Jumper EZBook 3 (N3350, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Jumper EZbook 3
Brand: Jumper

山寨MacBook Air。 Jumper更新了EZBook，为它搭配了Apollo Lake平台的赛扬N3350双核处理器。一块雾面全高清屏幕，低重量和低售价让它十分有吸引力。请阅读我们的评测了解这款小巧笔记本电脑的弱点又在哪里。

Klaus Hinum, ✓ Katja Steyrleuthner (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 04/01/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Chinese Tech

Test device courtesy of Gearbest

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Jumper EZbook 3 (EZbook Series)

Processor

Intel Celeron N3350 2 x 1.1 - 2.4 GHz, Apollo Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 500, Core: 450 MHz, 4590

Memory

4 GB

, DDR3 800 MHz -15-15-34

Display

14.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 156 PPI, MS_9003, TN LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Apollo Lake

Storage

Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC, 64 GB

, 38 GB free

Soundcard

RealTek ALC269 @ Intel Apollo Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD

Networking

Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 21 x 330 x 220

Battery

38 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 7.6V, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 4 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Primary Camera: 0.3 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Released

02/01/2017

Weight

1.225 kg, Power Supply: 111 g

Price

343 Euro

Links

Jumper homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Jumper EZbook 3 Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz DIN A4 ❌

Samsung T3 USB SSD in right USB 2.0 port

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV	49.23 MB/s +155%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT	22.7 MB/s +18%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6	20.56 MB/s +7%
Jumper EZbook 3	19.3 MB/s
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H	19.1 MB/s -1%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV	82.1 MB/s +200%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H	37 MB/s +35%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6	34.5 MB/s +26%
Jumper EZbook 3	27.4 MB/s
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT	26.6 MB/s -3%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	469 MBit/s +501%
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	311 MBit/s +299%
Jumper EZbook 3 Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0	78 MBit/s
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)	72 MBit/s -8%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro 802.11 b/g/n	41.6 MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AX12
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	349 MBit/s +306%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	323 MBit/s +276%
Jumper EZbook 3 Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0	86 MBit/s
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)	71 MBit/s -17%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro 802.11 b/g/n	40.6 MBit/s -53%


352 cd/m²	351 cd/m²	331 cd/m²
351 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	309 cd/m²
345 cd/m²	356 cd/m²	293 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

MS_9003 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 384 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 341.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 76 %
Center on Battery: 384 cd/m²
Contrast: 300:1 (Black: 1.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 11.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
53% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
77.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
51.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Jumper EZbook 3 MS_9003, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.1"	Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Chi Mei N140BGA-EA3, TN LED, 1366x768, 14"	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz APPA027, IPS, 2304x1440, 12"	Teclast Tbook 10s LCD, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	VOYO VBook V3 Chi Mei N116HSE, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Cube i7 Book CDK09 Samsung LTN140W1-L01, IPS, 1920x1080, 10.6"
Display		-20%	27%
Display P3 Coverage	51.6	40.97 -21%	66.8 29%
sRGB Coverage	77.3	61.5 -20%	95.4 23%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	53	42.35 -20%	68 28%
Response Times		-43%	-76%	-58%	-126%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	46 ?(25, 21)	32 ?(10, 22) 30%	41.2 ?(15.6, 25.6) 10%	40 ?(21, 19) 13%	49 ?(27, 22) -7%
Response Time Black / White *	11.6 ?(7.7, 3.8)	30 ?(16, 14) -159%	30.4 ?(6.8, 23.6) -162%	26.4 ?(14, 12.4) -128%	40 ?(19, 21) -245%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(99)	200 ?(90) 0%
Screen		22%	64%	45%	36%	51%
Brightness middle	384	270 -30%	387 1%	279 -27%	195 -49%	384 0%
Brightness	341	247 -28%	358 5%	280 -18%	200 -41%	370 9%
Brightness Distribution	76	80 5%	88 16%	82 8%	72 -5%	89 17%
Black Level *	1.28	0.57 55%	0.47 63%	0.29 77%	0.24 81%	0.37 71%
Contrast	300	474 58%	823 174%	962 221%	813 171%	1038 246%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.7	3.01 65%	1.6 82%	6.7 23%	5 43%	5.8 33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	16.7	6.33 62%	4 76%	10.8 35%	9.31 44%	19.8 -19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	11.1	12.73 -15%	1 91%	6.8 39%	5.98 46%	5.1 54%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.36 ^93%	2.26 ^97%	2.27 ^97%	2.17 ^101%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	12445 ^52%	14629 ^44%	6680 ^97%	8466 ^77%	6764 ^96%	7125 ^91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		39	61.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		62	82.2
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-14% / -1%	5% / 34%	-7% / 24%	-45% / 4%	51% / 51%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.7 ms rise
11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 25 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	91 Points +98%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	90 Points +96%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 Intel Core m3-6Y30	89 Points +93%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	53 Points +15%
Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350	46 Points
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel Pentium N3710	41 Points -11%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 Intel Celeron N3050	35 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	218 Points +160%
Cube i7 Book CDK09 Intel Core m3-6Y30	211 Points +151%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	165 Points +96%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel Pentium N3710	152 Points +81%
Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350	84 Points
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 Intel Celeron N3050	65 Points -23%

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

2654

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

1503

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

2941

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

0.91 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

4.25 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

0.46 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.6 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

1.07 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

10.9 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

84 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

46 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Cube i7 Book CDK09 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, FORESEE 64GB O1229B	2976 Points +87%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points +60%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2114 Points +33%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	2073 Points +30%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	1661 Points +4%
Jumper EZbook 3 HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC	1592 Points
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1088 Points -32%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	3550 Points +61%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	2801 Points +27%
Jumper EZbook 3 HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC	2207 Points
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1595 Points -28%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	1464 Points -34%
Teclast Tbook 10s HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1329 Points -40%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1592 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		2207 points
PCMark 10 Score		1195 points
Help

	Jumper EZbook 3 Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz Apple SSD AP0256	Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 128 GB eMMC Flash	Chuwi Hi12 Hynix HCG8E 64 GB	Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX	HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		1814%	265%	155%	134%	-32%	-38%
Read Seq	151	821 444%	428 183%	166.5 10%	141 -7%	109.6 -27%	106 -30%
Write Seq	50	660 1220%	124.2 148%	85 70%	50 0%	107.5 115%	106.1 112%
Read 512	133	672 405%	283.9 113%	153.8 16%	132 -1%	36.63 -72%	33.53 -75%
Write 512	41.3	737 1685%	41.49 0%	75.6 83%	44.8 8%	49.35 19%	39.03 -5%
Read 4k	5.07	16.28 221%	15.95 215%	13.2 160%	17.9 253%	0.419 -92%	0.407 -92%
Write 4k	2.47	24.87 907%	14.67 494%	13.04 428%	11.4 362%	1.171 -53%	1.026 -58%
Read 4k QD32	16.4	271.9 1558%	98.9 503%	35.12 114%	35.3 115%	1.03 -94%	0.898 -95%
Write 4k QD32	2.74	223.9 8072%	15.41 462%	12.66 362%	12.1 342%	1.239 -55%	1.003 -63%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC

Sequential Read: 151 MB/s

Sequential Write: 50 MB/s

512K Read: 133 MB/s

512K Write: 41.3 MB/s

4K Read: 5.07 MB/s

4K Write: 2.47 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 16.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 2.74 MB/s

3DMark Cloud Gate Score

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1001 Points +119%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Intel HD Graphics 510, Intel Core i5-6198DU	847 Points +85%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200	583 Points +27%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	496 Points +8%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	463 Points +1%
Jumper EZbook 3 Intel HD Graphics 500, Intel Celeron N3350	458 Points
Acer Switch One 10 SW1-011-14UQ Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	298 Points -35%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		3393 points
3DMark 11 Performance		505 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		2074 points
Help

... in comparison

World of Warships - 1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear
MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel HD Graphics (Haswell), Intel Celeron 2970M	41.4 (21^min - 51^max) fps +117%
Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-6410	28.6 fps +50%
Jumper EZbook 3 Intel HD Graphics 500, Intel Celeron N3350	19.1 (7^min - 28^max) fps
Acer Extensa 2519-C7DC Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050	16.8 fps -12%
Chuwi Hi12 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	13.9 (7^min - 19^max) fps -27%

	low	med.	high	ultra
World of Warcraft (2005)	46
Diablo III (2012)	12.7
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)	14
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	15.9
World of Warships (2015)	19.1
Team Fortress 2 (2017)	21.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	5.3
World of Tanks enCore (2018)	34 (error at the end)	4 (error at the end)
Strange Brigade (2018)	0 game wont start
League of Legends (2019)	28.2	20.2	13.9	12.6
Hearthstone (2020)	23.9	24	11.2
Valorant (2020)	9.09

Max. Load

Idle


41 °C	37 °C	29 °C
39 °C	34 °C	29 °C
32 °C	32 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 33.2 °C


29 °C	38 °C	42 °C
30 °C	34 °C	38 °C
29 °C	30 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 33.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.7 °C / -6.7 F).

Jumper EZbook 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.13 / 0.17 Watt
Idle	3.18 / 6.14 / 6.4 Watt
Load	13.3 / 13.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Jumper EZbook 3 Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.1"	Chuwi Hi10 Pro Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12"	Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 14"	Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, TN LED, 1366x768, 13.3"	HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6"
Power Consumption		23%	-3%	-11%	-21%	-32%	-33%
Idle Minimum *	3.18	1.4 56%	3.9 -23%	2 37%	4.1 -29%	4.5 -42%	5.3 -67%
Idle Average *	6.14	4.82 21%	6.4 -4%	2.06 66%	8.3 -35%	7.6 -24%	7.1 -16%
Idle Maximum *	6.4	5.43 15%	6.5 -2%	6.94 -8%	8.6 -34%	8.5 -33%	8.2 -28%
Load Average *	13.3	11.61 13%	11.1 17%	22.52 -69%	13.5 -2%	17.4 -31%	15.5 -17%
Load Maximum *	13.6	12.48 8%	13.8 -1%	24.87 -83%	14.5 -7%	17.6 -29%	18.9 -39%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		7h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 54min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 55 Wh	661 min +57%
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 5650U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh	620 min +48%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh	554 min +32%
Jumper EZbook 3 Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 38 Wh	420 min
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh	389 min -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh	354 min -16%
VOYO VBook V3 Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Wh	208 min -50%

Pros

+ 低售价（网购）

+ 雾面，明亮的全高清屏幕

+ 无噪音散热设计

+ 高能效处理器

Cons

- 屏幕可视角度差

- 易划伤的塑料材质

- 迟缓的处理器拖慢了系统整体性能

- 99%以下的亮度采用200赫兹闪烁亮度控制

- 电池需要较长时间充满

- 摄像头位置不合理，拍摄效果差

EZBook 3是一台廉价的轻盈笔记本电脑，它搭配了明亮的雾面屏幕，无噪音（被动式）散热系统，和时尚的外观。和其他同价位设备相似，它也需要在一些方面节省成本。这台设备的弱点包括：使用的机身材质一般，屏幕可视角度窄同时有200赫兹的闪烁，系统性能低，电池续航也不算优秀。尽管它的触控版都和它模仿的对象相去甚远，但可以满足偶尔的工作需要。类似于其他很多中国厂商的设备，EZBook 3目前没有得到CE认证，因此它的质保根据购买店铺的情况不同而会有所不同。同时生产商也没有提供驱动支持。不过，英特尔显卡的驱动可以直接从官网找到。

银色的Jumper EZBook 3目前在Gearbest售价194.25欧元欧洲仓库有货（建议零售价343欧元，约2518人民币）。它的实惠价位可能对能够接受我们所提到的缺点的用户十分有吸引力。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Jumper EZbook 3 - 2017-03-24 03/24/2017 v6 ^(old)
Klaus Hinum

Chassis

62 / 98 → 63%

Keyboard

72%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

36 / 80 → 45%

Weight

72 / 35-78 → 87%

Battery

90%

Display

74%

Games Performance

42 / 68 → 62%

Application Performance

49 / 87 → 56%

Temperature

92 / 91 → 100%

Noise

100%

Audio

56 / 91 → 62%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

66%

77%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Jumper EZBook 3 (N3350, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Klaus Hinum, 2017-04- 1 (Update: 2017-05-23)