Notebookcheck Logo

联想 IdeaPad 510-15ISK 笔记本电脑简短评测

白色视野。 尽管我们的测试编辑不愿意迎娶这台联想的轻盈小巧的15寸多媒体设备,但他并不介意和它建立商务联系。这台新设备搭配了独立GeForce 940MX显卡,在测试中没有表现出任何缺陷。它最大的特色依然是它白色的外观,这可能会对女性消费者有更大的吸引力。
Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK (Ideapad 510 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1242 MHz, RAM: 1800 MHz, DDR3, ForceWare 359.23
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, 双通道, 1x 板载 + 1x 插槽, 两个内存槽一个已占用
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD04A7 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPK2 , IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, 1000 GB 
, 5400 rpm
Soundcard
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频输入输出接口, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE0N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22.9 x 379 x 260
Battery
30 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 100万像素
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声/Harman, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.2 kg, Power Supply: 209 g
Price
799 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Left: power-in, Ethernet (fold-out), HDMI, USB 3.0, audio in/out, SD card
Left: power-in, Ethernet (fold-out), HDMI, USB 3.0, audio in/out, SD card
Right: LED, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, DVD drive, Kensington
Right: LED, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, DVD drive, Kensington
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
 
73.7 MB/s +341%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
 
57.4 MB/s +244%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
 
55 MB/s +229%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
 
16.7 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus N552VX-FY103T
 
84.7 MB/s +222%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
 
80.8 MB/s +207%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
 
26.3 MB/s
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)
331 MBit/s +26%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
276 MBit/s +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (Seb)
263 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
334 MBit/s +27%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)
327 MBit/s +25%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (Seb)
262 MBit/s
295
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LGD04A7 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPK2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 275.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 284 cd/m²
Contrast: 861:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.86 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.26% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKAcer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1Asus N552VX-FY103THP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Display
96%
60%
Display P3 Coverage
39.26
84.2
114%
67.9
73%
sRGB Coverage
58.7
99.7
70%
87.7
49%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.59
82.7
104%
64
58%
Response Times
631%
-7%
2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 ?(19, 21)
44 ?(24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU)
-10%
42 ?(18, 24)
-5%
36.4 ?(18, 18.4)
9%
Response Time Black / White *
24 ?(9, 15)
23 ?(7, 16, Plateau)
4%
26 ?(5, 21)
-8%
25.2 ?(14, 11.2)
-5%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(90)
1000 ?(80)
1900%
Screen
-15%
25%
8%
Brightness middle
284
234
-18%
336
18%
220
-23%
Brightness
276
219
-21%
304
10%
209
-24%
Brightness Distribution
80
80
0%
85
6%
88
10%
Black Level *
0.33
0.48
-45%
0.34
-3%
0.28
15%
Contrast
861
488
-43%
988
15%
786
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.21
11.8
-64%
5.26
27%
4.58
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
15.12
20.69
-37%
10.49
31%
11.47
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.86
13.3
-94%
4.26
38%
2.34
66%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.47 89%
2.35 94%
2.26 97%
CCT
6726 97%
17098 38%
6758 96%
6661 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
74
100%
57
54%
34.6
-6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
100
72%
88
52%
54.2
-7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
237% / 127%
26% / 28%
5% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 50 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus N552VX-FY103T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
146 Points +34%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
119 Points +9%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U
115 Points +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
109 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus N552VX-FY103T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
673 Points +130%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
295 Points +1%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
293 Points
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U
270 Points -8%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
109 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
293 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus N552VX-FY103T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
3452 Points +5%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3390 Points +3%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
3294 Points
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
3238 Points -2%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus N552VX-FY103T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
4503 Points +15%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3970 Points +2%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
3907 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3294 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3907 points
Help
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
Asus N552VX-FY103T
Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
42%
12563%
Read Seq
84.5
108.1
28%
469.3
455%
Write Seq
69.9
105.6
51%
309.1
342%
Read 512
28.87
35.32
22%
Write 512
28.08
46.13
64%
Read 4k
0.326
0.413
27%
14
4194%
Write 4k
0.595
0.9
51%
73.9
12320%
Read 4k QD32
0.602
0.895
49%
149.5
24734%
Write 4k QD32
0.612
0.884
44%
204.6
33331%
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Transfer Rate Minimum: 36.4 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 101.3 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 78.4 MB/s
Access Time: 18.2 ms
Burst Rate: 185 MB/s
CPU Usage: 5.9 %
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4416 Points +88%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
4239 Points +81%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2508 Points +7%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2343 Points
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
21794 Points +155%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
21635 Points +153%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
8541 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
3555 Points +125%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3233 Points +105%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1580 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
2424 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5765 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1381 points
Help
lowmed.highultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 85.2 45 39.3 13.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 30.1 17.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 30.8 18.1

Noise Level

Idle
33.6 / 33.6 / 33.9 dB(A)
Load
37.5 / 38.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)
Max. Load
 37.2 °C35 °C26.9 °C 
 36.5 °C34.6 °C26.8 °C 
 33.8 °C34.1 °C27.2 °C 
Maximum: 37.2 °C
Average: 32.5 °C
25.1 °C36.3 °C37.2 °C
24.6 °C31 °C39 °C
27.1 °C29 °C34 °C
Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 31.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.2 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.1 °C / 93.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.3 °C / -9.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.5312533.630.33134.338.74030.631.35032.430.66328.928.88028.427.610026.427.612526.529.416024.534.320024.43825023.146.831522.656.740021.261.250020.460.763019.666.680019.464.810001962.1125018.562.5160018.261.4200018.666.8250018.568.2315018.667.3400018.867.3500018.870.7630018.867.7800018.965.31000018.863.51250018.762.51600018.657.8SPL31.278.4N1.642.3median 18.9median 62.5Delta1.48.837.73238.537.73532.938.7353432.941.43433.131.533.333.132.733.135.432.729.829.33429.830.729.829.230.731.330.331.531.327.727.129.827.729.932.134.929.932.437.340.732.444.34852.244.349.154.157.349.153.357.562.253.351.956.360.751.955.960.965.555.961.566.570.761.556.561.46656.551.757.26151.745.450.354.445.453.558.662.853.554.659.363.554.659.764.769.159.760.765.868.960.760.665.970.160.655.860.96555.853.258.562.753.261.666.871.561.665.770.87565.757.963.267.457.970.175.279.370.125.334.444.425.3median 53.5median 58.6median 62.8median 53.56.98.28.46.934.245.132.934.233.543.639.533.536.437.542.436.431.933.130.331.933.530.531.833.530.831.831.830.828.228.628.328.227.427.728.127.427.730.633.427.729.334.437.829.332.737.441.632.73237.541.93240.445.850.840.452.458.163.352.452.458.16352.454.159.463.954.150.955.960.550.950.155.460.150.153.959.363.953.948.953.858.448.945.55155.645.550.555.660.350.551.656.961.451.651.356.36151.351.857.161.551.855.160.264.555.153.558.462.753.547.752.75747.741.947.151.241.94246.850.94263.668.873.363.616.723.230.816.7median 50.1median 55.4median 60.1median 50.17.48.18.77.437.735.939.137.736.835.139.236.235.234.735.33534.835.837.136.839.439.432.135.530.646.330.952.730.16029.662.828.565.127.869.527.772.928.373.326.671.826.671.626.57025.974.725.473.925.270.625.47424.77624.773.624.967.124.457.524.260.438.884.63.562.2median 26.6median 69.52.68.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKAcer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1Asus N552VX-FY103THP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Asus N552VX-FY103T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

HP Pavilion 14-al003ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.7 / 11.7 / 13.6 Watt
Load midlight 48.3 / 41 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus N552VX-FY103T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
6200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280, LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Power Consumption
-22%
-39%
19%
Idle Minimum *
7.7
8.3
-8%
7
9%
4
48%
Idle Average *
11.7
12.1
-3%
10.9
7%
6.4
45%
Idle Maximum *
13.6
15.4
-13%
12.9
5%
7
49%
Load Average *
48.3
56
-16%
72
-49%
45.5
6%
Load Maximum *
41
70
-71%
109
-166%
62.2
-52%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
7h 23min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 45min
DVD
2h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 13min
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Asus N552VX-FY103T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 44 Wh
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
Battery Runtime
77%
-2%
46%
Reader / Idle
443
667
51%
357
-19%
WiFi v1.3
225
386
72%
268
19%
329
46%
Load
73
152
108%
68
-7%
H.264
335

Pros

+ 轻盈纤薄
+ 经典机身设计与白色材质
+ 不错的工艺品质
+ 支持TPM 2.0
+ 两个维护底盖
+ 优秀的加速利用率
+ 安静清凉

Cons

- 缓慢的SD读卡器
- 风扇只有拆机才可以接触到
- 较小的色域覆盖
- 屏幕闪烁
- 未使用固态硬盘造成系统响应较慢
- 缓慢的传统硬盘
- 电池续航短
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

联想IdeaPad 510-15ISK是一款引人注目的设备。

选择它的用户可以得到一台做工精良,轻盈纤薄的多媒体笔记本电脑,它结合了不错的输入设备,一块IPS屏幕和GeForce 940MX独立显卡,售价不足800欧元(约5926人民币)。尽管这个机型没有搭配固态硬盘,但它没有任何技术上的弱点。

不过,它在很多方面表现平平。至少它高对比度IPS屏幕的色彩准确度还有改进的空间,同时一般的性能和不算出色的输入设备也是如此。再加上缺少固态硬盘让它的系统运行更加迟缓。它的电池续航让不错的便携型打了折扣,而音响系统也很难达到多媒体设备的一般水平。

不过,它提供了维护底盖和TPM模组,系统运行安静而清凉让它对处理器加速的效率很高,这都为它赢得了加分。我们认为如果考虑到性价比的话,如果它的售价可以降低100欧元(约740人民币)的话将会十分值得考虑选购。从我们的经验来看它在不久之后就会开始降价。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK - 09/29/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
45 / 81 → 56%
Weight
62 / 20-67 → 89%
Battery
74%
Display
83%
Games Performance
64 / 85 → 75%
Application Performance
72 / 92 → 78%
Temperature
93%
Noise
81 / 95 → 85%
Audio
64%
Camera
58 / 85 → 68%
Average
73%
79%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 IdeaPad 510-15ISK 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-10- 8 (Update: 2016-10-12)