LG K10 2017
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 视频拍摄@1080p,广角
Price comparison
Average of 16 scores (from 36 reviews)
Reviews for the LG K10 2017
将力量带给人们。 LG K10 (2017)相比前代机型具备更强的性能和品质更高的机身。配置得到提高的这台设备售价稍高于200欧元(约1477人民币),我们将通过实际测试仔细考察它的表现。
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG K10 (2017)is hard to recommend given there are a lot better options in the same price range. For Rs 13,000, you can easily get a bigger battery, Full HD display, and definitely a better design (that’s subjective though) in a smartphone. For instance, there’s Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, Moto G5, Lenovo Vibe K5 Note or even Honor 6X that offers a dual rear camera setup means that for LG K10, convincing potential buyers will be very hard.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/16/2017
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At R3 899 the LG K10 doesn’t break the bank, but ultimately left me unconvinced. The wide-angle front facing camera and Android Nougat are not enough to make it a certain pick from the midrange bowl. The real killer for me was the K10’s underwhelming HD screen (720 x 1280), which if it was Full HD could have had me rooting for it. Ultimately, if you can spend a bit more you will find better midrange offerings.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To conclude, the LG K10 2017 has a compact and sleek design coupled with some above average display and has an advantage of running on Android 7.0 Nougat. However, looking at the sheer specs sheet, the device falls flat when compared to the likes of Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, Coolpad Cool 1, Honor 6X, which offers superior performance, coupled with some premium design language.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/22/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K10 looks to be a serviceable smartphone. It doesn’t do anything that really makes it standout, but it offers all the features you’d want from a mid-to-low tier device in a package which is highly usable, if not a looker.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 95% performance: 60% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2017
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% features: 53% display: 75% mobility: 81%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 80% performance: 60% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Turn On DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 62%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/05/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/24/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/11/2017
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/04/2017
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/31/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 75% display: 59% mobility: 85% workmanship: 55%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 70% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 60% display: 50% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Toms Hardware Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 76% features: 71% display: 75% mobility: 78% ergonomy: 78%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 70% features: 66%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/10/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% display: 50% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 80% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Spiders Web PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%
Comment
ARM Mali-T860 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6750: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.30":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.