Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar联想 IdeaPad Miix 700 变形本简短评测
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 (Miix Series)
Processor
Intel Core m5-6Y54 2 x 1.1 - 2.7 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 900 MHz, 双通道, 10.18.15.4281
Memory
4 GB
, LPDDR3-1866, 双通道, 板载内存
Display
12.00 inch 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixel, 电容式，10点触控, native pen support, Samsung L_QLLTN120QL01L01, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2, 128 GB
, 100 GB free
Weight
1.08 kg, Power Supply: 197 g
Price
999 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Samsung L_QLLTN120QL01L01 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 341 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 317.9 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 341 cd/m²
Contrast: 947:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 8.12 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 18 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 18 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8791 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33 ms). | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 IPS, 2160x1440 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 IPS, 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB IPS, 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 IPS, 2736x1824 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 IPS, 2732x2048 | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 IPS-Panel, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -4% | -1% | 16% | -34% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.1 | 67.5 -1% | 65 -5% | 66.9 -2% | 91.2 34% | 44.4 -35% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.4 | 96.6 -1% | 96.5 -1% | 97.5 0% | 98.1 1% | 66.4 -32% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.2 | 69 -2% | 67 -5% | 68.6 -2% | 79.3 13% | 45.91 -35% |
| Response Times | -74% | -74% | 1642% | |||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 46 ? -53% | 46 ? -53% | 48.4 ? -61% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * | 16 ? | 31 ? -94% | 31.2 ? -95% | 35.6 ? -123% | ||
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 50 ? -75% | 50 ? -75% | 10420 5110% | ||
| Screen | 24% | 18% | 29% | 34% | -12% | |
| Brightness middle | 341 | 389.2 14% | 413 21% | 436.7 28% | 399 17% | 364 7% |
| Brightness | 318 | 392 23% | 396 25% | 433 36% | 393 24% | 331 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 92 6% | 87 0% | 87 0% | 92 6% | 84 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.27 25% | 0.36 -0% | 0.326 9% | 0.22 39% | 0.44 -22% |
| Contrast | 947 | 1441 52% | 1147 21% | 1340 41% | 1814 92% | 827 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6 | 3.61 40% | 3.09 48% | 1.82 70% | 2.96 51% | 7.32 -22% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.12 | 3.8 53% | 3.92 52% | 1.44 82% | 3 63% | 7.37 9% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.3 96% | 2.1 105% | 2.21 100% | 2.03 108% |
| CCT | 7011 93% | 5969 109% | 7333 89% | 6560 99% | 7049 92% | 6479 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.4 | 63 -1% | 61 -4% | 62.3 -2% | 71.15 12% | 42.2 -33% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.4 | 97 0% | 97 0% | 97.5 0% | 97.87 0% | 66.1 -32% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-1% | -20% /
-5% | 557% /
346% | 25% /
29% | -23% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Sunspider | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | Peacekeeper
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 | |
| Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 | |
| Peacekeeper - --- (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
| Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 4518 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2733 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3344 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3837 points | |
Help | ||
| PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Sequential Read:
497.9 MB/s
Sequential Write:
153.5 MB/s
512K Read:
401.2 MB/s
512K Write:
154.5 MB/s
4K Read:
36.2 MB/s
4K Write:
95.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
389.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
154 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 5842 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1109 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 38523 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3936 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 630 points | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) | 50 | 27.2 | 11.2 | |
| The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 31.1 | 18.7 | 11.6 | 7.1 |
| Diablo III (2012) | 61.9 | 41.8 | 35.1 | 20.5 |
| Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 76.7 | 57.3 | 35.1 | 20.2 |
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 45.3 | 23 | 16.3 | 7.2 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 33.1 | 18.5 | 15.4 | 4.7 |
| GRID: Autosport (2014) | 86.5 | 26.3 | 14.9 | 12.5 |
| Sims 4 (2014) | 161.1 | 39.2 | 17.1 | 10.4 |
| F1 2014 (2014) | 41 | 28 | 17 | 12.5 |
| Battlefield Hardline (2015) | 22.1 | 18.1 | 6.8 | 4.1 |
| Dirt Rally (2015) | 65.7 | 14.4 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
| World of Warships (2015) | 42.8 | 26.3 | 12.7 | 7.4 |
| Anno 2205 (2015) | 15.5 | 9.3 | ||
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 18.7 | 10.4 |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-10.5 °C / -18.9 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-10.5 °C / -18.9 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 6650U, Iris Graphics 540 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X, A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 5Y51, HD Graphics 5300 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -9% | -33% | 2% | -7% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38.6 | 43.6 -13% | 52.3 -35% | 45.4 -18% | 40.1 -4% | 36.6 5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 40.8 | 45.2 -11% | 51.4 -26% | 43.2 -6% | 39.3 4% | 37.3 9% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.4 | 32.4 -7% | 43.2 -42% | 25.2 17% | 33.8 -11% | 30.5 -0% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28 | 29.6 -6% | 36 -29% | 24 14% | 32.9 -18% | 29.9 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.2 / 0.4 Watt |
| Idle |  4 / 8.6 / 9.3 Watt |
| Load |
18.6 / 36.3 Watt |
    
| |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X, A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 5Y51, HD Graphics 5300 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | 18% | 48% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 4.4 -10% | 2.69 33% | 1.5 62% |
| Idle Average * | 8.6 | 9 -5% | 10.95 -27% | 4 53% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.3 | 10.7 -15% | 11.14 -20% | 5 46% |
| Load Average * | 18.6 | 19.6 -5% | 11.54 38% | 13.9 25% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.3 | 19.9 45% | 12.8 65% | 16.9 53% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 41 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 38 Wh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 39 Wh | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | -9% | -36% | 62% | 51% | |
| Reader / Idle | 861 | 791 -8% | 899 4% | 654 -24% | 1933 125% | 1063 23% |
| H.264 | 450 | 630 40% | 658 46% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 440 | 488 11% | 427 -3% | 293 -33% | 695 58% | 675 53% |
| Load | 157 | 138 -12% | 111 -29% | 79 -50% | 195 24% | 288 83% |
Pros
+ 明亮，高对比度的IPS屏幕
+ 无风扇运行
+ M.2固态硬盘
+ 硬盘底座
+ 手写笔
+ 非常优秀的电池续航
Cons
- 多线程处理时有降频
- 显卡降频
- 机身不够坚固
联想的IdeaPad Miix 700是他们产品线中全新的一台优雅平板／变形本，它给了我们很好的第一印象。搭载的酷睿M处理器为日常使用提供了足够的运算性能。尽管采用了被动散热，它可以保持一定的性能——至少在单线程运行时。在多任务处理中它的性能有些（小）下降。它的显卡核心无法发挥全部性能。它甚至无法在冷启动后达到芯片较弱的Core m3 Surface Pro 4的性能水平。
这让人怀疑联想是否应该为它搭配一块酷睿m3处理器。这块酷睿m5处理器只能稍稍领先Surface Pro 4的酷睿m3。联想应该为Miix 700增加一个采用酷睿m3的入门型号，它应该会让这款设备更有竞争力。
处理器被动散热的一个好处在于无噪音的运行。对于所有的Miix 700都是如此。联想为这个系列机型全部搭配了酷睿M系列处理器。它除了电子噪音外不会有其它的声音。它搭配的固态硬盘保证了高速的系统运行。它可以定制更换更高容量。Miix 700的屏幕整体上可以让人满意。它十分明亮，对比度高且可视角度稳定。它的色彩还原也十分优秀——在校对之后。非常优秀的电池续航为它的整体表现画上了完满的句点。
在Miix 700和酷睿m3 Surface Pro 4之间很难决出一个胜者。
这两台设备都具备另一方没有的优秀特质。Miix 700售价较低——而Surface Pro 4提供了更明亮、对比度更高的屏幕。微软为Surface Pro设计了很多独特的配件——联想的Miix 700有搭配LTE网络模组的型号。哪一款更适合就需要消费者自己决定了。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
-
08/22/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Convertible - Weighted Average