戴尔 Inspiron 15 5578-1777 变形本简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 244 cd/m²
Contrast: 976:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.93 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.13% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.74% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.7
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -9% | -5% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.74 | 38.04 -9% | 39.45 -5% | 42.58 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.8 | 57.1 -9% | 59.2 -6% | 63.9 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.13 | 39.3 -9% | 40.76 -5% | 43.99 2% |
Response Times | 7% | -15% | -17% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55 ? | 42 ? 24% | 55 ? -0% | 43.2 ? 21% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20 ? | 22 ? -10% | 26 ? -30% | 30.8 ? -54% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | |||
Screen | -3% | -28% | 2% | |
Brightness middle | 244 | 266 9% | 205 -16% | 254 4% |
Brightness | 242 | 249 3% | 191 -21% | 230 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 85 -9% | 74 -20% | 86 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.26 -4% | 0.3 -20% | 0.26 -4% |
Contrast | 976 | 1023 5% | 683 -30% | 977 0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.94 | 4.98 -1% | 7.2 -46% | 4.23 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.3 | 11.82 -62% | 12.7 -74% | 9.5 -30% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.93 | 2.68 46% | 6.86 -39% | 2.87 42% |
Gamma | 2.7 81% | 2.27 97% | 2.27 97% | 2.35 94% |
CCT | 7401 88% | 6583 99% | 6983 93% | 5965 109% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 36 -10% | 38 -5% | 40.35 1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63 | 57 -10% | 59 -6% | 63.48 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-3% | -16% /
-22% | -4% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 35 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3446 points | |
Help |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0 | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK Liteonit CV3-DE256 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -4% | -91% | 6% | |
Read Seq | 503 | 458.6 -9% | 102.4 -80% | 487 -3% |
Write Seq | 465.3 | 270 -42% | 102 -78% | 450.7 -3% |
Read 512 | 293 | 397.4 36% | 31.37 -89% | 384.5 31% |
Write 512 | 322.7 | 242 -25% | 48.12 -85% | 356.3 10% |
Read 4k | 28.9 | 19.88 -31% | 0.357 -99% | 27.05 -6% |
Write 4k | 55 | 86.7 58% | 1.047 -98% | 63.7 16% |
Read 4k QD32 | 314.5 | 275.3 -12% | 0.844 -100% | 281.5 -10% |
Write 4k QD32 | 209.2 | 197.6 -6% | 1.098 -99% | 232 11% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1528 points | |
Help |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 40.3 | 24.3 | 19.9 | 6.3 |
Civilization VI (2016) | 26.8 | 9.2 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.3 / 35.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.5 °C / 77.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+2.6 °C / 4.7 F).
Speakers
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.25 / 0.35 Watt |
Idle | 4.3 / 7.6 / 9.8 Watt |
Load |
32.6 / 28.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 |
Pros
Cons
Inspiron 15 5578是戴尔设计的一台15.6寸变形本。它只有内部硬件与前几台机型有所不同。生产商现在为它搭配了一颗Kaby Lake处理器,为它提供了在未来几年都不需要担心的足够性能。这台Inspiron的散热风扇或硬盘不再会给用户带来噪音。在待机时,这台设备能够完全保持安静;甚至是在高负载下它也不算吵闹。这台笔记本电脑也能够保持清凉。
一块高速固态硬盘保证了系统的迅捷响应。由于底盖可以打开,用户可以更换固态硬盘。这台设备的电池续航表现不俗。它的触控屏幕表现完美,可以对手指或主动式手写笔的操作作出实时的响应。为了测试手写笔的表现,我们用Hama生产的一根手写笔尝试了点击和全屏的拖拽操作,这台设备都没有让我们失望。它的背光键盘整体上也十分实用。
在所有重要的领域,这台Inspiron都从Kaby Lake更新中得到了好处。它的电池续航也得到了长足进步,系统更是得到了更高的运算性能。
它的IPS屏幕十分养眼,提供了宽广的可视角度范围,高对比度和不错的色彩还原准确度。它的亮度对于户外使用来说有点低,这让我们感到有些遗憾,用户将只能在室内使用这台设备了。它的另一个缺点是缺少USB-C接口。作为一台最新设备,我们期待它至少能提供一个最新接口。
另外一个值得一提的是,如果你要在戴尔官网购买这台设备的话,它的标准质保时间是一年。而在欧洲的一些其他购物网站(如notebooksbilliger.de)会提供消费者两年的质保。在这两种情况下,用户都可以选购戴尔的额外保修计划。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1
- 01/18/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck