戴尔 Latitude 14 3470 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
HP ProBook 440 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 | |
HP ProBook 440 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 206 cd/m²
Contrast: 429:1 (Black: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 11.51 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60.61% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.21% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Innolux N140BGE, TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 Lenovo N140HCE-EAA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 LG LP140WF6-SPB2, IPS-Panel, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G3 Chi Mei CMN14A7, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 AUO1136, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | -3% | -2% | 66% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.21 | 42.2 5% | 39.1 -3% | 39.6 -2% | 67.9 69% |
sRGB Coverage | 60.5 | 62.3 3% | 58.8 -3% | 59.1 -2% | 96.8 60% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.55 | 43.72 5% | 40.41 -3% | 40.94 -1% | 70 68% |
Response Times | -4% | 13% | -2% | -1% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 44.4 ? 6% | 40 ? 15% | 46 ? 2% | 46.4 ? 1% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 29.6 ? -14% | 23.2 ? 11% | 27.6 ? -6% | 26.4 ? -2% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 32% | 30% | 8% | 57% | |
Brightness middle | 206 | 245 19% | 233 13% | 246 19% | 327 59% |
Brightness | 193 | 225 17% | 221 15% | 215 11% | 316 64% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 83 -5% | 88 1% | 84 -3% | 87 0% |
Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.24 50% | 0.3 37% | 0.5 -4% | 0.35 27% |
Contrast | 429 | 1021 138% | 777 81% | 492 15% | 934 118% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11 | 6.89 37% | 4.43 60% | 8.6 22% | 4.39 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.57 | 17.62 10% | 7.27 63% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.51 | 6.45 44% | 3.78 67% | 9.36 19% | 4.69 59% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.46 89% | 2.31 95% | 2.39 92% | 2.15 102% |
CCT | 13671 48% | 6857 95% | 7171 91% | 11226 58% | 7101 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.46 | 40.1 4% | 37.3 -3% | 37.8 -2% | 62.52 63% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60.61 | 61.8 2% | 58.7 -3% | 59.1 -2% | 96.71 60% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
21% | 13% /
20% | 1% /
5% | 41% /
51% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
HP ProBook 440 G3 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
HP ProBook 440 G3 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3074 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3982 points | |
Help |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 Toshiba HG6 THNSFJ256GCSU | Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS | HP ProBook 440 G3 Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 12972% | 4431% | 39% | |
Read Seq | 108.9 | 480.9 342% | 497.6 357% | 124.8 15% |
Write Seq | 103.2 | 426.4 313% | 180 74% | 123.6 20% |
Read 4k | 0.362 | 21.51 5842% | 18.91 5124% | 0.559 54% |
Write 4k | 0.946 | 71.5 7458% | 37.13 3825% | 1.277 35% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.721 | 277.6 38402% | 95.7 13173% | 1.179 64% |
Write 4k QD32 | 0.901 | 230.4 25472% | 37.26 4035% | 1.304 45% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
HP ProBook 440 G3 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
HP ProBook 440 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
HP ProBook 440 G3 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1135 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4181 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 536 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total War: Rome II (2013) | 25.4 | 18.6 | ||
Dirt Rally (2015) | 62.3 | 13.25 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 7 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 32.3 / 32.3 / 32.3 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 32.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.3 / 33.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.2 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.4 °C / 93.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-6.7 °C / -12 F).
Off / Standby | 0.28 / 0.68 Watt |
Idle | 5 / 6.8 / 8.9 Watt |
Load |
26.2 / 31.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 6500U, Radeon R5 M330, Toshiba HG6 THNSFJ256GCSU, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 6200U, Radeon R7 M360, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS, IPS-Panel, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G3 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -7% | -23% | -9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 3.1 38% | 4.1 18% | 5.2 -4% |
Idle Average * | 6.8 | 6.3 7% | 8 -18% | 8.2 -21% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.9 | 7.9 11% | 8.9 -0% | 9 -1% |
Load Average * | 26.2 | 29.5 -13% | 39.3 -50% | 28.8 -10% |
Load Maximum * | 31.8 | 57.3 -80% | 52.2 -64% | 34 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 6500U, Radeon R5 M330, 48 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G3 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 6200U, Radeon R7 M360, 47 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 32% | -14% | -2% | |
Reader / Idle | 668 | 1153 73% | 537 -20% | 736 10% |
WiFi v1.3 | 278 | 425 53% | 293 5% | 292 5% |
Load | 140 | 97 -31% | 101 -28% | 112 -20% |
H.264 | 431 | 321 | 425 |
Pros
Cons
我们希望从它的一些优势开始总结:Latitude 3470的屏幕搭配了磨砂表面,它的电池可以更换,同时接口配备在这个尺寸上也十分合理。它的键盘,尽管和更贵的Latitude无法相比,但也相比同价位的消费级产品更好。最后它的屏幕上盖和掌托采用了柔软的胶质表面,手感十分舒适。
遗憾的是,尽管它在细节上有不少优势。但由于戴尔为它的定位是以低价吸引用户。在很多方面它都节省了成本:它的散热系统不够有效,风扇几乎一直在旋转而设备依然会变得很热。戴尔也为它搭配了一个较慢的读卡器,卡槽也太浅不适合长期把卡放置其中。它的屏幕搭配了磨砂表面,而其他方面的表现则让人感到遗憾。它的商务功能也不是很让人满意:用户无法得到商务设备常见的指点杆、拓展坞接口和智能卡槽。
戴尔Latitude 3470表现优秀,而究竟是在哪方面呢?可能主要还是售价。除此之外,这台Latiude无法提供竞争对手惠普和联想所带来的丰富功能,同时它的部件选择对于德国境内的个人用户也十分有限。
综合考虑下我们无法推荐3470,除非你真的需要一台如此低价的商务系统。这台测试机的功能性无法和同类设备相提并论,当然它们的售价也更高。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Dell Latitude 14 3470
- 09/13/2016 v5.1 (old)
Benjamin Herzig