LG K Series
Processor: unknown, Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762, Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, Mediatek MT6580M, Mediatek MT6582, Mediatek MT6735, Mediatek MT6750, Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Snapdragon 425Graphics Adapter: unknown, ARM Mali-400 MP2, ARM Mali-T720, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, Imagination PowerVR GE8320, Qualcomm Adreno 304, Qualcomm Adreno 306, Qualcomm Adreno 308
Display: 4.50 inch, 5.00 inch, 5.30 inch, 5.45 inch, 5.70 inch, 6.10 inch, 6.26 inch, 6.50 inch, 6.53 inch, 6.55 inch, 6.60 inch
Weight: 0.12kg, 0.128kg, 0.132kg, 0.136kg, 0.138kg, 0.14kg, 0.142kg, 0.145kg, 0.148kg, 0.15kg, 0.152kg, 0.157kg, 0.159kg, 0.162kg, 0.17kg, 0.173kg, 0.182kg, 0.188kg, 0.191kg, 0.1917kg, 0.195kg
Price: 119, 120, 129, 150, 159, 169, 199, 200, 209, 249, 400 euro
Average of 102 scores (from 194 reviews)
LG K4
Specifications
Notebook: LG K4Processor: Mediatek MT6735
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720
Display: 4.50 inch, 16:9, 854 x 480 pixels
Weight: 0.12kg
Price: 119 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
LTE at an entry-level price. LG offers an affordable entry-level smartphone with LTE functionality for 119 Euros (~$133), dubbed K4 LTE. That is, however, its only highlight. The review sample makes a rather outdated impression in all other aspects. Have too many cutbacks been made?
Foreign Reviews
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The biggest barrier for the K4 is that low price however, as handsets like the Motorola Moto E and new Vodafone Smart Prime 7 offer even more phone (4G, a 720p HD display, higher resolution cameras and a partly metal build in the case of the Prime 7) for even less. The LG K4 has its place, but we wouldn't call it a worthwhile purchase in the long run.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2016
Source: Focus Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 41% features: 32% ergonomy: 50%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/02/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 03/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/14/2017
LG K10
Specifications
Notebook: LG K10Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 306
Display: 5.30 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.14kg
Price: 199 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
不见五指。 LG K10希望把时尚带进中低端市场。请阅读我们的评测了解为什么它的相机和屏幕效果限制了它的表现。
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K10 is a relatively affordable MetroPCS phone with a nice design and a decent display, but it comes up short everywhere else. For even less money, the ZTE Zmax Pro gets you a faster processor, more RAM, a sharper display, a better camera, longer battery life, and a fingerprint sensor. It's a better choice in every way, provided you're comfortable with the fact that it's huge. If that's not your cup of tea, the Samsung Galaxy On5 offers a similar level of performance to the K10 in a smaller form factor, and is easier to recommend because of its lower price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K10 is a relatively affordable MetroPCS phone with a nice design and a decent display, but it comes up short everywhere else. For even less money, the ZTE Zmax Pro gets you a faster processor, more RAM, a sharper display, a better camera, longer battery life, and a fingerprint sensor. It's a better choice in every way, provided you're comfortable with the fact that it's huge. If that's not your cup of tea, the Samsung Galaxy On5 offers a similar level of performance to the K10 in a smaller form factor, and is easier to recommend because of its lower price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you're looking for one of the cheapest GSM phones on the market and are willing to compromise on camera quality, battery life, screen resolution and performance, the LG K10 is worth considering, particularly if you can get it for less than $100 or for free. However, if you can spend up to $200, the Huawei Honor 5X, which has a full 1080p screen and longer battery life, is a superior choice.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you're looking for one of the cheapest GSM phones on the market and are willing to compromise on camera quality, battery life, screen resolution and performance, the LG K10 is worth considering, particularly if you can get it for less than $100 or for free. However, if you can spend up to $200, the Huawei Honor 5X, which has a full 1080p screen and longer battery life, is a superior choice.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The budget smartphone has completely changed over the past two years or so. Earlier, phones were made of plastic, had HD or lower resolution screens and performance was sub-par. This is the market that the LG K10 competes in.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 56%
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The budget smartphone has completely changed over the past two years or so. Earlier, phones were made of plastic, had HD or lower resolution screens and performance was sub-par. This is the market that the LG K10 competes in.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 56%
Source: Techtree.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG's interface has become simpler and less cartoonish over the years and it doesn't introduce any lag as such on the K10, but at the same time, this is no blazing fast phone. LG says the glossy pebble design is meant to appeal to young people but yet, the performance on the phone isn't fast enough to satisfy the content-hungry gaming youngster.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Techtree.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG's interface has become simpler and less cartoonish over the years and it doesn't introduce any lag as such on the K10, but at the same time, this is no blazing fast phone. LG says the glossy pebble design is meant to appeal to young people but yet, the performance on the phone isn't fast enough to satisfy the content-hungry gaming youngster.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K10 brings freshness to the mid-range, but the competition in this price range is more than fierce, so it will be difficult for this device to become a breakthrough. With the exception of the not so enduring battery, we have no other remarks as regards this model. We were pleased by its nice design and the 13Mp camera, which showed decent results. The Snapdragon 410 chip justified our expectations of reasonable performance and maintenance of low exterior temperatures after load. LG’s UI, on the other hand, did not fail to provide a number of pre-installed apps, modes and functions – all this being ordered and dressed very neatly. Last but not least is the 5.3″ display, which offers not only enough room for operation, but also reasonable detail and color contrast, thanks to the HD resolution and IPS technology.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2016
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K10 brings freshness to the mid-range, but the competition in this price range is more than fierce, so it will be difficult for this device to become a breakthrough. With the exception of the not so enduring battery, we have no other remarks as regards this model. We were pleased by its nice design and the 13Mp camera, which showed decent results. The Snapdragon 410 chip justified our expectations of reasonable performance and maintenance of low exterior temperatures after load. LG’s UI, on the other hand, did not fail to provide a number of pre-installed apps, modes and functions – all this being ordered and dressed very neatly. Last but not least is the 5.3″ display, which offers not only enough room for operation, but also reasonable detail and color contrast, thanks to the HD resolution and IPS technology.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2016
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG has given the K10 LTE an MRP of Rs. 13,750, which straight up feels way too much for what's on offer. It feels like the phone is competing with the wrong crowd, and it's hard to justify this price tag with this feature set in mid-2016. A more appropriate price level would be about half this much, considering there's nothing really special about it other than its design, a good screen, and decent battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 50% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K10 LTE scores when it comes to the build quality of the phone and design, but fails to impress with its specifications and internal features. For the price of Rs, 13,500, the phone comes with an average display, which is a let down. Although the macro shots are good , the camera is not the best for the price. Next up, the phone lacks a fingerprint sensor. It is 2016 and you got to have a fingerprint sensor on your device, at least for a price like this.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2016
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG has given the K10 LTE an MRP of Rs. 13,750, which straight up feels way too much for what's on offer. It feels like the phone is competing with the wrong crowd, and it's hard to justify this price tag with this feature set in mid-2016. A more appropriate price level would be about half this much, considering there's nothing really special about it other than its design, a good screen, and decent battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 50% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K10 LTE scores when it comes to the build quality of the phone and design, but fails to impress with its specifications and internal features. For the price of Rs, 13,500, the phone comes with an average display, which is a let down. Although the macro shots are good , the camera is not the best for the price. Next up, the phone lacks a fingerprint sensor. It is 2016 and you got to have a fingerprint sensor on your device, at least for a price like this.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/30/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/30/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2017
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2016
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2016
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2016
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2016
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/02/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/02/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 03/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 03/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartfoun.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70%
Source: Smartfoun.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70%
LG K7
Specifications
Notebook: LG K7Processor: Mediatek MT6580M
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 854 x 480 pixels
Weight: 0.159kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: LG homepage K7 (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Social media with hurdles. With the K7, LG promises outstanding selfie-capability at an affordable price point. The 5-inch Android smartphone does many things right, but unfortunately doesn't quite deliver on LG's main promise.
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K7 is one of the most affordable phones you can get on T-Mobile, but many more powerful options are available unlocked for similar or less money.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Techtree.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG's interface has become simpler and less cartoonish over the years and it doesn't introduce any lag as such on the K10, but at the same time, this is no blazing fast phone. LG says the glossy pebble design is meant to appeal to young people but yet, the performance on the phone isn't fast enough to satisfy the content-hungry gaming youngster.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K7 LTE feels out of place in today's cut-throat budget smartphone segment. The good battery life and design aside, it falls short on pretty much every count. Then there's the price - at Rs. 9,500, it's simply too expensive to even consider when you have phones like the Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus, Coolpad Note 3, and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, all of which perform better and are less expensive.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 50% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To sum up, the K7 LTE is a phone that offers good build quality and performs well. However, the display is just FWVGA, which is not impressive. For a price of Rs 9,500, the display should have been at least 720p. The rear camera is also just 5MP, whereas other phones in this price range offer 8MP or 13MP rear camera. All in all, the K7 LTE does fail to justify its price tag with low specifications.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2016
LG K8
Specifications
Notebook: LG K8Processor: Mediatek MT6735
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.157kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: LG homepage K8 (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K8 is a solid all-round affordable mobile that gives the excellent Vodafone Smart Prime 7 a run for its money. If you're after a no-frills everyday handset or a dependable second mobile for taking to festivals and the rest, we'd happily recommend it. Of course, Vodafone customers will likely prefer the Smart Prime 7, which at just £75 offers even better value for your cash. If you're on a different network, the K8 is a good alternative.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/29/2016
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/07/2016
LG K5
Specifications
Notebook: LG K5Processor: Mediatek MT6582
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 482 x 854 pixels
Weight: 0.128kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Sin Celular ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/27/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 63% price: 80% display: 50% ergonomy: 75%
LG K10 2017
Specifications
Notebook: LG K10 2017Processor: Mediatek MT6750
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Display: 5.30 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.138kg
Price: 209 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
将力量带给人们。 LG K10 (2017)相比前代机型具备更强的性能和品质更高的机身。配置得到提高的这台设备售价稍高于200欧元(约1477人民币),我们将通过实际测试仔细考察它的表现。
Foreign Reviews
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG K10 (2017)is hard to recommend given there are a lot better options in the same price range. For Rs 13,000, you can easily get a bigger battery, Full HD display, and definitely a better design (that’s subjective though) in a smartphone. For instance, there’s Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, Moto G5, Lenovo Vibe K5 Note or even Honor 6X that offers a dual rear camera setup means that for LG K10, convincing potential buyers will be very hard.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/16/2017
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG K10 (2017)is hard to recommend given there are a lot better options in the same price range. For Rs 13,000, you can easily get a bigger battery, Full HD display, and definitely a better design (that’s subjective though) in a smartphone. For instance, there’s Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, Moto G5, Lenovo Vibe K5 Note or even Honor 6X that offers a dual rear camera setup means that for LG K10, convincing potential buyers will be very hard.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/16/2017
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At R3 899 the LG K10 doesn’t break the bank, but ultimately left me unconvinced. The wide-angle front facing camera and Android Nougat are not enough to make it a certain pick from the midrange bowl. The real killer for me was the K10’s underwhelming HD screen (720 x 1280), which if it was Full HD could have had me rooting for it. Ultimately, if you can spend a bit more you will find better midrange offerings.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At R3 899 the LG K10 doesn’t break the bank, but ultimately left me unconvinced. The wide-angle front facing camera and Android Nougat are not enough to make it a certain pick from the midrange bowl. The real killer for me was the K10’s underwhelming HD screen (720 x 1280), which if it was Full HD could have had me rooting for it. Ultimately, if you can spend a bit more you will find better midrange offerings.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To conclude, the LG K10 2017 has a compact and sleek design coupled with some above average display and has an advantage of running on Android 7.0 Nougat. However, looking at the sheer specs sheet, the device falls flat when compared to the likes of Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, Coolpad Cool 1, Honor 6X, which offers superior performance, coupled with some premium design language.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/22/2017
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To conclude, the LG K10 2017 has a compact and sleek design coupled with some above average display and has an advantage of running on Android 7.0 Nougat. However, looking at the sheer specs sheet, the device falls flat when compared to the likes of Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, Coolpad Cool 1, Honor 6X, which offers superior performance, coupled with some premium design language.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/22/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K10 looks to be a serviceable smartphone. It doesn’t do anything that really makes it standout, but it offers all the features you’d want from a mid-to-low tier device in a package which is highly usable, if not a looker.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K10 looks to be a serviceable smartphone. It doesn’t do anything that really makes it standout, but it offers all the features you’d want from a mid-to-low tier device in a package which is highly usable, if not a looker.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 95% performance: 60% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 95% performance: 60% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2017
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2017
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% features: 53% display: 75% mobility: 81%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% features: 53% display: 75% mobility: 81%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 80% performance: 60% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 80% performance: 60% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Turn On DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Turn On DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 62%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 62%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/05/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/05/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/24/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/24/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/11/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/11/2017
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2017
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/04/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/04/2017
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/31/2017
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/31/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 75% display: 59% mobility: 85% workmanship: 55%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 75% display: 59% mobility: 85% workmanship: 55%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 70% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 70% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 60% display: 50% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 60% display: 50% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Toms Hardware Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 76% features: 71% display: 75% mobility: 78% ergonomy: 78%
Source: Toms Hardware Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 76% features: 71% display: 75% mobility: 78% ergonomy: 78%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 70% features: 66%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 70% features: 66%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/10/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/10/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% display: 50% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% display: 50% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/31/2017
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 80% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 80% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Spiders Web PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: Spiders Web PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2017
Source: Product Test RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%
LG K3 2017
Specifications
Notebook: LG K3 2017Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 210 MSM8909
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 304
Display: 4.50 inch, 16:9, 854 x 480 pixels
Weight: 0.132kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2017
Rating: performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
LG K4 2017
Specifications
Notebook: LG K4 2017Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 210 MSM8909
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 304
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 854 x 480 pixels
Weight: 0.136kg
Price: 120 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Good for beginners. This phone is really an ideal first smartphone: if you are not accustomed to smartphones, you will have no difficulties navigating through the home screens, switching between two SIM cards or taking notes on the smartphone. Everyone else will probably not be satisfied with the level of the LG K4's hardware.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computer Magazin - 01/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Sin Celular ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/04/2018
Source: Canaltech PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/29/2017
Source: Canaltech PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/29/2017
Source: Canaltech PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/22/2017
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 6% performance: 65% display: 65% mobility: 65% workmanship: 70%
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2017
LG K8 2017
Specifications
Notebook: LG K8 2017Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 308
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.142kg
Price: 159 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
小兄弟。 2017年的LG K8 比起LG K10更加实惠,更小,性能更弱。但他对于那些购买廉价手机的人来说可能是更好的选择?我们将会在我们的测试中找出答案。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I love the way the LG K8 looks. I think it is one of the best looking budget Android phones on the market right now.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I love the way the LG K8 looks. I think it is one of the best looking budget Android phones on the market right now.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 88% performance: 20% features: 60% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 88% performance: 20% features: 60% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 67% performance: 76% features: 47% display: 74% mobility: 78%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 67% performance: 76% features: 47% display: 74% mobility: 78%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2017
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 61%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 61%
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/07/2017
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/07/2017
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/09/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/09/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Meilleurmobile FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Meilleurmobile FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 75% display: 65% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 75% display: 65% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/07/2017
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/07/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
LG K10 Novo
Specifications
Notebook: LG K10 NovoProcessor: Mediatek MT6750
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Display: 5.30 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.142kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2017
LG K20 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: LG K20 PlusProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 308
Display: 5.30 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.14kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG’s K20 Plus is a fine phone, but it’s not future-proofed — it has a microUSB port for charging instead of the more common USB-C, and there’s no indication the phone, currently running Nougat, will be upgradable to Android Oreo anytime soon.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
LG K8 2018 (K9)
Specifications
Notebook: LG K8 2018 (K9)Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 210 MSM8909
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 304
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.152kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A cheeky little phone, but one that needs a price to really show whether it's a great creation from LG. It doesn't excel in many areas, but for a budget phone it doesn't offer up too many issues either.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2018
LG K10 2018
Specifications
Notebook: LG K10 2018Processor: Mediatek MT6750
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Display: 5.30 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.162kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/16/2018
LG K30
Specifications
Notebook: LG K30Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 308
Display: 5.45 inch, 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.148kg
Price: 129 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Reviews
The LG K30 is an affordable entry-level phone that still has a lot to offer in terms of battery life and camera. Whether the manufacturer can do it at a price of just 129 euros, you'll find out in the test.
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The unlocked LG K30 is a reasonably capable Android phone, but it's priced too high for what it offers.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/25/2018
LG K40
Specifications
Notebook: LG K40Processor: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 5.70 inch, 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.145kg
Price: 169 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
The LG K40 is an affordable smartphone that includes a few tricks, such as DTS-X sound support. However, has the South Korean manufacturer focussed too much on flashy features and forgotten to get the basics right? Our rigorous tests will reveal all in this detailed review.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
An unassuming affordable mid-range phone that features a surprising amount of technology but throws up performance concerns and doesn't look like it can compete with rivals from the likes of Motorola.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/01/2019
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG K40 is far from the most exciting phone announced at MWC 2019, but if you're looking for a budget phone this may sport enough tech for you.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/28/2019
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/22/2019
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2019
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 61%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 55% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 75% workmanship: 65%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2019
LG K12 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: LG K12 PlusProcessor: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 5.70 inch, 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.15kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2019
LG K50
Specifications
Notebook: LG K50Processor: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.26 inch, 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.17kg
Price: 200 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
The LG K50 seems well priced at around 200 Euros (~$223) for what the South Korean company has included. The device has a large display, dual rear-facing cameras and a dedicated Google Assistant button, although some may find the latter somewhat of a gimmick. Read on to find out how the handset performs in our tests and how it fares against comparably priced devices.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
LG K40S
Specifications
Notebook: LG K40SProcessor: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.10 inch, 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.173kg
Price: 159 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
The LG K40S, the successor to the LG K40, has fewer screen edges and significantly more battery capacity. In addition, it's even a bit cheaper, but there's no progress in terms of performance. You'll find out whether it's still worth buying in the test.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Aberto ate de Madrugada PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/29/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
LG K41S
Specifications
Notebook: LG K41SProcessor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: unknown
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.1917kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Showmetech.com.br PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Portablegear NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 02/18/2020
LG K51S
Specifications
Notebook: LG K51SProcessor: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.55 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.195kg
Price: 209 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Reviews
Will even an inexpensive smartphone like the LG K51S still be allowed to bring Android 9 in 2020? And is it worthwhile to buy it thanks to the quadruple camera and NFC, despite the older operating system? These are just two of the questions we want to answer in this review of the LG cell phone.
Foreign Reviews
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2020
Source: Portablegear NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 02/18/2020
LG K61
Specifications
Notebook: LG K61Processor: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.53 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.191kg
Price: 249 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
The LG K61 looks chic, but comes with Android 9 and a rather slow processor for its price range. But maybe the LG phone can surprise us? You can read more in the review.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While I have a bit of a soft spot for this phone's design and camera, it's hard to recommend it. As I said with the TCL 10L, you may be better off getting something like the TCL Plex from last year, which is often discounted to be cheaper than this one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Neowin Archive.org version
We go hands-on with the LG K61, a mid-range smartphone powered by a MediaTek Helio P35, 4GB of RAM, and 128GB of storage. It has a quad camera with a 48MP main sensor, plus a punch-hole cutout on the display for the selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/04/2020
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2020
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 52%
Source: MuyComputer ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Different IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 70% features: 70% display: 85% mobility: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/29/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 65% features: 65% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Portablegear NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 02/18/2020
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
LG K42
Specifications
Notebook: LG K42Processor: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.60 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.182kg
Price: 150 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN
The LG K42 so far has gained great impressions in its design, it is a military-grade MLT-STD-816G complaint, has a unique wave pattern on the back, and gives a comfortable grip. The display on the other hand is bright despite being a 720p. But due to the weak CPU and the average cameras, rivals may outperform the LG K42. It can be a good alternative to the Chinese rivals, as far as you are not concerned about the performance and cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN
Summarising the LG K42, the phone has a new design, a large display, a decent battery life and an average camera performance. Though the phone fairs well on many fronts, what may not work is the price segment in which it falls. Brands like Xiaomi, Realme and for that matter, even Samsung offer multiple options in this price range. And to be fair, they come with more features than offered by LG K42. At Rs 10,990, LG K42 may not be a deal-breaker, but if you can get hold of it at a lesser price, it can be a good option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN
The LG K42 is a good looking device, but fails to stand out in any other area. The phone’s looks are great and can turn heads, but a phone that doesn’t have the performance, the camera optics, or the battery life to stand out in a sea of competitors cannot be a good recommendation. Further, the LG K42’s grippy and good looking back is rendered pointless if you have to snap on a case to protect the phone anyway.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
LG K51
Specifications
Notebook: LG K51Processor: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.50 inch, 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.188kg
Price: 400 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN
If you want an entry-level smartphone that looks and feels far beyond its price, the LG K51 just might be for you. It’s large and in charge, and the display and speaker are great for streaming videos and music. Even better, the 4,000mAh battery lasts longer than all day, and the headphone jack means you can keep your favorite songs to yourself. However, this isn’t a processing powerhouse, and you might want to look elsewhere if you have gaming or heavy usage in mind. There are also question marks over support, as LG has decided to withdraw from the smartphone business. If you’re concerned with software and security updates (you should be!) then there are more reliable alternatives. The LG K51 sits close to the OnePlus Nord N200 ($239) in terms of pricing, though OnePlus has the better spec sheet by a solid margin, not to mention that the N200 offers 5G on T-Mobile’s network. You may also want to give Motorola’s Moto G series a look, especially the Moto G Power ($249). One final rival to consider is Nokia’s 5.4 ($249) with four times the storage, a pacier processor, and better cameras on both sides.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Comment
LG:
ARM Mali-T720:
Qualcomm Adreno 306:
ARM Mali-400 MP2:
ARM Mali-T720 MP2:
Qualcomm Adreno 304:
Qualcomm Adreno 308:
Imagination PowerVR GE8320:
用于中档ARM SoC的集成显卡。
unknown:
ARM Mali-T860 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Mediatek:
MT6735:
64位四核的系统芯片(4个ARM Cortex-A53核心),主频最高1.5 GHz,面向低价平板电脑和智能手机。
Helio P35 MT6765:
基于ARM的八核SoC(8x ARM Cortex-A53),频率高达2.3 GHz。该芯片还包括Cat.7 LTE调制解调器(下载速度为300 Mbps)。
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200:
210 MSM8909:
入门级芯片,采用四个Cortex-A7内核,运行于最高1.1 GHz。 此外,它还具有一个集成的Cat 4 LTE调制解调器和1080p视频解码和编码功能。
Mediatek Helio 20:
Helio P22 MT6762:
基于ARM的八核SoC(8x ARM Cortex-A53),频率高达2 GHz。该芯片还包括Cat.7 LTE调制解调器(下载速度为300 Mbps)。
:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
69.46%: No rating comment found (one expected)!
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.