MP6:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 810:
基于ARM的八核SoC,包含两个用于执行性能任务的Cortex-A76内核(高达2.2 GHz)和六个Cortex-A55内核(高达1.88 GHz)以节省功耗。此外,SoC集成了LTE(降低1400 MBps)和ARM Mali-G52MP6 GPU。 SoC是在台积电7纳米工艺。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.40":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.