联想 IdeaPad 510S-14ISK (80TK003KGE) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK |
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 257 cd/m²
Contrast: 1071:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.88% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK NV140FHM-N41, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK Chi Mei CMN14A7, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus X302UV-FN016T InfoVision M133NWN1 R3, 1366x768, 13.3" | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW LG LP133WF2-SPL3, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-d020ng AU Optronics AUO272D, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK LG Display LP133WF2-SPL3, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | 13% | -9% | 47% | -9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 42.88 | 40.74 -5% | 48.37 13% | 39.18 -9% | 63.7 49% | 39.05 -9% |
sRGB Coverage | 64.1 | 60.6 -5% | 72.6 13% | 58.6 -9% | 93 45% | 58.7 -8% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.3 | 42.15 -5% | 49.98 13% | 40.51 -9% | 65.1 47% | 40.35 -9% |
Response Times | 8% | 6% | -12% | 116% | 3% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45 ? | 43 ? 4% | 42 ? 7% | 41 ? 9% | 34 ? 24% | 46 ? -2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 23 ? 12% | 23 ? 12% | 34.4 ? -32% | 24 ? 8% | 24 ? 8% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 50 ? 0% | 208 ? 316% | |||
Screen | -43% | -14% | -21% | 17% | -13% | |
Brightness middle | 257 | 249 -3% | 218 -15% | 247 -4% | 345 34% | 250 -3% |
Brightness | 263 | 235 -11% | 210 -20% | 239 -9% | 335 27% | 247 -6% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 88 -2% | 81 -10% | 95 6% | 87 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.44 -83% | 0.5 -108% | 0.38 -58% | 0.25 -4% | 0.43 -79% |
Contrast | 1071 | 566 -47% | 436 -59% | 650 -39% | 1380 29% | 581 -46% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.44 | 9.47 -74% | 3.89 28% | 5.95 -9% | 4.94 9% | 4.51 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.93 | 15.41 -41% | 7.11 35% | 14.2 -30% | 8.85 19% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.95 | 10.22 -159% | 4.9 -24% | 5.25 -33% | 5.85 -48% | 3.18 19% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.34 94% | 2.41 91% | 2.42 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.43 91% |
CCT | 6896 94% | 11451 57% | 7860 83% | 6736 96% | 7105 91% | 6743 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 39 -2% | 46 15% | 37.28 -7% | 60 50% | 37 -7% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64 | 57 -11% | 73 14% | 58.37 -9% | 93 45% | 58 -9% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-29% | 2% /
-5% | -14% /
-17% | 60% /
41% | -6% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 28 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 50 Hz | ≤ 60 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK |
PCMark 7 | |
Score | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Productivity | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T |
PCMark 7 Score | 5340 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3710 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4327 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4579 points | |
Help |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | Asus X302UV-FN016T Hynix HFS128G3MND | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | HP Envy 13-d020ng Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO | Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -4% | -40% | -7% | -13% | -11% | |
Read Seq | 510 | 507 -1% | 428.2 -16% | 515 1% | 478.7 -6% | 522 2% |
Write Seq | 458.8 | 309.5 -33% | 178.6 -61% | 338 -26% | 268.5 -41% | 447.4 -2% |
Read 512 | 399.7 | 409.5 2% | 282.6 -29% | 368.1 -8% | 386.6 -3% | 392.3 -2% |
Write 512 | 299.3 | 308.3 3% | 179.1 -40% | 338.6 13% | 268.8 -10% | 388 30% |
Read 4k | 35.27 | 36.24 3% | 6.559 -81% | 28.88 -18% | 26.88 -24% | 21.1 -40% |
Write 4k | 90.2 | 93.3 3% | 71.2 -21% | 74.2 -18% | 78.7 -13% | 71.1 -21% |
Read 4k QD32 | 397.7 | 394.5 -1% | 253 -36% | 319.9 -20% | 369.4 -7% | 248 -38% |
Write 4k QD32 | 257.3 | 241.6 -6% | 174 -32% | 309.4 20% | 259.7 1% | 212.9 -17% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
HP Envy 13-d020ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1943 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 60650 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6252 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 968 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 414 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 61.3 | 34 | 29 | 7.8 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 59.9 | 33.4 | 24.8 | 8.2 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 23.6 | 16.2 | 9.5 | 4.3 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 32.2 / 32.2 / 32.3 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 32.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38.4 / 39.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Intel Core i5-6267U, Iris Graphics 550 | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK Intel Core i7-6500U, GeForce 940M | Asus X302UV-FN016T Intel Core i5-6200U, GeForce 920MX | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW Intel Core i5-6267U, Iris Graphics 550 | HP Envy 13-d020ng Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | 4% | 2% | 3% | 8% | |
off / environment * | 31.2 | 31.3 -0% | 31.2 -0% | 29.1 7% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 32.2 | 31.3 3% | 32.9 -2% | 29.1 10% | 32.5 -1% | 31.5 2% |
Idle Average * | 32.2 | 31.7 2% | 32.9 -2% | 29.1 10% | 32.5 -1% | 31.5 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 32.3 | 31.8 2% | 33 -2% | 29.1 10% | 32.4 -0% | 31.5 2% |
Load Average * | 38.4 | 36.7 4% | 33 14% | 41.1 -7% | 36 6% | 32.4 16% |
Load Maximum * | 39.9 | 39.4 1% | 34.6 13% | 46.4 -16% | 36.5 9% | 32.3 19% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.3 °C / 82.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (0 °C / 0 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
Idle | 3.9 / 7.1 / 8.8 Watt |
Load |
27.6 / 30.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 14" | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 6500U, GeForce 940M, 14" | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX, 13.3" | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 13.3" | Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -20% | 6% | -17% | -13% | 3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 3.8 3% | 3.3 15% | 3.4 13% | 4.2 -8% | 3.8 3% |
Idle Average * | 7.1 | 7.2 -1% | 5.1 28% | 6.5 8% | 7.4 -4% | 5.8 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.8 | 7.6 14% | 5.2 41% | 7 20% | 10.1 -15% | 8.1 8% |
Load Average * | 27.6 | 40 -45% | 29.5 -7% | 44.5 -61% | 33.4 -21% | 30.2 -9% |
Load Maximum * | 30.2 | 52 -72% | 44 -46% | 49.5 -64% | 34.7 -15% | 32.4 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 30 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 6500U, GeForce 940M, 30 Wh | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX, 38 Wh | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 51 Wh | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 51 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -27% | 2% | 58% | -1% | 23% | |
Reader / Idle | 638 | 346 -46% | 1035 62% | 906 42% | ||
H.264 | 231 | 246 6% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 384 | 257 -33% | 392 2% | 412 7% | 381 -1% | 349 -9% |
Load | 100 | 64 -36% | 206 106% | 135 35% |
Pros
Cons
联想IdeaPad 510S-14ISK整体上是一台十分有吸引力的亚笔记本电脑。它优秀的性价比应该可以让不少消费者动心。这台14寸设备采用了坚固的机身和不错的输入设备,售价799欧元(约5991人民币)。全高清IPS屏幕面板可视角度稳定,同时有均匀的背光和忠实的色彩还原。英特尔酷睿 i5-6267U集成了Iris Graphics 550显卡,为日常使用保证了充足的性能。
联想IdeaPad 510S-14ISK在许多方面都十分优秀。不过,经常出门在外需要长电池续航的用户可能不会对它非常满意。
当然有优势也会有缺点,它的一些不足包括:
首先,它的电池续航表现较弱。如果希望提供合理的续航时间,它至少应该搭配一块45-50瓦时的电池。它的处理器和显卡性能潜能也无法完全发挥。基于相似硬件的宏碁Aspire V3-372-57CW在一些情况下速度明显更快。不过这并不表示IdeaPad 510S-14ISK响应迟缓。它的性能不足只有在测试软件中比较明显,在使用中很难感受到。除此之外,第七代的英特尔酷睿也将在不久后上市。联想已经在它的在线商店开始宣传了。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK
-
09/17/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Bade