KUU LeBook 12.6二合一敞篷车评论。一个更便宜的微软Surface Pro替代品

Name: Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U
Brand: Kuu

科大讯飞很酷吗？

除了微软的平板电脑，还有很多Windows 10平板电脑可供选择。在视觉设计和性能方面，KUU LeBook也许是最接近的，而成本可能要低数百美元，但它在几个方面没有达到标准。

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 09/08/2021 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...

Business Convertible / 2-in-1 Touchscreen Tablet

KUU LeBook 12.6是一款与Surface Pro系列相同的Windows 10可拆卸式。它的设计和功能显然受到了成功的微软平板电脑的启发，但为了保持价格的显著降低，它做了某些改变和偷工减料。这些变化之一是使用了较老的英特尔第八代酷睿U系列CPU，而不是目前市场上大多数PC上的最新11代版本。本评论将探讨用户在购买更便宜的LeBook而不是更传统的Surface Pro时可以期待的所有其他差异。

LeBook的竞争者包括其他Windows 10平板电脑或可拆卸设备，如微软Surface, 联想ThinkPad X12，或戴尔Latitude 12 7210 2合1所有这些产品的零售价格都较高。然而，LeBook的独特之处在于其稍大的3：2 12.6英寸显示屏，而不是通常的12.3英寸或12.5英寸屏幕。由于截至发稿时尚未广泛上市，制造商尚未最终确定LeBook的价格。

Test device courtesy of KUU-TECH

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U

Processor

Intel Core i7-8550U 4 x 1.8 - 4 GHz, 18 W PL2 / Short Burst, 15 W PL1 / Sustained, Kaby Lake Refresh

Graphics adapter

Intel UHD Graphics 620, Core: 1067 MHz, RAM: 1150 MHz, 27.20.100.8682

Memory

8 GB

, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel

Display

12.60 inch 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixel 206 PPI, Capacitive, native pen support, BOE TV126WTM-NU0, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH

Storage

KUU-512GB

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.5 x 288 x 205

Battery

42 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Primary Camera: 7.7 MPix 1080p30
Secondary Camera: 4.9 MPix 1080p30

Additional features

Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Detachable keyboard base, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

859 g, Power Supply: 211 g

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

potential competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
75.3 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620	859 g	9.5 mm	12.60"	2160x1440
88.5 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2021	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.1 kg	14.5 mm	12.30"	1920x1280
88.5 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2021	Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	796 g	8.5 mm	12.30"	2736x1824
89.5 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2021	Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620	850 g	9.35 mm	12.30"	1920x1280
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2020	Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	1.1 kg	15.69 mm	12.40"	1536x1024
77.1 % v6 ^(old)		NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500	1 kg	15 mm	12.50"	2560x1440

案例

金属底盘是LeBook的一个亮点，因为它感觉接近于价格较高的Surface Pro的质量。然而，背面的金属支架本可以更坚硬或更厚，因为它有点容易变形。

底部由Alcantara和仿皮的底部纹理组成。虽然它看起来很好，有高质量的感觉，但它太灵活了，容易扭曲，对打字体验有负面影响。如果有一个更牢固的、更坚实的键盘甲板会更好。

尺寸和重量都比Surface Pro 7略大和略重，这与稍大的12.6英寸显示屏有关。不管怎么说，KUU的屏占比是比较高的。使用键盘底座使平板电脑的重量增加了约308克。

铰链打开到最大角度。请注意，键盘底座没有完全平放在桌子上，这对打字体验有负面影响。

NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 DIN A4 ❌

连接性

两个USB-C端口分别支持充电和外部显示器。不幸的是，与Surface Pro系列不同，没有集成的USB-A端口。

沟通

没有Wi-Fi 6支持可能是为了节省成本。集成的1x1英特尔3168提供的实际传输速率只有350Mbps左右，比配备英特尔AX200或AX201的昂贵笔记本电脑慢4倍以上。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1690 (1490^min - 1764^max) MBit/s +526%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1382 (984^min - 1508^max) MBit/s +412%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1371 (716^min - 1466^max) MBit/s +408%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1107 (539^min - 1219^max) MBit/s +310%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	317 MBit/s +17%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	270 (239^min - 312^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1471 (1155^min - 1602^max) MBit/s +316%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1374 (1205^min - 1438^max) MBit/s +288%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1354 (783^min - 1513^max) MBit/s +282%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	919 (714^min - 1122^max) MBit/s +160%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	354 (302^min - 360^max) MBit/s
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	350 MBit/s -1%

Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø353 (302-360)

Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø271 (239-312)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U: 10.52 ∆E min: 1.68 - max: 18.53 ∆E

配件和保修

零售包装盒包括交流适配器、可拆卸的键盘底座和一支主动式手写笔。标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。

输入设备

键盘

打字体验比Surface Pro系列差，主要是因为一个缺点：底座不能完全平放在桌子上。因此，键盘底座的背面在打字时总是上下跳动，影响了键盘按键的反馈。打字时感觉很有弹性，因为你每按一次键都要把整个底座压下去。

键盘底座的左手掌托上有两个LED指示灯。这些灯比较亮，我们希望它们能再小一点，以减少视觉上的干扰。

触摸板

点击板比Surface Pro 7的点击板大（10.8 x 6.4厘米对10.2 x 5.3厘米）。然而，它的优势到此为止，因为LeBook点击板的其他方面几乎都很糟糕。它的表面在以较慢的速度滑行时很粘，导致光标跳动。多点触摸输入也很不稳定，反应迟钝，而且经常不准确。例如，当试图拖放时，系统会经常将我们的动作登记为放大或缩小。集成的点击板按钮虽然响亮，但需要很大的力量才能真正按下。最后，点击板不支持Precision ，这意味着任何微软Precision 的功能都是不可能的。

显示

12.6英寸的京东方TV126WTM-NU0 IPS面板是第一个出现在我们数据库中的。某些属性，如响应时间和色彩覆盖率比Surface Pro略差，幸好在网络浏览时不会有太大影响。其他属性，如对比度和最大亮度是微不足道的，是预算面板的代表。


248.8 cd/m²	267.2 cd/m²	260.7 cd/m²
238.7 cd/m²	269.7 cd/m²	261.6 cd/m²
233.4 cd/m²	267.3 cd/m²	258.6 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE TV126WTM-NU0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 269.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 256.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 269.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 586:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.27
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U BOE TV126WTM-NU0, IPS, 12.6", 2160x1440	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 N123NCA-GS1, a-Si IPS LED, 12.3", 1920x1280	Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus LG Philips LP123WQ332684, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824	Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Sharp LQ123N1, IPS, 12.3", 1920x1280	Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 LG Philips LP125WX112403, IPS, 12.4", 1536x1024	NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Sharp SHP142C, IPS, 12.5", 2560x1440
Display		4%	4%	4%	0%	12%
Display P3 Coverage	68.8	67 -3%	66.9 -3%	67.9 -1%	64.4 -6%	74.8 9%
sRGB Coverage	89.1	99.2 11%	96.7 9%	96.8 9%	94.6 6%	98.9 11%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.3	68.8 5%	69.1 6%	68.8 5%	65.7 1%	75.6 16%
Response Times		-29%	-11%	42%	15%	8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42 ?(22.4, 19.6)	63.2 ?(30, 33.2) -50%	50.8 ?(25.2, 25.6) -21%	29 ?(4, 25) 31%	34.8 ?(19.6, 15.2) 17%	37.6 ?(20.4, 17.2) 10%
Response Time Black / White *	33.2 ?(19.2, 14)	36 ?(18, 18) -8%	33.6 ?(18.8, 14.8) -1%	16 ?(4, 12) 52%	29.2 ?(17.2, 12) 12%	31.6 ?(16.8, 14.8) 5%
PWM Frequency			199.2 ?(57, 119)	1250 ?(30)	21930 ?(51)	198.4 ?(25)
Screen		70%	45%	38%	44%	4%
Brightness middle	269.7	419 55%	408 51%	380 41%	354.3 31%	431.5 60%
Brightness	256	406 59%	425 66%	378 48%	353 38%	406 59%
Brightness Distribution	87	94 8%	85 -2%	86 -1%	95 9%	80 -8%
Black Level *	0.46	0.23 50%	0.34 26%	0.31 33%	0.29 37%	0.43 7%
Contrast	586	1822 211%	1200 105%	1226 109%	1222 109%	1003 71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.72	1.1 70%	1.5 60%	2.28 39%	1.41 62%	3.56 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.49	2.2 79%	2.5 76%	3.93 63%	2.96 72%	7 33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.27	0.5 61%	1.4 -10%	0.97 24%	1.44 -13%	3.34 -163%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	1.5 35%	1.6 30%	2.56 -11%	1.2 48%	2.9 -26%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.06 ^107%	2.05 ^107%	2.32 ^95%	2.26 ^97%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6910 ^94%	6524 ^100%	6432 ^101%	6130 ^106%	6600 ^98%	6572 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		62.8	63.7	63	60.2	66.7
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.2	96.8	97	94.4	98.9
Total Average (Program / Settings)		15% / 42%	13% / 28%	28% / 32%	20% / 30%	8% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

色彩空间很宽，约为sRGB的89%，而价格较高的超极本和平板电脑的色彩空间则超过95%。色彩再现大致与Surface Laptop Go的显示屏相当。笔记本电脑.

尽管起步价很便宜，但显示屏开箱后的校准效果还不错。色温略微过冷，但校准后就能解决这个问题，没有任何问题。最终的平均灰度和ColorChecker deltaE值分别只有1.5和1.27，比我们最初的预期要好。然而，品红色的阴影可能比其他颜色更不准确。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.2 ms rise
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22.4 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

户外能见度比大多数其他平板电脑要差，因为显示屏比较暗。在大多数户外条件下，预计会有很多不可避免的眩光。

业绩

处理器

CPU的性能大约比最新的30％和45％慢酷睿i7-1165G7 在单线程和多线程工作负载中分别慢30%和45%。虽然很重要，但对于网络浏览或文字处理等较简单的任务来说，这种差异并不十分明显。当然，它仍然比赛扬或Atom系统好，在那里应用程序需要更长的时间来启动或浏览。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø450 (423.97-477.55)

Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø547 (525.27-680.19)

HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA Intel Core i7-8565U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø446 (440.95-506.36)

Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Intel Core i7-8550U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø454 (446.34-529.84)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	2829 Points +153%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	2253 Points +102%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	2119 Points +90%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	2068 Points +85%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	1573 Points +41%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	1510 Points +35%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	1394 Points +25%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	1178 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (1118 - 1138, n=2)	1128 Points +1%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	1118 Points
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	1117 Points 0%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel Core i5-8265U	1038 Points -7%
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	516 Points -54%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	580 Points +47%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	501 Points +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	501 Points +27%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	461 Points +17%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	452 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	451 Points +14%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	446 Points +13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	413 Points +5%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	394 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (383 - 394, n=2)	389 Points -1%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel Core i5-8265U	370 Points -6%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	351 Points -11%
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	165 Points -58%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5477 (5385.09^min - 5477.06^max) Points +88%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	4125 Points +42%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	3852 Points +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	3008 (2913.49^min - 3007.87^max) Points +3%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	2914 (2837.58^min - 2913.58^max) Points
Average Intel Core i7-8550U ()	2914 Points 0%
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	1230 Points -58%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1507 Points +48%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	1305 Points +28%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	1151 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	1079 Points +6%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	1021 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8550U ()	1021 Points 0%
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	424 Points -58%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	1049 (803.97^min - 1049.04^max) Points +119%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	888 (852.57^min - 888.2^max) Points +86%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	864 (426.12^min - 863.97^max) Points +81%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	850 (812.27^min - 850.43^max) Points +78%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	784 Points +64%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	680 (525.27^min - 680.19^max) Points +42%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	579 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (301 - 761, n=78)	576 Points +21%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	564 Points +18%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Intel Core i7-8550U	530 Points +11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	527 (466.1^min - 527.11^max) Points +10%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA Intel Core i7-8565U	519 Points +9%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel Core i5-8265U	496 (406.64^min - 496.34^max) Points +4%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	478 (423.97^min - 477.55^max) Points
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	223 Points -53%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Intel Celeron N3350	85 Points -82%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	224 Points +60%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	188 Points +34%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	182 Points +30%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	178 Points +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	174 Points +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	170 Points +21%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA Intel Core i7-8565U	168 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	161 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (108 - 172, n=76)	159.6 Points +14%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Intel Core i7-8550U	154 Points +10%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel Core i5-8265U	146 Points +4%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	143 Points +2%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	140 Points
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	133 Points -5%
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	73 Points -48%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Intel Celeron N3350	48 Points -66%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	2558 Seconds * -180%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	1115 Seconds * -22%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel Core i5-8265U	1039 Seconds * -14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	944 Seconds * -3%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	942 Seconds * -3%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	913 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (841 - 937, n=4)	883 Seconds * +3%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	798 Seconds * +13%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	766 Seconds * +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	735 Seconds * +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	562 Seconds * +38%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	551 Seconds * +40%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	447 Seconds * +51%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5405 MIPS +25%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	4422 MIPS +2%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	4337 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-8550U ()	4337 MIPS 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	4313 MIPS -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	4312 MIPS -1%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	4136 MIPS -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	3932 MIPS -9%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel Core i5-8265U	3885 MIPS -10%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	3755 MIPS -13%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	3726 MIPS -14%
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	2145 MIPS -51%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	31114 MIPS +99%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	24996 MIPS +60%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	24436 MIPS +57%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	22950 MIPS +47%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	20211 MIPS +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	17340 MIPS +11%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	16748 MIPS +7%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	15613 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-8550U ()	15613 MIPS 0%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	15003 MIPS -4%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel Core i5-8265U	13812 MIPS -12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	13715 MIPS -12%
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	5832 MIPS -63%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	1409 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	1334 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	1163 Points
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	1157 Points
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	1155 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	1144 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	1085 Points
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	438 Points

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	5443 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	4866 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	4843 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	4409 Points
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	4224 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	3522 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	2839 Points
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	1509 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	8.81 fps +134%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	7.05 fps +87%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	6.93 fps +84%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	6.09 fps +62%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	4.82 fps +28%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	4.57 fps +21%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (3.77 - 4.43, n=3)	4.03 fps +7%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	3.89 fps +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	3.89 fps +3%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	3.77 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	3.75 fps -1%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel Core i5-8265U	3.51 fps -7%
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	1.38 fps -63%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	136 s * -79%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	75.9 s *
Average Intel Core i7-8550U ()	75.9 s * -0%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	69.6 s * +8%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	67 s * +12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	64.5 s * +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	61.3 s * +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	60.5 s * +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	57.2 s * +25%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	57 s * +25%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	45.1 s * +41%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Teclast F7 Air Intel Celeron N4120	1.645 sec * -130%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	0.851 sec * -19%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-10610U	0.781 sec * -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	0.76 sec * -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1	0.743 sec * -4%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	0.716 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-8550U ()	0.716 sec * -0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.68 sec * +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	0.648 sec * +9%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U	0.611 sec * +15%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.566 sec * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

478 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

37 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

140 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

1118 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

394 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1021 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

2914 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

PCMark的结果是我们所期望的，相对于具有相同Core i7-8550U CPU的其他型号。我们很欣赏这个事实，即该系统没有制造商的臃肿软件，可以获得干净的Windows 10体验。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	4640 Points +27%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G	4120 Points +13%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ	4026 Points +10%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, KUU-512GB	3645 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2629 - 4072, n=31)	3607 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	3474 Points -5%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, SanDisk DF4064	1102 Points -70%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	9734 Points +28%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G	8541 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ	8149 Points +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	7975 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6628 - 9291, n=29)	7780 Points +2%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, KUU-512GB	7617 Points
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, SanDisk DF4064	3073 Points -60%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G	6710 Points +6%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, KUU-512GB	6329 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4889 - 7006, n=29)	6175 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	6155 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ	5544 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	4872 Points -23%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, SanDisk DF4064	1743 Points -72%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	4525 Points +66%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ	3921 Points +44%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G	3313 Points +21%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	2930 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1506 - 3160, n=29)	2748 Points +1%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, KUU-512GB	2728 Points
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, SanDisk DF4064	678 Points -75%

PCMark 10 Score		3645 points
Help

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示，在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时，没有重大延迟问题。尽管采用了过时的英特尔CPU，但在60FPS下播放4K视频也没有任何问题。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G	1737 μs * -86%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, KUU-512GB	936 μs *
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	530 μs * +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	464.6 μs * +50%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ	313.5 μs * +67%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

内部存储的空间为512GB，传输率与大多数SATA III SSD相似。缺少SD卡读卡器意味着当内部驱动器像大多数笔记本电脑驱动器一样大时，这就不是一个问题了。

	Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U KUU-512GB	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ	Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G	Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus SanDisk DF4064
AS SSD		121%	171%	268%	85%	-127%
Seq Read	503	1760 250%	1725 243%	2185 334%	1347 168%	154 -69%
Seq Write	421.1	761 81%	931 121%	1731 311%	491 17%	102.4 -76%
4K Read	19.23	47.68 148%	50.1 161%	46.28 141%	38.08 98%	5.07 -74%
4K Write	78.1	176 125%	136.9 75%	161.6 107%	98.2 26%	8.42 -89%
4K-64 Read	133.6	581 335%	870 551%	1021 664%	483.1 262%	27.74 -79%
4K-64 Write	222.3	118.5 -47%	762 243%	1125 406%	350.9 58%	12.15 -95%
Access Time Read *	0.091	0.155 -70%	0.279 -207%	0.069 24%	0.057 37%	0.747 -721%
Access Time Write *	0.558	0.188 66%	0.028 95%	0.046 92%	0.105 81%	1.136 -104%
Score Read	203	805 297%	1093 438%	1286 533%	656 223%	48 -76%
Score Write	342	371 8%	992 190%	1460 327%	498 46%	31 -91%
Score Total	653	1551 138%	2616 301%	3389 419%	1458 123%	103 -84%
Copy ISO MB/s	433.4		1174 171%	1555 259%	765 77%	119.7 -72%
Copy Program MB/s	365.8		262.8 -28%	468.5 28%	299.6 -18%	72.8 -80%
Copy Game MB/s	409.2		562 37%	841 106%	371.5 -9%	116.5 -72%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		98%	156%	211%	93%	-77%
Write 4K	85.8	72.8 -15%	165.3 93%	182.7 113%	87.6 2%	7.837 -91%
Read 4K	19.22	26.35 37%	42.95 123%	51.4 167%	40.41 110%	7.689 -60%
Write Seq	412.7	823 99%	955 131%	1303 216%	601 46%	104.9 -75%
Read Seq	518	1169 126%	867 67%	1450 180%	1033 99%	167.8 -68%
Write 4K Q32T1	201	112.6 -44%	423.5 111%	342.9 71%	269.1 34%	13.64 -93%
Read 4K Q32T1	125.6	327.2 161%	479.2 282%	523 316%	261.4 108%	32.95 -74%
Write Seq Q32T1	451.1	1039 130%	1060 135%	1776 294%	818 81%	99.5 -78%
Read Seq Q32T1	556	2176 291%	2251 305%	2378 328%	2025 264%	128.8 -77%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		110% / 111%	164% / 165%	240% / 247%	89% / 88%	-102% / -109%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

KUU-512GB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 556 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 451.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 125.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 201 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 518 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 412.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 19.22 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 85.8 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU性能

的。 UHD Graphics 620以今天的标准来看是很差的，因为 Radeon RX Vega和 Iris Xe型号是最高的。对于4K流媒体或非游戏玩家来说，这不会是一个问题，但即使是最轻微的编辑或游戏，也会从升级到Surface平板电脑或任何其他配备AMD Zen或11英特尔Tiger Lake CPU的设备中大大受益。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7	5926 Points +240%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7	5128 Points +194%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	4927 Points +183%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	3585 Points +106%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U	3401 Points +95%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1	2280 Points +31%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U	1988 Points +14%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U	1789 Points +3%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244)	1749 Points 0%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U	1743 Points
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U	1709 Points -2%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U	1666 Points -4%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1597 Points -8%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Intel HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350	412 Points -76%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7	5967 Points +285%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	3943 Points +155%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	3601 Points +132%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7	3597 Points +132%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U	2417 Points +56%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1	1989 Points +28%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U	1964 Points +27%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U	1646 Points +6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (927 - 2505, n=244)	1578 Points +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U	1562 Points +1%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U	1549 Points
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U	1546 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1485 Points -4%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Intel HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350	440 Points -72%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7	4652 Points +300%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7	3355 Points +189%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	3036 Points +161%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	2945 Points +153%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U	2285 Points +97%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1	1713 Points +47%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U	1379 Points +19%
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U	1216 Points +5%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U	1177 Points +1%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U	1162 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213)	1161 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1111 Points -4%
Teclast F7 Air Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120	466 Points -60%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7	1376 Points +269%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7	1319 Points +254%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U	903 Points +142%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	886 Points +138%
Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U	441 Points +18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1	440 Points +18%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (299 - 797, n=88)	389 Points +4%
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U	373 Points
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U	365 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	330 Points -12%
Teclast F7 Air Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4120	116 Points -69%

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 Performance		1913 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		8139 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1046 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		427 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	75.3	40.9	17.9	16
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	11.7	5.39	5.39
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	11.3	9.73	9.11

Emissions

系统噪音

内部风扇很吵，而且经常跳动。即使是简单的动作，如浏览网页，也会启动风扇，而在大多数其他平板电脑和超低电压笔记本电脑上，它将保持沉默。预计在大多数情况下，风扇的脉动在36至41dB(A)范围内，或者在运行游戏等高负荷时高达45dB(A)。

风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，绿色：Prime95压力）。

	Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, KUU-512GB	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G	Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
Noise		10%	14%	4%
off / environment *	23.8	25.1 -5%	25 -5%	26.4 -11%
Idle Minimum *	23.8	25.1 -5%	25 -5%	26.4 -11%
Idle Average *	23.8	25.1 -5%	25 -5%	26.4 -11%
Idle Maximum *	41.1	26 37%	25 39%	26.4 36%
Load Average *	44.5	34.6 22%	28.7 36%	36.9 17%
Load Maximum *	45	37 18%	34.5 23%	44.2 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *		34.6

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle		23.8 / 23.8 / 41.1 dB(A)
Load		44.5 / 45 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A)

温度

在桌面上空转时，表面温度比预期的要高，正面和背面的热点分别高达41℃和36℃。运行更高的负载会启动内部风扇，导致前面的热点温度略低，为37摄氏度，而后面的热点温度略高，为40摄氏度。在处理平板电脑时，温度很明显，但幸好边缘和角落的温度较低，不会让人分心。

Max. Load

Idle


33.8 °C	36.8 °C	36.8 °C
32.6 °C	33.2 °C	31 °C
32.2 °C	32.6 °C	32.4 °C

Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 33.5 °C


36.6 °C	39.8 °C	39 °C
34.6 °C	37.8 °C	36.2 °C
30.8 °C	31.2 °C	31.4 °C

Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 35.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).

压力测试

当运行Prime95时，CPU会在大约30秒内提升到2.4GHz，直到达到77℃的核心温度。此后，时钟频率会下降，在1GHz和1.7GHz之间循环，以保持60℃至65℃的冷却温度。因此，Turbo Boost的可持续性在LeBook上是有限的，因为它毕竟是一个平板电脑。

用电池供电运行不会限制性能。在电池上运行3DMark 11，物理学和图形学得分分别为6186和1689分，而在主电源上则为5384和1743分。

	CPU时钟(GHz)	GPU时钟(MHz)	CPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲	--	--	41
Prime95压力	1.0 - 1.7	--	60 - 65
Prime95 + FurMark压力	600	400	58

发言人

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management

消耗功率

在运行类似的应用程序时，该系统的耗电量比Surface Pro 7 Plus略低。然而，与微软平板电脑能够提供的比LeBook更高的性能相比，仅仅几瓦的节省显得微不足道。

当同时运行Prime95和FurMark时，我们能够从小型（约6.3 x 6.3 x 3厘米）的45瓦交流适配器中测量到38.9瓦的临时最大功耗，然后热限制就开始了。前面提到的Surface Pro 7 Plus由于其较新的处理器具有较高的Turbo Boost潜力，其耗电量可以显著增加到62.5瓦。

CineBench R15多线程大约需要84秒才能完成。请注意，只有在最初的25秒左右，功耗最高。

Prime95压力在10秒时启动。消耗量将跃升至36.6瓦，然后下降并在20瓦和26瓦之间循环，导致循环的时钟速率

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.8 / 1.05 Watt
Idle	6.4 / 8.8 / 8.9 Watt
Load	33.6 / 38.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, KUU-512GB, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1280, 12.3"	Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3"	Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3"	Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 1536x1024, 12.4"	NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, SanDisk DF4064, IPS, 2560x1440, 12.5"
Power Consumption		7%	-18%	19%	9%	29%
Idle Minimum *	6.4	4 37%	5.5 14%	3.2 50%	2.8 56%	4.7 27%
Idle Average *	8.8	5.9 33%	9.1 -3%	5.3 40%	6.8 23%	7 20%
Idle Maximum *	8.9	8.3 7%	10.8 -21%	8.4 6%	8 10%	8 10%
Load Average *	33.6	30.1 10%	39.2 -17%	27 20%	37.2 -11%	14.1 58%
Load Maximum *	38.9	59 -52%	62.5 -61%	46.9 -21%	51.6 -33%	27.1 30%
Witcher 3 ultra *		30.8

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Prime95 Stress Test

Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U: Ø27.9 (22.7-39)

电池寿命

电池容量介于Surface Pro 7和Latitude 12 7210 2合1之间。然而，无线局域网的运行时间在KUU模型上大约短了两个小时，总共将近6.5小时。

从空电到满电大约需要两个整小时。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		6h 22min

	Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 42 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 48.9 Wh	Dell Latitude 12 7210 2-in-1 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh	Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 39 Wh	NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 31.9 Wh
Battery Runtime		29%	26%	28%	26%	7%
WiFi v1.3	382	492 29%	483 26%	489 28%	481 26%	409 7%
Load		119	232	111	118	214
Reader / Idle			816	1365	2102	676

Pros

+ 包括可拆卸的键盘底座和活动笔

+ 2个带DP和PD的USB-C端口

+ 有吸引力的金属底盘设计

+ 大尺寸点击板

Cons

- 打字时键盘底座弯曲太大

- 风扇频繁而响亮地跳动

- 图形性能缓慢

- 显示器可以更亮

- 键盘精度差

结论 - 预算内较好的Windows平板电脑之一

KUU LeBook的优势是视觉上的和有形的。它是一款坚固的平板电脑，可以作为价格较高的旗舰机型，如Surface Pro或HP ElitePad。我们还必须赞扬制造商坚持使用酷睿U系列CPU，而不是像Surface Go或其他许多预算范围内的廉价Windows平板电脑那样采用更弱的Atom、Celeron或Pentium部分。宽敞的12.6英寸触摸屏和相对较窄的边框有助于使LeBook更有吸引力。

它看起来和感觉上都像是一款高质量的平板电脑，其酷睿U系列CPU的性能令人尊敬。然而，弹跳的键盘底座和高亢的风扇噪音很难被忽视。

KUU的好处大多是皮毛，因为脉动的高音调风扇、较暗的显示屏、较短的电池和海绵状的键盘按键都阻碍了用户体验，尽管机箱可能是多么光滑和顺畅。虽然LeBook在这些特定领域无法与Surface Pro相比，但它总体上仍比其他预算的Windows平板电脑好，包括华硕变形金刚书或笔记本特别是在显示屏尺寸和性能方面。

价格和可用性

LeBook 12.6尚未广泛上市，在发布时也没有确切的上市日期。

Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U - 09/04/2021 v7 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis

83 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

72%

Pointing Device

57%

Connectivity

23 / 75 → 30%

Weight

73 / 20-75 → 96%

Battery

71%

Display

85%

Games Performance

50 / 78 → 65%

Application Performance

79 / 85 → 93%

Temperature

89%

Noise

77%

Audio

53 / 91 → 58%

Camera

54 / 85 → 63%

Average

67%

75%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5241 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 23599 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > KUU LeBook 12.6二合一敞篷车评论。一个更便宜的微软Surface Pro替代品

Allen Ngo, 2021-09- 8 (Update: 2021-09- 8)

potential competitors in comparison

案例

连接性

沟通

网络摄像头

配件和保修

输入设备

键盘

触摸板

显示

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

业绩

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

系统性能

DPC延时

存储设备

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU性能

Emissions

系统噪音

温度

压力测试

发言人

Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Energy Management

消耗功率

Power Consumption Prime95 Stress Test

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 预算内较好的Windows平板电脑之一

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison