Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc A310

Intel A310

英特尔 Arc A310 是英特尔专门为台式机推出的入门级显卡。它基于 ACM-G11 芯片,提供 8 个 Xe 内核中的 6 个(96 个 ALU)、8 个光线追踪单元中的 6 个、1.152 MB L1 缓存和 4MB L2 缓存。显存接口为 64 位宽,支持 4GB GDDR6 显存,速度为 15.5 Gbps。根据型号的不同,TGP 在 40 瓦到 75 瓦之间。

A310 类似于 移动 Arc A350M除了内核和内存的时钟频率更高。

ACM-G11 芯片在台积电以 6 纳米(N6 工艺)制造,提供 72 亿个晶体管,大小为 157 平方毫米。它集成了两个媒体引擎,用于 VP9、AVC、HEVC、AV1 8k60 12 位 HDR 解码和 8k 10 位 HDR 编码。集成的 4 个显示管道支持 4x 4k120 HDR、HDMI 2.0B、DP 2.0 10G 和自适应同步。

Arc Series

Arc A770 4096 @ 2.1 - 2.4 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Arc A750 3584 @ 2.05 - 2.4 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Arc A580 3072 @ 1.7 - 2 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
A770M 4096 @ 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
A730M 3072 @ 1.1 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A570M 16 @ 0.9 - 1.3 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A550M 16 @ 0.9 - 2.01 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A530M 12 @ 0.9 - 1.3 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
A370M 8 @ 1.55 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Arc A380 1024 @ 2 GHz96 Bit @ 15500 MHz
A310 6 @ 2 GHz64 Bit @ 15500 MHz
A350M 6 @ 1.15 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameAlchemist
ArchitectureXe HPG
Pipelines6 - unified
Raytracing Cores6
Core Speed2000 (Boost) MHz
CacheL1: 1.1 MB, L2: 4 MB
Memory Speed15500 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth124 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption75 Watt (40 - 75 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count7.2 Billion
Die Size 157 mm²
technology6 nm
PCIe4 8x
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 2.0 10G Ready
Date of Announcement01.09.2022
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.7 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
3.3 -12%
3.36 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.41 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.42 -9%
3.44 -8%
3.5 -6%
3.53 -6%
3.59 -4%
3.65 -2%
Intel Arc A310
3.74
3.74 0%
3.78 1%
3.85 3%
3.96 6%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.08 9%
4.09 9%
4.11 10%
4.23 13%
4.28 14%
...
20.4 445%
max:
33.3 790%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
3743 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3269 Points (9%)
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -97%
...
2998 -8%
3075 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 -5%
3123 -4%
3139 -4%
3155 -3%
3197 -2%
3231 -1%
3242 -1%
Intel Arc A310
3269
3324 2%
3364 3%
3430 5%
3492 7%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 7%
3526 8%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3567 9%
3601 10%
3610 10%
...
19434 494%
max:
36259 1009%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
44891 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
53244 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
8192 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
8464 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
257130 Points (28%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
13031 Points (17%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
11915 Points (10%)
171.8 -99%
...
10818 -9%
10952 -8%
11119 -7%
11171 -6%
11305 -5%
11314 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 -4%
11796 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 0%
Intel Arc A310
11915
11984 1%
12066 1%
12289 3%
12467 5%
12479 5%
12583 6%
12797 7%
12801 7%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
13160 10%
...
59943 403%
max:
104201 775%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
46839 Points (14%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
39213 Points (21%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
36214 -8%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
36391 -7%
36405 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 -6%
37644 -4%
37785 -4%
38502 -2%
38910 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
39191 0%
Intel Arc A310
39213
39319 0%
40134 2%
40146 2%
40643 4%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
42370 8%
42967 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
43525 11%
43587 11%
44188 13%
...
132443 238%
max:
170928 336%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
35.9 fps (15%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
80.5 fps (15%)
3.3 -96%
...
62.8 -22%
63.8 -21%
64.7 -20%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 -20%
65.5 -19%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU
72.4 -10%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 -8%
78.4 -3%
78.8 -2%
Intel Arc A310
80.5
84.6 5%
87.1 8%
87.5 9%
89.3 11%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 13%
93.2 16%
94.7 18%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
96 19%
96.8 20%
...
536 566%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
199.7 fps (15%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
854 Samples/s (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
2784 Samples/s (5%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5254 points (6%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
62.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
53.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
20.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
38.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1920x1080
260  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
154.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
141.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
102.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
75.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
53.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
34.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
153.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
106.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
40.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
56.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
35.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
42.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
187.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
99  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
176  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
108  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
187.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
187.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
169
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
181.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Last Epoch62.553.439.630.9
Skull & Bones
Helldivers 222.419.516.716.3
Enshrouded20.41813.89.88
Palworld38.333.223.220.9
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown260154.7141.6
Ready or Not102.275.658.334.6
The Finals7553.146.634.6
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora1614118.1
EA Sports WRC34.327.318.616.8
Alan Wake 216.313.912.3
Lords of the Fallen22.722.218.414
Total War Pharaoh11173.641.632.3
Assassin's Creed Mirage37322520
Counter-Strike 2153.5106.337.527.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty4131.125.723.7
Baldur's Gate 340.63225.524.9
Lies of P49.3423630.3
The Crew Motorfest37332722
Starfield17.314.21310.3
Armored Core 656.343.83926.9
Atlas Fallen32.631.826.78.12
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart30.324.619.116.1
F1 2388754212
Resident Evil 4 Remake42.430.121.69.5
Company of Heroes 335.231.225.424.8
Sons of the Forest29.918.917.417.1
Atomic Heart54.240.327.418.8
Returnal30292621
Hogwarts Legacy42.335.221.515.4
Strange Brigade187.379.765.353.8
Far Cry 599514744
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark41.724.1
The Witcher 31761085629
GTA V187.7187.638.316.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
7
15
6
4
10
16
6
2
21
11
1
1
24
7

1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 19. 09:36:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#15 composed specs +0s ... 0.032s

#16 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#17 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 12464 +0.028s ... 0.06s

#19 got single benchmarks 12464 +0.007s ... 0.067s

#20 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#21 min, max, avg, median took s +0.393s ... 0.459s

#22 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.46s

#23 Got 136 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.468s

#24 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.468s

#25 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.023s ... 0.491s

#26 benchmarks composed for output. +1.258s ... 1.749s

#27 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.752s

#28 return log +0s ... 1.752s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

M4 40-core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter