英飞凌INBook X2笔记本电脑评测。更薄、更轻的INBook X1 Pro
自从我们审查了InBook X1 Pro之后,才过了半年 笔记本X1 Pro而Infinix已经在准备推出InBook X2。与去年的机型一样,InBook X2的目标是预算和中档价格范围,同时提供更多诱人的规格和外观,使自己与其他人区分开来。这也恰好是该制造商迄今为止推出的第二个笔记本电脑型号。
InBook X2的竞争者包括预算到中档的14英寸轻薄笔记本电脑,如 联想IdeaPad 5 14, 华硕VivoBook S14, 戴尔Inspiron系列, 或 惠普Pavilion 14.
更多Infinix评论。
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.5 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | Infinix INBook X2 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
80.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.8 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
80.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2020 | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 19.1 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
85.3 % v7 (old) | Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.6 kg | 20.7 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 彩色金属
Infinix在InBook X1 Pro和InBook X2之间采用了类似的金属合金材料,这两款机型的感觉相似。最大的区别在于它们的尺寸和重量,InBook X2的边框更窄,尺寸更小,重量明显更轻(1.2公斤对1.5公斤)。底盘刚性比华硕VivoBook或联想IdeaPad 3略好。 联想IdeaPad 3但比高端的 戴尔XPS 13或 HP Spectre.与上述价格较高的替代品相比,底座、键盘中心和盖子都更容易扭动。
连接性 - 不支持Thunderbolt
端口选项与去年的型号不一样。例如,专有的桶形充电器端口和一个USB-A端口都被取消了。请记住,HDMI端口只能支持最高4K和30 Hz的外部显示器,而不是4K和60 Hz。
虽然有两个USB-C端口,但只有左边的一个能够为笔记本电脑充电或输出到外部显示器。右边的USB-C端口不能做任何事情。
令人讨厌的是,右边的USB-A端口是倒置的,而左边的USB-A端口是右置的。这也许是我们看到的第一台有如此反常的USB配置的笔记本电脑。
SD卡阅读器
集成的MicroSD读卡器仍然很慢,就像InBook X1 Pro上的情况一样。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Infinix INBook X2 (AV Pro V60) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro (AV Pro V60) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Infinix INBook X2 (AV Pro V60) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro (AV Pro V60) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
通信 - 仅限Wi-Fi 5
英特尔9461是Wi-Fi 5连接的标准配置,理论速度高达433 Mbps,而最新的Wi-Fi 6模块的速度是其两倍以上,可能是为了节省成本。当与我们的Netgear RAX200测试路由器配对时,我们没有遇到连接问题。相比之下,InBook X1 Pro将配备Wi-Fi 6。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
网络摄像头
网络摄像头的清晰度比InBook X1有所提高,但颜色和分辨率没有变化。
InBook X2的新功能是在网络摄像头旁边有两个正面的白色LED灯,以改善在黑暗房间的照明。然而,这些LED灯的麻烦比它们的价值更大,因为光线刺眼,让人不舒服。
维护
一旦11颗飞利浦螺钉被卸下,底板就会相对容易地弹出。用户只能升级孤独的M.2 PCIe3 x4 SSD,因为内存和WLAN都是焊接的。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,盒子里没有任何额外的东西。一年有限的制造商保修适用。要求保修可能比较困难,因为可能需要海外运输。
输入设备 - 舒适和点击率高
键盘
键盘与InBook X1 Pro上的键盘相同,具有相同的打字体验。这里有一个背光灯,可以照亮所有的按键和符号,而旧版InBook X1 Pro则没有这样的功能。
触摸板
点击板大于 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 14(12.5 x 7 cm vs. 10.5 x 7 cm),同时比InBook X1 Pro上的点击板略窄。光标控制很流畅,反应迅速,没有任何突然的跳跃或停止。集成的点击板按钮在按下时也有令人满意的反馈,但它们很浅,因此声音相对较大。
显示屏--颜色宽,响应时间慢
与InBook Pro X1相比,Infinix为其InBook X2使用了不同的面板。较新的面板更亮,但在其他方面具有类似的色彩再现和对比度水平。不幸的是,这次的黑白和灰白响应时间要慢得多,因为有明显的重影。这种影响在移动光标或运行快速移动的游戏时最为明显。
|
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 368 cd/m²
Contrast: 944:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.59
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
Infinix INBook X2 140PM42D1568, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Infinix INBook X1 Pro BOE NV140FHM-N62, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng LGD0619, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AU Optronics B140HAN04.E, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D BOE NV14N4F, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 0% | -32% | -39% | -37% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 62.7 | 65.7 5% | 62 -1% | 41.55 -34% | 37.47 -40% | 39.02 -38% |
sRGB Coverage | 89.2 | 86.6 -3% | 92 3% | 62 -30% | 56 -37% | 58 -35% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.1 | 63.3 -1% | 63 -2% | 42.99 -33% | 38.71 -40% | 40.32 -37% |
Response Times | -13% | 52% | -2% | 90% | -12% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 65.2 ? | 43.2 ? 34% | 37 ? 43% | 34 ? 48% | 41 ? 37% | 46 ? 29% |
Response Time Black / White * | 43.2 ? | 32 ? 26% | 17 ? 61% | 24 ? 44% | 28 ? 35% | 32 ? 26% |
PWM Frequency | 10000 ? | 200 ? -98% | 250 ? -97% | 29800 198% | 1000 ? -90% | |
Screen | -31% | 2% | -33% | 5% | -16% | |
Brightness middle | 368 | 282 -23% | 387 5% | 220 -40% | 357 -3% | 235 -36% |
Brightness | 331 | 271 -18% | 359 8% | 204 -38% | 315 -5% | 219 -34% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 74 -10% | 84 2% | 68 -17% | 82 0% | 81 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.24 38% | 0.55 -41% | 0.155 60% | 0.455 -17% | 0.21 46% |
Contrast | 944 | 1175 24% | 704 -25% | 1419 50% | 785 -17% | 1119 19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 6.1 -24% | 4.04 18% | 5.23 -7% | 3.98 19% | 6.11 -25% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.22 | 14.05 -71% | 8.28 -1% | 21.51 -162% | 6.92 16% | 16.6 -102% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.59 | 3.94 -148% | 1 37% | 4.4 -177% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 8.7 -50% | 5 14% | 3.77 35% | 3.33 43% | 5.52 5% |
Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.14 103% | 2.62 84% | 2.35 94% | 2.47 89% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 7163 91% | 8672 75% | 7123 91% | 6666 98% | 6138 106% | 6680 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 36 | 37 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | 56 | 58 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-21% | 18% /
9% | -22% /
-27% | 19% /
14% | -22% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
该面板覆盖了约90%的sRGB,与许多中端或高端超极本不同。预算或低端机型通常只覆盖60%的sRGB,不适合进行图形编辑。
灰度开箱后太冷了,颜色也因此受到影响。一旦经过校准,平均灰度和色彩deltaE值将分别从5.8提高到2.2和4.9提高到1.59,幅度相对较大。我们建议对该显示器进行校准,以更好地利用其宽广的sRGB色彩范围。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise | |
↘ 20.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
65.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 33.2 ms rise | |
↘ 32 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 10000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 10000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 10000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
更加明亮的显示屏使InBook X2在户外使用时比使用华硕VivoBook S14更容易。华硕VivoBook S14或旧的InBook Pro X1。一些眩光是不可避免的,但至少不会像其他有光泽面板的笔记本电脑那样令人分心。
性能 - 第十代英特尔Ice Lake
测试条件
我们的设备通过Windows设置为高性能模式,以获得尽可能好的基准分数。
处理器
CPU的性能比平均水平慢10%到15%左右。 酷睿i7-1065G7在我们的数据库中的笔记本电脑。涡轮增压的时钟速率在很长一段时间内波动,就像我们在去年的InBook X1 Pro上发现的那样。CineBench R15 xT循环得分因此会在490和560分之间波动,而在大多数其他超极本上得分会保持平稳。
请注意,InBook X1 Pro的CPU性能一直超过我们InBook X2的CPU,尽管两个系统使用的是同一处理器。这将在下面的压力测试和功耗部分进一步探讨。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1081 - 2024, n=31) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=31) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3127 - 4281, n=3) | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1050 - 1212, n=2) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (288 - 836, n=36) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (141 - 190, n=35) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (675 - 1650, n=23) | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10406 - 22898, n=24) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3289 - 4589, n=24) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=18) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (948 - 1348, n=18) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.2 - 6.38, n=22) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (46.9 - 85.3, n=19) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (0.661 - 0.798, n=18) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2599 - 5966, n=19) | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (11536 - 24782, n=19) | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (796 - 1684, n=18) | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (31314 - 42918, n=19) | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1966 - 4074, n=19) | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (7094 - 14868, n=19) | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (29068 - 62557, n=19) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (138 - 339, n=19) | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1343 - 3098, n=19) | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10972 - 36042, n=19) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D |
系统性能
PCMark的分数明显低于 氙气14采用较新的Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 CPU,但其他方面与第一代InBook X1 Pro相当。主观上,在这个系统上浏览Windows 11感觉有点笨拙,因为在打开文件资源管理器和其他应用程序时有轻微的延迟。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3878 - 4679, n=20) | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (8302 - 9902, n=20) | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (5462 - 7379, n=20) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3260 - 4424, n=20) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL |
PCMark 10 Score | 4291 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (19170 - 51100, n=19) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (21532 - 53870, n=19) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (20855 - 51537, n=19) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (71.9 - 111, n=19) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在我们长达1分钟的视频测试中,4K视频在60FPS下的播放非常流畅,只有一个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备--只容得下一个
A 512 GB预见 GSYAPGCM.2 2280 PCIe3 x4 NVMe固态硬盘是标准配置,其连续读取和写入速度分别接近2500 MB/s和1500 MB/s。这是一款中端NVMe固态硬盘,并不接近价格较高的三星PM981a,但考虑到它所搭配的处理器和硬件,它在其他方面已经足够了。
在循环运行DiskSpd时,该固态硬盘没有表现出性能下降,表明没有热节流。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng -8! | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL |
DiskSpd | |
seq read | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
seq write | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
seq q8 t1 read | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
seq q8 t1 write | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
4k q1 t1 read | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
4k q1 t1 write | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
4k q32 t16 read | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
4k q32 t16 write | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--优于任何UHD Graphics 620
总体图形性能与我们期望的具有相同集成度的其他笔记本电脑相比是差不多的。 Iris Plus G7 GPU.我们怀疑,如果不是因为上面提到的低于平均水平的CPU性能和有限的8GB内存,结果可能会略高。即便如此,Iris Plus G7仍然比老款的Iris Plus G7快很多。 UHD Graphics 620.
由于GPU时钟速率的波动,在低720p设置下运行Witcher 3 ,帧率会在40至50FPS之间波动。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2112 - 4630, n=28) | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA |
3DMark 11 Performance | 4257 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13600 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2354 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 916 points | |
Help |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (17.3 - 20.7, n=6) | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (9 - 11.3, n=6) | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (6.6 - 9.6, n=5) |
Strange Brigade | |
1280x720 lowest AF:1 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (47.7 - 53.9, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (18.5 - 21.4, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (15.4 - 17.3, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) () |
X-Plane 11.11 | |
1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (16.4 - 42.9, n=18) | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (11.4 - 22.3, n=17) | |
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (10.8 - 19.7, n=18) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 54 | 34.7 | 18.5 | 9.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 92.4 | 62.5 | 26.4 | 29.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 18.2 | 9.6 | 9.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 23 | 22.3 | 19.7 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 22 | 9 | 9 | 11 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 53.9 | 21.4 | 17.3 |
排放
系统噪音
InBook X2的风扇噪音通常比InBook X1 Pro的要大。要求不高的任务,如网页浏览或文字处理,偶尔会导致风扇脉冲到28分贝(A),而安静的背景是23.1分贝(A)。当运行游戏等高负荷时,风扇噪音将稳定在38分贝(A)。虽然一般来说不是很响,但风扇的声音有点高,因此比我们希望的更明显。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 24.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 35.2 / 38 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) |
Infinix INBook X2 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Foresee GSYAPGC-512G | Infinix INBook X1 Pro Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13 | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H) | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE Vega 7, R5 5500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D UHD Graphics 620, i5-10310U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | -3% | -23% | -8% | -5% | |
off / environment * | 23.1 | 24.6 -6% | 25.4 -10% | 30.7 -33% | 25.5 -10% | 24.9 -8% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.3 | 25.1 -3% | 25.4 -5% | 31 -28% | 25.5 -5% | 24.9 -2% |
Idle Average * | 24.3 | 25.1 -3% | 25.4 -5% | 31 -28% | 25.5 -5% | 24.9 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.5 | 25.1 -2% | 25.4 -4% | 31.3 -28% | 25.5 -4% | 24.9 -2% |
Load Average * | 35.2 | 32.7 7% | 35.4 -1% | 43.4 -23% | 40.6 -15% | 38.7 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38 | 33.4 12% | 42.8 -13% | |||
Load Maximum * | 38 | 33.4 12% | 35.5 7% | 41.5 -9% | 40.8 -7% | 39.2 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘左半部分的表面温度明显比右半部分高,因为处理器位于这里的正下方。当长时间运行非常高的负载时,键盘两半的温差可高达15℃。值得庆幸的是,按键的温度从来没有高到让人不舒服的程度。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+2.2 °C / 3.9 F).
Infinix INBook X2 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Infinix INBook X1 Pro Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D Intel Core i5-10310U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -16% | -2% | 3% | -0% | 6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45 | 43 4% | 40.5 10% | 43 4% | 40.8 9% | 39.4 12% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.2 | 51 -15% | 39.9 10% | 44.8 -1% | 42.2 5% | 36.2 18% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.2 | 32 -22% | 31.3 -19% | 26.2 -0% | 29.8 -14% | 28.2 -8% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.2 | 37.6 -29% | 31.1 -7% | 27 8% | 29.5 -1% | 28.5 2% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在Prime95下受压时,CPU时钟频率会在达到99C的核心温度之前的第一秒左右飙升到3.9GHz。然后时钟频率会稳步放缓,最终在1.4GHz和1.7GHz之间循环,循环的核心温度为68C和75C。这种循环行为也在InBook X1 Pro上观察到,它解释了上面的CineBench R15 xT循环结果。在Prime95压力测试开始时,CPU封装功率将飙升至44W,然后下降并稳定在15W左右。
当运行Witcher 3 ,代表高负荷或游戏负荷时,我们观察到类似的结果。GPU和核心温度将分别在750和950MHz以及64C和70C之间循环,而大多数其他笔记本电脑将在固定的时钟速率和温度下运行。游戏时的帧率往往会因此而在英飞凌系统上循环。
用电池供电运行不会影响性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将分别返回物理和图形分数8961和3935分,而在主电源上则为8909和3968分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 46 |
Prime95压力 | 1.4 - 1.7 | -- | 68 - 75 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.3 | 300 - 500 | 66 |
Witcher 3 压力 | 0.6 | 750 - 950 | 64 - 70 |
发言人
Infinix INBook X2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
InBook X2配备了一个小的45瓦(约9 x 5.3 x 3厘米)的交流适配器。而InBook X1配备了一个容量更大的65瓦交流适配器。InBook X1能够达到更高的功耗值,因此从相同的Core i7-1065G7 CPU中榨取更多的性能。InBook X1 Pro的游戏功耗约为47W,而InBook X2仅约为40W。我们能够测量出较新机型的最大功耗为45瓦,而较旧机型在承受极端处理压力时为59瓦。
Off / Standby | 0.33 / 0.34 Watt |
Idle | 4.3 / 6.3 / 9.6 Watt |
Load |
40.7 / 44.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Infinix INBook X2 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Foresee GSYAPGC-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE R5 5500U, Vega 7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -34% | -11% | -5% | -26% | 13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 5 -16% | 4.8 -12% | 2.4 44% | 5.4 -26% | 2.9 33% |
Idle Average * | 6.3 | 11.5 -83% | 8.5 -35% | 4.2 33% | 8.4 -33% | 4.5 29% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.6 | 12 -25% | 12.4 -29% | 7.8 19% | 11.3 -18% | 7.4 23% |
Load Average * | 40.7 | 48.7 -20% | 37.7 7% | 57 -40% | 45.3 -11% | 34.6 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.9 | 46.4 -26% | 35.4 4% | 52 -41% | 46.6 -26% | |
Load Maximum * | 44.4 | 58.8 -32% | 45.3 -2% | 64 -44% | 63 -42% | 60 -35% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
预计内部50Wh的电池在现实世界中的WLAN使用时间刚刚超过6.5小时。从空电到满电大约需要1小时45分钟。
令人讨厌的是,只有左边的USB-C端口支持充电。
Infinix INBook X2 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 50 Wh | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 55 Wh | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 43 Wh | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE R5 5500U, Vega 7, 56.5 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 5410-RJ80D i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 27% | -10% | 28% | 62% | 105% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 401 | 508 27% | 360 -10% | 514 28% | 649 62% | 823 105% |
H.264 | 356 | 762 | 910 | |||
Witcher 3 ultra | 121 | |||||
Reader / Idle | 1181 | |||||
Load | 82 | 125 |
Pros
Cons
评语--该系列的一个侧重点
InBook X2比InBook X1 Pro前进了几步,又退了几步。它更薄、更轻的外形,更亮的显示屏和键盘背光是它比老的第一代机型的主要三个优势。除此之外,该机型并没有比其前辈更快、更持久,甚至更安静。也许我们需要等待 "InBook X2 Pro "才能看到这些优势。
InBook X2在几个方面比InBook X1 Pro有所改进,同时保持了原来的优秀显示色彩。然而,它在几个方面也更差,使人感觉该系统是该系列的一个侧重点。
该系统与华硕VivoBook S14或联想IdeaPad 5 14等其他预算和中低端产品相比仍有优势,特别是在显示质量方面。英飞凌在显示屏上投入了更多资金,以获得更深更亮的色彩,而不影响机箱设计或便携性。旧的第10代英特尔CPU对一些人来说可能是一个破坏者,但它对一般的网页浏览、视频播放和多任务处理仍然是绰绰有余的。大多数用户首先不需要第11代英特尔部件来运行此类任务。
价格和可用性
InBook X2还没有广泛上市。一旦我们收到定价和零售商的信息,本节将予以更新。
Infinix INBook X2
- 12/28/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo