联想 IdeaPad 710S Plus (酷睿 i7) 亚笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Brand: Lenovo

便携多媒体。 时尚，小巧，轻盈，且全面。听起来不错吧？尽管大部分亚笔记本电脑都属于办公设备，但这台适合多媒体用途的710S甚至可以胜任偶尔玩玩游戏的需要。我们将会通过测试考察这台新设备能否跟上它诸多前辈的步伐。

Sven Kloevekorn, ✓ Manuel Masiero (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 02/11/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows Ultrabook

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

80W3 (IdeaPad 710S Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7500U 2 x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1242 MHz, RAM: 5000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 369.15, Nvidia Optimus

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4, 2134 MHz, 单通道, 板载, 所有内存槽均已占用

Display

13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), IPS, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, 512 GB

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机接口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 14 x 307 x 214

Battery

46 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清 720p (90万像素)

Additional features

Speakers: 位于前端底部, JBLStereo 扬声器，支持 DolbyDAX2 , Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.1 kg, Power Supply: 212 g

Price

1299 EUR

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA DIN A4 ❌

Left: USB 2.0 (always-on charging), SD card

Right: Audio in/out, USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C, USB 3.0, power

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	107.8 MB/s +58%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB	68.1 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	250.6 MB/s +185%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB	88 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	614 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	575 MBit/s -6%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	608 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	525 MBit/s -14%


314 cd/m²	315 cd/m²	302 cd/m²
316 cd/m²	343 cd/m²	306 cd/m²
278 cd/m²	289 cd/m²	290 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 305.9 cd/m² Minimum: 6.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 343 cd/m²
Contrast: 1143:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.29 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Chimei Innolux, N133HCE-GP1, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA AUO226D, , 1920x1080, 12.5"	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display		4%	-26%	-18%
Display P3 Coverage	65.3	64.6 -1%	44.45 -32%	48.94 -25%
sRGB Coverage	82.9	89.1 7%	65.2 -21%	73.3 -12%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	60.6	64.8 7%	45.96 -24%	50.5 -17%
Response Times		19%	23%	7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	45 ?(12, 33)	31 ?(14, 17) 31%	32 ?(14.8, 17.2) 29%	32.8 ?(16, 16.8) 27%
Response Time Black / White *	29 ?(6, 23)	27 ?(7, 20) 7%	24 ?(12.4, 11.6) 17%	33.2 ?(10.8, 22.4) -14%
PWM Frequency
Screen		3%	-9%	-7%
Brightness middle	343	359 5%	289 -16%	351.2 2%
Brightness	306	344 12%	298 -3%	325 6%
Brightness Distribution	81	92 14%	87 7%	89 10%
Black Level *	0.3	0.25 17%	0.27 10%	0.195 35%
Contrast	1143	1436 26%	1070 -6%	1801 58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.73	4.57 3%	4.82 -2%	7.4 -56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.05	9.25 -2%	10.73 -19%	9.08 -0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.29	5.2 -58%	3.84 -17%	6.71 -104%
Gamma	2.36 ^93%	2.47 ^89%	2.41 ^91%	2.74 ^80%
CCT	6437 ^101%	6887 ^94%	6492 ^100%	7222 ^90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	54	58 7%	42.03 -22%	50.48 -7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	83	89 7%	64.8 -22%	73.31 -12%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		9% / 5%	-4% / -8%	-6% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points +16%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	124 Points +13%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54	111 Points +1%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54	111 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Intel Core i7-7500U	110 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV Intel Core i5-7200U	320 Points +9%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	318 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Intel Core i7-7500U	293 Points
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54	250 Points -15%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel Core i5-7Y54	207 Points -29%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

110 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

293 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	3535 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	3147 Points
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG	3064 Points -3%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	3037 Points -3%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	4568 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4184 Points
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4146 Points -1%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3147 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4184 points
Help

	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-48%	-6%	-27%
Read Seq	1577	431.2 -73%	1482 -6%	1233 -22%
Write Seq	1472	401 -73%	1232 -16%	733 -50%
Read 512	1165	283.7 -76%	1191 2%	1036 -11%
Write 512	1244	313.6 -75%	1220 -2%	439.9 -65%
Read 4k	54.8	36.62 -33%	46.96 -14%	29.31 -47%
Write 4k	121.5	76.1 -37%	100.7 -17%	116.9 -4%
Read 4k QD32	407.5	329.4 -19%	464 14%	479.2 18%
Write 4k QD32	321.4	325.6 1%	292.1 -9%	218.3 -32%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP

Sequential Read: 1577 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1472 MB/s

512K Read: 1165 MB/s

512K Write: 1244 MB/s

4K Read: 54.8 MB/s

4K Write: 121.5 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 407.5 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 321.4 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2447 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1545 Points -37%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	1254 Points -49%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	1039 Points -58%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	13075 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	8177 Points -37%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	7035 Points -46%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	5541 Points -58%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	1940 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	963 Points -50%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	844 Points -56%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	647 Points -67%

3DMark 11 Performance		2589 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		7123 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1794 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	38.6	22.4
Far Cry Primal (2016)	36	16
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)		94.1	40	26.8

Noise Level

Idle		30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
Load		36.2 / 37.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)

Temperature development upper side (load)

Temperature development underside (load)

Temperature development upper side (idle)

Max. Load

Idle


31.9 °C	42.6 °C	43.2 °C
29.7 °C	37.6 °C	29.2 °C
27.6 °C	27.6 °C	30.4 °C

Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 33.3 °C


40.9 °C	45.3 °C	33.6 °C
35.1 °C	36.4 °C	30.8 °C
30.5 °C	30.9 °C	28.9 °C

Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 34.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).

Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.34 / 0.4 Watt
Idle	3.6 / 7.4 / 8.7 Watt
Load	43 / 42 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG, IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5"	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Power Consumption		28%	20%	30%
Idle Minimum *	3.6	4.1 -14%	4.3 -19%	4.1 -14%
Idle Average *	7.4	6.4 14%	6 19%	4.2 43%
Idle Maximum *	8.7	6.8 22%	6.4 26%	5.1 41%
Load Average *	43	16 63%	22.7 47%	22.1 49%
Load Maximum *	42	18.7 55%	31.2 26%	29.4 30%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		7h 48min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 38min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 29min

	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh	Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 41.58 Wh	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Battery Runtime		68%	29%	118%
Reader / Idle	468	792 69%	526 12%	1295 177%
WiFi v1.3	338	438 30%	355 5%	677 100%
Load	89	182 104%	152 71%	157 76%
H.264		410	413

Pros

+ 轻盈纤薄

+ 坚固的高品质机身

+ 时尚的表面材质

+ 不易沾染指纹

+ 优秀的输入设备

+ 支持TPM和指纹识别

+ 明亮高对比度的屏幕，宽广的桌面空间

+ 无闪烁亮度控制

+ GeForce 940MX搭配GDDR5显存

+ 优秀的无线网络性能

+ 优秀的摄像头

+ 高速固态硬盘

+ 安静清凉

Cons

- 打开屏幕上盖需要两只手

- 接口数量少

- 外接屏幕只能通过USB-C

- 屏幕反光

- 不适合图片编辑

- 不适合快节奏游戏的屏幕响应速度

- GeForce 940MX频率略低

- 风扇在中等转速即开始发出呜呜声

- 在Cinebench和压力测试程序中均有降频问题

- 电池续航不够理想

In review: Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus. Review sample courtesy of Campuspoint.de

与接近完美的前代机型形成鲜明对比的是，我们在联想最新的Ideapad 710S Plus中寻找到了不少小瑕疵。不过可能只有响应不均匀的触控版会带来比较大的影响。它的屏幕整体上十分出色，雾面表面和宽广的色域覆盖更是锦上添花。即使对于亚笔记本来说接口较少是很常见的情况，但我们认为它还是有空间提供一个小尺寸的视频输出接口如HDMI或DP的。它的电池续航也无法达到便携设备的常见水平。而会影响它是否值得推荐的最大问题是散热风扇的嗡嗡声，不过这在旋转速度较低时并不会出现，同时也可能只是我们测试机的个别情况。

便携和多变是联想Ideapad 710S Plus的最大优势。不过，感兴趣的用户需要小心检查它有没有风扇噪音的问题。

当然，它轻盈而坚固的机身也是一个非常值得赞赏的优势。它的输入设备应该可以满足大部分用户的需要。TPM和指纹识别也可以让需要更高安全性的用户满意，时钟频率略有降低的搭配GDDR5显存的GeForce 940MX应该也可以让偶尔玩游戏的用户十分欣喜。与前代机型不同的是，它的屏幕不再有闪烁，而大尺寸固态硬盘速度也更快，无线网络速度也不再是个弱点了。整体上，我们认为710S十分值得考虑，但是我们建议用户试试它在负载下有没有风扇噪音。不常玩游戏的用户可以考虑搭配i5-7200U处理器的售价更低的机型。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB - 02/01/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis

87 / 98 → 89%

Keyboard

85%

Pointing Device

84%

Connectivity

51 / 80 → 64%

Weight

74 / 35-78 → 90%

Battery

86%

Display

84%

Games Performance

66 / 68 → 97%

Application Performance

82 / 87 → 94%

Temperature

92 / 91 → 100%

Noise

85%

Audio

50 / 91 → 55%

Camera

71 / 85 → 83%

Average

77%

86%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 IdeaPad 710S Plus (酷睿 i7) 亚笔记本电脑简短评测

Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-02-11 (Update: 2017-02-11)