Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarLenovo Yoga Smart Tab平板电脑评测：谷歌助手
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2020 | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F SD 439, Adreno 505 | 580 g | 23 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 81 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2018 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N SD 450, Adreno 506 | 531 g | 8 mm | 10.50" | 1920x1200 | |
| 78.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2019 | Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3 | 504 g | 9.8 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 79.5 % v6 (old) | 04 / 2019 | Alldocube Alldocube X MT8176, PowerVR GX6250 | 496 g | 6.9 mm | 10.50" | 2560x1600 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 392 cd/m²
Contrast: 1089:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5" | Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Alldocube Alldocube X AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 26% | -12% | -53% | |
| Brightness middle | 392 | 556 42% | 449 15% | 297.3 -24% |
| Brightness | 359 | 514 43% | 425 18% | 307 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 87 -1% | 89 1% | 83 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.42 -17% | 0.6 -67% | |
| Contrast | 1089 | 1324 22% | 748 -31% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 1.8 33% | 3.1 -15% | 6.74 -150% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.4 | 3.2 41% | 6.4 -19% | 14.42 -167% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 2.2 42% | 3.8 -0% | 2.2 42% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.09 105% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 7276 89% | 6819 95% | 7202 90% | 6719 97% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 32.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (84645 - 99193, n=4) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
| Alldocube Alldocube X | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (75175 - 79792, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (15.9 - 16.9, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (last 2 years) | |
| Alldocube Alldocube X (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (25.3 - 27.1, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (32 - 38, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (17.4 - 18.5, n=5) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Alldocube Alldocube X (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4512 - 4958, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60) | |
| Alldocube Alldocube X (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 | Alldocube Alldocube X | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | -2% | -30% | 5% | 386% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 295.6 | 285.6 -3% | 266.2 -10% | 255.4 -14% | 274 ? -7% | 957 ? 224% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 238.9 | 103.3 -57% | 180.1 -25% | 101.1 -58% | 176.2 ? -26% | 646 ? 170% |
| Random Read 4KB | 64.8 | 71.1 10% | 75 16% | 14.62 -77% | 59.4 ? -8% | 185.8 ? 187% |
| Random Write 4KB | 16.76 | 13.39 -20% | 23.28 39% | 11.62 -31% | 32 ? 91% | 178.1 ? 963% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 86.5 ? | 80.6 ? -7% | 77.2 ? -11% | 87.2 1% | 77.4 ? -11% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.4 ? | 60.4 ? -8% | 52 ? -20% | 66.1 1% | 58.3 ? -11% |
Arena of Valor
Asphalt 9: Legends
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.16 Watt |
| Idle |  1.28 / 4.5 / 4.59 Watt |
| Load |
5.71 / 6.99 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 6300 mAh | Alldocube Alldocube X 8000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | 9% | -61% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.28 | 1.26 2% | 1.14 11% | 3.8 -197% |
| Idle Average * | 4.5 | 4.22 6% | 3.71 18% | 5.9 -31% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.59 | 4.29 7% | 3.74 19% | 6.3 -37% |
| Load Average * | 5.71 | 5.48 4% | 5.26 8% | 7.4 -30% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.99 | 6.57 6% | 7.68 -10% | 7.6 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 6300 mAh | Alldocube Alldocube X 8000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 13% | 10% | -68% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2083 | 1960 -6% | 1691 -19% | |
| H.264 | 919 | 963 5% | 1480 61% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 795 | 938 18% | 950 19% | 253 -68% |
| Load | 288 | 385 34% | 228 -21% |
Pros
Cons
如导言中所述，Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab有点与众不同，与竞争对手不同。它带有一个内置支架和一个非常厚的底部，包括两个强大的扬声器和一个坚固的支架。坦率地说，我们很喜欢这种设计，因为平板电脑可以很方便地手持在舒适厚实的底端。显然，它不能平放在桌子上。
联想的Yoga Yoga智能标签非常适合用作智能家居中心。但是，它需要用户不时地进行手动干预。
其余只是标准水平。它的中端硬件足以满足日常应用的需求，但在竞争对手中并不突出。尽管microSD卡读取器的速度稍快，但连接性也没有特别的。其唯一的独特能仍然是Google的环境模式。借助其三个麦克风，可以从各个方面检测和理解语音命令。不幸的是，即使在设置中启用了平板电脑的内置支架，当打开平板电脑的内置支架时，上述环境模式的自动激活也无法正常进行。
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
-
01/14/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
