富士通 Lifebook P727 (i7, 16 GB, LTE) 变形本简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
Dell Latitude 5289 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
Dell Latitude 5289 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 303 cd/m²
Contrast: 659:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.14 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 LP125WF4-SPH1, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 Sharp LQ133M1JX15, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 CMN1374, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 5289 BOE NV12N51, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Fujitsu Lifebook T937 Sharp SHP141B , , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -6% | -35% | 1% | -38% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.2 | 67.9 1% | 65.5 -3% | 42.79 -36% | 68.7 2% | 41.08 -39% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.5 | 97.3 0% | 88.8 -9% | 64.3 -34% | 96.8 -1% | 61.6 -37% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.1 | 69.9 1% | 64.9 -6% | 44.21 -36% | 70.4 2% | 42.48 -39% |
Response Times | -11% | -15% | -7% | -51% | -14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 42 ? 5% | 55.2 ? -25% | 42 ? 5% | 67 ? -52% | 46 ? -5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 32.8 ? -26% | 27.2 ? -5% | 31 ? -19% | 39 ? -50% | 32 ? -23% |
PWM Frequency | 217.4 ? | 531 ? | 212 ? | |||
Screen | 7% | -2% | 11% | 20% | 8% | |
Brightness middle | 303 | 374 23% | 262 -14% | 336 11% | 442 46% | 236 -22% |
Brightness | 272 | 356 31% | 256 -6% | 320 18% | 410 51% | 219 -19% |
Brightness Distribution | 79 | 87 10% | 83 5% | 90 14% | 86 9% | 87 10% |
Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.33 28% | 0.25 46% | 0.34 26% | 0.22 52% | 0.18 61% |
Contrast | 659 | 1133 72% | 1048 59% | 988 50% | 2009 205% | 1311 99% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.94 | 4.7 -19% | 5.13 -30% | 3.45 12% | 5.22 -32% | 4.25 -8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.57 | 9.5 -45% | 9.46 -44% | 7.95 -21% | 11.84 -80% | 7.4 -13% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.14 | 6.5 -26% | 6.23 -21% | 1.68 67% | 7.88 -53% | 2.5 51% |
Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.19 100% | 2.45 90% | 2.49 88% | 2.51 88% | 2.48 89% |
CCT | 6521 100% | 7086 92% | 6413 101% | 6782 96% | 6756 96% | 7082 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 63.1 0% | 57.84 -8% | 41 -35% | 64 2% | 39 -38% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 97.2 -1% | 88.57 -10% | 64 -35% | 97 -1% | 62 -37% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
4% | -8% /
-5% | -10% /
-1% | -10% /
7% | -15% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3714 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4932 points | |
Help |
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Dell Latitude 5289 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8 | Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 42% | -15% | -32% | -17% | -1% | |
Read Seq | 513 | 1070 109% | 467.1 -9% | 423.7 -17% | 469 -9% | 549 7% |
Write Seq | 467.7 | 484.5 4% | 443.6 -5% | 406.4 -13% | 277.3 -41% | 526 12% |
Read 512 | 379.8 | 680 79% | 312.3 -18% | 260.8 -31% | 404.4 6% | |
Write 512 | 399.1 | 483.1 21% | 372.5 -7% | 255.6 -36% | 266.6 -33% | |
Read 4k | 38.74 | 30.55 -21% | 29.43 -24% | 22.73 -41% | 25.24 -35% | 34.71 -10% |
Write 4k | 89.8 | 127.3 42% | 56.5 -37% | 27.92 -69% | 89.4 0% | 89.6 0% |
Read 4k QD32 | 337.1 | 460.8 37% | 311.3 -8% | 306.2 -9% | 322.5 -4% | 279.3 -17% |
Write 4k QD32 | 254.2 | 414.5 63% | 225.2 -11% | 158.8 -38% | 208.1 -18% | 255.8 1% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Dell Latitude 5289 | |
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell Latitude 5289 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Dell Latitude 5289 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1597 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5792 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 796 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 44.27 | 25.35 | 21.31 | |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 20.76 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 10.84 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 30 dB(A) |
Load |
| 30.8 / 30.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.6 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.5 °C / 81.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.15 / 0.46 Watt |
Idle | 3.9 / 6.6 / 6.9 Watt |
Load |
27 / 27.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Fujitsu Lifebook T937 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | -4% | 3% | 14% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 3.6 8% | 3.2 18% | 2.7 31% | 3.4 13% | 3 23% |
Idle Average * | 6.6 | 7.2 -9% | 5.5 17% | 5.1 23% | 5.8 12% | 6.8 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 8.4 -22% | 6.5 6% | 7.6 -10% | 6.7 3% | 7.7 -12% |
Load Average * | 27 | 29.9 -11% | 29.7 -10% | 33 -22% | 21.4 21% | 30 -11% |
Load Maximum * | 27.1 | 32.2 -19% | 41.3 -52% | 29 -7% | 21.6 20% | 30.3 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 44 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook T937 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 13% | 58% | 56% | 34% | 23% | |
Reader / Idle | 941 | 1163 24% | 1387 47% | 1728 84% | 1001 6% | 1022 9% |
WiFi v1.3 | 353 | 488 38% | 630 78% | 708 101% | 719 104% | 523 48% |
Load | 164 | 127 -23% | 244 49% | 136 -17% | 150 -9% | 184 12% |
H.264 | 576 | 659 |
Pros
Cons
该机在拥有众多优秀机器的市场上,很难脱颖而出。戴尔曾不得不吞下Latitude 5289这颗苦药,现在轮到了富士通。先说优点:外壳由高级材料制作,非常坚固;显示屏虽然不如承诺那样明亮,但表现非常好,特别是在色彩空间覆盖方面;连接方式——提供全尺寸VGA和以太网端口或全尺寸MicroSD卡插槽;用户可自行更换电池即使容量不大,这是一个独特的卖点;键盘是非常好用,打字愉悦;最后是,Lifebook P727在一些市场中提供LTE调制解调器配置(目前美国不行)。
可惜,它还有一些缺点的。P727不能否认它身上带有Lifebook U系列的影子,触摸板问题最大,非常不准确而且令人生厌。虽然我们赞扬富士通配备了了VGA和以太网等传统端口,但雷电3的缺失令人不安。由于底部专有的对接端口的缺失,用户被限制于USB-C对接方案。另一个缺点是处理器过热时,不能按照达到规定的性能,并且在某些情况下甚至落后于较慢的酷睿 i5。而且,更糟糕的是,电池续航相对较短。
Lifebook P727的传统端口和用户可更换电池是两个独特卖点。可怕的触摸板及其低于平均水平的电池续航时间,破坏了原有的良好印象。
因此,我们不能无限制地推荐P727。如果您有较老的设备,例如VGA投影机,P727肯定会成为一个非常有趣的选择。那些喜欢可更换电池的人也是如此。否则,Elitebook x360和ThinkPad Yoga 370是更好选择,具有更长的电池寿命和更好的输入设备。此外,这些13.3英寸变形本会比P727稍笨重些。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Fujitsu Lifebook P727
- 06/07/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig