戴尔 Latitude 13 7370 超极本简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 261 cd/m²
Contrast: 1004:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.82 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
77.84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
49.18% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
53.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
78.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
52.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Dell Latitude 13 7370 1920x1080, IPS | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE 2560x1440, IPS | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 2560x1440, IPS | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 1920x1080, IPS | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 2304x1440, IPS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 25% | 28% | 28% | 25% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 52.2 | 66.7 28% | 67.9 30% | 67.9 30% | 66.8 28% |
sRGB Coverage | 78.3 | 94.7 21% | 96.8 24% | 98 25% | 95.4 22% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 53.9 | 68.4 27% | 70 30% | 69.8 29% | 68 26% |
Response Times | 21% | 15% | 17% | 14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50.4 ? | 44 ? 13% | 46.4 ? 8% | 42 ? 17% | 41.2 ? 18% |
Response Time Black / White * | 33.6 ? | 24 ? 29% | 26.4 ? 21% | 28 ? 17% | 30.4 ? 10% |
PWM Frequency | 220 ? | 217 ? | |||
Screen | 15% | 10% | 3% | 23% | |
Brightness middle | 261 | 272 4% | 327 25% | 300 15% | 387 48% |
Brightness | 241 | 268 11% | 316 31% | 280 16% | 358 49% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 95 12% | 87 2% | 87 2% | 88 4% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.32 -23% | 0.35 -35% | 0.31 -19% | 0.47 -81% |
Contrast | 1004 | 850 -15% | 934 -7% | 968 -4% | 823 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 2.61 39% | 4.39 -2% | 4.9 -14% | 1.6 63% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.66 | 6.43 26% | 7.27 16% | 8.91 -3% | 4 54% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.82 | 3.31 43% | 4.69 19% | 6.69 -15% | 1 83% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.35 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.33 94% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6771 96% | 6360 102% | 7101 92% | 6487 100% | 6680 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 49.18 | 63 28% | 62.52 27% | 63 28% | 61.6 25% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 77.84 | 95 22% | 96.71 24% | 98 26% | 82.2 6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 20% /
18% | 18% /
14% | 16% /
10% | 21% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 30 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ512G8NY | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -40% | 75% | -52% | -30% | |
Seq Read | 1425 | 499.1 -65% | 1839 29% | 494.9 -65% | 1056 -26% |
Seq Write | 889 | 294 -67% | 1190 34% | 431.9 -51% | 651 -27% |
4K Read | 35.72 | 30.43 -15% | 47.72 34% | 16.97 -52% | 16.4 -54% |
4K Write | 97.9 | 74.6 -24% | 126.6 29% | 65.6 -33% | 22.1 -77% |
4K-64 Read | 450.6 | 370.4 -18% | 1858 312% | 217.9 -52% | 509 13% |
4K-64 Write | 347.2 | 253.4 -27% | 344.3 -1% | 147.9 -57% | 283 -18% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 704 | 236.2 -66% | 1313 87% | 545 -23% |
PCMark 7 - Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7370 |
PCMark 7 Score | 4165 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3048 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3528 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4238 points | |
Help |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 6244 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1094 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 38931 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3481 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 509 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 38 | 20.3 | 17.6 | 5.3 |
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 16.4 | 13.5 | 8.7 | |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 24.6 | 18.2 | 12.8 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
Off / Standby | 0.35 / 0.5 Watt |
Idle | 5 / 7.5 / 8 Watt |
Load |
15.3 / 26.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell Latitude 13 7370 34 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE 52 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 45.6 Wh | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 52 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 41.4 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 18% | -16% | -6% | 33% | |
Reader / Idle | 588 | 942 60% | 530 -10% | ||
H.264 | 391 | 510 30% | 339 -13% | 512 31% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 367 | 429 17% | 309 -16% | 345 -6% | 501 37% |
Load | 176 | 115 -35% | 131 -26% | 231 31% |
Pros
Cons
一块几乎无边框的屏幕,被动散热和Thunderbolt 3接口——戴尔Latitude 13 7370必然可以从一成不变的主流商务笔记本中脱颖而出。这台超极本不需要在便携性和品质上惧怕任何惊蛰对手,它的机身工艺无可挑剔,输入设备也十分可靠。酷睿m平台的性能表现也十分优秀:在BIOS更新之后,短时间负载下它的表现几乎可以与主动散热机型相媲美。它的频率和性能只有在持续负载下才会明显下降,不过这在日常办公中应该十分少见。
7370没能得到很好分数的主要原因是屏幕。戴尔为它搭配了一块背光明亮的不错屏幕面板,不过由于自动亮度和对比度控制无法一直处于高亮度下。这让人十分费解,我们希望可以通过更新得到解决。这样的话,只有它的高售价会成为我们难以向用户推荐的原因了:目前价位约2200欧元(约16056人民币),Latitude 13显然不算便宜——甚至(面相消费用户)Apple MacBook 12也还便宜几百欧元。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Dell Latitude 13 7370
-
05/12/2016 v5.1 (old)
Till Schönborn