富士通 LifeBook E557 (i3-7100U, HD620) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Interfaces
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 5580 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus X510UA-BR305T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 5580 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus X510UA-BR305T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus X510UA-BR305T | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
Asus X510UA-BR305T | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 216 cd/m²
Contrast: 404:1 (Black: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 9.37 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.15% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 BOE0665, , 1366x768, 15.6" | Asus X510UA-BR305T Chi Mei N156BGA-EA3, , 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 Lenovo NT156WHM-N42, , 1366x768, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 5580 1366x768, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | 6% | -5% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 37.9 | 36.79 -3% | 40.13 6% | 35.97 -5% | |
sRGB Coverage | 56.8 | 55.4 -2% | 60 6% | 54.1 -5% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.15 | 38.01 -3% | 41.5 6% | 37.17 -5% | |
Response Times | 3951% | 18% | 7% | 33% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50 ? | 49 ? 2% | 46 ? 8% | 30 ? 40% | 44 ? 12% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 14 ? 46% | 13 ? 50% | 29.6 ? -14% | 12 ? 54% |
PWM Frequency | 210 ? | 25000 ? 11805% | 200 ? -5% | 201.6 ? -4% | |
Screen | 13% | -14% | -15% | 24% | |
Brightness middle | 214 | 226 6% | 242 13% | 238 11% | 241 13% |
Brightness | 213 | 215 1% | 233 9% | 216 1% | 229 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 73 -17% | 83 -6% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.53 | 0.51 4% | 0.59 -11% | 0.53 -0% | 0.46 13% |
Contrast | 404 | 443 10% | 410 1% | 449 11% | 524 30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.93 | 6.21 22% | 10.9 -37% | 10.8 -36% | 3.4 57% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.9 | 8.9 36% | 20.84 -50% | 29.3 -111% | 7.61 45% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.37 | 7.06 25% | 13.07 -39% | 12.1 -29% | 1.7 82% |
Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.35 94% | 2.37 93% | 2.25 98% | 2.36 93% |
CCT | 9971 65% | 8321 78% | 13123 50% | 14344 45% | 6750 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 35 -3% | 38.3 6% | 34 -6% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | 55 -2% | 59.9 7% | 54 -4% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1982% /
1087% | 0% /
-6% | -1% /
-7% | 17% /
19% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 210 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 210 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 210 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
Asus X510UA-BR305T | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
Asus X510UA-BR305T | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Asus X510UA-BR305T | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3179 points | |
Help |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | Asus X510UA-BR305T Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Latitude 5580 Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -89% | 199% | -86% | 34% | |
Read Seq | 417.2 | 89.4 -79% | 1589 281% | 132.3 -68% | 485.8 16% |
Write Seq | 262.6 | 84.2 -68% | 1217 363% | 131.1 -50% | 456.1 74% |
Read 512 | 389.5 | 29.55 -92% | 1155 197% | 27.04 -93% | 328 -16% |
Write 512 | 263 | 61.7 -77% | 783 198% | 56.6 -78% | 446.8 70% |
Read 4k | 17.5 | 0.326 -98% | 59.7 241% | 0.459 -97% | 26.95 54% |
Write 4k | 60.6 | 0.438 -99% | 148.8 146% | 0.812 -99% | 86.7 43% |
Read 4k QD32 | 311.4 | 1.047 -100% | 473.6 52% | 1.1 -100% | 245.9 -21% |
Write 4k QD32 | 201.1 | 0.967 -100% | 428.7 113% | 0.828 -100% | 300.2 49% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
Asus X510UA-BR305T | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1410 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 30.96 | 15.87 | 12.94 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34.2 / 34.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.9 °C / 84 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.2 °C / -2.1 F).
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.34 / 0.35 Watt |
Idle | 2.7 / 4.9 / 5.8 Watt |
Load |
26 / 24.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
Asus X510UA-BR305T | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E557 |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
LifeBook E557通过其模块化设计和特殊界面来突显自己,这样的设计目前并不容易找到。790欧元(917美元)的价格下,提供着不错的性能。不过,富士通在外壳用料上节约了太多成本。设计可以被描述为“复古”。这些材料看起来很廉价,但其他一切看起来都很坚实耐用。优点在于,所提供的维护性,是我们所喜欢的。
总的来说,LifeBook E557通过外观的差异和易于维护性,差异化自己。
对于消费者来说,如果他可以忍受较差的用料,而且需要一台设计特别的电脑,LifeBook E557值得考虑。 我们测试机的硬件,为日常任务提供了足够的性能。而那些愿意花更多钱的人,同样可以获得更好的显示效果和更快的处理器。
Fujitsu Lifebook E557
- 10/26/2017 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker