LG G5 智能手机简短评测

Name: LG G5
Brand: LG

大眼睛，模块化。 LG的新机型G5有了一些创新特性。这台智能手机更加模块化，同时搭配了双相机。除了标准镜头，它还可以使用广角镜头，遗憾的是相机分辨率较低。同时它的电池容量也有所降低。

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 05/19/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of LG Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

LG G5 (Optimus G Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 4 x 2.15 GHz, Kryo

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 530, Core: 624 MHz

Memory

4 GB

, LPDDR4

Display

5.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 554 PPI, 电容式，10点触控, IPS Quantum, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 23.07 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机麦克风接口, Card Reader: microSD最大支持2 TB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 近距传感器，旋转传感器，加速传感器和重力传感器，VR传感器，数字指南针，气压计, Android Beam, Wifi Direct, Miracast, SlimPort, OTG, DLNA, 红外

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2 LE, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 和 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 和 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38 和 40), LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 149.4 x 73.9

Battery

10.78 Wh, 2800 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 3.85伏特, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 29 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 21 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 400 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 400 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix (78°标准视角和135°广角, f/1.8, HDR, 色域传感器, 激光自动对焦, 光学防抖2.0, RAW格式支持)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器，USB数据线，耳机, LG Backup, SmartWorld, QuickRemote, QuickMemo+, LG Health, LG Friends Manager, 24 Months Warranty, USB-C, FM收音机, 头部辐射值: 0.737 W/kg, fanless

Weight

159 g, Power Supply: 68 g

Price

699 Euro

Links

LG homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


774 cd/m²	809 cd/m²	749 cd/m²
734 cd/m²	784 cd/m²	781 cd/m²
740 cd/m²	789 cd/m²	803 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 809 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 773.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.93 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 784 cd/m²
Contrast: 1823:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.46% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.08% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3", 16:9	LG G4 Quantum-IPS, 2560x1440, 5.5", 16:9	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5", 16:9	OnePlus 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5", 16:9	Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5", 16:9	Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2", 16:9	Google Nexus 6P AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7", 16:9	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5", 16:9
Screen		-9%	-22%	-1%	-1%	7%	9%	25%
Brightness middle	784	566 -28%	560 -29%	451 -42%	583 -26%	582 -26%	363 -54%	554 -29%
Brightness	774	536 -31%	541 -30%	446 -42%	560 -28%	563 -27%	365 -53%	552 -29%
Brightness Distribution	91	90 -1%	85 -7%	90 -1%	91 0%	91 0%	90 -1%	96 5%
Black Level *	0.43	0.47 -9%	0.45 -5%	0.3 30%	0.46 -7%	0.38 12%
Contrast	1823	1204 -34%	1244 -32%	1503 -18%	1267 -30%	1532 -16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.5	6.17 5%	9.19 -41%	3.84 41%	3.55 45%	4.4 32%	2.34 64%	1.59 76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.7		15.01 -28%			7.4 37%		2.56 78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8	6.26 22%	10.58 -32%	3.97 50%	3.88 51%	4.8 40%	1.03 87%	2.01 75%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.48 ^89%	2.7 ^81%	2.46 ^89%	2.2 ^100%	2.2 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.01 ^109%
CCT	8699 ^75%	8171 ^80%	9760 ^67%	7283 ^89%	7280 ^89%	6175 ^105%	6429 ^101%	6321 ^103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	68.08	65.48 -4%	73.19 8%	58.07 -15%	59.05 -13%	77.78 14%		82.12 21%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	97.46	98.63 1%		90.14 -8%	92.8 -5%	99.44 2%		99.98 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 24 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2273 Hz

≤ 34 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2273 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 34 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2273 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G5	124244 Points
Google Nexus 6P	79502 Points -36%
Motorola Moto X Force	89911 Points -28%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	94122 Points -24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	78324 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	128749 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	133626 Points +8%
OnePlus 2	65936 Points -47%
Huawei P9	95743 Points -23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	131327 Points +6%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G5	2396 Points
LG G4	1107 Points -54%
Google Nexus 6P	1335 Points -44%
Motorola Moto X Force	1262 Points -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1335 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2170 (2120^min) Points -9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2538 Points +6%
OnePlus 2	1140 Points -52%
Huawei P9	1767 Points -26%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	2376 Points -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G5	5507 Points
LG G4	3556 Points -35%
Google Nexus 6P	4587 Points -17%
Motorola Moto X Force	4791 Points -13%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	4492 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	6480 (6415^min) Points +18%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4429 Points -20%
OnePlus 2	4804 Points -13%
Huawei P9	6522 Points +18%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	5500 Points 0%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG G5	5581 Points
LG G4	4579 Points -18%
Google Nexus 6P	4716 Points -15%
Motorola Moto X Force	5365 Points -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	5094 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4660 Points -17%
OnePlus 2	4282 Points -23%
Huawei P9	7058 Points +26%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	6590 Points +18%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG G5	28730 Points
LG G4	18821 Points -34%
Google Nexus 6P	26876 Points -6%
Motorola Moto X Force	25751 Points -10%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	26380 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28671 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	27795 Points -3%
OnePlus 2	22400 Points -22%
Huawei P9	19854 Points -31%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	24446 Points -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG G5	32109 Points
LG G4	23390 Points -27%
Google Nexus 6P	34758 Points +8%
Motorola Moto X Force	38394 Points +20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	37725 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	33031 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	41615 Points +30%
OnePlus 2	31858 Points -1%
Huawei P9	21577 Points -33%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	30585 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G5	20997 Points
LG G4	11178 Points -47%
Google Nexus 6P	14983 Points -29%
Motorola Moto X Force	11963 Points -43%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	12852 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	19610 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	12854 Points -39%
OnePlus 2	10985 Points -48%
Huawei P9	15517 Points -26%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	14358 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG G5	3277 Points
LG G4	1324 Points -60%
Google Nexus 6P	1877 Points -43%
Motorola Moto X Force	2413 Points -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2009 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2710 (2421^min) Points -17%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	3316 Points +1%
OnePlus 2	1734 Points -47%
Huawei P9	1237 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG G5	4468 Points
LG G4	1399 Points -69%
Google Nexus 6P	2302 Points -48%
Motorola Moto X Force	3226 Points -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2336 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3015 (2895^min) Points -33%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4557 Points +2%
OnePlus 2	1854 Points -59%
Huawei P9	1080 Points -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG G5	1695 Points
LG G4	1115 Points -34%
Google Nexus 6P	1142 Points -33%
Motorola Moto X Force	1282 Points -24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1348 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2002 (1539^min) Points +18%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1697 Points 0%
OnePlus 2	1414 Points -17%
Huawei P9	2510 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG G5	2478 Points
LG G4	513 Points -79%
Google Nexus 6P	1519 Points -39%
Motorola Moto X Force	1849 Points -25%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1132 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2204 (1923^min) Points -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2318 Points -6%
OnePlus 2	938 Points -62%
Huawei P9	974 Points -61%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	2207 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG G5	2833 Points
LG G4	440 Points -84%
Google Nexus 6P	1589 Points -44%
Motorola Moto X Force	2067 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1074 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2229 (2043^min) Points -21%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2601 Points -8%
OnePlus 2	846 Points -70%
Huawei P9	829 Points -71%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	2773 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG G5	1723 Points
LG G4	1216 Points -29%
Google Nexus 6P	1317 Points -24%
Motorola Moto X Force	1351 Points -22%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1402 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2121 (1594^min) Points +23%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1676 Points -3%
OnePlus 2	1517 Points -12%
Huawei P9	2503 Points +45%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	1288 Points -25%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G5	47 fps
LG G4	24.9 fps -47%
Google Nexus 6P	33 fps -30%
Motorola Moto X Force	42 fps -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	18.75 fps -60%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	52 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	51 fps +9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	59 fps +26%
OnePlus 2	47 fps 0%
Huawei P9	43 fps -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	56 fps +19%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G5	74 fps
LG G4	33.7 fps -54%
Google Nexus 6P	44 fps -41%
Motorola Moto X Force	58 fps -22%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	27.11 fps -63%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	56 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	81 fps +9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	78.9 fps +7%
OnePlus 2	48 fps -35%
Huawei P9	40 fps -46%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	91 fps +23%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG G5	30 fps
LG G4	9.5 fps -68%
Google Nexus 6P	17 fps -43%
Motorola Moto X Force	17 fps -43%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	11.81 fps -61%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	27 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	27 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	38.4 fps +28%
OnePlus 2	23 fps -23%
Huawei P9	19 fps -37%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	27 fps -10%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G5	42 fps
LG G4	15 fps -64%
Google Nexus 6P	25 fps -40%
Motorola Moto X Force	27 fps -36%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	17.54 fps -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	25 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	38 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	38.4 fps -9%
OnePlus 2	23 fps -45%
Huawei P9	18 fps -57%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	48 fps +14%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G5	17 fps
LG G4	5.7 fps -66%
Google Nexus 6P	9.5 fps -44%
Motorola Moto X Force	12 fps -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	19 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	28 fps +65%
OnePlus 2	19 fps +12%
Huawei P9	11 fps -35%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	15 fps -12%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G5	31 fps
LG G4	10 fps -68%
Google Nexus 6P	16 fps -48%
Motorola Moto X Force	20 fps -35%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	18 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	28 fps -10%
OnePlus 2	19 fps -39%
Huawei P9	10 fps -68%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	31 fps 0%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G5	11 fps
Motorola Moto X Force	7.3 fps -34%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	6.1 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	7.9 fps -28%
OnePlus 2	11 fps 0%
Huawei P9	7.1 fps -35%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	9.4 fps -15%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G5	18 fps
Motorola Moto X Force	12 fps -33%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	5.8 fps -68%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps -17%
OnePlus 2	11 fps -39%
Huawei P9	6.5 fps -64%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	18 fps 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
LG G5	2079 Points
LG G4	1596 Points -23%
Google Nexus 6P	1405 Points -32%
Motorola Moto X Force	1774 Points -15%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1465 Points -30%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1649 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2074 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2206 Points +6%
OnePlus 2	1681 Points -19%
Huawei P9	2025 Points -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	2410 Points +16%
System (sort by value)
LG G5	2925 Points
LG G4	2368 Points -19%
Google Nexus 6P	1798 Points -39%
Motorola Moto X Force	2878 Points -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1386 Points -53%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2737 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4080 Points +39%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	3925 Points +34%
OnePlus 2	2536 Points -13%
Huawei P9	3930 Points +34%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	3600 Points +23%
Memory (sort by value)
LG G5	1478 Points
LG G4	1558 Points +5%
Google Nexus 6P	1136 Points -23%
Motorola Moto X Force	1085 Points -27%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1945 Points +32%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	876 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2072 Points +40%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1124 Points -24%
OnePlus 2	1297 Points -12%
Huawei P9	2627 Points +78%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	2035 Points +38%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG G5	4807 Points
LG G4	1995 Points -58%
Google Nexus 6P	2424 Points -50%
Motorola Moto X Force	3376 Points -30%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	2040 Points -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	3137 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2203 Points -54%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4299 Points -11%
OnePlus 2	2631 Points -45%
Huawei P9	1583 Points -67%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	4710 Points -2%
Web (sort by value)
LG G5	900 Points
LG G4	881 Points -2%
Google Nexus 6P	791 Points -12%
Motorola Moto X Force	939 Points +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	837 Points -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	986 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1199 Points +33%
OnePlus 2	923 Points +3%
Huawei P9	1029 Points +14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	985 Points +9%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
LG G5	543 Points
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	478 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	733 Points +35%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	858 Points +58%
OnePlus 2	427 Points -21%
Huawei P9	328 Points -40%

Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality (sort by value)
LG G5	25532 Points
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	23747 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	32273 Points +26%
OnePlus 2	21533 Points -16%
Huawei P9	16610 Points -35%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	35000 Points +37%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
LG G5	25.26 fps
LG G4	8.74 fps -65%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	14.52 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13.31 fps -47%
OnePlus 2	15.68 fps -38%
Huawei P9	7.9 fps -69%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	22.7 fps -10%

Legend

LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

LG G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto X Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530,

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	108 Points
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	82 Points -24%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	116 Points +7%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	103 Points -5%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	113 Points +5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	106 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	163 Points +51%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	190 Points +76%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	80 Points -26%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	128 Points +19%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	108 Points 0%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9731 Points
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7832 (6791^min) Points -20%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8804 Points -10%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8699 Points -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8059 Points -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8851 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	13191 Points +36%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	15967 Points +64%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6955 Points -29%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11783 Points +21%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	10559 Points +9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	8395 Points -14%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3461 ms *
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4771 ms * -38%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4193 ms * -21%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4080 ms * -18%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5553 ms * -60%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4377 ms * -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2564 ms * +26%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	1743 ms * +50%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6585 ms * -90%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2923 ms * +16%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	6310 ms * -82%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	2460 ms * +29%

Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5473 (4080^min) Points
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4053 (4006^min) Points -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5395 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	7198 (6255^min) Points +32%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4526 Points -17%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6580 (6523^min) Points +20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	5954 Points +9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	5142 Points -6%

BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	900 Points
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	881 Points -2%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	791 Points -12%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	939 Points +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	837 Points -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	986 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	994 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	1199 Points +33%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	923 Points +3%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1029 Points +14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	985 Points +9%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	49.7 Points
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	43.12 Points -13%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.4 Points -5%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	49.37 Points -1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46 Points -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	48.2 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	75.1 Points +51%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	118.7 Points +139%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.29 Points -11%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	68.4 Points +38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	64 Points +29%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	55 Points +11%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	427.6 MB/s
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	251 MB/s -41%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	236.3 MB/s -45%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	252 MB/s -41%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	256.8 MB/s -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	487.3 MB/s +14%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	234.2 MB/s -45%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	281.3 MB/s -34%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	141.3 MB/s
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	153 MB/s +8%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	122.5 MB/s -13%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.99 MB/s -66%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	99.4 MB/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	145.1 MB/s +3%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	125.5 MB/s -11%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	72.2 MB/s -49%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	89.3 MB/s
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	31.5 MB/s -65%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	20.1 MB/s -77%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	22.55 MB/s -75%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	19.11 MB/s -79%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	86.7 MB/s -3%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21.87 MB/s -76%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39 MB/s -56%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	16.22 MB/s
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 MB/s -8%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11.79 MB/s -27%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	19.78 MB/s +22%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	14.53 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	15.79 MB/s -3%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13.94 MB/s -14%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.45 MB/s +193%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	78.5 MB/s
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	79 MB/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	76.4 MB/s -3%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55 MB/s -30%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	45.53 MB/s
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46.96 MB/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	50.4 MB/s +11%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.83 MB/s -45%

Max. Load

Idle


37.5 °C	37.7 °C	35.7 °C
37.6 °C	34.8 °C	34 °C
37.5 °C	34.3 °C	33.5 °C

Maximum: 37.7 °C
Average: 35.8 °C


35.8 °C	35.7 °C	35.5 °C
35 °C	34.9 °C	34.8 °C
34.1 °C	34.2 °C	33.9 °C

Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 34.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.22 Watt
Idle	0.55 / 1.37 / 2.25 Watt
Load	6.24 / 9.12 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		30h 33min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 27min

	LG G5 10.78 Wh	LG G4 12 Wh	Apple iPhone 6S Plus 10 Wh	Huawei P9 11.46 Wh	Motorola Moto X Force Wh	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 13 Wh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 13.86 Wh	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 13 Wh	Huawei Mate 8 Wh
Battery Runtime		-25%	4%	1%	10%	-22%	45%	-19%	46%
Reader / Idle	1833	1654 -10%	1655 -10%	1514 -17%	1610 -12%	1277 -30%	1663 -9%	1078 -41%	1872 2%
H.264	600	501 -16%	714 19%	568 -5%	710 18%	411 -31%	914 52%	611 2%	963 61%
WiFi v1.3	387	326 -16%	513 33%	569 47%	426 10%	372 -4%	732 89%	369 -5%	865 124%
Load	267	114 -57%	197 -26%	206 -23%	330 24%	210 -21%	392 47%	179 -33%	256 -4%

Pros

+ 明亮高对比度的屏幕

+ Always-On屏幕

+ 完备的安全功能

+ 优秀的相机

+ 出色的通话音质和降噪

+ 模式化插槽

+ 高速闪存

+ 可扩展存储空间

+ 高速处理器

Cons

- 仅支持USB 2.0

- 不支持App2SD

- 预装应用

- 仅支持LTE Cat.6

- 广角镜头分辨率较低

- 环境光传感器识别偏暗

- 负载下降频

In review: LG G5. Test model courtesy of LG Germany.

LG今年真的想出了很多可以吸引消费者注意力的创意，这家韩国生产商也提供了一台成功的产品。优秀屏幕、高品质相机和不错电池续航的组合实用可靠。我们也很喜欢LG G5的新设计和模块化理念，带来了很多新功能。

LG需要通过更新改进环境光传感器的准确度，它在户外使用时亮度较低，看不清屏幕内容。它的相机提供了和前代产品相近的性能，而广角镜头的主意也一定可以吸引一些用户，尽管分辨率较低，我们还是很喜欢这个功能。

LG G5是一台搭配优秀双相机的最新高端智能手机。由于模块插槽的设计，这款智能手机可以更个性化，但也需要用户付出更多的预算。

LG G5没有任何明显的问题，它是目前你可以找到的最优秀智能手机之一，也可以支持例如虚拟现实等即将到来的潮流。LG Friends附加功能也是LG产品中逐渐扩展的一个机遇。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

LG G5 - 05/04/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

70 / 75 → 94%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

59 / 60 → 98%

Weight

92%

Battery

90%

Display

86%

Games Performance

61 / 63 → 96%

Application Performance

60 / 70 → 85%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

69 / 91 → 76%

Camera

81%

Average

80%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1698 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > LG G5 智能手机简短评测

Daniel Schmidt, 2016-05-19 (Update: 2024-11- 4)