LG Class (H650E) 智能手机简短评测

Name: LG Class
Brand: LG

高端后盖。 LG推出了一款价格实惠，但同时质量上乘的中端智能手机Class。不过，它的高品质材料无法掩盖设计和功能上的弱点。

Nino Ricchizzi, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 01/29/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of LG Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

LG Class

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 4 x 1.2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 306

Memory

1536 MB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel, 电容式触控屏幕, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.89 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD, Sensors: 加速传感器，近距传感器，电子指南针，环境光传感器

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, LTE (4G), UMTS (3G), EDGE, GSM (2G) LTE/4G (800/1800/2600 MHz), HSPA+ 42 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), GSM (850/900/1800/1900MHz) Cat. 4 (150 Mbps/50 Mbps), WiFi-Direct, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 142 x 72

Battery

2050 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 6 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 10 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 340 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 340 h

Operating System

Android 5.1 Lollipop

Camera

Webcam: f2.0 光圈
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f2.2 光圈
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f2.0 光圈

Additional features

Speakers: 后置单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

144 g, Power Supply: 53 g

Price

250 Euro

Links

LG homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


496 cd/m²	504 cd/m²	487 cd/m²
485 cd/m²	518 cd/m²	477 cd/m²
488 cd/m²	504 cd/m²	473 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 518 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 492.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 518 cd/m²
Contrast: 1016:1 (Black: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.67 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.19

	LG Class Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Allview E4 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen		-20%	5%	-1%	3%
Brightness middle	518	312 -40%	418 -19%	349 -33%	534 3%
Brightness	492	314 -36%	407 -17%	353 -28%	503 2%
Brightness Distribution	91	91 0%	95 4%	93 2%	82 -10%
Black Level *	0.51		0.49 4%		0.57 -12%
Contrast	1016		853 -16%		937 -8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.41	6.28 -16%	3.92 28%	5.22 4%	5.65 -4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.76
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.67	8.24 -7%	3.81 50%	3.96 48%	3.69 52%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.12 ^104%	2.27 ^97%	2.08 ^106%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	8521 ^76%	8145 ^80%	7361 ^88%	7308 ^89%	7289 ^89%

* ... smaller is better

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | Geekbench 3 | 3DMark

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Class	5.2 fps
Allview E4	20 fps +285%
OnePlus X	23 fps +342%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	9.5 fps +83%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	17 fps +227%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Class	9.8 fps
Allview E4	12 fps +22%
OnePlus X	21 fps +114%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5.3 fps -46%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	12 fps +22%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Class	1.8 fps
Allview E4	4.2 fps +133%
OnePlus X	8.6 fps +378%
Samsung Galaxy J5	1.8 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1.7 fps -6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Class	4.1 fps
Allview E4	8.6 fps +110%
OnePlus X	10 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3.8 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3.7 fps -10%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Class	1442 Points
OnePlus X	2570 Points +78%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1563 Points +8%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	2395 Points +66%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Class	482 Points
OnePlus X	913 Points +89%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	528 Points +10%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	435 Points -10%

3DMark - 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
LG Class	5295 Points
Allview E4	8133 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy J5	5227 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5298 Points 0%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	7005 Points +32%

Legend

LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mediatek MT6592, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 8 GB eMMC Flash

PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG Class	3803 Points
Allview E4	3841 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3966 Points +4%
OnePlus X	4450 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3701 Points -3%

BaseMark OS II - Overall (sort by value)
LG Class	561 Points
Allview E4	823 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5	534 Points -5%
OnePlus X	1252 Points +123%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	515 Points -8%
ZTE Blade V6	687 Points +22%

Legend

LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

	LG Class Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	ZTE Blade V6 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5		9%	47%	51%	15%
Sequential Read 256KB	128.6	131.4 2%	269.3 109%	235.5 83%	145.5 13%
Sequential Write 256KB	74.1	22.33 -70%	37.37 -50%	49.31 -33%	39.4 -47%
Random Read 4KB	9.67	22.79 136%	27.08 180%	16.31 69%	19.25 99%
Random Write 4KB	7.7	5.11 -34%	3.66 -52%	14.22 85%	7.2 -6%

Sunspider | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Google V8 Ver. 7 | WebXPRT 2015

Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
LG Class	1415 ms *
Allview E4	1606 ms * -13%
OnePlus X	1509 ms * -7%
Samsung Galaxy J5	1022 ms * +28%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1573 ms * -11%
ZTE Blade V6	1692 ms * -20%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	1086 ms * +23%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Class	3028 Points
Allview E4	3177 Points +5%
OnePlus X	4810 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3038 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3296 Points +9%
ZTE Blade V6	2978 Points -2%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	2432 Points -20%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
LG Class	13980 ms *
Allview E4	13149 ms * +6%
OnePlus X	7264 ms * +48%
Samsung Galaxy J5	14074 ms * -1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	11843 ms * +15%
ZTE Blade V6	25141 ms * -80%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim	19205 ms * -37%

Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
LG Class	2979 Points
Allview E4	3042 Points +2%
OnePlus X	5328 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy J5	2760 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3125 Points +5%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
LG Class	57 Points
Allview E4	59 Points +4%
OnePlus X	85 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy J5	52 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	52 Points -9%

Legend

LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mediatek MT6592, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 8 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


32.8 °C	36.8 °C	37.7 °C
32.2 °C	35.2 °C	38.6 °C
31.5 °C	33.2 °C	36.4 °C

Maximum: 38.6 °C
Average: 34.9 °C


34.3 °C	35 °C	32.9 °C
34.5 °C	34.9 °C	30.7 °C
34.1 °C	34.4 °C	20 °C

Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 32.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 34.4 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Power Consumption

Idle	1.2 / 1.9 / 2.2 Watt
Load	3.1 / 5.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 940

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		16h 16min
WiFi Websurfing		7h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 16min

	LG Class Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mali-450 MP4, MT6592, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Allview E4 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime		-5%	23%	28%	-18%
H.264	628	495 -21%	677 8%	514 -18%	456 -27%
WiFi v1.3	422	398 -6%	526 25%	549 30%	315 -25%
Load	196	220 12%	264 35%	339 73%	193 -2%

Pros

+ 经典的设计

+ 铝合金机背

+ 可扩展存储空间

+ 屏幕亮度

Cons

- 通话品质有待提高

- 扬声器

- 机身坚固性不足

- 不可更换电池

In review: LG Class. Test model courtesy of LG Germany

我们获得了测试LG的新Class的机会，它确实兑现了一些承诺。它机身的铝合金后盖给人雅致硬朗的感觉。它外观最有特点的是圆滑的屏幕边缘。遗憾的是，它并不完美。在很多细节上它缺少磨砺。不过，在这个价位上只有很少的几款产品可以提供水平相近的材质。智能手机的核心功能仍然需要得到重视：拨打接听电话。我们希望它的通话品质和麦克风效果可以在以后得到改进。它的扬声器让我们也很惊诧。除此之外，LG的Class在测试中和同类产品表现相当。它的明亮屏幕提供了养眼的显示效果，也可以适合户外的明亮阳光下使用

它的硬件配置属于中端，测试分数中规中矩。最后一项重要测试是电池续航；这台测试机在这方面表现十分一般。

整体上，LG的Class达到了它的设计定位：一台采用高品质机身的实用中端智能手机。

我们很难抉择是否应该在这个价位上期待更高一些。需要更多性能或者减少预算的用户可以考虑一下OnePlus X。不过，它的其他的竞争对手也表现相当。因此，摩托罗拉的Moto G和同类产品也值得考虑。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

LG Class - 2016-01-05 01/05/2016 v4.1 ^(old)
Nino Ricchizzi

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

68 / 75 → 91%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

44 / 60 → 73%

Weight

93%

Battery

91%

Display

84%

Games Performance

54 / 63 → 86%

Application Performance

29 / 70 → 41%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

55 / 91 → 60%

Camera

67%

Average

73%

84%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > LG Class (H650E) 智能手机简短评测

Nino Ricchizzi, 2016-01-29 (Update: 2016-01-30)