联想 IdeaPad 110-15ACL (A8-7410, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Brand: Lenovo

体力不足。 联想的这台15.6寸笔记本电脑售价约350欧元（约2558人民币）。它的亮点在1TB硬盘和8GB内存。不过，选购的用户需要接受一颗较慢的处理器和较短的电池续航。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 04/08/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Carrizo Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE (IdeaPad 110 Series)

Processor

AMD A8-7410 4 x 2.2 - 2.5 GHz, Carrizo-L

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), Core: 847 MHz, 单通道, Crimson 17.2.1

Memory

8 GB

, DDR3-1600, 单通道, 一个内存槽（已占用）

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, BOE NT156WHM-N32, TN LED, glossy: yes

Mainboard

AMD KernCZ

Storage

Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, 1024 GB

, 850 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC235 @ AMD Avalon FCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD读卡器, TPM 2.0

Networking

RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE0N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 378 x 265

Battery

24 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 标清

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, Cyberlink Power2Go 8, Cyberlink PowerDVD 14, MS Office 365 (试用), McAfee LiveSafe (试用), 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.2 kg, Power Supply: 168 g

Price

349 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Asus F540SA-XX087T Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD DIN A4 ❌

Connectivity

Left: power-in, One Key Recovery button, HDMI, Fast-Ethernet, USB 2.0 (Type-A), USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (Type-A), combo audio

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus F540SA-XX087T	33 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE	26.6 MB/s
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT	22.7 MB/s -15%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA	17.8 MB/s -33%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE	39.4 MB/s
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA	36.7 MB/s -7%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT	26.6 MB/s -32%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	312 MBit/s +15%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	272 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	315 MBit/s
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	186 MBit/s -41%


265 cd/m²	252 cd/m²	251 cd/m²
254 cd/m²	253 cd/m²	235 cd/m²
235 cd/m²	238 cd/m²	228 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE NT156WHM-N32 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 265 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 245.7 cd/m² Minimum: 8.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 253 cd/m²
Contrast: 575:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.05 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.39% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.55

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Asus F540SA-XX087T TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"
Display		-6%	2%	-5%	7%
Display P3 Coverage	37.39	35.28 -6%	38.04 2%	35.43 -5%	40.17 7%
sRGB Coverage	56.2	53.2 -5%	57.2 2%	53.3 -5%	60 7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	38.63	36.45 -6%	39.3 2%	36.6 -5%	41.54 8%
Response Times		2%	13%	1%	26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	58	48 ?(26, 22) 17%	43 ?(21, 22, Plateau) 26%	42.4 ?(14.8, 27.6) 27%	20 ?(10, 10) 66%
Response Time Black / White *	23	26 ?(9, 17) -13%	23 ?(7, 16, Plateau) -0%	28.8 ?(10.8, 18) -25%	20 ?(12, 8) 13%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(90)				200 ?(90) 0%
Screen		-16%	-15%	-25%	9%
Brightness middle	253	225 -11%	201 -21%	199.8 -21%	215 -15%
Brightness	246	246 0%	202 -18%	199 -19%	200 -19%
Brightness Distribution	86	86 0%	92 7%	85 -1%	87 1%
Black Level *	0.44	0.46 -5%	0.67 -52%	0.712 -62%	0.26 41%
Contrast	575	489 -15%	300 -48%	281 -51%	827 44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	9.2	13.57 -48%	10.36 -13%	13.24 -44%	13.07 -42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	17.68	22.91 -30%	18.88 -7%	21.52 -22%	16.06 9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	11.05	15.07 -36%	11.06 -0%	13.33 -21%	4.34 61%
Gamma	2.55 ^86%	2.27 ^97%	2.56 ^86%	1.69 ^130%	2.48 ^89%
CCT	11451 ^57%	22046 ^29%	11368 ^57%	15879 ^41%	7212 ^90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36	34 -6%	36 0%	33.8 -6%	38 6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	56	53 -5%	57 2%	53.4 -5%	60 7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-7% / -11%	0% / -8%	-10% / -18%	14% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ ms rise
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

1917

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

6169

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

2819

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

50 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

166 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

17.25 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD Intel Core i3-5005U	82 Points +64%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	53 Points +6%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L AMD A8-7410	52 Points +4%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD A8-7410	52 Points +4%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD A8-7410	50 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	37 Points -26%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel Celeron N3050	33 Points -34%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD Intel Core i3-5005U	210 Points +27%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L AMD A8-7410	174 Points +5%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD A8-7410	174 Points +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD A8-7410	166 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	165 Points -1%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	68 Points -59%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel Celeron N3050	61 Points -63%

Cinebench R10
Shading 32Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD Intel Core i3-5005U	5601 Points +99%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	3223 Points +14%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD A8-7410	2819 Points
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD A8-7410	2681 Points -5%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	2510 Points -11%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel Celeron N3050	2265 Points -20%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L AMD A8-7410	1746 Points -38%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD Intel Core i3-5005U	6953 Points +13%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD A8-7410	6169 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	5149 Points -17%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L AMD A8-7410	4665 Points -24%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD A8-7410	4428 Points -28%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	2256 Points -63%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel Celeron N3050	1978 Points -68%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD Intel Core i3-5005U	1907 Points +46%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	1395 Points +7%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD A8-7410	1307 Points
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L AMD A8-7410	1205 Points -8%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel Celeron N3050	865 Points -34%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	4563 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD Intel Core i3-5005U	4093 Points +4%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD A8-7410	3918 Points
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L AMD A8-7410	3456 Points -12%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel Celeron N3050	1583 Points -60%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	1581 Points +17%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD A8-7410	1356 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	4364 Points +26%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD A8-7410	3460 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	90.1 Points +19%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD A8-7410	75.5 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD Intel Core i3-5005U	75.1 Points -1%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD A8-7410	71.2 Points -6%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	58.5 Points -23%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel Celeron N3050	51.1 Points -32%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1956 points
Help

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD HD Graphics 5500, 5005U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	2720 Points +39%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	1993 Points +2%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	1960 Points 0%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	1958 Points 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	1956 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	1661 Points -15%
Asus F540SA-XX087T HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142	1598 Points -18%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035

Transfer Rate Minimum: 1.3 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 130.7 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 96.1 MB/s

Access Time: 19.8 ms

Burst Rate: 104 MB/s

CPU Usage: 3.5 %

	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Toshiba MQ01ABD100	HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	Asus F540SA-XX087T Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		38%	50%	4252%	17%
Read Seq	92.1	111.3 21%	107.6 17%	484.4 426%	98.3 7%
Write Seq	88.5	107.2 21%	96.6 9%	139.2 57%	89.8 1%
Read 512	32.94	35.11 7%	22.5 -32%	338.1 926%	20.79 -37%
Write 512	26.71	41.3 55%	24.23 -9%	134.7 404%	34.84 30%
Read 4k	0.372	0.398 7%	0.474 27%	17.21 4526%	0.335 -10%
Write 4k	0.283	0.764 170%	1.089 285%	31.52 11038%	0.619 119%
Read 4k QD32	0.921	0.761 -17%	0.861 -7%	94.6 10171%	0.789 -14%
Write 4k QD32	0.473		0.991 110%	31.08 6471%	0.641 36%

3DMark 11 Performance		970 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U	957 Points +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410	899 Points
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410	782 Points -13%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410	744 Points -17%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200	624 Points -31%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050	384 Points -57%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060	382 Points -58%

	low	med.	high
World of Warcraft (2005)	75.8	52.4
BioShock Infinite (2013)	34.6	18.5	15.9
GTA V (2015)	24.6	20.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	26.2	21
XCOM 2 (2016)	9.9	2.5
Far Cry Primal (2016)	10	5
The Division (2016)	12.3	7
Hitman 2016 (2016)	7.2	4.1
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	7.7	5.6
Battlefield 1 (2016)	13.2	9.3
Civilization VI (2016)	18.3	7
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	41.5	28.3
Titanfall 2 (2016)	17.6	14.7
Dishonored 2 (2016)	7.1	5.1
Resident Evil 7 (2017)	19.8	11.9
For Honor (2017)	14.5	4.9
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)	8.8	2.9

BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410	34.6 fps
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410	33.7 fps -3%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200	23.7 fps -32%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410	23 fps -34%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060	18.1 fps -48%
Asus F540SA-XX087T Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050	17.5 fps -49%

Noise Level

Idle		30.9 / 30.9 / 31 dB(A)
HDD		32.3 dB(A)
DVD		37.3 / dB(A)
Load		31.8 / 31.9 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


32 °C	25.7 °C	23.3 °C
32.9 °C	26.6 °C	23.6 °C
31.1 °C	29.8 °C	30.2 °C

Maximum: 32.9 °C
Average: 28.4 °C


23.1 °C	23.6 °C	27.9 °C
23.5 °C	25 °C	34.5 °C
25.8 °C	26.8 °C	33.5 °C

Maximum: 34.5 °C
Average: 27.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 35.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).

Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (40% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.22 / 0.42 Watt
Idle	5.4 / 6.8 / 7.3 Watt
Load	21.1 / 25.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		3h 21min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 41 Wh	376 min +87%
Asus F540SA-XX087T N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 33 Wh	329 min +64%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh	321 min +60%
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD 5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 32 Wh	255 min +27%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE A8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 24 Wh	201 min

Pros

+ 运行安静

+ 几乎不会变热

+ 高硬盘容量

+ 8GB工作内存

+ 无线网络AC标准

Cons

- 镜面TN屏幕

- 很短的电池续航

- 仅一年质保

- 仅高速以太网接口

- 不支持USB-C

- 接口布局不够合理

In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

联想IdeaPad 110-15ACL是一台15.6寸基础办公笔记本电脑。它所采用的APU处理器可以满足简单办公应用和上网浏览的需要。这台设备在使用中几乎不会变热，可以保持安静运行。由于采用1TB机械硬盘，它的存储空间十分充裕。用户也可以自行更换升级固态硬盘，不过这需要打开机身底盖。它搭配的键盘可以满足家庭使用的需要。镜面、可视角度范围较窄的屏幕无法得到任何赞扬，不过考虑到价位它的表现也不是无法接受。

这是一台家用办公笔记本电脑，但在低售价设备中并不能脱颖而出，目前售价350欧元（约2558人民币）。

在这样的低价位上有所舍弃也无可厚非。这台笔记本电脑仅提供了高速以太网接口。而目前的标准配置是千兆网口。另外，它仅提供一年的质保，许多生产商为低价设备也提供了两年质保。必须提到的还有它低容量电池带来的极差续航表现。

这台IdeaPad在这个价位上可能很难吸引消费者的目光。例如联想另有一款相似的IdeaPad设备，搭配了更强的酷睿i3-6100U处理器和128GB固态硬盘，售价同样为350欧元（约2558人民币）。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE - 03/26/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

72 / 98 → 74%

Keyboard

73%

Pointing Device

81%

Connectivity

36 / 80 → 46%

Weight

62 / 20-67 → 89%

Battery

71%

Display

72%

Games Performance

50 / 68 → 74%

Application Performance

50 / 92 → 55%

Temperature

94%

Noise

93%

Audio

30%

Camera

35 / 85 → 42%

Average

63%

74%

Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 IdeaPad 110-15ACL (A8-7410, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sascha Mölck, 2017-04- 8 (Update: 2017-04- 8)

Size Comparison

Connectivity

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison