戴尔 Latitude 3180 (N4200, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Dell Latitude 3180
Brand: Dell

经久不衰。 这台11.6寸的Latitude设备搭配了高速固态硬盘，运行安静而续航持久。戴尔为它制定的价位不低，零售价为580欧元（约4357人民币）。预装Windows 10专业版系统应该是它定价较高的主要原因。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 04/29/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows

Test device courtesy of Dell Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Dell Latitude 3180

Processor

Intel Pentium N4200 4 x 1.1 - 2.5 GHz, Apollo Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 505, Core: 750 MHz, 21.20.16.4627

Memory

4 GB

Display

11.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 135 PPI, BOE NT11621, TN LED, glossy: no

Storage

Liteonit CV3-8D128, 128 GB

, 86 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC256 @ Intel Apollo Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD, TPM 2.0

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 23 x 332.9 x 231.8

Battery

42 Wh, 3500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 11.4 V

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 标清

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, McAfee LiveSafe (试用版), MS Office Home and Student 2016 (试用版), 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

1.63 kg, Power Supply: 325 g

Price

580 Euro

Links

Dell homepage
Dell notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Dell Latitude 3180 Dell Latitude 11 3150 Medion Akoya S2218 HP Stream 11-r000ng Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q DIN A4 ❌

Connectivity

Left: power-in, memory-card reader (micro-SD), HDMI, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-A)

SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	655 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	543 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (seb)	82 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (seb)	238 MBit/s


219 cd/m²	227 cd/m²	216 cd/m²
248 cd/m²	253 cd/m²	243 cd/m²
234 cd/m²	237 cd/m²	245 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE NT11621 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 253 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 235.8 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 253 cd/m²
Contrast: 538:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.87 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.13% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.78% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Dell Latitude 3180 TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6"	Dell Latitude 11 3150 TN, 1366x768, 11"	Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6"	HP Stream 11-r000ng TN, 1366x768, 11.6"	Medion Akoya S2218 IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6"
Display		-5%	3%	4%	17%
Display P3 Coverage	40.78	38.93 -5%	42.04 3%	42.52 4%	48.34 19%
sRGB Coverage	61.4	58.5 -5%	62.9 2%	63.5 3%	70.1 14%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	42.13	40.23 -5%	43.46 3%	43.97 4%	50 19%
Response Times			-7%	-1%	2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40 ?(22, 18)		38 ?(18, 20) 5%	44 ?(24, 20) -10%	27 ?(7, 20) 32%
Response Time Black / White *	26 ?(20, 6)		31 ?(14, 17) -19%	24 ?(8, 16) 8%	33 ?(14, 19) -27%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(90)				200 ?(90) 0%
Screen		-13%	7%	8%	39%
Brightness middle	253	235 -7%	218 -14%	264 4%	417 65%
Brightness	236	219 -7%	215 -9%	248 5%	394 67%
Brightness Distribution	85	72 -15%	85 0%	84 -1%	88 4%
Black Level *	0.47	0.81 -72%	0.38 19%	0.5 -6%	0.43 9%
Contrast	538	290 -46%	574 7%	528 -2%	970 80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	12.87	9.67 25%	10.29 20%	9.78 24%	6.7 48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	21.99		17.68 20%	16.39 25%	15.07 31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	13.97	11 21%	11.71 16%	11.16 20%	6.25 55%
Gamma	2.46 ^89%	2.2 ^100%	2.45 ^90%	2.44 ^90%	2.48 ^89%
CCT	18336 ^35%	11769 ^55%	14164 ^46%	12954 ^50%	5954 ^109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	39	37 -5%	40 3%	41 5%	46 18%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	61		63 3%	63 3%	69 13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-9% / -11%	1% / 4%	4% / 6%	19% / 28%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

1638

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

5440

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

32.61

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

51 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

175 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

19.87 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	53 Points +4%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	53 Points +4%
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	51 Points
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Pentium N4200	50 Points -2%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Pentium N3710	42 Points -18%
Dell Latitude 11 3150 Intel Pentium N3540	41 Points -20%
HP Stream 11-r000ng Intel Celeron N3050	28 Points -45%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	175 Points
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Pentium N4200	174 Points -1%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	165 Points -6%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	165 Points -6%
Dell Latitude 11 3150 Intel Pentium N3540	152 Points -13%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Pentium N3710	150 Points -14%
HP Stream 11-r000ng Intel Celeron N3050	57 Points -67%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	5440 Points
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Pentium N4200	5346 Points -2%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	5284 Points -3%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	5149 Points -5%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Pentium N3710	4649 Points -15%
Dell Latitude 11 3150 Intel Pentium N3540	4496 Points -17%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	1677 Points +2%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	1675 Points +2%
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	1638 Points
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Pentium N4200	1633 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 11 3150 Intel Pentium N3540	1339 Points -18%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Pentium N3710	1238 Points -24%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	1400 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	1395 Points 0%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	1362 Points -3%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Pentium N3710	1023 Points -27%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	4736 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	4563 Points -4%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	4425 Points -7%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Pentium N3710	3553 Points -25%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	1581 Points +3%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	1555 Points +1%
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	1541 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	4558 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	4364 Points -4%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	4162 Points -9%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	1571 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	4719 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel Pentium N4200	90.1 Points +3%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	89.1 Points +2%
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	87.5 Points
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Pentium N4200	84.6 Points -3%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel Pentium N3710	36.78 Points -58%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2314 points
Help

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 3180 HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, Liteonit CV3-8D128	2314 Points
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256	1999 Points -14%
HP Stream 11-r000ng HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1487 Points -36%
Medion Akoya S2218 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1027 Points -56%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Liteonit CV3-8D128

Sequential Read: 482.6 MB/s

Sequential Write: 213.2 MB/s

512K Read: 276.5 MB/s

512K Write: 162.6 MB/s

4K Read: 18.17 MB/s

4K Write: 44.77 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 132.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 118.1 MB/s

	Dell Latitude 3180 Liteonit CV3-8D128	Dell Latitude 11 3150 Samsung SSD PM851 128 GB MZ7TE128HMGR	Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Liteonit CV3-8D256	HP Stream 11-r000ng 32 GB eMMC Flash	Medion Akoya S2218 64 GB eMMC Flash
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-25%	25%	-58%	-67%
Read Seq	482.6	251.5 -48%	506 5%	154.2 -68%	140.2 -71%
Write Seq	213.2	124.4 -42%	393.4 85%	76.6 -64%	52.7 -75%
Read 512	276.5	229.2 -17%	329.1 19%	165.8 -40%	98.4 -64%
Write 512	162.6	124.8 -23%	282.5 74%	59.9 -63%	58.7 -64%
Read 4k	18.17	13.5 -26%	23.35 29%	18.25 0%	15.25 -16%
Write 4k	44.77	39.21 -12%	45.56 2%	13.16 -71%	9.817 -78%
Read 4k QD32	132.7	117.4 -12%	123.5 -7%	46.51 -65%	37.24 -72%
Write 4k QD32	118.1	98.6 -17%	111.2 -6%	13.21 -89%	8.734 -93%

3DMark 11 Performance		899 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200	825 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200	624 Points -24%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200	583 Points -29%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3710	473 Points -43%
HP Stream 11-r000ng Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050	375 Points -55%
Dell Latitude 11 3150 Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Pentium N3540	227 Points -72%

	low	med.	high
BioShock Infinite (2013)	32.3	18.6	16.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	5.1
Resident Evil 7 (2017)	14.4
For Honor (2017)	12.1
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)	5.9

Max. Load

Idle


38.2 °C	40.6 °C	29.2 °C
37.5 °C	37.7 °C	27.5 °C
27.1 °C	25.5 °C	25.8 °C

Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 32.1 °C


31 °C	47.4 °C	48.4 °C
27.4 °C	45.4 °C	41.3 °C
25.2 °C	27.5 °C	27.1 °C

Maximum: 48.4 °C
Average: 35.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 33.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.1 °C / 80.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.2 °C / 2.1 F).

Dell Latitude 3180 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.16 / 0.26 Watt
Idle	2.1 / 4.1 / 5.5 Watt
Load	14.6 / 15.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 40)		10h 21min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Dell Latitude 3180 Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 42 Wh	621 min
Dell Latitude 11 3150 N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 40 Wh	591 min -5%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 49 Wh	584 min -6%
HP Stream 11-r000ng N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 37 Wh	515 min -17%
Medion Akoya S2218 Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 43 Wh	500 min -19%

Pros

+ 雾面屏幕

+ 运行安静

+ M.2 2280固态硬盘

+ 非常优秀的电池续航

Cons

- 昏暗、对比度低、可视角度窄的屏幕

- 不支持USB-C

- 价位高

Dell Latitude 11 3180, courtesy of Dell Germany

戴尔Latitude 11 3180是一台在设计时充分考虑到教育用户需要的11.6寸笔记本电脑。它采用了坚固的塑料机身，搭载的Apollo Lake处理器可以提供办公和上网浏览所需的性能。这台设备在使用中十分安静，不会变得很热。

戴尔Latitude 11 3180是一台小巧耐久的笔记本电脑，十分适合教育机构用作文字输入和上网浏览设备。

另外，这台笔记本电脑并不是所有型号都搭配了固态硬盘。相对便宜的型号搭配的是不可更换的eMMC闪存，用户无法更换或升级。它的电池续航十分出色，同时搭配实用的键盘可以满足长时间文字输入所需。

它的屏幕让人十分失望。戴尔为它选择了一块低亮度、低对比度、可视角度很窄的屏幕，这并不适合它的定位——戴尔官网的介绍中提到这台笔记本电脑由于搭配可以180度旋转的屏幕，可以平放在桌面上使用。要达到这个目的，戴尔需要为它搭配一块IPS屏幕，而不是这块可视角度很窄的屏幕。除此之外，如果它作为课堂长时间使用的教育设备的话，不应该使用闪烁屏幕亮度控制。

我们的测试机型在戴尔网上商店中售价582欧元（约4369人民币）——对于这样一款简单的教育设备来说显得十分高昂。因此，它并不适合个人用户选购。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Dell Latitude 3180 - 04/19/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

77 / 98 → 79%

Keyboard

76%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

38 / 80 → 48%

Weight