富士通LifeBook UH572 超级本测评
Fujitsu took its time in releasing a cheap, full-fledged ultrabook onto the market. There are many interesting devices in the entry-price range of 700 Euro (~$877) and ultrabooks that cost far more than twice as much. In addition to our test device, Fujitsu also builds the Lifebook U772. It competes against more expensive opponents with an entry-price of 1200 Euro (~$1503) and a 14-inch screen in a 13-inch case.
Our Lifebook UH572, priced at 799 Euro (~$1001), is to compete against cheaper opponents such as Lenovo's U310, HP's Folio 13 or Acer's Aspire S3. They are all good value for money entry-level ultrabooks and can, though not uncompromisingly, convince in their own way. Fujitsu's main argument against these slim devices is mobile broadband, covered by Sierra Wireless' Gobi 3000 HSUPA modem in the Lifebook UH572. Let us take a closer look at the device's other qualities.
富士通了其在市场上便宜的，全面的ultrabook的释放时间。有很多有趣的设备范围内的入门价格为700欧元（约$877）和ultrabooks的成本远远超过了两倍多。在我们的测试设备，富士通还建立富士通LifeBook U772。它竞争的对手更昂贵的入门价格为1200欧元（〜$1503）和一台14英寸的屏幕在13英寸的情况下。
我们的LifeBook UH572，售价为799欧元（〜$1001），更便宜的对手，比如联想的U310，惠普的13开本或宏碁的Aspire S3一争高下。他们都是很好的价值的钱入门级ultrabooks可以，虽然不是毫不妥协，说服自己的方式。富士通的主要论点是对这些纤细的设备是由Sierra Wireless的“戈壁3000 HSUPA调制解调器的移动宽带，覆盖在富士通LifeBook UH572。让我们来仔细看看设备的其他素质。
Case
Most of our attentive readers likely know which specifications a modern ultrabook has to fulfill. Such a device has to particularly feature a light, slim, appealingly designed case that is rigid so that it can be used as a robust traveling companion. Moreover, it should sport a good battery life and a bright screen. Fujitsu does not have to redefine this category or customer wishes - long have a few manufacturers gathered experience in the field of ultrabooks. Thus unsurprisingly, Fujitsu does not tread new paths with the UH572's chassis. Nevertheless, Fujitsu's interpretation impresses right away.
Our version features a nicely shimmering metallic red magnesium case - however you can naturally choose a less striking silver color. The lid's surface is processed and painted so meticulously that it looks like colored aluminum under light. In addition to the slim, almost fragile appearing build (18 mm height (0.71 inches) - closed), the used material allows an impressive case stability at a weight of merely 1.57 kilograms (3.46 pounds). Even greater effort does not really warp or dent the base or even the lid, which is very rigid considering its thin build. Of course, the manufacturer has designed everything according to this slim size and light weight - but not without advantages and disadvantages that will still be seen.
The case is manufactured very well and feels agreeably soft. The edges and corners are ergonomically flattened in important places. Opening the device also proves to be very easy even with one hand. The lid can be opened to an angle of 145° and is held firmly by the two small hinges without rocking noticeably. The ruby-colored lid and base alternates with matte black on the input field. Their surface does not look as rubberized as do various ThinkPads, but is rather smooth. The designers considered usability here: The interfaces on the sides are marked on the top's right and left edge so that they are easily found.
我们细心的读者可能知道，一个现代化的Ultrabook履行的规范。这种装置特别配备了一盏灯，超薄的设计，恳求的情况下，是刚性的，因此，它可以作为一个强大的旅行伴侣。此外，还应该运动一个良好的电池寿命和明亮的画面。富士通不必重新定义此类别或顾客的愿望 - 长有一些厂商云集ultrabooks领域的经验。因此，毫不奇怪的是，富士通并没有践踏的新路径UH572的底盘。不过，富士通的解释令人印象深刻的时候了。
我们的版本提供一个很好的闪闪发光的金属红色的镁合金外壳， - 但是，你自然可以选择一个不太明显的银颜色。盖的表面处理和油漆精心，它看起来像彩色铝光下。除了超薄，几乎脆弱的出现构建高度（18毫米（0.71英寸） - 闭），所用的材料允许一个令人印象深刻的情况下，稳定的，只是1.57千克（3.46磅）的重量。付出更大的努力并没有真正的经纱或削弱的基础，甚至盖，这是非常严格的，考虑到其身材瘦削。当然，制造商设计了一切根据这种规模虽小，重量轻， - 但也不是没有优点和缺点，仍然可以看到。
的情况下被制造的非常好，感觉愉快软。棱角符合人体工程学扁平化的重要场所。打开设备也被证明是很容易的，甚至用一只手。盖可以打开到145°的角度，牢牢的两个小铰链没有明显的摇摆。红宝石色的盖子和底座与黑色磨砂交替的输入字段。他们表面看起来不作为橡胶做不同的ThinkPad笔记本电脑，而且是比较顺利的。设计者认为的可用性在这里：两侧的接口上都标有顶部的左，右边缘，因此，他们很容易被发现。
Connectivity
Meanwhile most manufacturers install all important interfaces even in budget ultrabooks. Thus, Fujitsu builds everything of distinction into the UH572.
In addition to a Kensington lock, the HDMI port for connecting the flat screen at home and two USB 3.0 ports are on the left. Since both USB ports are quite close to each other, broad flash drives may cover the neighboring port.
Fujitsu installs the former USB 2.0 standard and the power socket beside a SD/MMC/Memory stick card reader on the case's right. A plastic flap is seen when looking closer at the right. It covers the SIM card slot for the UMTS modem. If you are missing a LAN port in our list, it is available as a USB-to-RJ45 connector because, according to Fujitsu, it would not have fit into the slim case. Unlike its more expensive U772 brother model, the UH572 does not feature a docking port.
与此同时，大多数制造商安装所有重要的接口，即使在预算ultrabooks。因此，富士通建立到UH572一切的区别。
除了Kensington防盗锁，HDMI端口为连接平面在家，两个USB 3.0端口在左侧。由于两个USB端口彼此相当接近，广泛的闪存驱动器可以覆盖周边港口。
富士通以前安装的USB2.0标准的电源插座旁边的SD / MMC /记忆棒读卡器的情况下的权利。时，会出现在右侧仔细一看，一个塑料皮瓣。它涵盖了UMTS调制解调器的SIM卡插槽。如果你缺少一个LAN端口，它是在我们的名单，因为根据富士通可以作为一个USB-to-RJ45连接器，它会不会适合成亭亭玉立的情况下。与更昂贵的U772的兄弟机型，UH572不设停靠港口。
Communication
In addition to WLAN via Intel's Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (b/g/n), cabled network connections are also possible via a USB-to-LAN connector. However, a highlight of the low-priced UH572 is definitely the option of surfing on the Internet via HSUPA using mobile broadband. In addition to Bluetooth 4.0, Intel's WLAN module offers other technologies such as Wireless Display. Thus, wireless transmission of screen content to a compatible monitor or TV is possible.
Security
Apart from the slot for notebook locks, we unfortunately did not find any relevant security features on the UH572. Thus, the device can only be protected against theft at work. Fujitsu adds more such features in its U772 business ultrabook.
Accessories
Apart from the notebook, LAN connector and various instructions, we also find two recovery DVDs in the box. They enable resetting the ultrabook to state of delivery - providing that an external DVD drive is available because ultrabooks lack this equipment. Unlike the bigger U772 model, the UH572 does not feature a docking port. Thus, Fujitsu's accessories range from notebook cases to external hard disks and external input devices.
Maintenance
We were very pleased about the huge maintenance cover on the bottom of the ruby-red magnesium ultrabook. Merely 6 Torx screws separate the experienced user from replacing or expanding a few components. They are Western Digital's 500GB, 2.5-inch hard disk, the RAM (only one of two banks occupied with a 4GB, 1600 MHz DDR3 module), the Wi-Fi card and Sierra's UMTS module (both connected via mini PCIe) in the UH572.
Warranty
Fujitsu delivers the Lifebook with a standard 12 month collect & return service. We did not find any extension options on the manufacturer's homepage. Too bad, since a few competitors offer warranty extensions.
通讯
除了通过英特尔迅驰无线-N2230（B / G / N）无线局域网，有线网络连接，也可以通过一个USB-to-LAN连接器。然而，绝对的低价UH572的一大亮点是在互联网上冲浪，通过HSUPA移动宽带的选项。除了支持蓝牙4.0，英特尔的WLAN模块还提供了其他的技术，如无线显示。因此，无线传输到兼容的显示器或电视的屏幕内容。
安全
除了笔记本锁槽，很不幸我们没有找到任何有关安全功能的UH572。因此，该装置可以只在工作中保护，以防止盗窃。富士通增加了更多的功能在U772的业务ultrabook的。
饰品
除了笔记本电脑，LAN连接器和各种指令，我们也发现了两个恢复DVD的包装盒中。它们使复位的Ultrabook状态交货 - 提供外部DVD驱动器是可用的，因为ultrabooks缺乏这种设备。不同的是更大的U772模型，UH572不设停靠港口。因此，富士通的的配件范围从笔记本电脑的情况下，外部硬盘和外部输入设备。
保养
我们非常高兴巨额的维修盖底部的红宝石镁ultrabook的。仅仅6个Torx螺钉，更换或扩大几个组成部分分开，有经验的用户。他们是西数的500GB，2.5英寸硬盘，在RAM（只有1的两家银行占用一个4GB，1600 MHz的DDR3模块），的Wi-Fi卡和塞拉利昂的UMTS模块都连接通过MINI PCIE的UH572 。
保
富士通提供的LifeBook标准的12个月收集及退货服务。制造商的网站上没有找到任何扩展选项。太糟糕了，因为几个竞争对手提供保修扩展服务。
Input Devices
As seen in our recent review of the U772, it is not exactly the input devices that cover Fujitsu's new ultrabook with glory. Will this be different in the UH572?
Keyboard
Compared with the U772's keyboard unit, it is fairly good but far from being a paragon.
Typing is comparatively easy on this model. The key drop is short, but much better than in the significantly more expensive U772. The subjective typing feel conveys accuracy but the keyboard makes an extremely low-end impression. The entire chiclet keyboard unit seems to fit somewhat loose in the base. Thus, the construction clatters and "clicks" with every key stroke, no matter how gently pressed, and it also yields evidently. This reminds us of first generation netbook keyboards.
But not everything is bad about this keyboard. The pressure point is relatively crisp. Considering the price or the U772's unusual keyboard, the unit installed here is satisfactory. Typos are hardly an issue and the ergonomics are acceptable. Nevertheless it is disappointing when compared with input devices of recent contenders. We can recommend both the backlit keyboard of HP's Folio 13 as well as the "conventional" yet excellent keyboard in the IdeaPad U310. Unfortunately, the Aspire S3 offers a keyboard similar to the one installed here.
在我们最近的U772的评论，可以看出它是不完全的输入设备，包括富士通的新的Ultrabook与荣耀。这是在UH572有什么不同？
键盘
U772的键盘装置相比，它是相当不错的，但远的典范。
在此模型上打字是比较容易的。关键的下降是短暂的，但远远好于在更昂贵的U772。主观打字的手感传达的准确性，但键盘一个非常低端的印象。整个的独立式Chiclet键盘单元的基础似乎有所松动，以适应。因此，建设发出咔嗒声，“咔哒”的每一个关键中风，不管如何，轻轻按下，它也产生明显的。这让我们想起了第一代上网本键盘。
但并非一切都对这个键盘是坏的。压力点是比较清脆的。考虑到价格和U772不同寻常的键盘，安装在这里的单位是令人满意的。错别字是很难的问题，是可以接受的人体工程学。然而令人失望的是，当输入设备相比，最近的竞争者。我们可以为您推荐的背光键盘以及HP的13开本的“传统”，但出色的键盘在IdeaPad U310。不幸的是，的Aspire S3提供了一个键盘，在这里安装一个类似。
Touchpad
The Lifebook's mouse replacement is very similar to the one in the U772. Ergo it adopts all traits and problems but additionally exhibits a similar, clattery noise as perceived from the keyboard.
The inherited traits include the touchpad's rather smooth surface where you occasionally snag and the fairly unreliable keys' functionality. As it is so often seen in ultrabooks, the pad's touch-sensitive surface extends over the area of the left and right key. They are no longer dedicated and the entire touchpad can be pressed to perform clicks. However, our model exhibits a slightly unusual behavior here. The UH572 pad's outermost right and left corners, where we normally press to click, respond just as little as those in the U772. We had to press the buttons' center area hard to trigger the clicks. However, they were sometimes assigned to the wrong key - more often than not, a context menu popped up after an intended left click. Multi-touch gestures, such as the popular two-finger scrolling, work well. However, they have to be enabled via the driver menu instead of in the lower right task bar as would be usual.
触摸板
富士通LifeBook鼠标替代的是在U772非常相似。埃尔戈它采用全的特点和存在的问题，但认为从键盘还表现出相似，clattery的的的噪音。
遗传因素包括触控板的表面光滑，偶尔SnAg和相当不可靠键的功能。因为它是经常看到ultrabooks，垫的触摸敏感表面的上方延伸的区域的左侧和右侧的键。他们不再致力于和整个触控板可按下进行点击。然而，我们的模型显示出一个稍微不寻常的行为。 UH572垫的最外层的左，右角落，在那里我们通常按点击，回复这么少的在U772。我们按按钮的中心区域，很难触发的点击次数。然而，他们有时会分配给错了钥匙 - 更多的，往往不是预期的左侧点击后弹出的上下文菜单。多点触摸手势，如目前流行的双指滚动，做工精良。然而，他们必须通过驱动程序的菜单，而不是在右下角的任务栏通常被激活。
Display
While all ultrabook models in this comparison rely on glossy-type screens using the same resolution of 1366x768 in a 13.3-inch screen size, our Lifebook's matte version stands out a bit from its high-gloss contenders. The UH572's matte TN screen (LP133WH2-TLM3) comes from LG and takes up the fight against reflections indoors and out.
However, it struggles with the very often criticized flaws of such low-end screens. The average brightness of 177.8 cd/m2 (max: 196.5 cd/m2) cannot be recommended for outdoor use because the content simply looks too dark in bright surroundings.
在这种比较依赖于所有的Ultrabook机型光泽型屏幕，使用相同的分辨率为1366×768的13.3英寸的屏幕尺寸，我们通Lifebook的磨砂版本脱颖而出位，其高光泽竞争者的。 UH572的磨砂TN屏（LP133WH2-TLM3）来自LG和反射室内和室外的打击。
然而，它的斗争与经常批评的缺陷等低端屏幕。平均亮度为177.8流明（最大：196.5流明）不能被推荐为户外使用，因为它的内容简单地在明亮的环境太暗。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 189.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 158:1 (Black: 1.2 cd/m²)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 76 %
Center on Battery: 192 cd/m²
Contrast: 194:1 (Black: 0.99 cd/m²)
Seen subjectively, it is a screen suitable for Internet surfing and Office tasks that do not require high color intensity.
The measured rates confirm our impression of the low contrast. A too high black value only results in a weak contrast. The reproducible color spectrum is very limited. Here, like in the comparable competition, not even the sRGB standard is achieved. Consequently, the Lifebook is not suitable for graphic designers and photographers - but they will likely turn to specialized professional devices anyway.
If you are looking for an outdoor-suitable screen in an ultrabook and want a higher resolution, you will have to invest an additional 300 Euro (~$376) or more. Devices like the Zenbook UX32VD or Samsung's 900X3B offer these qualities. However, the Lifebook UH572's matte screen represents an interesting alternative to the glossy-type screens of the contenders of the 800 Euro (~$1002) price range.
看，这是一个主观屏幕，适合上网冲浪和办公室的任务，并不需要高显色强度。
价格确认我们印象中的低对比度。导致弱对比度一个过高的黑色值。可再现的色彩频谱是非常有限的。在这里，就像在可比的竞争，甚至没有sRGB标准的实现。因此，富士通LifeBook是不适合的平面设计师和摄影师 - 但他们很可能会转向专门的专业设备了。
如果你正在寻找的室外合适的屏幕在ultrabook的，希望有一个更高的分辨率，你将不得不投入额外的300欧元（〜$376）或以上。设备，如的ZENBOOK UX32VD的三星900X3B提供这些特质。不过，富士通LifeBook UH572的雾面屏幕，一个有趣的替代光泽型屏幕的竞争者的800欧元（〜$1002）价格范围。
Performance
Fujitsu basically offers its Lifebook UH572 in two configurations. We are testing the fairly low-priced 799 Euro (~$1001) alternative that features Intel's Core i5-3317U (2 x 1.7 GHz - 2.6 GHz) and a 500GB Western Digital hard disk which is fired up by a 32GB SSD cache. If you invest 150 Euro (~$188) more, you get a very fast, pure-bred 128GB SSD and a faster Core i7-3667U CPU (2 x 2 GHz - 3.2 GHz). Both versions include the same graphics solution in the form of Intel's HD Graphics 4000.
The price-performance ratio is first-rate in both versions. However we would sooner take the cheaper UH572 alternative because there are ultrabooks with better screens and input devices for just under 1000 Euro (~$1253).
When we take a look at the contenders in this comparison, we notice that the IdeaPad U310 also complies with Intel's minimum specifications regarding storage devices, so a similar array of 500GB HDD and 32GB SSD cache. Acer's S3 also uses a 320GB HDD + 20GB SSD. Merely the Folio 13 sports a swift 128GB SSD from Samsung and thus will likely be a tough opponent particularly in terms of system performance.
富士通的LifeBook UH572主要提供两种配置。我们正在测试相当低的价位799欧元（〜$1001）的替代方案，采用了英特尔的酷睿i5-3317U（2×1.7千兆赫 - 2.6千兆赫）发射了一个32GB的SSD缓存500GB的西数硬盘。如果你投资150欧元（约$188），你会得到一个非常快的，纯种的128GB SSD和更快的酷睿i7-3667U CPU（2×2吉赫 - 3.2千兆赫）。两个版本都包含相同的图形解决方案的形式，英特尔HD4000图形。
在这两个版本的价格性能比是一流的。然而，我们宁愿采取更便宜的UH572的选择，因为有更好的屏幕和输入设备在1000欧元（〜$1253）ultrabooks。
当我们看一看在这个比较的竞争者，我们看到的IdeaPad U310也符合英特尔的存储设备的最低规格，500GB硬盘和32GB SSD缓存一系列类似的。宏碁S3还采用了320GB HDD+20GB SSD。仅仅在Folio13运动迅速从三星128GB SSD，从而将可能是一个难缠的对手，尤其是在系统性能方面。
Processor
The core of our Lifebook UH572 is a very energy-efficient ULV (ultra-low voltage) processor from Intel's latest Ivy Bridge generation specified with a TDP of 17 Watts - the Core i5-3317U to be precise. It offers a default clock of 2 x 1.7 GHz. However, the single cores can be overclocked up to 2.6 GHz depending on the processor's load owing to Turbo Boost 2.0. In addition to this technology, Intel's CPU also supports Hyperthreading, which enables processing two threads on one processor core per clock simultaneously. This is also the reason that a dual-core CPU, such as the i5-3317U, shows four performance diagrams in the task manager rather than two as would actually be expected.
The processor even manages to outperform a few older Core i7 ULV CPUs due to this and various other improvements of the Ivy Bridge processor generation. Thus, it should also have enough power reserves for all routine scenarios and even allow occasional video editing (although there are much more suitable devices for this purpose).
Lenovo relies on exactly the same CPU and GPU (HD Graphics 4000) in the IdeaPad U310. Consequently we should find a good basis for comparison here. HP's Folio 13 and Acer's Aspire S3 both use the outdated Core i5-2467M featuring the integrated HD Graphics 3000. A look at the measured performance rates of CineBench R11.5 (CPU multithread) shows that our test device is inferior to the IdeaPad by 18%. It is even 22% below the Folio 13 although it uses an actually slower processor from the former Sandy Bridge generation. Acer's S3 is also 21% faster. The screenshot (upper right) is to illustrate why poorer results are achieved. The Lifebook exhibits reproducible clock rate decreases in CineBench R11.5 (multi). Thus, the clock frequency of both cores is reduced from 2.4 GHz to 800 GHz about every two seconds for a short period.
The Folio 13 lags behind by 18% and the Aspire S3 even by 20% in the CineBench R10 (64-bit) single-core run (both use Intel's Core i5-2467M).
处理器
我们的LifeBook UH572的核心是一个非常节能的ULV（超低电压）处理器，英特尔最新的Ivy Bridge的新一代指定的TDP为17瓦 - 酷睿i5-3317U是精确的。它提供了一个默认的2个1.7 GHz的时钟。然而，单核可以超频至2.6 GHz，根据处理器的负荷，由于睿频加速2.0。在除了该技术，Intel的CPU还支持超线程，这使得每个时钟同时在一个处理器核心处理两个线程。这也是一个双核CPU，比如酷睿i5-3317U，显示在任务管理器的性能图表，而不是两个，实际上预期的原因。
处理器甚至能够超越几个老酷睿i7 ULV的CPU由于和其他各种改进的Ivy Bridge处理器的新一代。因此，它也应该有足够的功率储备，所有常规情况下，甚至允许偶尔的视频编辑（虽然也有更适合用于此目的的设备）。
联想依赖于完全相同的CPU和GPU（HD 4000图形）在IdeaPad U310。因此，我们应该找到一个良好的基础比较在这里。 HP的13开本和宏碁的Aspire S3使用过时的酷睿i5-2467M集成高清显卡3000。一看测得的性能CINEBENCH R11.5（CPU多线程）可以看出，我们的测试设备是低于18％的IdeaPad。虽然它使用的是实际速度较慢的处理器Sandy Bridge的前代，甚至是22％以下，在Folio 13。宏碁S3还快21％。截图（右上）是为了说明为什么结果较差实现。富士通LifeBook表现出重复的时钟速率下降CINEBENCH R11.5（多）。因此，两个核心的时钟频率减少从2.4GHz到800 GHz的很短的期间，每隔2秒钟。
在CINEBENCH R10（64位）单核心运行（都采用了英特尔酷睿i5-2467M），甚至20％，18％和Aspire S3开本13落后。
System Performance
As expected from modern ultrabooks, the UH572 is usually quite fast subjectively. Of course it is noticed that a conventional hard disk is installed when opening some programs. However, you also clearly notice the speed boost that the small 32GB SSD enables in frequently used files and programs, such as when booting the operating system.
There is not much difference between the opponents subjectively. The advantage of an SSD-only system, like the Folio 13, normally only becomes evident while or shortly after booting the laptop. Otherwise all contenders process demanded tasks at an equally fast speed.
As expected, HP's Folio takes a 30% lead due to its SSD. The IdeaPad U310 lags behind our test device by 14% despite the same CPU and Acer's S3 using an even older CPU lags behind by 27% in PCMark Vantage. According to the latest PCMark 7, the IdeaPad is the leader and 18% faster than our test device and the equally fast Folio 13. Acer's S3 appears to be much slower and, beaten by a total of 44%, at the end of our comparison test.
Looking at the results, we can only conclude that the Aspire S3's system performance cannot keep up with the other three compared notebooks. This could be due to the smaller or slower SSD. Our Lifebook achieves second place in both benchmarks and thus should ensure a fast routine work speed. Nevertheless, the clear winner here is the Folio 13 due to its pure-bred SSD.
系统性能
正如预期的那样，从现代ultrabooks，UH572通常是相当快的主观判断。当然，这是在打开某些程序时发现，传统的硬盘安装。不过，你也清醒地看到，小的32GB SSD能够在经常使用的文件和程序，如开机时操作系统的速度提升。
之间的对手主观上没有太大的区别。的SSD系统唯一的优势，如在Folio13，通常只变得明显启动笔记本电脑的同时或之后不久。否则，所有的竞争者过程中要求任务以同样快的速度。
正如预期的那样，惠普的开本，30％的铅由于其SSD。的IdeaPad U310的14％，尽管我们的测试设备落后，甚至落后了27％，在PCMark Vantage的CPU相同的CPU和宏碁S3。根据最新的PCMark 7的IdeaPad是领导者和18％的速度比我们的测试设备和同样快速的开本13。宏碁S3似乎要慢得多，殴打一个总量的44％，在我们的对比测试。
结果看，我们只能得出这样的结论：无法跟上其他三个相比，笔记本电脑的Aspire S3的系统性能。这可能是由于更小或更慢的SSD。我们的LIFEBOOK在这两个基准，从而保证了快速的日常工作速度达到第二位。然而，这里明显的赢家是在Folio13，由于其纯种SSD。
| PCMark Vantage Result | 6770 points | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 2959 points | |
Help | ||
Storage Devices
We dealt in-depth with the importance of the installed storage device for the overall speed in the course of system performance. But what about the single, detailed rates of the employed array of a conventional, 500GB hard disk and 32GB SSD cache?
Since the operating system is on Western Digital's HDD, we first use HDTune as an adequate benchmark for assessing the storage device's speed. The average transfer rate proves to be one of the better results achieved by conventional HDDs. With averages of 90.3 MB/s, large amounts of data are processed agreeably fast (and 4% quicker than in the IdeaPad U310 - the Folio 13's SSD works twice as fast). The boost SSD likely contributes to the maximum rate of 176.4 MB/s, but its field of specialty is limited to reading and writing small files (which is why it is used, for example, when booting the laptop).
Thus, we use CrystalDiskMark for illustrating the impact of Sandisk's i100 32GB SSD. The 4K and 4K QD32 read speeds are the weaknesses of conventional hard disks, which are to compensate the small SSD caches. However, nothing of the kind is noticed in the UH572. The 4K / 4K QD32 read rates of 1.083 MB/s and 1.459 MB/s are on the level of good HDDs. The IdeaPad U310’s implementation of this technology is exemplary with 8.74 MB/s and 204.4 MB/s and can even partly outdo HP's Folio based on SSD-only (13.23 and 99.06 MB/s). Consequently, not too much should be expected of the Lifebook UH572's small SSD cache.
存储设备
我们深入处理与安装的存储装置的系统性能的过程中的整体速度的重要性。但是，有关的就业阵列的传统，500GB硬盘和32GB SSD高速缓存的单，详细价格？
由于操作系统是西数的硬盘，我们使用HDTune的一个适当的基准，以评估存储设备的速度。平均传输速率被证明是一个更好的结果实现了由传统的硬盘驱动器。随着平均值90.3 MB/ s时，大量的数据处理愉快快（和4％的速度比在IdeaPad U310 - 开本13的SSD工作快两倍）。提升SSD可能有助于176.4 MB/ s的最大速率是有限的，但其专业领域的阅读和写作小文件（这就是为什么它被使用，例如，在启动笔记本电脑时）。
因此，我们使用CrystalDiskMark的说明Sandisk的32GB SSD I100的影响。 4K和4K QD32读取速度是传统硬盘，这是补偿小的SSD高速缓存的弱点。然而，什么也没注意到的UH572。 4K /4K QD321.083 MB/ s和1.459 MB/ s的读取速率，良好的硬盘驱动器的水平。的IdeaPad U310实施这项技术的典范。8.74 MB/ s和204.4 MB/ s的，甚至可以部分超越HP开本基于SSD只（13.23和99.06 MB/秒）。因此，没有太多的应预计富士通LifeBook U
Graphics Card
The new IGP, HD Graphics 4000, was released alongside Intel's new Ivy Bridge generation. It should cover all application fields desired from an ultrabook well, from Internet surfing to playing HD videos and even rendering the odd game in low details smoothly.
Only the IdeaPad U310 uses the same graphics card. Although HP's Folio 13 and the Aspire S3 are equipped with the outdated HD Graphics 3000, they should find comparable limits in the multimedia field. How will our Lifebook fair in a comparison?
The identically equipped IdeaPad U310 is defeated by a whole 22% and the Folio as well as the Aspire S3 by 40% in 3DMark Vantage. Thus, our test device extracts quite a bit out of the graphics card in comparison. An oddity: Fujitsu's much more expensive U772 is also defeated by 9% here although it features a faster processor.
3DMark 11 confirms the result. The IdeaPad lags behind our Lifebook by 20%. Since the other contenders were not part of this benchmark at the time, they cannot be used for comparison.
The previously assumed temperature issues do not affect the graphics card because the Lifebook UH572 performs superbly with the integrated graphics card. If and how these results can be translated in games, for example, is seen in the following tests.
图形卡
新的IGP显卡HD4000，同时发布英特尔的新Ivy Bridge的新一代。它应涵盖所有的Ultrabook以及所需的应用领域，从上网冲浪，播放高清视频，甚至在低细节渲染奇数游戏顺利。
的IdeaPad U310使用相同的图形卡。虽然HP的13开本和Aspire S3配备了过时的高清显卡3000，他们必须找到可比在多媒体领域的限制。如何将我们的LIFEBOOK一个比较公平的呢？
相同的设备被击败的IdeaPad U310整体的22％，开本为40％，在3DMark Vantage中的Aspire S3。因此，我们的测试设备中提取相当多的显卡相比。一个怪胎：富士通U772昂贵得多，也击败了9％，虽然它的特点是速度更快的处理器。
3DMark 11的确认结果。的IdeaPad落后于我们的LifeBook20％。由于其他竞争者不属于这个基准的时候，他们不能被用来进行比较。
以前假定的温度问题不会影响显卡，因为富士通LifeBook UH572进行高档的集成显卡。是否以及如何翻译这些结果可以在游戏中，例如，被认为是在下面的测试。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 3880 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 2438 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 546 points | |
Help | ||
Gaming Performance
Of course, the processor-integrated HD Graphics 4000 is not made for gaming. Nevertheless, the one or other casual game should be playable in low details. The 3DMark scores whet our appetite.
We opted for the bestselling building strategy game Anno 2070 as its scalability is good and should thus be rendered smoothly even by weaker graphics cards. We managed a smoothly playable 33 fps (frames per second) in low details and a resolution of 1024x768. Even HP's Folio 13, which uses Intel's IGP from the previous generation, still manages 30.7 fps. The MacBook Air 13", using the same CPU and graphics, is the top reviewed ultrabook with 47 fps. 20 fps are reached in medium details and the native resolution of 1366x768. The difference to the Air is an unnoticed one frame per second. High settings should be avoided because the expected action degenerates to a slide show due to 13 fps.
FIFA 12 needs high frame rates sooner than Anno. Unforeseen stutters can lead to turnover or in the worst case a goal against your team. This game will not be fun on the ultrabook because it stutters occasionally even in minimum details and a resolution of 800x600 due to an average of 37 fps. We ascertained a real reproducible anomaly: When the frame rate drops to 21 fps in medium settings and a resolution of 1366x768, they again increase to 26 fps in high details and two-time anti-aliasing.
We also picked Metro 2033 as a hardware-hungry game for the extreme test. However, we would advise against playing this game on the UH572. 19 fps in low and 14 fps in medium details (800x600 / 1366x768) are no fun in horror shooters. The moral of this chapter - playing on the UH572 is not a "fun factor".
游戏性能
当然，处理器集成的高清显卡4000没有的游戏。然而，一个或其他休闲游戏应该可以在低细节上播放。在3DMark得分激起我们的胃口。
我们选择了最畅销的建设战略游戏纪元2070年，它的可扩展性好，从而顺利呈现，即使是较弱的图形卡。我们管理的顺利耐玩的33 FPS（每秒帧数）在低细节和分辨率为1024×768。即使HP的13开本，采用了英特尔的IGP从上一代，仍然拥有30.7 fps的。的MacBook Air13“，使用相同的CPU和显卡，是审查ultrabook的有47帧的顶部。达到20帧中的细节和原生分辨率为1366×768。在空气中的差异是一个被忽视的一帧每秒。设置应该避免，因为预期的动作退化到幻灯片由于13 fps的。
FIFA 12需要高帧速率，早于纪元。不可预见的口吃，可能会导致营业额或在最坏的情况下对你的团队目标。这个游戏不好玩，因为它断断续续的Ultrabook有时甚至在最小的细节，分辨率为800×60037 fps的平均由于。我们确定一个真正的再现异常：中等设置，分辨率为1366×76821 fps的帧速率下降到时，他们再次提高至26 fps的高细节和时间抗锯齿。
我们还选择了“地铁2033”作为一个硬件饿的极端测试游戏。但是，我们建议不要玩这个游戏的UH572。 19 fps的低，中的细节（800×600/1366×768），14 fps的有没有什么好玩的，恐怖的射手。本章的道德 - 玩的UH572是不是一个“有趣的因素”。
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metro 2033 (2010) | 19 | 14 | ||
| Fifa 12 (2011) | 37 | 21 | 26 | |
| Anno 2070 (2011) | 33 | 20 | 13 |
Emissions
System Noise
Unfortunately we cannot say that the Lifebook UH572 is a quiet ultrabook. The device's high-pitched fan starts up too often for that - even when it is allegedly idling. It is not very loud with almost 32 dB(A), but its permanent on and off ("pulsing") is annoying. If you want to weaken this effect, you should preferably use the energy setting "High Performance".
Roughly 40 dB(A) are measured during full load. That, alongside the fan's high-pitched noise, got very nerve-racking after a while of stress testing. However, none of the low-end ultrabooks are uncompromisingly quiet contemporaries. HP's Folio 13 can be muted for longer periods via BIOS settings and Lenovo's IdeaPad U310 sports an almost continuously whirring, but bigger fan that features a lower pitched noise and is not as annoying as the one in our test device.
系统噪声
不幸的是，我们不能说，富士通LifeBook UH572是一个安静的Ultrabook。该器件的高音调的风扇开始往往是 - 即使它据称是空转。近32分贝（A），这是不是很大声，但其永久的开启和关闭（是恼人的“脉动”）。如果你想削弱这一效果，您最好使用能源的“高性能”。
大约40分贝（A）在满负荷测量。说，除风扇的高频噪声，很伤脑筋了一段时间后的压力测试。然而，没有低端的ultrabooks是不折不扣的安静的同时代人。 HP的13开本可以通过BIOS设置和联想的IdeaPad U310运动几乎连续呼呼的，但更大的风扇，其特点是低尖锐的噪音，而不是作为一个恼人的，因为在我们的测试设备静音更长的时间。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 28 / 28.5 / 31.2 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 28.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 38.4 / 40.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft sl-300 (15 cm distance) | ||
Temperature
During normal use, or low load, as in cases of Internet surfing or Office tasks, the surface temperatures usually stay pleasantly cool with approx. 32.2 °C/max 38 °C on the top and approx. 33.9 °C/max 37.7 °C on the bottom. Thus, it is possible to use the magnesium ultrabook on the lap since the fan is located center left.
However, we measured a maximum temperature of 50.2 °C on the top and 53.6 °C on the bottom during our stress test, at full load. HP's Folio 13 reaches about the same temperature and the other models are all a bit cooler here.
The processor, originally clocked with 2.1 GHz during Turbo Boost, is slowed to its default clock of 1.7 GHz to prevent overtaxing the cooling system in the test (82 °C core temperature after 1 hour). Then the little fan squeals like a small hair dryer.
温度
在正常使用过程中，或低负荷时，在上网冲浪或办公任务的情况下，表面温度通常保持凉爽约。 32.2℃/最大38°C的顶部约。 33.9°C，最大/37.7°C底部。因此，它是可以使用镁ultrabook的上一圈，因为风扇位于中心左侧。
然而，我们测得的最大温度为50.2℃下的顶部和53.6℃在我们的压力测试过程中的底部，在满负荷。 HP的13开本达到大约相同的温度，其他车型都有点凉在这里。
原本主频的处理器，2.1 GHz的涡轮增压，放缓至其预设时脉为1.7 GHz，防止负担过重的冷却系统在测试中（1小时后的核心温度82°C）。小风扇尖叫声，就像一个小吹风机。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.8 °C / -5.1 F).
Speakers
The tiny speaker bar that Fujitsu installs into the Lifebook UH572 is of inferior quality. Although the voice output is acceptable, scenarios that go beyond occasional video calls are not possible with it. It lacks both volume and high detail in music playback. Our test tracks were rendered extremely treble-heavy and with a tinny hissing sound.
However, the music quality is acceptable when external loudspeakers or good headphones are connected.
音箱
这种微小的扬声器安装到富士通的LifeBook UH572的酒吧是质量低劣。虽然声音输出是可以接受的，超越偶尔视频通话的情况下，它是不可能的。它缺乏在音乐播放的音量和高细节。我们的测试曲目呈现非常重高音，用自带的咝咝的声音。
然而，音乐的质量是可以接受的，当连接外部扬声器还是不错的耳机。
Battery Life
Power Consumption
The idle power consumption of our Fujitsu device is within the average of all tested ultrabooks (5.9 - 8.9 Watts). This is unsurprising since they all feature similar hardware.
The consumption increases up to 40 Watts during load, which is a much worse rate than for example the 33.3 Watts measured in the Aspire S3 or the 35.8 Watts of the Folio 13. However, this result is likely due to the new graphics unit that has to work harder than the old IGP in the latter two devices.
耗电量
富士通设备的闲置功耗，我们的所有测试的ultrabooks（5.9 - 8.9瓦）内的平均水平。这是令人吃惊的，因为它们都拥有类似的硬件。
消耗增加至40瓦，在加载过程中，这是一个更糟糕的速度比为例如33.3瓦的Aspire S3或35.8瓦的开本13测定。然而，这样的结果很可能是由于新的图形单元，更加努力地工作比旧的IGP在后两个设备。
| Off / Standby | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle | 5.9 / 8.3 / 8.9 Watt |
| Load |
31.8 / 40.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
Battery Runtime
The Lifebook is as economic as its contenders in low load, but how is this translated in battery runtime? Can it benefit from the energy efficiency?
Not really, unfortunately. The built-in 42 Wh battery's capacity is somewhat lower than that of the competition. Thus it is unsurprising that the UH572 only lasts for a maximum of 5 hours and 55 minutes in our low load test via the Battery Eater's Reader's benchmark in minimum brightness and with disabled Wi-Fi. HP's Folio 13 relies on a big 59 Wh battery despite a similar case size and price, which can last for 9 hours and 49 minutes remote from the mains.
A similar picture is seen in our standardized Wi-Fi surfing test, where several online media, including YouTube videos, are visited via a script. Of course, Wi-Fi is enabled and the backlight is set to roughly 150 cd/m2 (here the max setting of 2). The Lifebook only survives for 3 hours and 17 minutes, which is not really a bad time. Nevertheless, it is a bit embarrassing for an ultrabook, considering these devices are normally known to stand out by surviving a long Internet session on battery power (HP Folio 13: 5 hours and 5 minutes). For example, really convincing but also more expensive devices like the MacBook Air 13 last for over 6 hours in this test. The average battery life of the compared, low-end contenders is a bit over 4 hours.
The device manages a full-load runtime of 1 hour 41 minutes, which is acceptable considering the battery capacity. (The leader here is again HP's Folio 13 with 2 hours 50 minutes). A somewhat bigger battery would not have hurt the UH572 when compared with the contenders.
电池运行时间
富士通LifeBook经济作为其在低负荷的竞争者，但在电池的使用时间，这是怎么翻译？受益于能源效率吗？
不是真的，很遗憾。内置在42 Wh电池的容量是略低于竞争。因此，它是不足为奇的，UH572仅持续5小时55分钟，在我们的低负载测试，通过电池食的读者在最低亮度的基准和有残疾的Wi-Fi最多。尽管类似的情况下，尺寸和价格，它可以持续9小时49分钟遥控器的电源，HP的13开本依赖于一个大的59瓦时电池。
类似的图片出现在我们的标准化的Wi-Fi上网测试，其中包括YouTube视频，网络媒体，通过脚本访问。当然，启用了无线网络连接和背光设置为大约150流明（最大设置为2）。富士通LifeBook仅剩3小时17分钟，这是不是一个真正的坏的时候。然而，这是一个有点尴尬的ultrabook的，考虑到这些设备通常被称为脱颖而出生存很长的Internet会话动力电池（惠普Folio13：5小时5分钟）。例如，真正有说服力的，但也更昂贵的设备，如MacBook Air13日超过6个小时，在这个测试中。平均电池寿命相比，低端的竞争者是有点超过4小时。
设备管理一个满负荷运行时，1小时41分钟，这是可接受的，考虑到电池的容量。 （这里的领导者又是HP的13开本，2小时50分钟）。一个更大的电池不会有伤害的UH572时，与竞争者相比。
Verdict
We praised the Fujitsu Lifebook's relatively good performance rates and the solid build quality of the pretty, red, slim, light and nevertheless rigid magnesium case. But competition never sleeps and mostly delivers stable and slim ultrabooks - but with the difference that they focus on a few important aspects apart from the case in the design and conception process. Battery runtime, keyboard, touchpad, fan management and thermal design are named as a few inadequately resolved points.
It is also too bad that sufficiently bright screens, suitable for outdoor use, are routinely axed away from the blueprints in low-end notebooks and reserved for better paying customers (e.g. Asus' Zenbook UX32VD, Samsung's 900X3B). Fujitsu is going the right way with the matte screen, but content can only be read when the backlight defies the ambient light outdoors as well.
Thus, even when we are willing to accept the existing restrictions of low-end ultrabooks we still want one thing: mobility. If we cannot have a bright screen, we should be allowed to console ourselves with a convincing battery runtime. But the UH572 cannot provide that.
Unfortunately, truly excellent ultrabooks usually cost 500 Euro (~$627) more. But as always true: Comparing is worthwhile. (Top 10 Subnotebooks).
我们称赞富士通Lifebook的性能相对较好的价格和漂亮的，红色的，身材苗条，重量轻，但刚性的镁合金外壳，坚实的基础质量。但是，竞争不夜城，主要业务是稳定和超薄的ultrabooks - 的差异，他们集中在几个重要的方面，除了在设计和构思过程中的情况下。电池使用时间，键盘，触控板，风扇和热设计被命名为一些不足，解决点。
这也太糟糕了，足够明亮的屏幕，适合户外使用，经常被砍了从低端笔记本电脑的蓝图，并保留更好的付费用户（例如华硕ZENBOOK UX32VD的，三星900X3B）。富士通会以正确的方式与雾面屏幕，但内容只能被读取时，背光以及违反了户外环境光。
因此，即使我们愿意接受现有的低端ultrabooks的限制，我们还是想一件事：流动性。如果我们不能有一个明亮的画面，我们应该允许安慰自己一个令人信服的电池运行时间。但UH572不能提供的。
不幸的是，真正优秀的的ultrabooks通常花费500欧元（〜$627）更多。然而，总是真正的比较是值得的。 （前10个亚笔记本电脑）。
