LG V10 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 450 cd/m²
Contrast: 2045:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -17% | 18% | -17% | 21% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 450 | 566 26% | 297 -34% | 538 20% | 363 -19% | 335.7 -25% |
Brightness | 431 | 536 24% | 297 -31% | 528 23% | 365 -15% | 332 -23% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 90 -3% | 93 0% | 92 -1% | 90 -3% | 89 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.47 -114% | 0.66 -200% | |||
Contrast | 2045 | 1204 -41% | 815 -60% | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.18 | 6.17 -19% | 2.67 48% | 2.63 49% | 2.34 55% | 2.33 55% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.39 | 3.98 62% | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.94 | 6.26 10% | 2.81 60% | 3.24 53% | 1.03 85% | 2.15 69% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.48 89% | 2.08 106% | 2.17 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.15 102% |
CCT | 8091 80% | 8171 80% | 6379 102% | 6906 94% | 6429 101% | 6184 105% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.48 | 66.31 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.63 | 99.79 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 40 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8791 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
Smartbench 2012 | |
Productivity Index (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
Gaming Index (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P |
Linpack Android / IOS | |
Single Thread (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Multi Thread (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
* ... smaller is better
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
LG V10 | |
LG G4 | |
Motorola Moto X Style | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Off / Standby | 0.08 / 0.21 Watt |
Idle | 0.67 / 1.94 / 2.1 Watt |
Load |
6.53 / 9.93 Watt |
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -16% | -8% | 7% | 13% | -10% | |
Reader / Idle | 1697 | 1654 -3% | 1078 -36% | 1447 -15% | 1459 -14% | 1141 -33% |
H.264 | 539 | 501 -7% | 611 13% | 533 -1% | 383 -29% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 353 | 326 -8% | 369 5% | 375 6% | 501 42% | 400 13% |
Load | 203 | 114 -44% | 179 -12% | 280 38% | 223 10% | 219 8% |
Pros
Cons
LG的V10是这家韩国生产商推出的又一款出色智能手机,它在配置上和G4非常相近,不过在外观上大相径庭。爱自拍的用户可能会很喜欢它的前置双相机。它的第二块屏幕十分新颖,不过实际用途还没有得到完全挖掘,主要的功能都可以在主屏幕上完成。
V10还搭配了非常优秀的指纹识别器,它隐藏在了机身背面的电源键中。LG还在屏幕上相比G4作出了改进,它搭配了具有超高对比度的出色屏幕。非常优秀的相机也得到了进一步的优化,不过遗憾的是生产商没能进一步完善自动模式。
LG为我们带来了又一款强大的智能手机V10。它的最大缺点在于较高的售价。
是否值得选择这台LG旗舰机还在于个人品味以及预算上。V10的售价相比G4高出了近200欧元(约1429人民币),最近后者的售价有了大幅降低。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
LG V10
-
02/02/2016 v4.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt