Notebookcheck Logo

LG Class (H650E) 智能手机简短评测

高端后盖。 LG推出了一款价格实惠,但同时质量上乘的中端智能手机Class。不过,它的高品质材料无法掩盖设计和功能上的弱点。
ARM Android Smartphone Touchscreen
LG Class
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 4 x 1.2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 306
Memory
1536 MB 
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel, 电容式触控屏幕, IPS, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.89 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD, Sensors: 加速传感器,近距传感器,电子指南针,环境光传感器
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, LTE (4G), UMTS (3G), EDGE, GSM (2G) LTE/4G (800/1800/2600 MHz), HSPA+ 42 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), GSM (850/900/1800/1900MHz) Cat. 4 (150 Mbps/50 Mbps), WiFi-Direct, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 142 x 72
Battery
2050 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 6 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 10 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 340 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 340 h
Operating System
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Webcam: f2.0 光圈
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f2.2 光圈
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f2.0 光圈
Additional features
Speakers: 后置单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
144 g, Power Supply: 53 g
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

LG's new Class...
LG's new Class...
...is characterized by...
...classy looks...
...and premium...
...selection of materials.
Unfortunately, it has...
...weaknesses in...
...build.
146.9 mm 70.9 mm 8.19 mm 137 g142.1 mm 72.4 mm 11.6 mm 155 g142.1 mm 71.8 mm 7.9 mm 147 g142 mm 72 mm 7.7 mm 144 g140.5 mm 70.3 mm 8.6 mm 131 g142 mm 69.5 mm 6.8 mm 120 g140 mm 69 mm 6.9 mm 138 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
LG Class
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
496
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 518 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 492.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 518 cd/m²
Contrast: 1016:1 (Black: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.67 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.19
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Allview E4
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
-20%
5%
-1%
3%
Brightness middle
518
312
-40%
418
-19%
349
-33%
534
3%
Brightness
492
314
-36%
407
-17%
353
-28%
503
2%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
95
4%
93
2%
82
-10%
Black Level *
0.51
0.49
4%
0.57
-12%
Contrast
1016
853
-16%
937
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.41
6.28
-16%
3.92
28%
5.22
4%
5.65
-4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.76
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.67
8.24
-7%
3.81
50%
3.96
48%
3.69
52%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.12 104%
2.27 97%
2.08 106%
2.15 102%
CCT
8521 76%
8145 80%
7361 88%
7308 89%
7289 89%

* ... smaller is better

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Class
5.2 fps
Allview E4
20 fps +285%
OnePlus X
23 fps +342%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9.5 fps +83%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
17 fps +227%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Class
9.8 fps
Allview E4
12 fps +22%
OnePlus X
21 fps +114%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.3 fps -46%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
12 fps +22%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Class
1.8 fps
Allview E4
4.2 fps +133%
OnePlus X
8.6 fps +378%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1.8 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1.7 fps -6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Class
4.1 fps
Allview E4
8.6 fps +110%
OnePlus X
10 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3.8 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3.7 fps -10%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Class
1442 Points
OnePlus X
2570 Points +78%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1563 Points +8%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
2395 Points +66%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Class
482 Points
OnePlus X
913 Points +89%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
528 Points +10%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
435 Points -10%
3DMark - 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
LG Class
5295 Points
Allview E4
8133 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy J5
5227 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5298 Points 0%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
7005 Points +32%

Legend

 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mediatek MT6592, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 8 GB eMMC Flash
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG Class
3803 Points
Allview E4
3841 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3966 Points +4%
OnePlus X
4450 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3701 Points -3%
BaseMark OS II - Overall (sort by value)
LG Class
561 Points
Allview E4
823 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5
534 Points -5%
OnePlus X
1252 Points +123%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
515 Points -8%
ZTE Blade V6
687 Points +22%

Legend

 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
ZTE Blade V6
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
9%
47%
51%
15%
Sequential Read 256KB
128.6
131.4
2%
269.3
109%
235.5
83%
145.5
13%
Sequential Write 256KB
74.1
22.33
-70%
37.37
-50%
49.31
-33%
39.4
-47%
Random Read 4KB
9.67
22.79
136%
27.08
180%
16.31
69%
19.25
99%
Random Write 4KB
7.7
5.11
-34%
3.66
-52%
14.22
85%
7.2
-6%
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
LG Class
1415 ms *
Allview E4
1606 ms * -13%
OnePlus X
1509 ms * -7%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1022 ms * +28%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1573 ms * -11%
ZTE Blade V6
1692 ms * -20%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
1086 ms * +23%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Class
3028 Points
Allview E4
3177 Points +5%
OnePlus X
4810 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3038 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3296 Points +9%
ZTE Blade V6
2978 Points -2%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
2432 Points -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
LG Class
13980 ms *
Allview E4
13149 ms * +6%
OnePlus X
7264 ms * +48%
Samsung Galaxy J5
14074 ms * -1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
11843 ms * +15%
ZTE Blade V6
25141 ms * -80%
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
19205 ms * -37%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
LG Class
2979 Points
Allview E4
3042 Points +2%
OnePlus X
5328 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy J5
2760 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3125 Points +5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
LG Class
57 Points
Allview E4
59 Points +4%
OnePlus X
85 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy J5
52 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
52 Points -9%

Legend

 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Allview E4 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mediatek MT6592, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 8 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 32.8 °C36.8 °C37.7 °C 
 32.2 °C35.2 °C38.6 °C 
 31.5 °C33.2 °C36.4 °C 
Maximum: 38.6 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
34.3 °C35 °C32.9 °C
34.5 °C34.9 °C30.7 °C
34.1 °C34.4 °C20 °C
Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 32.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  34.4 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.9 / 2.2 Watt
Load midlight 3.1 / 5.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
16h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 16min
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
HTC Desire 626G dual sim
Mali-450 MP4, MT6592, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Allview E4
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-5%
23%
28%
-18%
H.264
628
495
-21%
677
8%
514
-18%
456
-27%
WiFi v1.3
422
398
-6%
526
25%
549
30%
315
-25%
Load
196
220
12%
264
35%
339
73%
193
-2%

Pros

+ 经典的设计
+ 铝合金机背
+ 可扩展存储空间
+ 屏幕亮度

Cons

- 通话品质有待提高
- 扬声器
- 机身坚固性不足
- 不可更换电池
In review: LG Class. Test model courtesy of LG Germany
In review: LG Class. Test model courtesy of LG Germany

我们获得了测试LG的新Class的机会,它确实兑现了一些承诺。它机身的铝合金后盖给人雅致硬朗的感觉。它外观最有特点的是圆滑的屏幕边缘。遗憾的是,它并不完美。在很多细节上它缺少磨砺。不过,在这个价位上只有很少的几款产品可以提供水平相近的材质。智能手机的核心功能仍然需要得到重视:拨打接听电话。我们希望它的通话品质和麦克风效果可以在以后得到改进。它的扬声器让我们也很惊诧。除此之外,LG的Class在测试中和同类产品表现相当。它的明亮屏幕提供了养眼的显示效果,也可以适合户外的明亮阳光下使用

它的硬件配置属于中端,测试分数中规中矩。最后一项重要测试是电池续航;这台测试机在这方面表现十分一般。

整体上,LG的Class达到了它的设计定位:一台采用高品质机身的实用中端智能手机。

我们很难抉择是否应该在这个价位上期待更高一些。需要更多性能或者减少预算的用户可以考虑一下OnePlus X。不过,它的其他的竞争对手也表现相当。因此,摩托罗拉的Moto G和同类产品也值得考虑。

 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里 

LG Class - 01/05/2016 v4.1 (old)
Nino Ricchizzi

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 91%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
44 / 60 → 73%
Weight
93%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
54 / 63 → 86%
Application Performance
29 / 70 → 41%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
67%
Average
73%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > LG Class (H650E) 智能手机简短评测
Nino Ricchizzi, 2016-01-29 (Update: 2016-01-30)