联想 K6 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 470 cd/m²
Contrast: 1237:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Lenovo K6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2" | Honor 5X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Acer Liquid Z630S IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | LG K10 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | Wiko U Feel Prime IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 2% | 4% | -0% | -20% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 470 | 289 -39% | 535 14% | 350 -26% | 370 -21% | 411 -13% |
| Brightness | 461 | 291 -37% | 521 13% | 345 -25% | 355 -23% | 386 -16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 96 9% | 85 -3% | 84 -5% | 92 5% | 86 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.43 -13% | 0.27 29% | 0.28 26% | 0.36 5% | |
| Contrast | 1237 | 1244 1% | 1296 5% | 1321 7% | 1142 -8% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 4.7 10% | 4.88 6% | 4.7 10% | 6.7 -29% | 4.3 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.5 | 7.3 23% | 8.66 9% | 8.5 11% | 17.8 -87% | 7.9 17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 3 46% | 5.2 7% | 5.6 -0% | 7.9 -41% | 2.8 50% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.03 108% | 2.26 97% | 1.84 120% | 2.21 100% | 2.53 87% |
| CCT | 7924 82% | 6291 103% | 7766 84% | 6795 96% | 9072 72% | 6589 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| LG K10 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| LG K10 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| LG K10 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| LG K10 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| LG K10 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| LG K10 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| LG K10 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| LG K10 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| LG K10 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| LG K10 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Honor 5X | |
| LG K10 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Honor 5X | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| LG K10 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo K6 | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | Honor 5X | Acer Liquid Z630S | LG K10 | Wiko U Feel Prime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | -8% | -4% | -16% | 31% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 262.6 | 147 -44% | 144 -45% | 249 -5% | 131 -50% | 270.9 3% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 46.66 | 72 54% | 78 67% | 67.7 45% | 78 67% | 137.3 194% |
| Random Read 4KB | 32.01 | 21 -34% | 17 -47% | 28.43 -11% | 9.2 -71% | 55 72% |
| Random Write 4KB | 10.5 | 11.6 10% | 10 -5% | 5.82 -45% | 7.5 -29% | 9.4 -10% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 78.2 | 79.8 2% | 75.5 -3% | 41.98 -46% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 50.4 | 46.61 -8% | 45 -11% | 35.21 -30% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 27 fps | ||
| very low | 29 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 53 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo K6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Wiko U Feel Prime audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.09 / 0.11 Watt |
| Idle |  0.65 / 1.65 / 1.67 Watt |
| Load |
3.58 / 5.58 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo K6 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh | Honor 5X 3000 mAh | Acer Liquid Z630S 4000 mAh | LG K10 2300 mAh | Wiko U Feel Prime 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | -31% | -58% | 4% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 0.65 | 0.61 6% | 0.87 -34% | 1.82 -180% | 0.66 -2% | |
| Idle Average * | 1.65 | 1.41 15% | 2.08 -26% | 2.35 -42% | 1.66 -1% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.67 | 1.51 10% | 2.22 -33% | 2.6 -56% | 1.76 -5% | |
| Load Average * | 3.58 | 2.56 28% | 5.26 -47% | 3.69 -3% | 2.85 20% | |
| Load Maximum * | 5.58 | 3.1 44% | 6.34 -14% | 5.98 -7% | 5.01 10% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo K6 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh | Honor 5X 3000 mAh | Acer Liquid Z630S 4000 mAh | LG K10 2300 mAh | Wiko U Feel Prime 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | -27% | -5% | -27% | -22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1626 | 1599 -2% | 1053 -35% | 1123 -31% | 1254 -23% | |
| H.264 | 633 | 658 4% | 602 -5% | 603 -5% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 715 | 643 -10% | 643 -10% | 681 -5% | 453 -37% | 575 -20% |
| Load | 350 | 402 15% | 144 -59% | 231 -34% |
Pros
Cons
K6是一台非常优秀的中端智能手机，它具备十分不错的性价比。这台5寸智能手机具备十分坚固机身且搭配了一块全高清屏幕，LTE模组和优秀的1300万像素相机，指纹感应器和双SIM卡插槽。它支持杜比Atmos环绕立体声技术，不过音响效果达不到移动音乐厅的感觉，但也相比大部分智能手机的平庸扬声器更加动听。长电池续航和可视角度稳定的明亮屏幕也都是它的优势。
联想K6提供了通常属于中高端设备的硬件配置。
不过作为一台售价不足200欧元（约1463人民币）的设备，它也难免会面对一些妥协。尽管骁龙430处理器的表现中规中矩，但它的表现意味着在不久的将来面对更新的应用和游戏时就会遇到困难。16 GB的存储空间也不算充裕，你大概需要一块microSD卡来扩充空间，它的128 GB最大容量支持还显得十分慷慨。遗憾的是，如果选择使用存储卡扩充空间的话，它的另一个优势——双SIM卡支持就不复存在了，因为第二个卡槽是存储卡和SIM卡的共用卡槽。它有限的50Mbps无线网络连接速度也不算出色，不过仍然算是比较快。
还需要提到的是操作系统：安卓6.0棉花糖算是很新的一个安卓版本，不过我们还不知道它能否升级到安卓7。联想没有对此作出声明，根据网上的传闻，它可能会在第一季度或第二季度得到系统更新。想要安卓7的用户可以考虑等待一下再决定是否购买。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Lenovo K6
- 01/27/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
