LG V10 智能手机简短评测

Name: LG V10
Brand: LG

双胞胎配置。 LG V10的配置让我们不禁想起了G4。这家韩国生产商为它搭配了第二块屏幕和一个额外的前置摄像头。请阅读我们的评测了解它是否值得贴上更高的价码。

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 02/21/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen Phablet

Test device courtesy of LG Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

LG V10 (V Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 6 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53/A57

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 418, Core: 600 MHz

Memory

4 GB

Display

5.70 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel, 电容式触控屏幕，10点触控, 量子 IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 21.95 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 耳机麦克风整合接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 2 TB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), NFC, Sensors: 环境光传感器，近距传感器，位置传感器，加速传感器，重力传感器，磁感仪，数字指南针, WiFi Direct, 红外线, Miracast, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 和 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 和 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (800, 1800 和 2600 MHz), LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 159.6 x 79.3

Battery

12 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 3.85 V, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 22 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 18 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 150 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 150 h

Operating System

Android 5.1 Lollipop

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix (f/1.8, 8x 数码对焦, RAW格式支持, 激光自动对焦, OS 2.0, HDR, UHD视频拍摄)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (双镜头, 80°/120°, 全高清视频拍摄)

Additional features

Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 耳机，快速开始说明，USB数据线，电源适配器, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

192 g, Power Supply: 78 g

Price

649 Euro

Links

LG homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


424 cd/m²	424 cd/m²	423 cd/m²
436 cd/m²	450 cd/m²	428 cd/m²
423 cd/m²	448 cd/m²	420 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 450 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 430.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.92 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 450 cd/m²
Contrast: 2045:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.99
ΔE Greyscale 6.94 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24

	LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Screen		-17%	18%	-17%	21%	14%
Brightness middle	450	566 26%	297 -34%	538 20%	363 -19%	335.7 -25%
Brightness	431	536 24%	297 -31%	528 23%	365 -15%	332 -23%
Brightness Distribution	93	90 -3%	93 0%	92 -1%	90 -3%	89 -4%
Black Level *	0.22	0.47 -114%		0.66 -200%
Contrast	2045	1204 -41%		815 -60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.18	6.17 -19%	2.67 48%	2.63 49%	2.34 55%	2.33 55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.39		3.98 62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.94	6.26 10%	2.81 60%	3.24 53%	1.03 85%	2.15 69%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.48 ^89%	2.08 ^106%	2.17 ^101%	2.23 ^99%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	8091 ^80%	8171 ^80%	6379 ^102%	6906 ^94%	6429 ^101%	6184 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		65.48	66.31
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		98.63	99.79

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 40 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17673 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG V10	1172 Points
LG G4	1107 Points -6%
Motorola Moto X Style	1276 Points +9%
Google Nexus 6P	1335 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	1317 Points +12%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG V10	3684 Points
LG G4	3556 Points -3%
Motorola Moto X Style	3567 Points -3%
Google Nexus 6P	4587 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	4207 Points +14%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG V10	18585 Points
LG G4	18821 Points +1%
Motorola Moto X Style	19702 Points +6%
Google Nexus 6P	26876 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	23798 Points +28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG V10	23276 Points
LG G4	23390 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X Style	23321 Points 0%
Google Nexus 6P	34758 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	27549 Points +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG V10	10898 Points
LG G4	11178 Points +3%
Motorola Moto X Style	12767 Points +17%
Google Nexus 6P	14983 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	16117 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG V10	1332 Points
LG G4	1324 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X Style	1400 Points +5%
Google Nexus 6P	1877 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	1616 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG V10	1361 Points
LG G4	1399 Points +3%
Motorola Moto X Style	1419 Points +4%
Google Nexus 6P	2302 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	1606 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG V10	1241 Points
LG G4	1115 Points -10%
Motorola Moto X Style	1339 Points +8%
Google Nexus 6P	1142 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	1652 Points +33%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG V10	9.4 fps
LG G4	9.5 fps +1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	11.81 fps +26%
Motorola Moto X Style	9.3 fps -1%
Google Nexus 6P	17 fps +81%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	14 fps +49%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V10	15 fps
LG G4	15 fps 0%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	17.54 fps +17%
Motorola Moto X Style	15 fps 0%
Google Nexus 6P	25 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	18 fps +20%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG V10	4800 Points
LG G4	4579 Points -5%
Motorola Moto X Style	5859 Points +22%
Google Nexus 6P	4716 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	5130 Points +7%

Smartbench 2012
Productivity Index (sort by value)
LG V10	9071 points
LG G4	8940 points -1%
Motorola Moto X Style	8815 points -3%
Google Nexus 6P	10823 points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	16793 points +85%
Gaming Index (sort by value)
LG V10	4055 points
LG G4	4118 points +2%
Motorola Moto X Style	3873 points -4%
Google Nexus 6P	4332 points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	4566 points +13%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
LG V10	1627 Points
LG G4	1596 Points -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1465 Points -10%
Motorola Moto X Style	1743 Points +7%
Google Nexus 6P	1405 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	1801 Points +11%
System (sort by value)
LG V10	2598 Points
LG G4	2368 Points -9%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1386 Points -47%
Motorola Moto X Style	2783 Points +7%
Google Nexus 6P	1798 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	3321 Points +28%
Memory (sort by value)
LG V10	1527 Points
LG G4	1558 Points +2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1945 Points +27%
Motorola Moto X Style	1776 Points +16%
Google Nexus 6P	1136 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	1298 Points -15%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG V10	1954 Points
LG G4	1995 Points +2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	2040 Points +4%
Motorola Moto X Style	1918 Points -2%
Google Nexus 6P	2424 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+	2457 Points +26%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V10	25 fps
LG G4	24.9 fps 0%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	18.75 fps -25%
Motorola Moto X Style	24 fps -4%
Google Nexus 6P	33 fps +32%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V10	35 fps
LG G4	33.7 fps -4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	27.11 fps -23%
Motorola Moto X Style	34 fps -3%
Google Nexus 6P	44 fps +26%

Linpack Android / IOS
Single Thread (sort by value)
LG V10	453.2 MFLOPS
LG G4	361.4 MFLOPS -20%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	369.6 MFLOPS -18%
Motorola Moto X Style	415 MFLOPS -8%
Google Nexus 6P	87.1 MFLOPS -81%
Multi Thread (sort by value)
LG V10	570 MFLOPS
LG G4	507 MFLOPS -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	2957 MFLOPS +419%
Motorola Moto X Style	590 MFLOPS +4%
Google Nexus 6P	262 MFLOPS -54%

Legend

LG V10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

LG G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto X Style Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	90 Points
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	82 Points -9%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	113 Points +26%
Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	110 Points +22%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	116 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	95 Points +6%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8083 Points
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7832 (6791^min) Points -3%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8059 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8065 Points 0%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8804 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	7724 Points -4%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	42 Points
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	43.12 Points +3%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46 Points +10%
Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	45 Points +7%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.4 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	48.14 Points +15%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4499 ms *
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4771 ms * -6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5553 ms * -23%
Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7325 ms * -63%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4193 ms * +7%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5067 ms * -13%

Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7818 Points
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7818 Points 0%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7362 Points -6%
Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7829 Points 0%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8622 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	8801 Points +13%

BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	903 Points
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	881 Points -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	837 Points -7%
Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	974 Points +8%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	791 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	993 Points +10%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	249.3 MB/s
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	251 MB/s +1%
Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	246.9 MB/s -1%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	236.3 MB/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	383 MB/s +54%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	105.3 MB/s
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	153 MB/s +45%
Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46.15 MB/s -56%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	122.5 MB/s +16%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	151.1 MB/s +43%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	29.57 MB/s
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	31.5 MB/s +7%
Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	26.97 MB/s -9%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	20.1 MB/s -32%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	89.9 MB/s +204%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	16.55 MB/s
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 MB/s -9%
Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	31.1 MB/s +88%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11.79 MB/s -29%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	20.95 MB/s +27%

Max. Load

Idle


41 °C	37.2 °C	37.7 °C
40.7 °C	38.8 °C	37.7 °C
39.6 °C	38.3 °C	36.3 °C

Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 38.6 °C


37.8 °C	41.1 °C	41.2 °C
37.3 °C	40.1 °C	40.9 °C
37.5 °C	37.9 °C	37.7 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 39.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.21 Watt
Idle	0.67 / 1.94 / 2.1 Watt
Load	6.53 / 9.93 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		28h 17min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 23min

	LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime		-16%	-8%	7%	13%	-10%
Reader / Idle	1697	1654 -3%	1078 -36%	1447 -15%	1459 -14%	1141 -33%
H.264	539	501 -7%	611 13%	533 -1%		383 -29%
WiFi v1.3	353	326 -8%	369 5%	375 6%	501 42%	400 13%
Load	203	114 -44%	179 -12%	280 38%	223 10%	219 8%

Pros

+ 高速处理器

+ 坚固优雅的机身设计

+ 不错的可连接性

+ 可扩展存储空间

+ 可更换电池

+ 优秀的相机

+ 快速充电功能

+ 32位 HiFi DAC

+ 快速指纹识别器

+ 节能的第二块屏幕...

Cons

- ...不过功能有限

- 电源适配器功率有限

- 处理器降频问题

- 用户界面拖慢了系统响应速度

- 不支持无线充电

In review: LG V10. Review sample courtesy of LG Germany.

LG的V10是这家韩国生产商推出的又一款出色智能手机，它在配置上和G4非常相近，不过在外观上大相径庭。爱自拍的用户可能会很喜欢它的前置双相机。它的第二块屏幕十分新颖，不过实际用途还没有得到完全挖掘，主要的功能都可以在主屏幕上完成。

V10还搭配了非常优秀的指纹识别器，它隐藏在了机身背面的电源键中。LG还在屏幕上相比G4作出了改进，它搭配了具有超高对比度的出色屏幕。非常优秀的相机也得到了进一步的优化，不过遗憾的是生产商没能进一步完善自动模式。

LG为我们带来了又一款强大的智能手机V10。它的最大缺点在于较高的售价。

是否值得选择这台LG旗舰机还在于个人品味以及预算上。V10的售价相比G4高出了近200欧元（约1429人民币），最近后者的售价有了大幅降低。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

LG V10 - 2016-02-02 02/02/2016 v4.1 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

76 / 75 → 100%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

59 / 60 → 98%

Weight

89%

Battery

92%

Display

85%

Games Performance

66 / 63 → 100%

Application Performance

51 / 70 → 73%

Temperature

86%

Noise

100%

Audio

60 / 91 → 66%

Camera

86%

Average

80%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > LG V10 智能手机简短评测

Daniel Schmidt, 2016-02-21 (Update: 2016-02-28)