红米K30 Ultra智能手机评测:廉价120 Hz AMOLED
Comparison devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra Dimensity 1000+, Mali-G77 MP9 | 213 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
83.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 184 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.44" | 2440x1080 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 192 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.57" | 2340x1080 | |
82.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2020 | Samsung Galaxy A71 SD 730, Adreno 618 | 179 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
83.8 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2020 | ZTE Axon 11 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 168 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 | |
83.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Google Pixel 4a SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 143 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 5.80" | 2340x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
OnePlus Nord | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraLow lightMain cameraWide angle
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 775 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.163
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy A71 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | ZTE Axon 11 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Google Pixel 4a OLED, 2340x1080, 5.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -51% | -16% | -74% | -90% | 5% | |
Brightness middle | 775 | 529 -32% | 584 -25% | 629 -19% | 603 -22% | 705 -9% |
Brightness | 780 | 531 -32% | 583 -25% | 646 -17% | 608 -22% | 707 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 94 -4% | 97 -1% | 95 -3% | 92 -6% | 96 -2% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.19 | 2.53 -113% | 1.17 2% | 2.7 -127% | 3 -152% | 0.9 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.07 | 4.52 -118% | 2.95 -43% | 6 -190% | 6.2 -200% | 1.9 8% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.7 -6% | 1.7 -6% | 3 -88% | 3.8 -138% | 1.3 19% |
Gamma | 2.163 102% | 2.249 98% | 2.231 99% | 2.1 105% | 2.21 100% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6478 100% | 6462 101% | 6341 103% | 6340 103% | 7242 90% | 6576 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 270.3 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 270.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 270.3 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ () | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ () |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G | |
Google Pixel 4a | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ () |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ () | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ () | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra (Chrome 86) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra (Chrome 86) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ () | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra (Chrome 86) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ () | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra (Chrome 86) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ () | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra (Chrome 86) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ () | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Google Pixel 4a (Chrome 85) | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra (Chrome 86) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ () | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra | OnePlus Nord | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | Samsung Galaxy A71 | ZTE Axon 11 5G | Google Pixel 4a | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -29% | -22% | -56% | -25% | -41% | -38% | 79% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 975 | 956 -2% | 980 1% | 493 -49% | 956 -2% | 502 -49% | 760 ? -22% | 1894 ? 94% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 511 | 473.1 -7% | 476.9 -7% | 192.4 -62% | 417.1 -18% | 246.8 -52% | 297 ? -42% | 1476 ? 189% |
Random Read 4KB | 220.9 | 126.7 -43% | 156.4 -29% | 112.3 -49% | 166.3 -25% | 162.9 -26% | 152.9 ? -31% | 278 ? 26% |
Random Write 4KB | 290 | 104.5 -64% | 138.5 -52% | 109.6 -62% | 128.4 -56% | 187.4 -35% | 131.6 ? -55% | 312 ? 8% |
PUBG mobile
Real Racing 3
Asphalt 9 Legends
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (133.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 100% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus Nord audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 1.1 / 1.9 / 2.6 Watt |
Load |
6.4 / 11.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra 4500 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh | ZTE Axon 11 5G 4000 mAh | Google Pixel 4a 3140 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | 1% | 35% | 31% | 55% | 0% | 19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.1 | 1.8 -64% | 1.5 -36% | 0.63 43% | 0.78 29% | 0.49 55% | 1.1 ? -0% | 0.883 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 1.9 | 2.1 -11% | 2.2 -16% | 1.49 22% | 1.43 25% | 0.96 49% | 1.9 ? -0% | 1.467 ? 23% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.6 | 2.3 12% | 2.9 -12% | 1.51 42% | 1.54 41% | 1 62% | 2.6 ? -0% | 1.621 ? 38% |
Load Average * | 6.4 | 3.4 47% | 4.4 31% | 4.62 28% | 5.04 21% | 3.11 51% | 6.4 ? -0% | 6.58 ? -3% |
Load Maximum * | 11.9 | 5.2 56% | 7.2 39% | 7.11 40% | 7.49 37% | 5.23 56% | 11.9 ? -0% | 9.91 ? 17% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra 4500 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh | ZTE Axon 11 5G 4000 mAh | Google Pixel 4a 3140 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 4% | 46% | -3% | -11% | -15% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 911 | 869 -5% | 884 -3% | 815 -11% | 679 -25% | 669 -27% |
Load | 231 | 261 13% | 448 94% | 242 5% | 240 4% | 225 -3% |
Pros
Cons
总结——小米把标准提高了一大截:
Redmi K30 Ultra是一款动人心弦的中端智能手机,但(到目前为止)仅针对中国市场设计。 鉴于Redmi手机的价格范围,几乎没有任何真正的弱点。
摄像头模块仅处于平均水平,指纹扫描仪可能更快,而立体声扬声器也不是最好的。 此外,中国进口商品通常会有一些限制,例如保修和LTE覆盖范围。
如果您可以忍受中端手机的这些缺点,那么您将享受到高于平均水平的显示屏,更长的续航时间,快速的WLAN以及许多性能与出色的设计,获得物有所值的结果,而没有什么烦人的缺陷。
目前,您无法以300至400欧元(〜356至〜475美元)的价格获得比K30 Ultra更好的智能手机。
Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich