富士通 Lifebook U747 笔记本简短评测

Name: Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Brand: Fujitsu

为鼠标用户设计。 在竞争激烈的商务市场，富士通试图用其新品Lifebook U747来说服大公司的采购团队。我们的综合测试将会表明其是否在激烈的竞争中脱颖而出。

Benjamin Herzig, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 03/31/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Kaby Lake

Test device courtesy of Fujitsu

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Fujitsu LifeBook U747 (LifeBook Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2133 SO-DIMM, 两条插槽中的一条被占用

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, LG LP140WF3, IPS LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, 256 GB

, 201 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm 复合音频接口, Card Reader: 3-in-1 SD卡读卡器, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, Sierra EM7305, LTE

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 332.6 x 234

Battery

50 Wh Lithium-Polymer, removeable

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD 内置摄像头

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 6 行巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 恢复DVD, Cyberlink YouCam 6, Lifebook Application Panel, McAfee LiveSafe, Microsoft Office (trial), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.44 kg, Power Supply: 368 g

Price

1260 Euro

Links

Fujitsu homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Front with status LEDs and SD-card reader

Size Comparison

HP EliteBook 840 G3 T8X41EA Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 DIN A4 ❌

Left: power-in, VGA, USB Type-C, 1x USB 3.0 Type-A

Right: 3.5-mm jack, 1x USB 3.0 Type-A, DisplayPort, Ethernet, Kensington lock slot

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7	128 MB/s +76%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE	76.6 MB/s +6%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747	72.6 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7	248.1 MB/s +198%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE	88.7 MB/s +6%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747	83.3 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	512 MBit/s +1%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	509 MBit/s
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	474 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	657 MBit/s 0%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	655 MBit/s
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	506 MBit/s -23%


306 cd/m²	295 cd/m²	321 cd/m²
285 cd/m²	291 cd/m²	295 cd/m²
303 cd/m²	271 cd/m²	299 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG LP140WF3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 321 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 296.2 cd/m² Minimum: 6.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 296 cd/m²
Contrast: 909:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.77% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Fujitsu LifeBook U747 LG LP140WF3, , 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14"	Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N AU Optronics B140HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 14"	Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 AUO B140QAN Dell PN F0WXVV, , 2560x1440, 14"	HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD Chi Mei CMN14C0, , 1920x1080, 14"
Display		-32%	-41%	9%	-19%
Display P3 Coverage	66.1	41.6 -37%	35.53 -46%	67.2 2%	48.93 -26%
sRGB Coverage	84.8	61.9 -27%	53.3 -37%	95.9 13%	73.7 -13%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	62	43.06 -31%	36.72 -41%	69.3 12%	50.5 -19%
Response Times		-32%	-15%	-25%	-14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36 ?(16.4, 19.6)	41.6 ?(20.4, 21.2) -16%	44 ?(16, 28) -22%	48 ?(15, 33) -33%	43 ?(20, 23) -19%
Response Time Black / White *	23.2 ?(12.4, 10.8)	34 ?(9.6, 24.4) -47%	25 ?(7, 18) -8%	27 ?(7, 20) -16%	25 ?(9, 16) -8%
PWM Frequency					204 ?(90)
Screen		-19%	-3%	19%	-48%
Brightness middle	291	306 5%	254 -13%	380 31%	366 26%
Brightness	296	287 -3%	243 -18%	354 20%	336 14%
Brightness Distribution	84	88 5%	90 7%	81 -4%	87 4%
Black Level *	0.32	0.3 6%	0.19 41%	0.26 19%	0.65 -103%
Contrast	909	1020 12%	1337 47%	1462 61%	563 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.3	6.2 -44%	4.93 -15%	3.11 28%	10.26 -139%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.5	13.6 -81%	10.14 -35%	6.73 10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.3	5.8 -35%	2.71 37%	4.35 -1%	11.51 -168%
Gamma	2.31 ^95%	2.04 ^108%	2.36 ^93%	2.37 ^93%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	6529 ^100%	6277 ^104%	6914 ^94%	6771 ^96%	12725 ^51%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55.46	39.62 -29%	34 -39%	62 12%	47 -15%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	84.77	61.44 -28%	53 -37%	96 13%	74 -13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-28% / -23%	-20% / -12%	1% / 11%	-27% / -37%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.4 ms rise
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Intel Core i7-7600U	162 Points +25%
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel Core i7-6600U	142 Points +9%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel Core i5-7200U	130 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Intel Core i5-7200U	126 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD Intel Core i7-6500U	119 Points -8%
Fujitsu LifeBook U745 Intel Core i5-5300U	118 Points -9%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Intel Core i7-6500U	110 Points -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Intel Core i7-7600U	368 Points +11%
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel Core i7-6600U	334 Points +1%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Intel Core i5-7200U	326 Points -2%
HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD Intel Core i7-6500U	322 Points -3%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Intel Core i7-6500U	284 Points -14%
Fujitsu LifeBook U745 Intel Core i5-5300U	281 Points -15%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

130 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

331 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

34.78 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	3968 Points +13%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3511 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	3507 Points 0%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	3506 Points
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB	3344 Points -5%
HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	3231 Points -8%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	4856 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4667 Points 0%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	4653 Points
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	4594 Points -1%
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB	4543 Points -2%
HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	4275 Points -8%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3506 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4653 points
Help

	Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Lite-On CV1-8B256	Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB	HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		94%	-9%	-5%	-13%	148%
Read Seq	504	1155 129%	531 5%	518 3%	497.8 -1%	1760 249%
Write Seq	497.8	1076 116%	358.8 -28%	300.7 -40%	241.4 -52%	1666 235%
Read 512	396.7	811 104%	384.8 -3%	470.8 19%	396 0%	832 110%
Write 512	283.4	862 204%	363 28%	214 -24%	241.8 -15%	1064 275%
Read 4k	35.73	55.5 55%	31.3 -12%	36.32 2%	27.02 -24%	53.2 49%
Write 4k	87.8	134.6 53%	80.3 -9%	110.9 26%	82.6 -6%	167.4 91%
Read 4k QD32	399.1	496.2 24%	239.4 -40%	400.9 0%	388.5 -3%	630 58%
Write 4k QD32	249.7	425.4 70%	225.3 -10%	191.7 -23%	242.8 -3%	533 113%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung MZYTY256HDHP

Sequential Read: 504 MB/s

Sequential Write: 497.8 MB/s

512K Read: 396.7 MB/s

512K Write: 283.4 MB/s

4K Read: 35.73 MB/s

4K Write: 87.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 399.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 249.7 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U	1777 Points +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1432 Points +2%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1409 Points
HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1327 Points -6%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1274 Points -10%
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U	1264 Points -10%
Fujitsu LifeBook U745 Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i5-5300U	1019 Points -28%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U	9610 Points +41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6824 Points 0%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6803 Points
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	6674 Points -2%
Fujitsu LifeBook U745 Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i5-5300U	6554 Points -4%
HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	6351 Points -7%
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U	5819 Points -14%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U	1176 Points +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	818 Points +2%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	814 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	800 Points 0%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	799 Points
Fujitsu LifeBook U745 Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i5-5300U	763 Points -5%
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6600U	744 Points -7%

3DMark 11 Performance		1524 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5656 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		738 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high
BioShock Infinite (2013)	42.35	24.15	19.85
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)	21.04	16.04
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	14.45

Noise Level

Idle		28.2 / 28.2 / 28.2 dB(A)
Load		31.2 / 33 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


38.4 °C	42.6 °C	28.8 °C
36.1 °C	32.7 °C	26.3 °C
23.7 °C	23.4 °C	22.8 °C

Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 30.5 °C


27.7 °C	28.8 °C	34.4 °C
24.5 °C	32.8 °C	28.7 °C
22.2 °C	23.2 °C	23.6 °C

Maximum: 34.4 °C
Average: 27.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 35.2 °C | Room Temperature 22.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.7 °C / 74.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.9 °C / 7 F).

Fujitsu LifeBook U747 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.17 / 0.33 Watt
Idle	4.11 / 7.87 / 8.74 Watt
Load	30.2 / 32.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Lite-On CV1-8B256, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 6600U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB, IPS, 2560x1440, 14"	HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2560x1440, 14"
Power Consumption		13%	-16%	-12%	10%	-23%
Idle Minimum *	4.11	3.21 22%	5.3 -29%	5.1 -24%	3.8 8%	4.64 -13%
Idle Average *	7.87	6.15 22%	9.3 -18%	8.5 -8%	6.3 20%	8.93 -13%
Idle Maximum *	8.74	6.82 22%	11.5 -32%	10.1 -16%	6.8 22%	9.12 -4%
Load Average *	30.2	28.5 6%	30.8 -2%	35.2 -17%	34.4 -14%	42.2 -40%
Load Maximum *	32.4	34.5 -6%	32 1%	31 4%	28.3 13%	47.3 -46%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		13h 02min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)		7h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 10min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 57min

	Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh	Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 54 Wh	Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh	HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 46 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Battery Runtime		8%	17%	-12%	20%	-8%
Reader / Idle	782		1083 38%		1020 30%	787 1%
H.264	490	623 27%	545 11%			454 -7%
WiFi v1.3	430	438 2%	543 26%	346 -20%	453 5%	417 -3%
Load	117	110 -6%	110 -6%	112 -4%	146 25%	93 -21%

Pros

+ 高质量屏幕

+ 外壳坚固且制造出色

+ 键盘舒适

+ 电池容易移除

+ 维持低温且大多数情况下安静

+ 出色的接口多样性

Cons

- 糟糕的触摸板

- 糟糕的摄像头

- 扬声器音量过低

- 风扇高频噪音

- 无指点杆

- 相较竞品来说偏短的保修时间

In review: Fujitsu Lifebook U747. Review sample courtesy of Fujitsu Germany.

Lifebook U747是一台优秀的笔记本。富士通并没有犯很多的错误。它拥有出色的屏幕，优秀的电池续航时间，以及一块能够提供舒适打字体验的键盘。外壳设计坚固且制造质量出色，而且它的设计符合它的商务定位。这也可以说是有关于其接口的多样性。尽管确实缺失Thunderbolt 3接口，但这在近期更像是一个附加项缺乏也并不会成为缺点。评测样机的温度保持在较低水平，风扇也通常仅是待机。

我们来到了缺点部分：尽管风扇相对安静，但一旦开始工作便会产生高频噪音。这的确不是一个大问题，但是很烦人。同样的情况发生在扬声器和内置摄像头上。但是这两个部分通常都会被忽略。最大的缺点在于其鼠标替代品的选择：富士通并没有选择一块Precision触控板，这使得它显得有点过时，因此触摸板也不够好。不幸的是，触摸板的按键反馈也十分劣质而不准确。而Lifebook并没有配备用于代替触控板的指点杆。最后，保修时间相对于竞品来说也有些偏短。

富士通的Lifebook U747是商务市场中的有利竞品。但不幸的是，糟糕的触摸板毁了其对于商务人士的好印象。

除去触摸板，Lifebook整体上令人满意且值得推荐。但竞争激烈的市场并没有留给富士通一条好路。一款强有力的竞品联想 ThinkPad T470 在很多方面都比富士通得到了更高的分数，只有屏幕是其显著的弱点。戴尔的新Latitude和惠普的新EliteBook 型号(Latitude 7480 和 EliteBook 840 G4)也将肯定成为强力的竞争者。对应的评测将会在近日放出。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Fujitsu LifeBook U747 - 03/09/2017 v6 ^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis

85 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

79%

Connectivity

63 / 80 → 79%

Weight

70 / 20-67 → 100%

Battery

90%

Display

88%

Games Performance

55 / 68 → 81%

Application Performance

86 / 92 → 93%

Temperature

95%

Noise

95%

Audio

48%

Camera

38 / 85 → 45%

Average

75%

87%

Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 富士通 Lifebook U747 笔记本简短评测

Benjamin Herzig, 2017-03-31 (Update: 2017-03-31)